切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 340 -344. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2025.06.004

论著

高度近视眼患者静态及动态色觉特征的临床研究
潘星辰1, 王宇辰1, 周欣佐2, 何奕璇2, 楚文博2, 韩镒泽2, 郭安琪1, 王岳鑫1, 刘子源1,(), 李学民1   
  1. 1100191 北京大学第三医院眼科 眼部神经损伤的重建保护与康复北京市重点实验室
    2100191 北京大学医学部基础医学院
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-18 出版日期:2025-12-28
  • 通信作者: 刘子源
  • 基金资助:
    北京市自然科学基金项目(7242168); 中国初级卫生保健基金会项目(MTP2022C025); 国家自然科学基金面上基金项目(82571273)

Static and dynamic color vision characteristics in patients with high myopia

Xingchen Pan1, Yuchen Wang1, Xinzuo Zhou2, Yixuan He2, Wenbo Chu2, Yize Han2, Anqi Guo1, Yuexin Wang1, Ziyuan Liu1,(), Xuemin Li1   

  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reconstruction, Protection and Rehabilitation of Ocular Nerve Injury, Beijing 100191, China
    2Clinical Medicine, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2025-11-18 Published:2025-12-28
  • Corresponding author: Ziyuan Liu
引用本文:

潘星辰, 王宇辰, 周欣佐, 何奕璇, 楚文博, 韩镒泽, 郭安琪, 王岳鑫, 刘子源, 李学民. 高度近视眼患者静态及动态色觉特征的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 340-344.

Xingchen Pan, Yuchen Wang, Xinzuo Zhou, Yixuan He, Wenbo Chu, Yize Han, Anqi Guo, Yuexin Wang, Ziyuan Liu, Xuemin Li. Static and dynamic color vision characteristics in patients with high myopia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2025, 15(06): 340-344.

目的

探讨高度近视眼患者在不同波长条件下的静态精细色觉及动态色觉表现特征。

方法

选取2025年7月至9月于北京大学第三医院眼科门诊就诊的高度近视眼患者34例(68只眼)。其中,男性11例(22只眼),女性23例(46只眼);年龄14~67岁,平均年龄30 (25.5, 39.25)岁。于标准光照条件下,测量受试者在红、橙、黄、绿、青、蓝及紫7个可见光波段的静态精细色觉最小可辨色差及辨认时间;评估20、40、60、80角速度每秒度数(dps)条件下红、橙、黄、绿、蓝及紫6种颜色刺激下的动态色觉(DCVA)。DCVA经检验符合正态分布以±s表示,年龄、左眼等效球镜屈光度、右眼等效球镜屈光度、精细色觉检测最小可辨色差波长及反应时间等以中位数(四分位距)表示。色觉数据采用重复测量方差分析,检验变量的主效应以及变量之间的交互作用。在重复测量方差分析中,采用Mauchly球形性检验评估球形性假设。当球形性假设成立时,采用一元重复测量方差分析推断;反之,采用多变量分析推断。

结果

紫色、蓝色、青色、绿色、黄色、橙色及红色色差辨认分别为2(0,2)nm、2(0,2)nm、2(0,2)nm、2(2,7)nm、2(1,2)nm、1(1,3)nm及27(20,41)nm,组间比较差异有统计学意义(F=86.520,P<0.05);各色波段反应时间分别为14(9.5,19)s、10(6.5,14)s、12(7,15)s、11、(7,20)s、11(7.5,21)s、13(10,20.5)s及31(18,47)s,组间比较差异有统计学意义(F=17.206,P<0.05)。在20 dps、40 dps、60 dps及80 dps角速度时,红色、橙色、黄色、绿色、蓝色及紫色DCVA分别为(0.40±0.33)最小分辨角对数(logMAR)、(0.49±0.30)logMAR、(0.69±0.26)logMAR、(0.70±0.29)logMAR、(0.36±0.37)logMAR、(0.34±0.39)logMAR、(0.50±0.38)logMAR、(0.63±0.27)logMAR、(0.76±0.29)logMAR、(0.82±0.26)logMAR、(0.39±0.42)、(0.41±0.39)logMAR、(0.48±0.40)logMAR、(0.59±0.35)logMAR、(0.78±0.33)logMAR、(0.88±0.31)logMAR、(0.40±0.33)logMAR、(0.41±0.38)logMAR、(0.39±0.40)logMAR、(0.57±0.31)logMAR、(0.68±0.33)logMAR、(0.86±0.30)logMAR、(0.31±0.41)logMAR及(0.31±0.39)logMAR,组间比较差异有统计学意义(F=48.728,23.85,29.909,220.31;P<0.05)。重复测量方差分析显示,两组交互效应有统计学意义(F=2.401,P<0.05)。

结论

静态精细色觉受高度近视影响较弱,而动态色觉能力呈现明显的波长依赖性,高度近视眼患者的动态色觉变化具有视锥细胞依赖的波段及时间特异性。动态色觉检测有助于更全面地评估高度近视眼患者的生活性功能视觉特征。

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate the characteristics of static fine color discrimination and dynamic color vision in patients with high myopia under different wavelength conditions.

Methods

A total of 34 patients (68 eyes) with high myopia who attended the Ophthalmology Clinic of Peking University Third Hospital between July 2025, and September 2025, were enrolled. Among them, there were 11 males (22 eyes) and 23 females (46 eyes), with ages ranging from 14 to 67 years and a median age of 30 (25.5, 39.25) years. Under standard lighting conditions, participants underwent measure ments of static fine color vision, including the minimum discriminable color difference and recognition time across seven visible light bands (red, orange, yellow, green, cyan, blue, and violet). Dynamic color visual acuity (DCVA) was assessed under six color stimuli (red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and violet) at angular velocities of 20, 40, 60, and 80 degrees per second (dps). Continuous variables conforming to a normal distribution (DCVA) were expressed as ±s. Non-normally distributed continuous variables, including age, spherical equivalent of the left and right eyes, wavelength thresholds for static fine color vision (minimum discriminable color difference), and reaction time, were expressed as medians (interquartile range). Color vision data were analyzed using ANOVA to test the main effects of variables and their interactions. In the repeated measures ANOVA, Mauchly′s test of sphericity was used to assess the sphericity assumption. When the sphericity assumption was met, univariate repeated measures ANOVA results were used for statistical inference; otherwise, multivariate test results were used as the primary basis for statistical inference.

Results

The minimum discriminable color differences for violet, blue, cyan, green, yellow, orange, and red were 2 (0, 2)nm, 2 (0, 2)nm, 2 (0, 2)nm, 2 (2, 7)nm, 2 (1, 2)nm, 1 (1, 3)nm, and 27 (20, 41)nm, respectively, with statistically significant differences between groups (F=86.520, P<0.05). The corresponding reaction times for these color bands were 14 (9.5, 19)seconds, 10 (6.5, 14)seconds, 12 (7, 15)seconds, 11 (7, 20)seconds, 11 (7.5, 21)seconds, 13 (10, 20.5)seconds, and 31 (18, 47) seconds, respectively, showing statistically significant differences between groups (F=17.206, P<0.05). At an angular velocity of 20 dps, 40 dps, 60 dps, 80 dps, DCVA for red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and violet were (0.40±0.33)logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), (0.49±0.30)logMAR, (0.69±0.26)logMAR, (0.70±0.29)logMAR, (0.36±0.37)logMAR, (0.34±0.39)logMAR, (0.50±0.38)logMAR, (0.63±0.27)logMAR, (0.76±0.29)logMAR, (0.82±0.26)logMAR, (0.39±0.42)logMAR, (0.41±0.39)logMAR, (0.48±0.40)logMAR, (0.59±0.35)logMAR, (0.78±0.33)logMAR, (0.88±0.31)logMAR, (0.40±0.33)logMAR, and (0.41±0.38)logMAR, (0.39±0.40)logMAR, (0.57±0.31)logMAR, (0.68±0.33)logMAR, (0.86±0.30)logMAR, (0.31±0.41)logMAR, and (0.31±0.39)logMAR, respectively, with statistically significant differences between groups (F=48.728, 23.85, 29.909, 220.31; P<0.05). Repeated measures ANOVA showed the interaction effect was statistically significant (F=2.401, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Patients with high myopia exhibit marked wavelength-dependent differences in static fine color discrimination. DCVA is highly associated with color, showing selective differences across wavelengths. Assessment of dynamic color vision may contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation of functional visual characteristics in high myopia.

图2 高度近视眼患者不同角速度动态色觉比较的箱式图
表1 不同颜色组高度近视眼患者不同角速度动态色觉的比较(±s,最小分辨角对数)
[1]
Banashefski B, Rhee MK, Lema GMC. High myopia prevalence across racial groups in the united states: A systematic scoping review[J]. J Clin Med, 2023, 12(8): 3045.
[2]
刘尚,许毓鹏,许迅. 高度近视对眼部结构及视功能影响的研究现状与进展[J]. 中华眼底病杂志202339(8):690-695.
[3]
Ren X, Wang Y, Wang D, et al. A novel standardized test system to evaluate dynamic visual acuity post trifocal or monofocal intraocular lens implantation: A multicenter study[J]. Eye, 2020, 34(12): 2235-2241.
[4]
国家重点研发计划2020YFC2008200项目组,中华医学会眼科学分会眼视光学组,中国医师协会眼科医师分会眼视光专业委员会. 中国低视力康复临床指南(2021)[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志202123(3):161-170.
[5]
Wang Y, Guo Y, Wei S, et al. Dynamic visual acuity after small incision lenticule extraction for myopia patients[J]. Percept Mot Skills, 2023, 130(1): 403-418.
[6]
Shah R, Vlasak N, Evans BJW. High myopia: Reviews of myopia control strategies and myopia complications[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2024, 44(6): 1248-1260.
[7]
中华医学会眼科学分会眼视光学组,中国医师协会眼科医师分会眼视光专业委员会,中国非公立医疗机构协会眼科专业委员会视光学组,等. 高度近视防控专家共识(2023)[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志202325(6):401-407.
[8]
Klauke S, Sondocie C, Fine I. The impact of low vision on social function: The potential importance of lost visual social cues[J]. J Optom, 2023, 16(1): 3-11.
[9]
Song D, Yang Q, Ge J, et al. Color vision-associated environmental and biological factors in the development of myopia[J]. Exp Eye Res, 2025, 254: 110324.
[10]
Emery KJ, Volbrecht VJ, Peterzell DH, et al. Fundamentally different representations of color and motion revealed by individual differences in perceptual scaling[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A., 2023, 120(4): e2202262120.
[11]
Rucker FJ, Kruger PB. Cone contributions to signals for accommodation and the relationship to refractive error[J]. Vision Res, 2006, 46(19): 3079-3089.
[12]
Mäntyjärvi M, Tuppurainen K. Colour vision and dark adaptation in high myopia without central retinal degeneration.[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 1995, 79(2): 105-108.
[13]
Sawa M. Principal test for color sensation: Clinical aspects[J]. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 2024, 68(4): 259-292.
[14]
Waisberg E, Ong J, Paladugu P, et al. Dynamic visual acuity as a biometric for astronaut performance and safety[J]. Life Sci Space Res, 2023, 37: 3-6.
[15]
Wang Y, Xie J, Yu X, et al. Influence of short-term hypoxia exposure on dynamic visual acuity[J]. Front Neurosci, 2024, 18: 1428987.
[16]
Alzeer MS, Houwers K, vandeSmagt M, et al. After-image formation by adaptation to dynamic color gradients[J]. Atten Percept Psychophys, 2023, 85(1): 174-187.
[17]
Roorda A, Cholewiak SA, Bhargava S, et al. The visual benefits of correcting longitudinal and transverse chromatic aberration[J]. J Vis, 2023, 23(2): 3.
[18]
Gawne TJ, Banks MS. The role of chromatic aberration in vision[J]. Annu Rev Vis Sci, 2024, 10(1): 199-212.
[19]
Chen YY, Tsai TH, Liu YL, et al. The impact of light properties on ocular growth and myopia development[J]. Taiwan J Ophthalmol, 2024, 14(2): 143-150.
[20]
Medina J. Using single cases to understand visual processing: The magnocellular pathway[J]. Cogn Neuropsychol, 2022, 39(1-2): 106-108.
[21]
Liang J, Fang D, Diao Y, et al. Photoreceptor cone loss is associated with decreased deep retinal vessel density and impaired retinal sensitivity in high myopia[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2025, 109(10): 1194-1200.
[22]
李沅鸿,李学民. 动态视力与m通路及p通路相关研究概述[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版)202313(5): 291.
[1] 鲜昊城, 许珂, 代锦岳, 李学民. 高度近视眼合并开角型青光眼结构与血流参数诊断价值及联合诊断模型的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 333-339.
[2] 胡沘, 秦晓, 肖峣, 田磊. 基于计算流体力学角膜表面空气脉冲压强分布特征的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 199-205.
[3] 张英蕾, 石园方, 竺向佳. 重视高度近视眼合并白内障围手术期并发症[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 193-198.
[4] 张宁宁, 慕璟玉, 马晓玲, 李小龙, 王雁, 赵勇. 儿童青少年高度近视眼眼底特征的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 252-256.
[5] 姚沁楠, 万修华. 有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术与角膜屈光手术治疗高度近视眼有效性、安全性及可预测性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(06): 346-352.
[6] 何海龙, 刘振宇, 周春媛, 张立平, 王进达, 万修华. 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜切除术与有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术矫正高度近视眼疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 22-28.
[7] 赵鹏飞, 柳静, 徐雯, 胡雅斌, 翟长斌, 魏文斌. 术前应用人工泪液对FS-LASIK治疗高度近视眼术后干眼自觉症状和泪膜稳定性影响的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(06): 326-332.
[8] 吉祥, 张丁丁, 毛馨遥, 周仕萍, 刘慧. Wang-Koch优化眼轴SRK/T公式预测不同眼轴长度下高度近视眼合并白内障术后屈光度准确性的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(05): 281-287.
[9] 杨宇, 姜惠, 范玮. 高度近视眼眼底血流动力学的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(03): 183-187.
[10] 牛红蕾, 张东昌, 杨璐. 多模式眼底影像技术在高度近视眼检查中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(02): 123-128.
[11] 付庆东, 杨寅寅, 俞萍萍, 徐东, 孔祥筠, 刘继丽, 王露雯. Lenstar LS900光学生物测量与浸润式B型超声引导下的A型超声分段式生物测量法在高度近视眼眼轴测量中的一致性研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(06): 372-377.
[12] 蒋政, 王华, 罗栋强. 有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术矫正高度近视眼术后视觉质量的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(05): 305-311.
[13] 李梦媛, 汤云霞, 张静琳, 侯金佟, 陈倩茵, 马红婕, 吴德正. 成年超高度近视眼患者黄斑区巩膜厚度及其相关影响因素[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(02): 77-82.
[14] 戴荣平, 尹心恺, 曲艺, 龙琴. 重视高度近视眼黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(03): 97-102.
[15] 宋耀文, 贺瑞, 马秋霞. 高度近视眼行准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后长期稳定性的研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(01): 15-22.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?