切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华眼科医学杂志(电子版)

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 210 -215. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2022.04.004

论著

不同设计多焦点人工晶状体植入后视觉质量差异的临床研究
王晓宇1, 李亚新2, 刘一昀1, 耿嘉懿1, 秦锐1, 李炎城1, 敖明昕1, 刘德海1, 齐虹1,†()   
  1. 1. 100191　北京大学第三医院眼科　眼部神经损伤的重建保护与康复北京市重点实验室
    2. 102400　北京市房山区第一医院眼科
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-25 出版日期:2022-08-28
  • 通信作者: 齐虹
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81600760；81974128；82171022); 首都卫生发展科研专项自主创新项目(2020－2－4097)

Comparative analysis of visual quality after implantation different multifocal intraocular lens in patients with cataract

Xiaoyu Wang1, Yaxin Li2, Yiyun Liu1, Jiayi Geng1, Rui Qin1, Yancheng Li1, Mingxin Ao1, Dehai Liu1, Hong Qi1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Department of Ophthalmology, The First Hospital of Fangshan District, Beijing 102400, China
  • Received:2022-03-25 Published:2022-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Hong Qi
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

王晓宇, 李亚新, 刘一昀, 耿嘉懿, 秦锐, 李炎城, 敖明昕, 刘德海, 齐虹. 不同设计多焦点人工晶状体植入后视觉质量差异的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 210-215.

Xiaoyu Wang, Yaxin Li, Yiyun Liu, Jiayi Geng, Rui Qin, Yancheng Li, Mingxin Ao, Dehai Liu, Hong Qi. Comparative analysis of visual quality after implantation different multifocal intraocular lens in patients with cataract[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2022, 12(04): 210-215.

目的

比较三焦点衍射型人工晶状体(IOL)和双焦点折射型IOL植入后患者的术后视觉质量差异。

方法

回顾性队列研究。收集2019年3月至2020年7月于北京大学第三医院眼科行超声乳化白内障吸除联合后房型IOL植入的52例(104只眼)患者。其中，男性17例(34只眼)，女性35例(70只眼)；年龄36~87岁，平均年龄(69.3±11.2)岁。根据患者植入IOL种类分为区域折射组和衍射三焦组。区域折射组植入Lenstec SBL－3型IOL；衍射三焦组植入AT LISA tri 839MP型三焦点IOL。比较患者术后3个月裸眼近视力(UNVA)、裸眼中视力(UIVA)及裸眼远视力(UDVA)，最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、离焦曲线、客观视觉质量、脱镜率、不良视觉现象及满意度。两组患者视功能相关生活质量问卷评分以(±s)表示；UNVA、UIVA、UDVA、BCVA、调制传递函数截止频率(MTF cut－off)、斯特列尔比(SR)、客观散射指数(OSI)、对比度视力(VA)及患者满意度以中位数和四分位数表示，组间比较采用Mann－Whitney U检验。等效球镜屈光度(SE)的分布、脱镜率及不良视觉率以百分比表示，组间比较采用χ2检验。Spearman相关性分析患者术后客观视觉质量与BCVA的关系。

结果

衍射三焦组术后最小分辨角度对数视力(logMAR)UNVA、UIVA、UDVA及BCVA分别为0.10(0.05，0.10)、0.10(0.00，0.20)、0.10(0.10，0.20)及0.00(0.00，0.05)；区域折射组分别为0.05(0.00，0.10)、0.10(0.00，0.20)、0.10(0.00，0.20)及0.00(0.00，0.05)，UNVA比较的差异有统计学意义(Z＝－2.596，P<0.05)。衍射三焦组SE在±0.25 D、±0.50 D、±0.75 D及±1.00 D处，分布分别占34.6%、65.4%、90.4%及100.0%；区域折射组SE在±0.25 D、±0.50 D、±0.75 D及±1.00 D处，分别占57.7%、71.2%、78.9%及92.4%。两组SE整体分布比较的差异有统计学意义(χ2＝27.083，P<0.05)。两组平均SE分别为(－0.38±0.43)D和(－0.25±0.49)D，差异无统计学意义(t＝0.667，P>0.05)。离焦曲线分析显示，球镜屈光度为2.00 D、－2.00 D及－2.50 D时两组患者的logMAR BCVA比较的差异均有统计学意义(Z＝－2.378，－2.416，－2.821；P<0.05)。衍射三焦组术后MTF cut－off、SR、OSI、VA 100%、VA 20%及VA 9%分别为27.7(21.2，37.6)c/deg、0.14(0.10，0.21)、2.4(1.7，2.9)、0.9(0.7，1.3)、0.6(0.4，0.8)及0.3(0.2，0.5)；区域折射组分别为18.8(14.1，24.4)c/deg、0.11(0.09，0.13)、2.4(1.8，3.2)、0.6(0.5，0.8)、0.4(0.3，0.5)及0.2(0.2，0.3)。两组患者术后MTF cut－off、SR、OSI、VA 100%、VA 20%及VA 9%与logMAR BCVA呈正相关，且有统计学意义(r＝－0.352，－0.211，0.542，0.324，－0.314，－0.287；P<0.05)。OSI与logMAR BCVA的相关度最高且两组间OSI比较的差异无统计学意义(Z＝－0.807，P>0.05)。两组患者视功能相关生活质量问卷总分分别为(88.28±11.41)分和(87.43±12.62)分；视近脱镜率分别为80.8%和84.6%；不良视觉现象出现概率分别为23.1%和19.2%；平均满意度分别为3(3，4)和3(3，4)。

结论

两种多焦点IOL均能提高患者术后的主客观视觉质量，术后的有效性、准确性、生活质量、术后脱镜率及满意度相当；此外，区域折射组的术后UNVA优于衍射三焦组，衍射三焦组客观视觉质量均优于区域折射组，OSI可作为早期后囊膜混浊发现及手术时机选择的指标。

关键词: 白内障, 人工晶状体, 视觉质量, 脱镜率
Objective

To compare the visual quality of patients implanted the trifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) and the segmented refractive bifocal IOL after cataract surgery.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study. From March 2019 to July 2020, 52 patients (104 eyes) with cataract phacoemulsification and IOL implantation in the Department of Ophthalmology of Peking University Third Hospital were collected. There were 17 males (34 eyes) and 35 females (70 eyes) with the average age of (69.3±11.2) years-old (ranged from 36 to 87 years-old). The patients were divided into segmented refractive group and trifocal diffractive group according to the type of IOL implanted. Lenstec SBL-3 IOL was implanted in segmented refractive group; AT LISA tri 839MP triple focus IOL was implanted in the trifocal diffractive group. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent (SE), defocus curve, objective visual quality, off-glasses rate, poor visual events, life quality and satisfaction were evaluated after surgery for 3 months. The questionnaire scores of two groups were expressed by (±s), independent sample t test was used for comparison between groups; UNVA, UIVA, UDVA, BCVA, modulation transfer function cut-off (MTF cut off), strehl ratio (SR), objective scatter index (OSI), contrast visual acuity (VA) and patient satisfaction were expressed by median and quartile intervals, compared by Mann-Whitney U test between groups. The distribution of SE, off-glasses rate and poor visual events were expressed in percentage, and chi-square test was used for comparison between groups. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between objective visual quality and BCVA.

Results

The postoperative logMAR UNVA, UIVA, UDVA and BCVA of the trifocal diffractive group were 0.10(0.05, 0.10), 0.10(0.00, 0.20), 0.10(0.10, 0.20) and 0.00 (0.00, 0.05), and those of segmented refractive group were 0.05(0.00, 0.10), 0.10(0.00, 0.20), 0.10(0.00, 0.20) and 0.00(0.00, 0.05), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in logMAR UNVA between two groups(Z=-2.596, P<0.05). The distribution of SE in ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D, ±0.75 D and ±1.00 D in the trifocal diffractive group were 34.6%, 65.4%, 90.4% and 100.0%, respectively; those of segmented refractive group were 57.7%, 71.2%, 78.9% and 92.4%. There was a statistically significant difference in the total distribution of SE (χ2=27.083, P<0.05). There was not a statistically significant difference in the average distribution of SE (t=0.667, P>0.05). The defocus curve analysis showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the logMAR BCVA when the spherical power was 2.00 D, -2.00 D and -2.50 D between two groups (Z=-2.378, -2.416, -2.821; P<0.05). After operation, the MTF cut off, SR, OSI, VA 100%, VA 20% and VA 9% in trifocal diffractive group were 27.7(21.2, 37.6) c/deg, 0.14(0.10, 0.21), 2.4(1.7, 2.9), 0.9(0.7, 1.3), 0.6(0.4, 0.8) and 0.3(0.2, 0.5); and those of segmented refractive group were 18.8(14.1, 24.4) c/deg, 0.11(0.09, 0.13), 2.4(1.8, 3.2), 0.6(0.5, 0.8), 0.4(0.3, 0.5) and 0.2(0.2, 0.3), respectively. There were significant correlations between MTF cut off, SR, OSI, VA 100%, VA 20%, VA 9% and logMAR BCVA in both patients (r=-0.352, -0.211, 0.542, 0.324, -0.314, -0.287; P<0.05). OSI was related with logMAR BCVA, which was bigger than others and there was not a statistically significant difference in OSI between groups (Z=-0.807, P>0.05). The total scores of visual function related quality of life questionnaire in two groups were (88.28±11.41) scores and (87.43±12.62) scores; the rates of mirror removal rate were 80.8% and 84.6%; the rates of poor visual quality was 23.1% and 19.2%; the satisfaction distribution were 3(3, 4) and 3(3, 4), respectively.

Conclusions

Both 839 MP and SBL-3 multifocal IOLs can improve the subjective and objective visual quality of cataract patients after surgery, and the effectiveness, accuracy, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction of the two groups of patients are similar. Apart from that, the postoperative UNVA of SBL-3 was better than that of 839MP; the objective visual quality results (MTF cut off, SR, VA) of 839MP were better than those of SBL-3. OSI can be used for early detection of complications such as posterior capsular opacification and selection of surgical opportunity.

Key words: Cataract, Intraocular lens, Visual quality, Spectacle independence
表1 两组患者术前基本资料的比较
组别 眼数(只) UDVA[M(Q1，Q3)] BCVA[M(Q1，Q3)] 等效球镜(±s，D) 角膜散光度[M(Q1，Q3)，D] 眼轴长度(±s，mm) 前房深度(±s，mm) 角膜缘白到白距离(±s，mm) IOL屈光度(±s，D)
衍射三焦组 52 0.40(0.20，0.70) 0.20(0.15，0.30) －1.73±3.26 －0.04(－1.41，－1.26) 23.94±1.09 3.03±0.51 11.60±0.34 19.07±3.67
区域折射组 52 0.40(0.20，0.70) 0.20(0.10，0.40) －1.39±2.49 －0.42(－1.39，－1.28) 23.96±0.90 3.15±0.40 11.62±0.58 18.23±2.81
Z/t值   －0.619* －0.653* －0.596# －1.791* －0.095# －1.313# －0.059# 1.306#
P值   >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
图3 所有患者术后客观散射指数与最佳矫正视力的相关性分析
表2 两组患者术后3个月视力和客观视觉质量结果的比较[M(Q1，Q3)]
组别 眼数(只) 裸眼远视力 裸眼中视力 裸眼近视力 最佳矫正远视力 MTF cut－off(c/deg)
衍射三焦组 52 0.10(0.05，0.10) 0.10(0.00，0.20) 0.10(0.10，0.20) 0.00(0.00，0.05) 27.7(21.2，37.6)
区域折射组 52 0.05(0.00，0.10) 0.10(0.00，0.20) 0.10(0.00，0.20) 0.00(0.00，0.05) 18.8(14.1，24.4)
Z值   －0.451 －0.871 －2.596 －1.945 －4.271
P值   >0.05 >0.05 <0.05 >0.05 <0.05
组别 眼数(只) 斯特列尔比 客观散射指数 对比度视力
100% 20% 9%
衍射三焦组 52 0.14(0.10，0.21) 2.4(1.7，2.9) 0.9(0.7，1.3) 0.6(0.4，0.8) 0.3(0.2，0.5)
区域折射组 52 0.11(0.09，0.13) 2.4(1.8，3.2) 0.6(0.5，0.8) 0.4(0.3，0.5) 0.2(0.2，0.3)
Z值   －3.693 －0.807 －4.530 －4.313 －3.850
P值   <0.05 >0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
[1]
Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Presbyopia: Effectiveness of correction strategies[J]. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2019, 68: 124－143.
[2]
班景飞，李景珂，郭黎霞. 三种IOL对年龄相关性白内障患者视力和视觉质量的影响[J]. 国际眼科杂志，2021，21(1)：106－110.
[3]
谢瞻，丁宇华，刘庆淮，等. 三焦点与单焦点人工晶状体植入术效果的比较[J]. 国际眼科杂志，2019，19(5)：103－106.
[4]
Venter JA, Barclay D, Pelouskova M, et al. Initial experience with a new refractive rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens[J]. J Refract Surg, 2014, 30 (11): 770－776.
[5]
Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, et al. Development of the 25－item national eye institute visual function questionnaire[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2001, 119(7): 1050－1058.
[6]
钟慧，秦虹，王慧娟，等. 三焦点人工晶状体与双焦点人工晶状体植入术后视力及视觉质量的对比[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志，2020，22(4)：262－267.
[7]
Naderi K, Gormley J, O′Brart D. Cataract surgery and dry eye disease: A review[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2020, 30(5): 840－855.
[8]
中华医学会眼科学分会白内障及人工晶状体学组. 中国多焦点人工晶状体临床应用专家共识(2019年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志，2019，55(7): 491－494.
[9]
Devries NE, Nuijts RM. Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2013, 39(2): 268－278.
[10]
王文惠，巫雷，樊映川，等. 比较两种人工晶状体矫正老视效果的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版)，2020，10(5)：294－299.
[11]
林伟平，谷天瀑，厉娜，等. 视觉质量分析系统(OQAS－Ⅱ)在青少年人群中测量重复性研究[J]. 眼科新进展，2016，36(12)：1138－1140，1144.
[12]
Vilaseca M, Peris E, Pujol J, et al. Intra and intersession repeatability of a double－pass instrument[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2010, 87(9): 675－681.
[13]
Güell JL, Pujo IJ, Arjona M, et al. Optical quality analysis system. Instrument for objective clinical evaluation of ocular optical quality[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30 (7): 1598－1599.
[14]
Vargas V, Alio JL, Oliveira RF, et al. Long－term objective and subjective outcomes following bilateral implantation of diffractive bifocal or trifocal intraocular lenses[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2021, 31(3): 1014－1020.
[15]
肖畅，张远平. 三种多焦点人工晶体植入术后视觉质量对比分析[J]. 黑龙江医药科学，2020，43(3)：78－81.
[16]
Wang X, Tu H, Wang Y. Comparative analysis of visual performance and optical quality with a rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens and an apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2020: 7923045.
[17]
Lian H, Ma W, Wei Q, et al. A comparative study on early vision quality after implantation of refractive segmental and diffractive multifocal intraocular lens[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2020, 36(7): 1607－1612.
[18]
Shen J, Zhang L, Ni S, et al. Comparison of visual outcomes and quality of life in patients with high myopic cataract after implantation of AT LISA Tri 839MP and LS－313 MF30 intraocular lenses[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2022: 5645752.
[19]
Steinwender G, Schwarz L, Böhm M, et al. Visual results after implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in high myopes[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2018, 44 (6): 680－685.
[20]
Liu Y, Lan Q, Sun T, et al. Binocular visual function after unilateral versus bilateral implantation of segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: a pilot study[J]．Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2022, 260 (4): 1205－1213.
[21]
俞阿勇. 双通道客观视觉质量分析的临床实践[M]. 北京：人民卫生出版社，2017.
[22]
Marques EF, Ferreira TB. Comparison of visual outcomes of 2 diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2015, 41(2): 354－363.
[23]
Mojzis P, Peña－garcía P, Liehneova I, et al. Outcomes of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2014, 40(1): 60－69.
[24]
肖燕，王骞，朱俊英，等. AcrySof ReSTOR及ATLIS Atri 839MP多焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量的比较[J]. 实用防盲技术，2018，13(3)：25－28.
[25]
Cardona G, Vega F, Gil MA, et al. Visual acuity and image quality in 5 diffractive intraocular lenses[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2018, 28(1): 36－41.
[26]
Khoramnia R, Yildirim TM, Tandogan T, et al. Optical quality of three trifocal intraocular lens models: An optical bench comparison[J]. Der Ophthalmologe, 2018, 115(1): 21－28.
[27]
杨静梅. 客观散射指数在指导年龄相关性白内障手术时机中的应用[D]. 温州：温州医科大学，2018.
[28]
Liu X, Xie L, Huang Y. Comparison of the visual performance after implantation of bifocal and trifocal intraocular lenses having an identical platform[J]. J Refract Surg, 2018, 34(4): 273－280.
[29]
Alba－bueno F, Vega F, Millán MS. Halos and multifocal intraocular lenses: origin and interpretation[J]. Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia, 2014, 89(10): 397－404.
[30]
Song JE, Han SY, Khoramnia R, et al. Clinical outcomes of combined implantation of an extended depth of focus IOL and a trifocal IOL in a Korean population [J]. J Ophthalmol, 2021: 9034258.
[1] 陈川, 罗红. 胎儿先天性白内障的超声影像学特征及预后分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 548-552.
[2] 孙秀丽, 刘振宇, 唐婷婷, 张景尚, 李猛, 毛迎燕, 万修华. 关注后发性白内障的发病机制及防控措施[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 193-198.
[3] 陈灏楠, 肖伟. 透明角膜切口对白内障术后角膜散光的影响及其精准测量的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 172-176.
[4] 方蕊, 宋旭东. 非编码核糖核酸与白内障相关的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 94-98.
[5] 郝壮, 马济远, 何梦梅, 李兴育, 陆新婷, 武静, 周健. 迟发性囊袋阻滞综合征临床特征、治疗方法及其疗效的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 70-75.
[6] 马丹, 李雅楠, 张丽, 苗金红, 李学民, 胡晋平. 不同人工晶状体装载方法对术中襻与光学部黏附影响的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 24-29.
[7] 刘兆川, 宋旭东. 重视虹膜松弛综合征围手术期的防治[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 1-5.
[8] 万修华. 角膜移植术后白内障吸除联合张力环及后房型人工晶状体植入术[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 0-.
[9] 万修华. 白内障标准化手术系列视频（5级全白核）[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 0-.
[10] 王震宇, 张维嘉, 胡曼, 高传文, 石砚, 王怀洲. 微导管辅助360°小梁切开术治疗先天性白内障术后继发青光眼的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 275-280.
[11] 姜雅琴, 刘丽峰, 刘秀花, 张亚丽. 白内障术后早期患者配戴绷带镜对泪膜质量及其动态变化影响的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 204-209.
[12] 蒋晨, 万新娟, 谢小东, 丁琳. 糖化血红蛋白、硫氧还蛋白、硫氧还蛋白互作蛋白与皮质性白内障的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(09): 914-918.
[13] 付鹏, 沈念, 黄艳玲, 杨水平, 万小波. 外伤性晶状体脱位合并周边隐匿性视网膜病变的临床特征及预后分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 536-540.
[14] 彭丽, 于娜, 吴雪莲. 老年白内障患者超声乳化术后眼部疼痛原因分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 49-51.
[15] 刘天龙. 改良型超声乳化手术治疗高度近视合并白内障疗效观察[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 30-33.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号