切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 205 -209. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2023.04.003

论著

纯全氟丙烷填充联合玻璃体切割术治疗视网膜脱离的临床疗效观察
吴瑟菲, 苗金红, 谭舒眉, 李学民, 韩亮, 次仁琼达, 央珍, 胡晋平()   
  1. 100191 北京大学第三医院眼科 北京市眼部神经损伤的重建保护与康复重点实验室
    850010 拉萨,西藏自治区人民医院眼科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-26 出版日期:2023-08-28
  • 通信作者: 胡晋平
  • 基金资助:
    西藏自治区自然科学基金组团式援藏医学项目(XZ2022ZR-ZY5)

The clinical efficacy of pure perfluoropropane tamponade combined with vitrectomy in the treatment of retinal detachment

Sifei Wu, Jinhong Miao, Shumei Tan, Xuemin Li, Liang Han, Qiongda Ciren, Zhen Yang, Jinping Hu()   

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Beijing 100191, China
    Department of Ophthalmology, People′s Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region, Lhasa 850010, China
  • Received:2023-07-26 Published:2023-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Jinping Hu
引用本文:

吴瑟菲, 苗金红, 谭舒眉, 李学民, 韩亮, 次仁琼达, 央珍, 胡晋平. 纯全氟丙烷填充联合玻璃体切割术治疗视网膜脱离的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 205-209.

Sifei Wu, Jinhong Miao, Shumei Tan, Xuemin Li, Liang Han, Qiongda Ciren, Zhen Yang, Jinping Hu. The clinical efficacy of pure perfluoropropane tamponade combined with vitrectomy in the treatment of retinal detachment[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(04): 205-209.

目的

探讨纯全氟丙烷(C3F8)填充联合玻璃体切割术(PPV)治疗视网膜脱离(RD)的疗效。

方法

选择2022年3月至2022年11月于北京大学第三医院眼科行23G PPV联合C3F8填充治疗RD患者97例(97只眼)作为研究对象。其中,男性45例(45只眼),女性52例(52只眼);年龄41~71岁,平均(56.5±15.2)岁。依据术中气体填充方式将患者分为纯气组33例(33只眼)和混合气组64例(64只眼)。全部患者实施气体填充联合PPV治疗,纯气组术中给予适量100%C3F8,混合气组给予非膨胀浓度C3F8与无菌空气的混合气体。检查并记录患者的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、眼压、眼轴长度、术后视网膜末次复位率及术后眼部炎症情况。BCVA、眼压及眼轴长度符合正态分布,以±s表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验,组内手术前后比较采用配对样本t检验。两组眼压范围和术后眼部炎症情况采用例数和百分比描述,组间比较采用秩和检验;术后视网膜末次复位率采用Fisher精确检验。多时间点重复测量数据采用重复测量方差分析。

结果

纯气组患者术中配置眼内气体用时、注入气体用时及C3F8用量分别为(2.48±0.51)s、(5.09±1.21)s及(0.64±0.20)ml;混合气组分别为(16.62±6.20)s、(180.34±34.30)s及(4.69±2.59)ml,两组差异均有统计学意义(t=-18.207,-40.836,-12.41;P<0.05)。纯气组和混合气组患者术后6个月时的视网膜末次复位率分别为97.0%和98.4%,其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。经重复测量方差分析,两组患者术前、术后即刻、术后1 d及术后1个月时的眼压组别效应无统计学意义(F组别=0.032,P>0.05);时间效应有统计学意义(F时间=23.215,P<0.05);交互效应无统计学意义(F交互=1.735,P>0.05)。纯气组术后最高眼压≤21 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)、>21 mmHg且<30 mmHg及≥30 mmHg者分别为8例(8只眼)、14例(14只眼)及11例(11只眼),分别占24.2%、42.4%及33.3%;混合气组分别为18例(18只眼)、32例(32只眼)及14例(14只眼),分别占28.1%、50.0%及21.9%,两组术后最高眼压分布差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.979,P>0.05)。术后末次随访BCVA纯气组优于混合气组,其差异有统计学意义(t=-2.497,P<0.05)。两组患者术后眼部炎症等级分布的差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.430,P>0.05)。

结论

相较于混合气组,纯气组RD治疗效果更好,无术后并发症劣势,同时术后BCVA更好,术中配置眼内气体用时、注入气体用时及C3F8用量更少。

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of pure perfluoropropane (C3F8) tamponade combined with vitrectomy (PPV) in the treatment of retinal detachment (RD).

Methods

Ninety-seven patients (97 eyes) with RD who underwent 23G PPV combined with C3F8 tamponade at the Department of Ophthalmology of Peking University Third Hospital from March to November 2022 were selected as the research subjects. Among them, there were 45 males (45 eyes) and 52 females (52 eyes) ranged from 41 to 71 years with an average age of (56.5±15.2) years. According to the gas tamponade type, the patients were divided into pure gas group with 33 cases (33 eyes) and mixed gas group with 64 cases (64 eyes). All patients were treated by gas tamponade combined with PPV, and the pure gas group was given an appropriate amount of 100% C3F8, and the mixed gas group was given a mixture of non-expanding concentration of C3F8 and sterile air. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, axial length, the last retinal reattachment rate after operation and postoperative ocular inflammation were determined and recorded. The BCVA, intraocular pressure, axial length were in accordance with the normal distribution, described by ±s, and compared by the independent sample t test for inter-group and paired sample t test for intra-group before and after operation. The range of intraocular pressure and postoperative ocular inflammation in the two groups were described by the eyes number and percentage and compared by rank sum test for inter-group. Fisher′s exact test was used for the last retinal reattachment rate after operation. Repeated measurement data at multiple time points were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA.

Results

In the pure gas group, the time for intraocular gas preparation, gas injection and C3F8 consumption were (2.48±0.51)s, (5.09±1.21)s and (0.64±0.20)ml, respectively. In the mixed gas group, those were (16.62±6.20)s, (180.34±34.30)s and (4.69±2.59)ml, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (t= -18.207, -40.836, -12.41; P<0.05). The last retinal reattachment rate was 97.0% in pure gas group and 98.4% in mixed gas group after operation for 6 months, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the group effect of intraocular pressure between the two groups before surgery, immediately after surgery, after surgery for 1 day and 1 month (Fgroup=0.032, P>0.05). The time effect was statistically significant (Ftime=23.215, P<0.05). The interaction effect was not statistically significant (Finteraction=1.735, P>0.05). In the pure gas group, there were 8 cases (8 eyes) with the highest intraocular pressure < 21 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), 14 cases (14 eyes) with the highest intraocular pressure from 21 mmHg to 30 mmHg, and 11 cases (11 eyes) with the highest intraocular pressure ≥30 mmHg, accounting for 24.2%, 42.4% and 33.3%, respectively. In the mixed gas group, there were 18 cases (18 eyes) with the highest intraocular pressure < 21 mmHg, 32 cases (32 eyes) with the highest intraocular pressure from 21 mmHg to 30 mmHg, and 14 cases (14 eyes) with the highest intraocular pressure ≥30 mmHg, accounting for 28.1%, 50.0% and 21.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the distribution of the highest intraocular pressure between the two groups (Z= -0.979, P>0.05). The BCVA of the pure gas group was better than that of the mixed gas group at the last follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (t= -2.497, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative ocular inflammation between the pure gas group and the mixed gas group (Z= -1.430, P> 0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with the mixed gas tamponade group, the pure gas group has a better RD efficacy, no postoperative complications, and shows better postoperative BCVA. It can shorten the time of intraocular gas preparation and injection and reduce the dosage of C3F8.

表1 两组患者气体用量、配置气体用时及注入气体用时的比较(±s)
表2 两组患者不同时间点眼压的比较(±s,mmHg)
表3 两组患者术后最高眼压范围的比较[眼数(%)]
表4 两组患者术后最佳矫正视力的比较(±s,logMAR)
表5 两组患者术后前节炎症分级的比较[眼数(%)]
[1]
Kwok JM, Yu CW, Christakis PG. Retinal detachment[J]. CMAJ, 2020, 192(12): e312.
[2]
Kunikata H, Abe T, Nakazawa T. Historical, current and future approaches to surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2019, 248(3): 159-168.
[3]
Moussa G, Tadros M, Ch′ng SW, et al. Unexplained visual loss in retinal detachment repair: comparing gas, silicone oil and heavy silicone oil by multivariable regression[J]. Int J Retina Vitreous, 2023, 9(1): 30.
[4]
闫忠阳,冯炜,牛瑞,等. 不同填充物联合玻璃体切除及内界膜剥除治疗特发性黄斑裂孔疗效比较[J]. 国际眼科杂志202121(11):1937-1941.
[5]
Kontos A, Tee J, Stuart A, et al. Duration of intraocular gases following vitreoretinal surgery[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2017, 255(2): 231-236.
[6]
忻双华,柳孟云,何恒倩. 玻璃体切除联合C3F8填充术治疗糖尿病视网膜病变的临床疗效观察[J]. 现代实用医学202335(5):583-585.
[7]
魏艳丽,廖洪霞,陈少琼,等. 硅油与c3f8填充对黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离术后愈合效果的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志201817(4): 428-431.
[8]
关健,刘蕊,万超,等. 玻璃体切割联合c3f8气体填充术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的疗效分析[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志201533(8):909-912.
[9]
Neffendorf JE, Gupta B, Williamson TH. The role of intraocular gas tamponade in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a synthesis of the literature[J]. Retina, 2018, 38(S1): S65-S72.
[10]
Ch'ng SW, Patton N, Ahmed M, et al. The manchester large macular hole study: is it time to reclassify large macular holes?[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2018, 195: 36-42.
[11]
Vaziri K, Schwartz SG, Kishor KS, et al. Tamponade in the surgical management of retinal detachment[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2016, 10: 471-476.
[12]
Zhou C, Qiu Q, Zheng Z. Air versu SG as tamponade in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with inferior breaks after 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective, randomized comparative interventional study[J]. Retina, 2015, 35(5): 886-891.
[13]
Enders P, Schick T, Schaub F, et al. Risk of multiple recurring retinal detachment after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair[J]. Retina, 2017, 37(5): 930-935.
[14]
Lam RF, Lai WW, Cheung BT, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy and perfluoropropane (c3f8) tamponade for retinal detachment due to myopic macular hole: a prognostic factor analysis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2006, 142(6): 938-944.
[15]
Choi M, Hong S, Yun C, et al. Objective analysis of perfluoro-propane tamponade area after pars plana vitrectomy using ultra-widefield fundus stereographic projection images[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 18268.
[16]
李晓宏. 玻璃体切除术治疗较复杂型孔源性视网膜脱离的临床研究[J]. 中国临床研究201427(11): 1389-1390.
[17]
Kanclerz P, Grzybowski A. Case series of inappropriate concentration of intraocular sulfur hexafluoride[J]. Case rep ophthalmol, 2018, 9(2): 405-410.
[18]
Kanclerz P, Grzybowski A. Complications associated with the use of expandable gases in vitrectomy[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2018, PMID: 30581605.
[19]
Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Michalewska Z, et al. Clinical variables associated with failure of retinal detachment repair: the european vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report number 4[J]. Ophthalmology, 2014, 121(9): 1715-1719.
[20]
Kominami A, Ueno S, Kominami T, et al. Restoration of cone interdigitation zone associated with improvement of focal macular erg after fovea-off rhegmatogenous retinal reattachment[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2016, 57(4): 1604-1611.
[21]
Chan CK, Lin SG, Nuthi AS, et al. Pneumatic retinopexy for the repair of retinal detachments: a comprehensive review (1986—2007)[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2008, 53(5): 443-478.
[22]
Sigler EJ, Randolph JC, Calzada JI, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy with medium-term postoperative perfluoro-n-octane for recurrent inferior retinal detachment complicated by advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy[J]. Retina, 2013, 33(4): 791-797.
[23]
Romano MR, Ferrara M, Nepita I, et al. Biocompatibility of intraocular liquid tamponade agents: an update[J]. Eye (lond), 2021, 35(10): 2699-2713.
[1] 李岩, 刘洋辰, 邓美玉, 王琦妙, 武斌, 高建民, 张楠, 刘冬, 刘学一. 光学与超声生物测量在观察玻璃体积血及视网膜脱离患眼视轴长度中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(10): 738-742.
[2] 张珂, 刘武. 近视眼牵引性黄斑病变相关因素的研究现状[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(06): 380-384.
[3] 曾百卉, 王倩, 韩宁, 隋桂琴. 折叠式人工玻璃体球囊研究与应用的新进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 104-108.
[4] 曾百卉, 王倩, 韩宁, 隋桂琴. 下方孔源性视网膜脱离手术治疗的进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 60-64.
[5] 贾力蕴, 张永鹏, 佘海澄, 周海英, 高丽琴, 马凯, 魏文斌. 儿童孔源性视网膜脱离发病特点、病因及手术方式的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 35-40.
[6] 张骏, 刘志南, 邹茜, 孙倬, 王浩, 王惠云, 邓国华. 玻璃体切割联合消毒空气填充术治疗特发性黄斑裂孔疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 29-34.
[7] 李玲, 侯军军, 张红. 玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术对孔源性视网膜脱离疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 14-21.
[8] 李林, 韩崧, 王海燕, 杨光然, 佘海澄, 卢海. 外伤性视网膜脱离术后复发的临床特征分析[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(03): 153-159.
[9] 杨来庆, 张沧霞, 谢立科, 郝晓凤, 明静, 孙会兰, 李晓宇. 手术显微镜直视下巩膜外加压治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的临床观察[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(03): 116-121.
[10] 戴荣平, 尹心恺, 曲艺, 龙琴. 重视高度近视眼黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的手术治疗[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(03): 97-102.
[11] 付鹏, 沈念, 黄艳玲, 杨水平, 万小波. 外伤性晶状体脱位合并周边隐匿性视网膜病变的临床特征及预后分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 536-540.
阅读次数
全文


摘要