切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 326 -331. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2023.06.002

论著

不同屈光不正患者无黏弹剂辅助植入人工晶状体前后瞳孔直径变化和瞳孔动力变化的临床观察
马子程1, 朱思泉1,()   
  1. 1. 100029 首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院眼科
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-05 出版日期:2023-12-28
  • 通信作者: 朱思泉
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(52273134)

Pupillary diameter change and dynamics in different refractive error groups after implantation of a collamer lens with a central hole without viscoelastic agent

Zicheng Ma1, Siquan Zhu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing AnZhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2023-12-05 Published:2023-12-28
  • Corresponding author: Siquan Zhu
引用本文:

马子程, 朱思泉. 不同屈光不正患者无黏弹剂辅助植入人工晶状体前后瞳孔直径变化和瞳孔动力变化的临床观察[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 326-331.

Zicheng Ma, Siquan Zhu. Pupillary diameter change and dynamics in different refractive error groups after implantation of a collamer lens with a central hole without viscoelastic agent[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 326-331.

目的

观察在无黏弹剂辅助下植入人工晶状体(ICL)后,不同屈光不正组患者的瞳孔直径和瞳孔动力变化。

方法

收集2019年8月至2021年1月期间于中国北京安贞医院眼科接受ICL V4c植入术的53例(104只眼)患者的病例资料。其中,男性11例(22只眼),女性42例(82只眼);年龄21~48岁,平均年龄(33.5±6.9)岁。根据患者术前等效球镜屈光度分为中低度近视眼组和高度近视眼组。检查所有患者的眼压、等效球镜、前房深度、中央角膜厚度、白到白直径及瞳孔直径。年龄、眼压、瞳孔直径及瞳孔动力变化等计量资料经过正态性检验,服从正态分布,以±s表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验,组内术前术后比较采用配对t检验;等效球镜不服从正态分布以中位数(四分位间距)表示,组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验,组内前后比较采用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验。性别以例和百分比表示,组间比较采用χ2检验。两组间术前术后瞳孔动力变化趋势的相关性采用Pearson或者Spearman相关性分析。

结果

在明光下,中低度近视眼组患者术前术后瞳孔直径分别为(4.16±0.60)mm和(3.99±0.65)mm,其差异有统计学意义(t=2.338,P<0.05);在暗光下,术前术后瞳孔直径分别为5.76(1.58)mm和5.48(1.13)mm,其差异无统计学意义(Z=1.873,P>0.05)。中低度近视眼组患者在术后在明光下瞳孔直径明显缩小。在明光下,高度近视眼组患者术前术后瞳孔直径分别为4.18(1.00)mm和4.17(1.08)mm;在暗光下,术前术后瞳孔直径分别为(5.81±0.84)mm和(5.86±0.89)mm。在明光下,两组患者术后瞳孔直径比较差异均有统计学意义(Z=-0.688,P<0.05);在暗光下,术后瞳孔直径比较差异有统计学意义(t=-0.02,P<0.05)。在明暗光下,中低度近视眼组患者术前术后瞳孔直径差分别为1.29(1.07)mm和(1.48±0.33)mm,其差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.111,P>0.05);高度近视眼组患者术前术后瞳孔直径差分别为(1.39±0.45)mm和(1.59±0.53)mm,其差异有统计学意义(t=-3.265,P<0.05);两组患者术前术后孔直径差值比较差异均无统计学意义(Z=-0.306,-0.721;P>0.05)。在明光下,中低度近视眼组患者术后与术前瞳孔直径差值为(-0.17±0.48)mm;暗光下为-0.09(0.25)mm,均呈缩小趋势,其差异无统计学意义(Z=0.000,P>0.05)。在明光下,高度近视眼组患者术后与术前瞳孔直径差值为-0.17(0.43)mm;在暗光下为(0.05±0.41)mm,其差异有统计学意义(Z=2.411,P<0.05),高度近视眼组患者暗光下术后瞳孔直径呈增大趋势。中低度近视眼组患者术前瞳孔动力与术后瞳孔动力经Spearman相关性分析,两者呈正相关性具有统计学意义(r=0.587,P<0.05)。高度近视眼组患者术前瞳孔动力与术后瞳孔动力经Pearson相关性分析,两者呈正相关性具有统计学意义(r=0.518,P<0.05)。

结论

在无黏弹剂辅助植入ICL V4c会使中低度和高度近视眼组患者术后1个月的瞳孔直径在明光下瞳孔明显减小;高度近视患者术后瞳孔在暗光下瞳孔直径变化更大,更容易影响视觉质量。

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes of pupil diameter and dynamics in patients with different ametropia after implantable collamer lens (ICL)V4c without viscoelastic agent.

Methods

A Total of 53 patients (104 eyes) who underwent ICL V4c implantation surgery in the Department of Ophthalmology, Anzhen Hospital in Beijing, China from August 2019 to January 2021 were collected. Among them, there were 11 males (22 eyes) and 42 females (84 eyes) with the average age of (33.5±6.9) years old (ranged from 21 to 48) years old. According to the preoperative equivalent spherical refractive index of patients, they are divided into moderate to low myopia group and high myopia group. The patient's intraocular pressure, equivalent spherical lens, anterior chamber depth, central corneal thickness, and white to white diameter, the pupil diameter before and one month after ICL V4c implantation were performed. Age, intraocular pressure, pupil diameter, and changes in pupil motility and other quantitative data have undergone normality tests and conformed to a normal distribution, were expressed as ±s, and compared by independent sample t-tests for inter group, and paired t-tests for intra group. Quantitative data with equivalent spherical mirrors that did not follow a normal distribution were expressed as median (interquartile range), and compared by Mann Whitney U test for inter group, and Wilcoxon signed rank test for intra group. Gender was expressed in examples and percentages, and compared by χ2 for inter group. The correlation analysis between preoperative and postoperative changes in pupil dynamics between two groups was performed using Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis.

Results

Under bright light, the preoperative and postoperative pupil diameters of patients in moderate to low degree myopia group were (4.16±0.60) mm and (3.99±0.65) mm, respectively, with a statistical significance difference between them (t=2.338, P<0.05). Under dark light, the preoperative and postoperative pupil diameters were 5.76 (1.58) mm and 5.48 (1.13) mm, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (Z=1.873, P>0.05). The pupil diameter of moderate to low degree myopia group significantly decreased under postoperative bright light. The preoperative and postoperative pupil diameter of the high myopia group was 4.18 (1.00) mm and 4.17 (1.08) mm, respectively. The differencewas statistically significant between the two groups (Z=2.978, P<0.05). The pupil diameters of the highly myopic group before and after surgery under bright light were 4.18 (1.00) mm and 4.17 (1.08) mm, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (t=-1.004, P>0.05). Under dark light, the preoperative and postoperative pupil diameters were (5.81±0.84) mm and (5.86±0.89) mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative pupil diameter between the two groups (Z=-1.510, -2.030; P>0.05). Under bright light, the difference in postoperative pupil diameter between the two groups was statistically significant (Z=-0.688, P<0.05). Under dark light, the postoperative pupil diameter was statistically significant (t=-0.02, P<0.05). The difference in pupil diameter dynamics before and after surgery was 1.29 (1.07) mm and (1.48±0.33) mm in the moderate to low degree myopia group, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between them (Z=-0.111, P>0.05). The difference in pupil dynamics before and after surgery in the high myopia group was (1.39±0.45) mm, and (1.59±0.53) mm, with a statistical significance difference (t=-3.265, P<0.05). The postoperative changes in pupil dynamics in the high myopia group were significantly larger than that of before surgery. The difference in pupil diameter between the two groups before and after surgery was not statistically significant (Z=-0.306, -0.721; P>0.05). Under bright light, the difference between the postoperative and preoperative pupil diameter in the medium to low degree myopia group was (-0.17±0.48) mm, and under dark light that was -0.09 (0.25) mm, both showing a decreasing trend, with no statistically significant difference (Z=0.000, P>0.05). Under bright light, the difference in postoperative and preoperative pupil diameter in the high myopia group was -0.17 (0.43) mm, and under dark that was (0.05±0.41) mm with statistically significant between them (Z=2.411, P<0.05). The high myopia group showed an increasing trend in postoperative pupil diameter under dark. Spearman correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between the preoperative and the postoperative pupil dynamics with statistical significance in low degree myopia group (r=0.587, P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between the preoperative and postoperative pupil dynamics, with a statistical significance difference between them (r=0.518, P<0.05).

Conclusions

The pupil diameter of the patients with moderate to low myopia and high myopia can be significantly reduced after ICL V4c implantation for one month without viscoviscoid-assisted implantation under bright light. In patients with high myopia, the pupil diameter changes more greatly under light and dark lighting after surgery, which is more likely to affect the visual quality.

图1 前房不使用黏弹剂植入人工晶状体V4c手术过程的彩色照相 图A示3.0 mm透明角膜切口,且切口密闭性良好,无需黏弹剂即可维持前房深度;图B示不使用黏弹剂将人工晶状体V4c植入前房;图C示在灌注液环抱水流下将人工晶状体V4c调整到后房,使用手柄式超乳注吸器调整人工晶状体位置,使其受力更均匀
表1 两组患者术前术后不同照明度下瞳孔直径的比较(±s,mm)
表2 两组术前与术后瞳孔动力的比较(±s,mm)
表3 两组患者不同照明度下术前术后瞳孔直径的变化趋势(±s,mm)
[1]
Kawamorita T, Shimizu K, Shoji N. Theoretical study on the need for laser iridotomy in an implantable collamer lens with a hole using computational fluid dynamics[J]. Eye (Lond), 2017, 31(5): 795-801.
[2]
Zhang H, Gong R, Zhang X, et al. Analysis of perioperative problems related to intraocular Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation[J]. Int Ophthalmol, 2022, 42(11): 3625-3641.
[3]
Garcia-De la RG, Olivo-Payne A, Serna-Ojeda JC,et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography angle and vault analysis after toric and non-toric implantable collamer lens V4c implantation in patients with high myopia[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2018, 102(4): 544-548.
[4]
Chen D, Zhao X, Chou Y, et al. Comparison of of visual outcomes and optical quality of femtosecond laser-assisted smile and visian implantable collamer lens (ICL V4c) implantation for moderate to high myopia: a meta-analysis[J]. J Refract Surg, 202238(6): 332-338.
[5]
Chun YS, Park IK, Lee HI, et al. Iris and trabecular meshwork pigment changes after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006, 32(9): 1452-1458.
[6]
Wannapanich T, Kasetsuwan N, Reinprayoon U. Intraocular implantable collamer lens with a central hole implantation: safety, efficacy, and patient outcomes[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2023, 17: 969-980.
[7]
Cerpa-Manito S, Sánchez-Trancón A, Torrado-Sierra O,et al, Biometric and ICL-related risk factors associated to sub-optimal vaults in eyes implanted with implantable collamer lenses[J]. Eye Vis (Lond), 2021, 8(1): 26.
[8]
Mastropasqua L, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, et al. Intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification and foldable silicone lens implantation using Healon GV[J]. Ophthalmologica, 1998, 212(5): 318-321.
[9]
Pan AP, Wen LJ, Shao X, et al. A novel ophthalmic viscosurgical device-free phakic intraocular lens implantation makes myopic surgery safer[J]. Eye Vis (Lond), 2020, 7: 18.
[10]
Qin Q, Bao L, He Z, et al. Pure ICL Implantation: a novel ophthalmic viscosurgical device-free method[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2021, PMID: 7363267.
[11]
Li D, Yang Y, Su C, et al. Pupil diameter changes in high myopes after collamer lens implantation[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2015, 92(12): 1161-1169.
[12]
Tian Y, Jiang HB, Jiang J, et al. Comparison of Implantable Collamer Lens Visian ICL V4 and ICL V4c for high myopia: A cohort study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(25): e7294.
[13]
Martínez-Plaza E, López-de-la Rosa A, López-Miguel A,et al. EVO/EVO+ visian implantable collamer lenses for the correction of myopia and myopia with astigmatism[J]. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2023, 20(2): 75-83.
[14]
Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Saito A, et al. Comparison of optical quality and intraocular scattering after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) implantation using the double-pass instrument[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(6): e66846.
[15]
Miao H, Chen X, Tian M, et al. Refractive outcomes and optical quality after implantation of posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lens with a central hole (ICL V4c)[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2018, 14, 18(1): 141.
[16]
Miao HM, Zhao F, Niu LL, et al. One-step viscoelastic agent technique for ICL V4c implantation for myopia[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2021, 14(9): 1359-1364.
[17]
Senthil S, Choudhari NS, Vaddavalli PK, et al. Etiology and management of raised intraocular pressure following posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in myopic eyes[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(11): e0165469.
[18]
Wei R, Li M, Aruma A, et al. Factors leading to realignment or exchange after implantable collamer lens implantation in 10 258 eyes[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2022, 48(10): 1190-1196.
[19]
Niruthisard D, Kasetsuwan N. Unilateral Urrets-Zavalia syndrome after Implantable Collamer Lens implantation: a case report and review of the literature[J]. J Med Case Rep, 2021, 15(1): 467.
[20]
Keuch RJ, Bleckmann H. Pupil diameter changes and reaction after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002, 28(12): 2170-2172.
[21]
Lim DH, Lyu IJ, Choi SH, et al. Risk factors associated with night vision disturbances after phakic intraocular lens implantation[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014, 157(1): 135-141.
[22]
Gonzalez-Lopez F, Bouza-Miguens C, Tejerina V, et al. Dynamic assessment of variations in pupil diameter using swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography after phakic collamer lens implantation[J]. Eye Vis (Lond), 2021, 8(1): 39.
[23]
Zhu Y, Yue Y, Zhu H, et al. Influence of refractive error on pupil diameters in highly myopic eyes with implantable collamer lenses[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2020, 30(6): 1328-1334.
[24]
Totsuka K, Ishikawa H, Kamiya K, et al. Pupil dynamics induced by light reflex after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation[J]. J Refract Surg, 2017, 33(10): 704-707.
[25]
Kato S, Shimizu K, Igarashi A. Vault changes caused by light-induced pupil constriction and accommodation in eyes with an implantable collamer lens[J]. Cornea, 2019, 38(2): 217-220.
[1] 崔莹, 方雨新, 周丹. 重视无囊膜支撑眼人工晶状体植入手术方式的选择及并发症的防范[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 257-262.
[2] 马丹, 李雅楠, 张丽, 苗金红, 李学民, 胡晋平. 不同人工晶状体装载方法对术中襻与光学部黏附影响的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 24-29.
[3] 万修华. 角膜移植术后白内障吸除联合张力环及后房型人工晶状体植入术[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 0-0.
[4] 万修华. 白内障标准化手术系列视频(5级全白核)[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 0-0.
[5] 王晓宇, 李亚新, 刘一昀, 耿嘉懿, 秦锐, 李炎城, 敖明昕, 刘德海, 齐虹. 不同设计多焦点人工晶状体植入后视觉质量差异的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 210-215.
[6] 万修华. 白内障标准化手术系列视频(4级核)[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 0-0.
[7] 熊天旭, 范玮, 万修华. 白内障患者老视矫正的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 52-56.
[8] 万修华. 白内障标准化手术系列视频(2级核)(视频)[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 0-0.
[9] 姚沁楠, 万修华. 有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术与角膜屈光手术治疗高度近视眼有效性、安全性及可预测性的Meta分析[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(06): 346-352.
[10] 王珏雪, 王开杰, 万修华. 人工晶状体相关并发症的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 311-315.
[11] 李猛, 王进达, 张景尚, 王开杰, 毛迎燕, 陈淑莹, 姚沁楠, 万修华. 六种人工晶状体计算公式计算先天性白内障患者人工晶状体度数准确性的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 211-216.
[12] 刘兆川, 宋旭东. 重视景深延长型人工晶状体在屈光性白内障手术中的应用[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 193-197.
[13] 陇悦, 范玮. 白内障手术中复曲面人工晶状体拓展运用的临床现状[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 109-113.
[14] 姜雅琴, 张敏, 马健利, 黄旭东, 宋丽平. 飞秒激光辅助超声乳化术后不同人工晶状体有效位置和轴向位移量变化的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 76-81.
[15] 何海龙, 刘振宇, 周春媛, 张立平, 王进达, 万修华. 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜切除术与有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术矫正高度近视眼疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 22-28.
阅读次数
全文


摘要