白内障术后早期患者配戴绷带镜对泪膜质量及其动态变化影响的临床研究

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2022.04.003

目的

观察白内障患者术后早期配戴绷带镜对泪膜质量及动态变化的影响。

方法

选择2020年2月至2020年5月就诊于潍坊眼科医院晶状体病区诊断为年龄相关性白内障的患者50例(60只眼)作为研究对象。其中，男性25例(31只眼)，女性25例(29只眼)；年龄48~85岁，平均年龄(65.6±10.0)岁。全部患者行超声乳化白内障吸除联合后方房型人工晶状体植入术治疗。术后，部分患者配戴绷带镜。根据患者术后是否配戴绷带镜，将所有患者按照随机数字表法分为绷带镜组和非绷带镜组，各25例(30只眼)。检测并记录所有患者术前、术后1 d、术后1周及1个月后的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)、Schirmer Ⅱ试验及欧卡斯双通道系统视觉质量。患者的年龄、BCVA、TBUT、Schirmer Ⅱ、调制传递函数截止频率(MTF cut off)、客观视力(OVA)、基础客观散射指数(OSI)及泪膜客观散射指数(TF－OSI)结果符合正态分布，以(±s)表示，各时间点的组间比较采用两因素重复测量方差分析，当差异有统计学意义时，进一步采用SNK法进行两两比较。

结果

绷带镜组患者术前、术后1 d、术后1周及术后1个月的最小分辨角度对数视力(logMAR)BCVA分别为(0.60±0.33)、(0.09±0.11)、(0.09±0.13)及(－0.01±0.05)；非绷带镜组分别为(0.64±0.31)、(0.03±0.06)、(－0.01±0.06)及(－0.02±0.05)。经单因素方差分析，各时间点两组logMAR BCVA结果比较的差异均有统计学意义(t＝19.478，22.600；P<0.05)。绷带镜组患者术前、术后1周及术后1个月的TBUT分别为(9.213±1.928)s、(7.214±1.477)s及(9.643±2.170)s；非绷带镜组患者分别为(10.500±2.175)s、(5.714±1.489)s及(9.071±1.730)s。各时间点两组TBUT比较的差异均有统计学意义(t＝6.651，24.183；P<0.05)。绷带镜组患者术前、术后1周及术后1个月的Schirmer Ⅱ检测值分别为(16.928±3.771)mm、(14.643±4.181)mm及(14.143±3.231)mm；非绷带镜组患者分别为(16.500±3.299)mm、(14.143±2.685)mm及(14.714±1.267)mm。绷带镜组各时间点Schirmer Ⅱ检测值比较的差异有统计学意义(t＝7.501，P<0.05)。绷带镜组患者术前、术后1 d、术后1周及术后1个月的TF－OSI分别为(0.752±1.137)、(0.909±1.918)、(1.073±0.618)及(0.865±0.812)；OSI分别为(8.657±6.363)、(2.200±1.202)、(1.721±1.147)、(1.243±0.472)；非绷带镜组患者TF－OSI分别为(0.625±0.788)、(1.225±0.605)、(1.166±0.891)及(1.063±0.793)；OSI分别为(9.107±7.117)、(1.450±0.664)、(1.321±0.891)及(1.100±0.679)。术后1 d，两组患者TF－OSI和OSI比较的差异均有统计学意义(t＝－2.440，2.043；P<0.05)。绷带镜组患者术前、术后1 d、术后1周及术后1个月的MTF cut off分别为(9.914±6.524)c/deg、(33.114±11.634)c/deg、(27.048±12.795)c/deg及(33.116±10.373)c/deg，OVA分别为(0.335±0.231)、(1.121±0.289)、(0.993±0.410)及(1.193±0.350)；非绷带镜组患者MTF cut off分别为(7.734±5.511)c/deg、(32.515±8.709)c/deg、(34.618±9.159)c/deg及(33.892±9.666)c/deg；OVA分别为(0.401±0.497)、(0.401±0.497)、(1.242±0.279)及(1.214±0.303)。术后1 d，两组患者OVA比较的差异有统计学意义(t＝－2.361，P<0.05)。经两因素重复测量方差分析，两组患者各时间点logMAR BCVA、TBUT、TF－OSI、OSI、MTF cut off及OVA组间比较均有统计学意义(F＝3.037，2.172，4.899，31.957，0.103，4.054，7.775；P<0.05)；Schirmer Ⅱ检测值组间比较无统计学意义(F＝0.261，P>0.05)；logMAR BCVA、TBUT、Schirmer Ⅱ、TF－OSI、OSI、MTF cut off及OVA组内比较均有统计学意义(F＝87.675，24.843，4.899，15.735，1.854，38.563，30.491；P<0.05)；交互作用无统计学意义(F＝0.959，5.424，0.041，0.751，0.15，2.043，1.556；P>0.05)。

结论

超声乳化白内障吸除联合后方房型人工晶状体植入术后早期配戴绷带镜有利于稳定泪膜，且不会影响患者的视觉质量。

关键词: 白内障, 泪膜质量, 绷带镜, 视觉质量, 舒适度

Objective

To observe the effect of wearing bandage lens on the quality and dynamic change of tear film in early postoperative cataract patients.

Methods

From February 2020 to May 2020, 50 patients (60 eyes) diagnosed with age-related cataract in the Lens Wards of Weifang Eye Hospital were selected. There were 25 males (31 eyes) and 25 females (29 eyes) with the average age of (65.6±10.0) years (ranged from 48 to 85 years). All patients underwent phacoemulsification combined with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. After surgery, some patients wore bandage lens. According to the patients wore bandage lens or not after surgery, they were divided into bandage group and non-bandage group according to the random number table method, 25 cases (30 eyes) for each group. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), tear film rupture time (TBUT), Schirmer Ⅱ test and visual quality of orca dual-channel system of all patients were recorded before operation, after operation for 1 day, 1 week and 1 month. The results of age, BCVA, TBUT, Schirmer Ⅱ, modulation transfer function (MTF) cut off, objective visual acuity (OVA), basic objective scattering index (OSI), and tear film objective scattering index (TF-OSI) were in accordance with normal distribution and expressed as (±s). Two-factor repeated measures ANOVA was used for comparison between groups at each time point. When the difference was statistically significant, SNK method was further used for pairwise comparison.

Results

The logarithm of minimal angel resolutuion vision (logMAR) BCVA of the bandage group before operation, after operation for 1 day, 1 week and 1 month were (0.60±0.33), (0.09±0.11), (0.09±0.13) and (-0.01±0.05), respectively; for the non-bandage group were (0.64±0.31), (0.03±0.06), (-0.01±0.06) and (-0.02±0.05), respectively. There were significant differences in logMRA BCVA between two groups at different time points through ANOVA (t=19.478, 22.600; P<0.05). The TBUT of patients in the bandage group before operation, after operation for 1 week and 1 month were (9.213±1.928)s, (7.214±1.477)s and (9.643±2.170)s, respectively; for the non-bandage group were (10.500±2.175)s, (5.714±1.489)s and (9.071±1.730)s, respectively. There were significant differences in TBUT between the two groups at different time points (t=6.651, 24.183; P<0.05). The Schirmer Ⅱ of bandage group were (16.928±3.771) mm, (14.643±4.181) mm and (14.143±3.231) mm before operation, after operation for 1 week and 1 month , respectively; for the non-bandage group were (16.500±3.299) mm, (14.143±2.685) mm and (14.714±1.267) mm, respectively. There were significant differences in Schirmer Ⅱof bandage group at different time points (t=7.501, P<0.05). In the bandage group, the TF-OSI before operation, after operation for 1 day, 1 week and 1 month were (0.752±1.137), (0.909±1.918), (1.073±0.618) and (0.865±0.812), respectively; OSI were (8.657±6.363), (2.200±1.202), (1.721±1.147) and (1.243±0.472), respectively. In the non-bandage group, TF-OSI were (0.625±0.788), (1.225±0.605), (1.166±0.891) and (1.063±0.793), respectively; OSI were (9.107±7.117), (1.450±0.664), (1.321±0.891) and (1.100±0.679), respectively. There were not statistically significant differences in TF-OSI and OSI between two groups after operation for 1 day (t=-2.440, 2.043; P<0.05). MTF cut of patients in bandage group before operation, after operation for 1 day, 1 week and 1 month were (9.914±6.524)c/deg, (33.114±11.634)c/deg, (27.048±12.795)c/deg and (33.116±10.373)c/deg, respectively; OVA were (0.335±0.231), (1.121±0.289), (0.993±0.410) and (1.193±0.350), respectively. MTF cut off of the non-bandage group were (7.734±5.511)c/deg, (32.515±8.709)c/deg, (34.618±9.159)c/deg and (33.892±9.666)c/deg, respectively; OVA were (0.401±0.497), (0.401±0.497), (1.242±0.279) and (1.214±0.303), respectively. There was a significant difference in OVA between two groups after operation for 1 day (t=-2.361, P<0.05). After two-factor repeated measurement ANOVA, there were statistically significant differences in logMAR BCVA, TBUT, TF-OSI, OSI, MTF cut off and OVA between two groups at each time point (F=3.037, 2.172, 4.899, 31.957, 0.103, 4.054, 7.775; P<0.05), excepts Schirmer Ⅱ groups (F=0.261, P>0.05). The difference among logMAR BCVA, TBUT, TF-OSI, OSI, MTF cut off and OVA within groups was statistically significant (F=87.675, 24.843, 4.899, 15.735, 1.854, 38.563, 30.491; P<0.05), the interaction among them with non-significant difference (F=0.959, 5.424, 0.041, 0.751, 0.15, 2.043, 1.556; P>0.05).

Conclusions

Early wearing of bandage lens after phacoemulsification combined with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation is beneficial to stabilize the tear film and does not affect the visual quality of patients.

Key words: Cataract, Tear film quality, Bandage lens, Visual quality, Comfort

表1 两组患者各时间点各检查结果的比较(±s)

组别	眼数(只)	最佳矫正视力(以最小分辨角度对数视力表示)				泪膜破裂时间(s)
组别	眼数(只)	术前	术后1 d	术后1周	术后1个月	术前	术后1周	术后1个月
绷带镜组	30	0.64±0.31	0.03±0.06^a	－0.01±0.06^ab	－0.02±0.05^ab	9.213±1.928	7.214±1.477^a	9.643±2.170^b
非绷带镜组	30	0.60±0.33	0.09±0.11^a	0.09±0.13^a	－0.01±0.05^abc	10.500±2.175	5.714±1.489^a	9.071±1.730^b
t值		－0.308	1.963	2.609	0.317	－1.655	2.675	2.118
P值		>0.05	>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05	<0.05	<0.05
组别	眼数(只)	Schirmer Ⅱ(mm)			泪膜客观散射指数
组别	眼数(只)	术前	术后1周	术后1个月	术前	术后1 d	术后1周	术后1个月
绷带镜组	30	16.928±3.771	14.643±4.181^a	14.143±3.231^a	0.752±1.137	0.909±1.918^a	1.073±0.618^b	0.865±0.812^ac
非绷带镜组	30	16.500±3.299	14.143±2.685	14.714±1.267	0.625±0.788	1.225±0.605^a	1.166±0.891^a	1.063±0.793^a
t值		0.320	0.377	0.137	－0.897	2.440	1.221	0.807
P值		>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05
组别	眼数(只)	基础客观散射指数				调制传递函数截止频率(c/deg)
组别	眼数(只)	术前	术后1 d	术后1周	术后1个月	术前	术后1 d
绷带镜组	30	8.657±6.363	2.200±1.202^a	1.721±1.147^a	1.243±0.472^ac	9.914±6.524	33.114±11.634^a
非绷带镜组	30	9.107±7.117	1.450±0.664^a	1.321±0.891^a	1.100±0.679^a	7.734±5.511	32.515± 8.709^a
t值		－0.176	2.043	1.030	0.646	0.955	－2.163
P值		>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05
组别	眼数(只)	调制传递函数截止频率(c/deg)		客观视力
组别	眼数(只)	术后1周	术后1个月	术前	术后1 d	术后1周	术后1个月
绷带镜组	30	27.048±12.795^a	33.116±10.373^ab	0.335±0.231	1.121±0.289^a	0.993±0.410^a	1.193±0.350^abc
非绷带镜组	30	34.618± 9.159^a	33.892± 9.666^a	0.401±0.497	0.814±0.392^a	1.242±0.279^a	1.214±0.303^a
t值		－1.800	－1.800	－0.449	－2.361	－2.638	－0.173
P值		>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05

表1 两组患者各时间点各检查结果的比较(±s)

组别	眼数(只)	最佳矫正视力(以最小分辨角度对数视力表示)				泪膜破裂时间(s)
组别	眼数(只)	术前	术后1 d	术后1周	术后1个月	术前	术后1周	术后1个月
绷带镜组	30	0.64±0.31	0.03±0.06^a	－0.01±0.06^ab	－0.02±0.05^ab	9.213±1.928	7.214±1.477^a	9.643±2.170^b
非绷带镜组	30	0.60±0.33	0.09±0.11^a	0.09±0.13^a	－0.01±0.05^abc	10.500±2.175	5.714±1.489^a	9.071±1.730^b
t值		－0.308	1.963	2.609	0.317	－1.655	2.675	2.118
P值		>0.05	>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05	<0.05	<0.05
组别	眼数(只)	Schirmer Ⅱ(mm)			泪膜客观散射指数
组别	眼数(只)	术前	术后1周	术后1个月	术前	术后1 d	术后1周	术后1个月
绷带镜组	30	16.928±3.771	14.643±4.181^a	14.143±3.231^a	0.752±1.137	0.909±1.918^a	1.073±0.618^b	0.865±0.812^ac
非绷带镜组	30	16.500±3.299	14.143±2.685	14.714±1.267	0.625±0.788	1.225±0.605^a	1.166±0.891^a	1.063±0.793^a
t值		0.320	0.377	0.137	－0.897	2.440	1.221	0.807
P值		>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05
组别	眼数(只)	基础客观散射指数				调制传递函数截止频率(c/deg)
组别	眼数(只)	术前	术后1 d	术后1周	术后1个月	术前	术后1 d
绷带镜组	30	8.657±6.363	2.200±1.202^a	1.721±1.147^a	1.243±0.472^ac	9.914±6.524	33.114±11.634^a
非绷带镜组	30	9.107±7.117	1.450±0.664^a	1.321±0.891^a	1.100±0.679^a	7.734±5.511	32.515± 8.709^a
t值		－0.176	2.043	1.030	0.646	0.955	－2.163
P值		>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05
组别	眼数(只)	调制传递函数截止频率(c/deg)		客观视力
组别	眼数(只)	术后1周	术后1个月	术前	术后1 d	术后1周	术后1个月
绷带镜组	30	27.048±12.795^a	33.116±10.373^ab	0.335±0.231	1.121±0.289^a	0.993±0.410^a	1.193±0.350^abc
非绷带镜组	30	34.618± 9.159^a	33.892± 9.666^a	0.401±0.497	0.814±0.392^a	1.242±0.279^a	1.214±0.303^a
t值		－1.800	－1.800	－0.449	－2.361	－2.638	－0.173
P值		>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05

[1]	Benito A, Pérez GM, Mirabet S, et al. Objective optical assessment of tear－film quality dynamics in normal and mildly symptomatic dry eyes[J]. J Refract Surg, 2011, 37(8): 1481－1487.
[2]	Khalifa YM, Mifflin MD. Keratitis and corneal melt with ketorolactromethamine after conductive keratoplasty[J]. Cornea, 2011, 30: 477－478.
[3]	张瑞帆，吴峥峥. 超声乳化术后早期应用硅水凝胶角膜接触镜的临床效果观察[J]．眼科新进展，2014，34(1)：78－81.
[4]	王忠叶，马山，张敏，等. 超声乳化白内障吸除联合肝素修饰人工晶状体植入术后炎症反应的临床观察[J/CD]．中华眼科医学杂志(电子版)，2020，10(1)：33－38.
[5]	苏远东，梁庆丰，王宁利，等. 泪膜客观散射指数对干眼诊断价值的研究[J]. 中华眼科杂志，2017，53(9)：668－674.
[6]	孙龙格，马忠旭，马林等. 基于OQAS－Ⅱ视觉质量参数对轻中度干眼泪膜稳定性动态变化的评估[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志，2017，4(35)：344－348.
[7]	Habay T, Majzoub S, Perrault O, et al. Objective assessment of the functional impact of dry eye severity on the quality of vision by double－pass aberrometry[J]. J Fr Ophtalmol, 2014, 37(3): 188－194.
[8]	Khanal S, Tomlinson A, Esakowitz L, et al. Changes in corneal sensitivity and tear physiology after phacoemulsification[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2008, 28(2): 127－134.
[9]	Sahu PK, Das GK, Malik A, et al. Dry eye following phacoemulsification surgery and its relation to associated intraoperative risk factors[J]. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol, 2015, 22: 472－427.
[10]	Oh T, Jung Y, Chang D, et al. Changes in the tear film and ocular surface after cataract surgery[J]. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 2012, 56(2): 113－118.
[11]	Cho YK, Kim MS. Dry eye after cataract surgery and associated intraoperative risk factors[J]. Korean J Ophthalmol , 2009, 23(2): 65－73.
[12]	Li XM, Hu L, Hu J, et al.Investigation of dry eye disease and analysis of the pathogenic factors in patients after cataract surgery[J]. Cornea, 2007, 26(9): S16－S20.
[13]	Walker TD. Benzalkonium toxicity[J]. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2004, 32(6): 656－657.
[14]	Kasetsuwan N, Satitpitakul V, Changul T, et al. Incidence and pattern of dry eye after cataract surgery[J]. PloS One, 2013, 8(11): e78657.
[15]	Park DH, Chung JK, Seo DR, et al. Clinical effects and safety of 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution for patients with dry eye after cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2016, 163: 122－131.
[16]	Peter B, Bill L, Sally D, et al. Long－term clinical results：3 years of up to 30－night continuous wear of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel and daily wear of low－Dk/t hydrogellenses[J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2007, 33(2): 74－80.
[17]	中国健康管理协会接触镜安全监控与视觉健康专业委员会. 中国治疗用绷带镜临床应用专家共识[J]．中华眼科杂志，2019，55(6)：405－412.
[18]	Ngamjit K，Vannarut S，Theerapa C, et al.Incidence and pattem of dry eye after cataract surgery[J]．PloS One, 2013, 8(11): e78657.
[19]	Song H, Li Y, Zhang Y, et al. Bandage lenses in the posto－perative care for cataract surgery patients: a substitute for eye patch? [J]. J Ophthalmol, 2018: 1493967.
[20]	Montes－Mico R, Cervino A, Ferrer－Blasco T, et al. Optical quality of the interface air－tear film following instillation of eye drops in dry eyes[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36: 935－940.
[21]	Montes－Mico R, Alio JL, Charman WN. Dynamic changes in the tear film in dry eyes[J]．Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005, 46: 1615－1619.
[22]	邱煜焱，康刚劲，徐曼华，等. 白内障超声乳化术后泪膜变化与视觉质量相关性研究[J]. 眼科新进展，2020，40(2)：148－152.
[23]	Fogt JS, Kowalski MJ, King－Smith PE, et al.Tear lipid layer thickness with eye drops in meibomian gland dysfunction[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2016, 10: 2237－2243.

[1]	陈川, 罗红. 胎儿先天性白内障的超声影像学特征及预后分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 548-552.
[2]	孙秀丽, 刘振宇, 唐婷婷, 张景尚, 李猛, 毛迎燕, 万修华. 关注后发性白内障的发病机制及防控措施[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 193-198.
[3]	陈灏楠, 肖伟. 透明角膜切口对白内障术后角膜散光的影响及其精准测量的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 172-176.
[4]	方蕊, 宋旭东. 非编码核糖核酸与白内障相关的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 94-98.
[5]	郝壮, 马济远, 何梦梅, 李兴育, 陆新婷, 武静, 周健. 迟发性囊袋阻滞综合征临床特征、治疗方法及其疗效的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 70-75.
[6]	刘兆川, 宋旭东. 重视虹膜松弛综合征围手术期的防治[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 1-5.
[7]	万修华. 角膜移植术后白内障吸除联合张力环及后房型人工晶状体植入术[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 0-.
[8]	万修华. 白内障标准化手术系列视频（5级全白核）[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 0-.
[9]	王震宇, 张维嘉, 胡曼, 高传文, 石砚, 王怀洲. 微导管辅助360°小梁切开术治疗先天性白内障术后继发青光眼的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 275-280.
[10]	王晓宇, 李亚新, 刘一昀, 耿嘉懿, 秦锐, 李炎城, 敖明昕, 刘德海, 齐虹. 不同设计多焦点人工晶状体植入后视觉质量差异的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 210-215.
[11]	王子杨, 杨文利. 关注屈光性白内障手术时代的精准眼球生物测量[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 193-197.
[12]	蒋晨, 万新娟, 谢小东, 丁琳. 糖化血红蛋白、硫氧还蛋白、硫氧还蛋白互作蛋白与皮质性白内障的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(09): 914-918.
[13]	付鹏, 沈念, 黄艳玲, 杨水平, 万小波. 外伤性晶状体脱位合并周边隐匿性视网膜病变的临床特征及预后分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 536-540.
[14]	彭丽, 于娜, 吴雪莲. 老年白内障患者超声乳化术后眼部疼痛原因分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 49-51.
[15]	刘天龙. 改良型超声乳化手术治疗高度近视合并白内障疗效观察[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 30-33.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

The effect of silica wearing bandage lens on the quality and dynamic changes of tear film in early postoperative cataract patients

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

The effect of silica wearing bandage lens on the quality and dynamic changes of tear film in early postoperative cataract patients