切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 210 -214. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2023.04.004

论著

角膜地形图引导个性化切削屈光术矫正近视眼和散光的早期临床疗效
赵欣, 赵晴, 张华()   
  1. 050000 石家庄市人民医院眼科
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-03 出版日期:2023-08-28
  • 通信作者: 张华
  • 基金资助:
    河北省医学科学研究课题计划项目(20210908)

The early clinical efficacy of topography-guided customized ablation treatment with refractive surgery for correcting myopia and astigmatism

Xin Zhao, Qing Zhao, Hua Zhang()   

  1. Ophthalmology Department, Shijiazhuang People′s Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • Received:2023-08-03 Published:2023-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Hua Zhang
引用本文:

赵欣, 赵晴, 张华. 角膜地形图引导个性化切削屈光术矫正近视眼和散光的早期临床疗效[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 210-214.

Xin Zhao, Qing Zhao, Hua Zhang. The early clinical efficacy of topography-guided customized ablation treatment with refractive surgery for correcting myopia and astigmatism[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(04): 210-214.

目的

探讨角膜地形图引导个性化切削(T-CAT)屈光术矫正近视眼和散光的早期临床疗效。

方法

选择2020年1月至2022年1月于石家庄市人民医院眼科收治的90例(154只眼)近视眼和散光患者的临床资料进行研究。其中,男性49例(83只眼),女性41例(71只眼);年龄18~40岁,平均年龄为(25.4±2.5)岁。采用随机数字表法将患者分为对照组45例(78只眼)和试验组45例(76只眼)。对照组采用T-CAT引导准分子激光角膜屈光手术(CV-LASEK),试验组采用T-CAT引导全飞秒激光微透镜取出术(SMILE)。两组患者的裸眼视力、角膜前表面彗差、球差、球镜屈光度、柱镜屈光度、等效球镜屈光度、散光矫正指数(CI)、成功指数(IOS)、变平指数(FI)、角膜滞后量(CH)及角膜阻力因子(CRF)等符合正态分布,以±s表示,组间比较采用t检验,治疗前后组内比较采用配对t检验;术后并发症以眼数和百分比表示,组间比较采用χ2检验。

结果

术后7 d试验组的裸眼视力、彗差、球差、球镜屈光度、柱镜屈光度、等效球镜屈光度、CI、IOS、FI、CH及CRF分别为(0.85±0.12)logMAR、(0.30±0.07)μm、(0.45±0.05)μm、(0.19±0.07)D、(-0.39±0.10)D、(-0.39±011)D、(0.95±0.15)D、(0.44±0.17)D、(2.58±0.25)D、(6.06±0.58)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)及(5.22±0.51)mmHg;对照组患者分别为(0.72±0.14)logMAR、(0.38±0.09)μm、(0.59±0.06)μm、(0.21±0.09)D、(-0.40±0.12)D、(-0.40±0.10)D、(0.96±0.17)D、(0.42±0.18)D、(2.56±0.24)D、(6.18±0.63)mmHg及(5.36±0.56)mmHg。两组患者裸眼视力、彗差及球差比较的差异均有统计学意义(t=6.180,6.147,15.709;P<0.05);其余比较的差异均无统计学意义(t=1.537,0.561,0.591,0.387,0.709,0.507,1.229,1.621;P>0.05)。试验组和对照组患者术后并发症发生率分别为13.16%和26.92%,比较的差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.507,P<0.05)。

结论

T-CAT引导SMILE术矫正近视眼和散光的早期有效性、稳定性均较好,术后并发症少,安全性高,值得推广。

Objective

The aim of this study is to analyze the early clinical efficacy of topography-guided customized ablation treatment (T-CAT) refractive surgery for correcting myopia and astigmatism.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of clinical data of 90 cases (154 eyes) with myopia and astigmatism registered at the Ophthalmology Department of Shijiazhuang People′s Hospital from January 2020 to January 2022. Among them, there were 49 males (83 eyes) and 41 females (71 eyes) ranged from 18 to 40 years with an average age of (25.4±2.5) years. According to the random number table method, patients were divided into control group with 45 cases (78 eyes) and testing group with 45 cases (76 eyes). The control group underwent T-CAT contoura vision-laser epithelial keratomileusis (CV-LASEK), while the testing group underwent T-CAT small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Naked eye visual acuity, anterior corneal surface aberration, spherical aberration, spherical degree, cylindrical degree, equivalent spherical degree, correction index (CI), index of success (IOS), flattening index (FI), corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) according with normal distribution were expressed as ±s, and compared by t test between the two groups, by paired sample t test before and after surgery. The postoperative complications were expressed as eyes number and percentage and compared by χ2 test.

Results

After surgery for 7 days, the naked eye visual acuity, coma and spherical aberration, spherical, cylindrical and equivalent spherical degree, CI, IOS, FI, CH and CRF of patients in the testing group were (0.85±0.12) logMAR, (0.30±0.07)μm, (0.45±0.05)μm, (0.19±0.07)D, (-0.39±0.10)D, (-0.39±011)D, (0.95±0.15)D, (0.44±0.17)D, (2.58±0.25)D, (6.06±0.58)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) and (5.22±0.51)mmHg, respectively; those of patients in the control group were (0.72±0.14)logMAR, (0.38±0.09)μm, (0.59±0.06)μm, (0.21±0.09)D, (-0.40±0.12)D, (-0.40±0.10)D, (0.96±0.17)D, (0.42±0.18)D, (2.56±0.24)D, (6.18±0.63)mmHg and (5.36±0.56)mmHg, respectively. There were significantly differences in the naked eye visual acuity, coma and spherical aberration between the two groups (t=6.180, 6.147, 15.709; P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the others (t=1.537, 0.561, 0.591, 0.387, 0.709, 0.507, 1.229, 1.621; P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the testing group and the control group were 13.16% and 26.92%, respectively. There were significantly difference in them between the two groups (χ2=4.507, P<0.05).

Conclusions

T-CAT SMILE has good early effectiveness and stability in correcting myopia and astigmatism, with fewer postoperative complications and high safety, and is worth promoting.

表1 两组患者术前术后裸眼视力、彗差、球差矫正、屈光状态、散光、术眼稳定性及并发症发生率的比较
组别 眼数(只眼) 裸眼视力(±s,logMAR) 彗差(±s,μm) 球差(±s,μm) 球镜屈光度(±s,D)
术前 术后7 d 术前 术后7 d 术前 术后7 d 术前
试验组 76 0.46±0.08 0.85±0.12* 0.23±0.11 0.30±0.07* 0.26±0.14 0.45±0.05* -4.44±0.43
对照组 78 0.47±0.09 0.72±0.14* 0.24±0.12 0.38±0.09* 0.25±0.13 0.59±0.06* -4.45±0.41
t   0.728 6.180 0.539 6.147 0.460 15.709 0.148
P   >0.05 <0.05 >0.05 <0.05 >0.05 <0.05 >0.05
组别 眼数(只眼) 球镜屈光度(±s,D) 柱镜屈光度(±s,D) 等效球镜屈光度(±s,D) 矫正指数(±s,D)
术后7 d 术前 术后7 d 术前 术后7 d 术后7 d 术后3个月
试验组 76 0.19±0.07* -0.65±0.13 -0.39±0.10* 4.77±0.46 -0.39±0.11* 0.95±0.15 0.97±0.14
对照组 78 0.21±0.09* -0.62±0.15 -0.40±0.12* 4.76±0.47 -0.40±0.10* 0.96±0.17 0.98±0.13
t   1.537 1.325 0.561 0.133 0.591 0.387 0.460
P   >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
组别 眼数(只眼) 成功指数(±s,D) 变平指数(±s,D) 角膜滞后量(±s,mmHg) CRF(±s,mmHg)
术后7 d 术后3个月 术前 术后7 d 术前 术后7 d 术前
试验组 76 0.44±0.17 0.39±0.19 2.58±0.25 2.63±0.26 10.94±1.05 6.06±0.58* 10.64±1.03
对照组 78 0.42±0.18 0.38±0.21 2.56±0.24 2.62±0.27 11.03±1.09 6.18±0.63* 10.59±1.01
t   0.709 0.310 0.507 0.702 0.522 1.229 0.304
P   >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
组别 眼数(只眼) CRF(±s,mmHg) 弥散型不透明气泡 角膜上皮下雾状混浊 术眼疼痛 干眼 眼压升高 角膜层间异物 并发症发生率[眼数(%)]
术后7 d
试验组 76 5.22±0.51* 5(6.58) 0(0.00) 3(3.95) 1(1.32) 1(1.32) 0(0.00) 10(13.16)
对照组 78 5.36±0.56* 0(0.00) 6(7.69) 7(8.97) 4(5.13) 2(2.56) 2(2.56) 21(26.92)
t2   1.621             4.07#
P   >0.05             <0.05
[1]
于心怡,张文芳. 微视野检查在近视诊疗中的应用[J]. 华中科技大学学报:医学版202049(4):504-507.
[2]
Alpins N, Ong JKY, Randleman JB, et al. Quantifying corneal topographic astigmatism (CorT Total) in keratoconic eyes[J]. J Refract Surg, 2023, 39(3): 206-213.
[3]
周其亮,周跃华,周春阳,等. Trans-PRK,FS-LASIK和SMILE矫正近视散光的对比观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报202337(1):85-83.
[4]
Huang G, Melki S. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): myths and realities[J]. Semin Ophthalmol, 2021, 36(4): 140-148.
[5]
祁晓君,明春平,杨卫国,等. 全飞秒激光手术对近视眼患者视力改善及角膜非球面系数和角膜全层厚度的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志202322(2):196-199.
[6]
Song J, Cao H, Chen X, et al. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser assisted stromal in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for astigmatism corrections: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2023, 247(1): 181-199.
[7]
张虹. 眼科疾病诊疗指南[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2013.
[8]
黄杨利,周文娟,孙丽丽. 近视激光手术LASEK与Smile的优劣分析[J]. 攀枝花学院学报202138(5):59-63.
[9]
Sharma VK, Sati A, Kumar S. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) refractive surgery: Our initial experience[J]. Med J Armed Forces India, 2022, 78(1): 105-110.
[10]
刘逾,陈海婷,牛广增,等. SMILE与ICL V4c植入术矫正高度近视的临床效果及视觉质量对比分析[J]. 河北医科大学学报202142(2):186-191.
[11]
Ang M, Farook M, Htoon HM, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing femtosecond LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction[J]. Ophthalmology, 2020127(6): 724-730.
[12]
罗珍,齐文娟,罗琰,等. 手动旋转补偿法在SMILE手术矫正近视散光中的应用[J]. 眼科新进展202242(1):44-48.
[13]
曹记红,蒋海翔,张丹. SMILE与LASEK术治疗高度近视对患者视力恢复及并发症的影响[J]. 海南医学202334(1):71-75.
[14]
Elsaadani IA, Hamed AM, Elshahat A, et al. Comparison of refractive outcomes in small-incision lenticule extraction performed with one or two incisions[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 202216(1): 281-291.
[1] 叶诗洋, 黄一冰, 邱韬, 郭维华. 头帽式肌激动器矫治儿童骨性Ⅱ类错畸形1例[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 95-100.
[2] 齐鑫, 赵瑞, 刘思源, 徐斌, 牛艺璇, 刘志鹏, 折占飞. 保留哺乳功能的改良乳头内陷矫正术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 201-204.
[3] 娜荷雅, 朱丹. 红光疗法在儿童近视眼防控中的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 252-256.
[4] 陈灏楠, 肖伟. 透明角膜切口对白内障术后角膜散光的影响及其精准测量的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 172-176.
[5] 任美琪, 李俊红, 冯张青. 间歇性外斜视新型热点问题的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 162-166.
[6] 唐悆, 邓宏伟, 陶政旸, 吕宗岳. 基于Gabor视标的视知觉学习治疗难治性弱视的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 134-139.
[7] 赵艳, 朱丹. 低浓度阿托品在儿童近视眼防控中应用的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 124-128.
[8] 宗晨曦, 肖林, 宋红欣. 人工智能视力筛查在近视眼防控中的应用研究与展望[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 60-64.
[9] 付玥川, 陶晨. 角膜塑形镜对儿童青少年低度近视眼进展控制长期效果及其影响因素的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 287-292.
[10] 张宁宁, 慕璟玉, 马晓玲, 李小龙, 王雁, 赵勇. 儿童青少年高度近视眼眼底特征的研究现状[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 252-256.
[11] 张瑞恒, 董力, 魏文斌. 雷帕霉素靶蛋白复合体1通路在近视眼进展中的研究现状[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 247-251.
[12] 许馨月, 陈涛, 苏玉婷, 张作明. 青少年近视眼预防与控制技术研究的新进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 173-177.
[13] 曹晓光, 何燕玲, 鲍永珍, 王凯, 赵明威. 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术矫正散光的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 57-62.
[14] 熊天旭, 范玮, 万修华. 白内障患者老视矫正的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 52-56.
[15] 吴彬阁, 何婧, 常颖, 赵世强, 接英. 内蒙古自治区包头市各民族青少年眼部生物学参数的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 31-36.
阅读次数
全文


摘要