切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 7 -13. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2019.01.002

论著

单纯超声乳化白内障吸除联合后房型人工晶状体植入术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼疗效的临床观察
王芳1, 王雪1, 吴志鸿1,(), 汪东生2   
  1. 1. 100039 北京,武警总医院眼科
    2. 100730 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-20 出版日期:2019-02-28
  • 通信作者: 吴志鸿
  • 基金资助:
    国家卫计委卫生行业科研专项基金(201002019)

Clinical observation the curative effect of phacoemulsification combined with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation for primary angle-closure glaucoma

Fang Wang1, Xue Wang1, Zhihong Wu1,(), Dongsheng Wang2   

  1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Police General Hospital of China, Beijing 100039, China
    2. Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2019-01-20 Published:2019-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Zhihong Wu
引用本文:

王芳, 王雪, 吴志鸿, 汪东生. 单纯超声乳化白内障吸除联合后房型人工晶状体植入术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼疗效的临床观察[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(01): 7-13.

Fang Wang, Xue Wang, Zhihong Wu, Dongsheng Wang. Clinical observation the curative effect of phacoemulsification combined with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation for primary angle-closure glaucoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2019, 09(01): 7-13.

目的

观察单纯超声乳化白内障吸除联合后房型人工晶状体植入术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼的疗效。

方法

收集2013年8月至2015年1月武警总医院眼科收治的原发性闭角型青光眼合并白内障患者48例(60只眼)进行研究。其中,男性20例(28只眼),女性28例(32只眼)。年龄在57~82岁,平均年龄为(69.20±7.32)岁。按照起病缓急,将急性闭角型青光眼者32例(34只眼)分为A1组;将慢性闭角型青光眼者16例(26只眼)分为A2组。按照前房角粘连范围,将<180°者22例(28只眼)分为B1组;将≥180°者26例(32只眼)分为B2组。按照两种局部降压药物是否能控制眼压在正常范围,将控制良好者18例(21只眼)分为C1组;将控制不佳者30例(39只眼)分为C2组。所有患者均行单纯超声乳化白内障吸除联合后房型人工晶状体植入术。术后3个月对受试者进行随访,记录眼压、最佳矫正视力、中央前房深度、前房角开放距离、前房角开放度数、前房角粘连范围、术中术后并发症及药物使用情况。对所得数据采用独立样本t检验进行组间比较。

结果

A1组和A2组术前眼压分别为(30.52±8.29)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)和(23.91±8.12)mmHg,术后3个月眼压分别为(12.3±4.21)mmHg和(17.7±4.13)mmHg,经独立样本t检验,其差异具有统计学意义(t=3.09,4.96;P<0.05);B1组和B2组术前眼压分别为(20.8±4.45)mmHg和(32.59±8.16)mmHg,术后3个月眼压分别为(14.04±3.19)mmHg和(16.38±4.80)mmHg,经独立样本t检验,其差异具有统计学意义(t=-6.81,2.19;P<0.05);C1组和C2组术前眼压分别为(19.8±1.05)mmHg和(34.59±7.26)mmHg,术后3个月眼压分别为(12.04±2.19)mmHg和(18.98±2.65)mmHg,经独立样本t检验,其差异具有统计学意义(t=9.25,-10.25;P<0.05);所有受试者,术前中央前房深度、前房角开放距离、前房角开放度数分别为(2.01±0.31)mm、(0.14±0.05)mm及(15.6±5.36)mm;术后3个月中央前房深度、前房角开放距离、前房角开放度数分别(3.60±0.15)mm、(0.34±0.04)mm及(34.3±3.42)mm。术后3个月与术前相比,中央前房加深,前房角开放距离增大、开放度数增加,差异有统计学意义(t=-35.76,-24.19,-22.78;P<0.05)。术后3个月与术前相比,前房角粘连范围差异有统计学意义(χ2=33.39,P<0.05)。术后3个月与术前相比,最佳矫正视力差异有统计学意义(χ2=16.88;P<0.05)。术后随访3个月,A1、A2、B1、B2、C1及C2组患者的眼压控制率分别为97%、88%、96%、91%、100%及91%。此外,术前眼压小于30 mmHg的原发性闭角型青光眼患者,术后眼压下降程度与术前眼压以及晶体拱高之间存在着一定的相关性,相应的函数关系为Y=-0.854+0.813X1-1.648X2 (X1为术前眼压,X2为晶体拱高)。

结论

单纯超声乳化白内障吸除联合后房型人工晶状体植入术能有效降低术前应用两种或两种以内降眼压药物能有效控制眼压或前房角粘连范围<180°的原发性闭角型青光眼患者的眼压。对于术前眼压小于30 mmHg的原发性闭角型青光眼患者,术后眼压下降程度与术前眼压以及晶状体拱高密切相关。单纯超声乳化白内障吸除联合后房型人工晶状体植入术可使原发性闭角型青光眼患者前房加深、前房角开放、最佳矫正视力提高。

Objective

The aim of this study was to observe the clinical effect of phacoemulsification combined with posterior chamberintraocularlens implantation in primary angle closure glaucoma.

Methods

A total of 48 cases (60 eyes) with primary angle closure glaucoma and cataract admitted to the ophthalmology department of the General Hospital of Armed Police from August 2013 to January 2015 were studied. Among them, there were 20 males (28 eyes) and 28 females (32 eyes). The age ranged from 57 to 82 years, with an average age of (69.20±7.32) years. Patients with acute angle-closure glaucoma (34 eyes) were divided into A1 group and chronic angle-closure glaucoma (26 eyes) into A2 group according to the onset time. According to the range of angle adhesion, 28 eyes were divided into B1 group and 32 eyes were divided into B2 group. According to whether two local antihypertensive drugs can control (intraocular pressure, IOP) in normal range, 21 eyes with good control were divided into C1 group and 39 eyes with poor control were divided into C2 group. All patients underwent phacoemulsification combined with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Three months after operation, the subjects were followed up to record intraocular pressure, best corrected visual acuity, central anterior chamber depth, angle opening distance, angle opening degree, angle adhesion range, intraoperative and postoperative complications and drug use. The data were compared by independent sample t test.

Results

The intraocular pressure of group A1 and group A2 were (30.52±8.29) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) and (23.91±8.12) mmHg respectively before operation, and (12.3±4.21) mmHg and (17.7±4.13) mmHg 3 months after operation. After independent sample t test, the difference was statistically significant (t=3.09, 4.96; P<0.05); preoperative intraocular pressure of group B1 and group B2 were (20.8±4.45) mmHg and (32.59±8.16) mmHg, respectively, and intraocular pressure of group B1 and group B2 were (14.04±3.19) mmHg and (16.38±4.80) mmHg three months after operation. After independent sample t test, the difference was statistically significant (t=-6.81, 2.19; P<0.05); preoperative intraocular pressure in C1 group and C2 group were (19.8±1.05) mmHg and (34.59±7.26) mmHg respectively, and intraocular pressure in 3 months after operation were (12.04±2.19) mmHg and (18.98±2.65) mmHg respectively. The difference was statistically significant (t=9.25, - 10.25; P<0.05) by independent sample t test. The preoperative central anterior chamber depth, angle opening distance and angle opening degree were (2.01±0.31) mm, (0.14±0.05) mm and (15.6±5.36) mm for all subjects, respectively. The central anterior chamber depth, angle opening distance and angle opening degree were (3.60±0.15) mm, (0.34±0.04) mm and (34.3±3.42) mm, respectively three months after operation. Three months after operation, the central anterior chamber deepened, the angle opened distance increased and the degree of opening increased. The difference was statistically significant (t=-35.76, -24.19, -22.78; P<0.05). There was a significant difference in the angle adhesion range between the three months after operation and before operation (χ2 =33.39, P<0.05). There was significant difference in the best corrected visual acuity (χ2 =16.88; P<0.05) between 3 months after operation and before operation. After 3 months follow-up, the IOP control rates of A1, A2, B1, B2, C1 and C2 groups were 97%, 88%, 96%, 91%, 100% and 91%, respectively. In addition, in patients with primary angle closure glaucoma whose intraocular pressure was less than 30 mmHg before surgery, there is a certain correlation between the degree of intraocular pressure decline after surgery and preoperative intraocular pressure and lens arch height. The corresponding functional relationship is Y=-0.854+ 0.813X1-1.648X2 (X1 is preoperative intraocular pressure, X2 is lens arch height).

Conclusions

Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation could reduce the IOP of primary angle-closure glaucoma(PACG) patients with goniosynechia <180° and with whose two kinds of drugscould get IOP well controlled.Preoperative IOP and lens vault are significant correlated with the degree of IOP decline, for PACG patients with preoperative IOP of less than 30 mmHg. What's more, phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation can improve the anterior chamber, angle and visual acuity of PACG.

表1 手术前后A1与A2组患者眼压的比较(±s ,mmHg)
表2 手术前后B1与B2组患者眼压的比较(±s ,mmHg)
表3 手术前后C1与C2组患者眼压的比较(±s ,mmHg)
表4 中央前房深度、前房角开放距离及前房角开放度数术前与术后的比较(±s )
表5 全部患者前房角粘连范围术前与术后的比较
表6 术前与术后全部患者最佳矫正视力的比较
[1]
Stevens GA, White RA, Flaxman SR, et a1. Global prevalence of vision impairment and blindness: magnitude and temporal trends, 1990-2010[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013, 120(12): 2377-2384.
[2]
Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2006, 90(3): 262-267.
[3]
王芳. 超声乳化人工晶状体植入治疗原发性闭角型青光眼合并白内障研究进展[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志201432(8),930-933.
[4]
葛坚,郭彦,刘奕志,等. 超声乳化白内障吸除术治疗闭角型青光眼的初步临床观察[J].中华眼科杂志200137(5):355-358.
[5]
王宁利. 目前青光眼防治工作中存在的问题与解决对策[J]. 中华眼科杂志20022(38):705-708.
[6]
乔利亚,梁远波,王宁利,等. 晶状体摘除术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼合并白内障的循证评价[J]. 眼科200514(2):93-98.
[7]
宋旭东,王宁利,唐广贤,等. 超声乳化手术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼合并白内障的多中心试验[J]. 医学研究杂志201039(3):17-22.
[8]
刘杏,李媚. 眼前节相干光断层扫描在原发性闭角型青光眼诊治中的应用[J]. 眼科2013(1):1-5.
[9]
Lam DS, Leung DY, Tham CC, etal. Randomized trial of early phacoemulsification versus peripheral to prevent intraocular pressure rise after acute primary angle closure[J]. Ophthalmology, 2008, 115(7): 1134-1140.
[10]
梁远波,王宁利,乔利亚,等. 对单纯白内障手术治疗合并白内障的闭角型青光眼的疗效评价[J]. 中华眼科杂志200440(11):723-725.
[11]
Teekhasaenee C, Ritch R. Combined phacoemulsmcation and goniosynechialysis for uncontrolled chronic angle-closure glaucoma after acute angle-closure glaucoma[J]. Ophthalmolgy, 1999, 106(4): 669-674.
[12]
贾乃伟,丁亚丽,李兵,等. 超声乳化人工晶体植入联合小梁切除术治疗青光眼合并白内障临床观察[J]. 中国实用医药200927(4):17-29.
[13]
Wang N, Chintala SK, Fini ME, et a1. Ultrasound activates the TM ELAM-1/IL-1/NF-kappaBresponse:a potential mechanism for intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2003, 44(5): 1977-1981.
[14]
罗谦,吴峥峥,程依琏. 超声乳化白内障摘除治疗闭角型青光眼[J]. 四川医学2007,(12):1412-1413.
[15]
Ritch R, Liebmann J, Tello C. A construct for understanding angle-closure glaucoma:the role of ultrasound biomicroscopy[J]. Ophthalmology Clinics of North America, 1995, 8(2): 281-293.
[16]
Tham CC, Kwong YY, Baig N, etal. Phacoemulsi?cation versus Trabeculectomy in Medically Uncontrolled Chronic Angle-Closure Glaucoma without Cataract[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013, 120(1): 62-67.
[17]
Tham CC, Kwong YY, Leung DY, etal. Phacoemulsification versus combined phacotrabeculectomy in medically controlled chronic angle closure glaucoma with cataract[J]. Ophthalmology, 2008, 115(12); 2167-2173.
[18]
Kurimoto Y, Park M, Sakaue H, et al. Changes in the Anterior Chamber Configuration After Small-Incision Cataract Surgery With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation[J]. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1997, 124(6):775-780.
[19]
丘亮辉,谢依明,赖江峰. 超声乳化白内障摘除术治疗急性闭角型青光眼[J]. 海南大学学报(自然科学版)200523(2):130-132.
[20]
裴锦云,刘文,陈惠娥. 等. 改良小梁切除联合超声乳化白内障吸除术治疗青光眼合并白内障[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志200321(12):929-930.
[21]
辛成明,刘霞,凡长春. 超声乳化人工晶体植入联合遂道内小梁切除术[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志200422(5):366-367.
[22]
赵军民,喻增华. 超声乳化白内障吸除联合巩膜遂道瓣小梁切除术[J]. 中华眼科杂志200339(3):181-182.
[23]
Liu CJ, Cheng CY, Ko YC, et al. Determinants of long-term intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification in primary angle-closure glaucoma[J]. J Glaucoma, 2011, 20(9): 566-570.
[24]
Issa SA, Pacheco J, Mahmood U, et al. A novel index for predicting intraocular pressure following cataract surgery[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2005, 89(5): 543-546.
[25]
Issa SA, Pacheco J, Mahmood U, et al. A novel index for predicting intraocular pressure following cataract surgery[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2005, 89(5): 543-546.
[26]
Ge J, Zhang X. angle-closure glaucoma: Surgical management of acute angle-closure glaucoma[M]// Pearls of Glaucoma Management. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2010: 102-103.
[27]
姚克,王玮,吴炜,等. 同轴1.8mm微切口超声乳化白内障手术临床效果评价[J]. 中华眼科杂志201147(10):903-907.
[28]
Tarongoy P, Ho CL, Walton DS. Angle-closure Glaucoma: The Role of the Lens in the Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Treatment[J]. Survey of Ophthalmology, 2009, 54(2): 211-225.
[29]
Lam DSC . Randomized trial of early phacoemulsification versus peripheral iridotomy to prevent intraocular pressure rise after acute primary angle closure[J]. Ophthalmology, 2008, 115(7): 1134-1140.
[30]
Zhi ZM, Lim ASM, Wong TY. A pilot study of lens extraction in the management of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma[J]. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2003, 135(4): 530-536.
[31]
朱思泉,王宁利,张红言,等. 白内障超声乳化摘除联合房角粘连分离术治疗青光眼合并白内障的临床研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报200526(3),263-265.
[32]
Zhao YN, Li XY, Tao AZ, et al. Intraocular pressure and calculated diastolic ocular perfusion pressure during three simulated steps of phacoemulsification in vivo[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009, 50(6): 2927-2931.
[33]
Riva CE, Hero M, Titze P, et al. Autoregulation of human optic nerve head blood flow in response to acute changes in ocular perfusion pressure[J]. Craefes Arch ClinExp Ophthalmol, 1997, 235(10): 618-626.
[34]
李春梅. 超声乳化白内障摘除联合小梁切除术治疗青光眼合并白内障的临床疗效观察[J]. 实用医院临床杂志2016(4):161-162,163.
[35]
王敬娜. 超声乳化晶状体摘除术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼合并白内障的效果分析[J]. 河南医学研究2017,(18):3360-3361.
[36]
Zhang XL, Ge J, Cai XY, et al. A preliminary comparison study of three types of microsurgery on management of primary angle closure glaucoma[J]. Chin J PractOphthalmol, 2006, 24(7): 695-699.
[37]
Zhang XL, Teng LL, Li A, et al. The clinical outcomes of three surgical managements on primary angle-closure glaucoma[J]. Eye Sci, 2007, 23(2): 65-74.
[38]
郑东健,王宁利,甄兆忠,等. 原发性闭角型青光眼白内障术后房角形态的改变[J]. 眼科20009(3):131-135.
[39]
Hong S, Seong GJ, Hong YJ. Long-term Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation and Progressive Visual Field Deterioration in Patients With Glaucoma and Low Intraocular Pressures After a Triple Procedure[J]. Archives of Ophthalmology, 2007, 125(8): 1010.
[40]
Jackson AL, Yin NYS, Lee SH, et al. Mean target intraocular pressure and progression rates in chronic angle-closure glaucoma[J]. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology & Therapeutics the Official Journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2009, 25(1): 71-75.
[1] 孙秀丽, 刘振宇, 唐婷婷, 张景尚, 李猛, 毛迎燕, 万修华. 关注后发性白内障的发病机制及防控措施[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 193-198.
[2] 陈灏楠, 肖伟. 透明角膜切口对白内障术后角膜散光的影响及其精准测量的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 172-176.
[3] 杨蕾, 刘姗姗, 范晓军, 王一涵, 张燕妮, 徐嘉轶, 王继兵. 自制眼内前房角镜-分离器行前房角分离联合超声乳化白内障吸除及后房型人工晶状体植入术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 140-145.
[4] 冷玥祺, 廖衍沣, 武歆纯, 李美瑶, 石逸雯, 王晋豪, 杨嘉瑞, 李学民. 环境因素对眼部生理与病理影响的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 109-113.
[5] 方蕊, 宋旭东. 非编码核糖核酸与白内障相关的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 94-98.
[6] 郝壮, 马济远, 何梦梅, 李兴育, 陆新婷, 武静, 周健. 迟发性囊袋阻滞综合征临床特征、治疗方法及其疗效的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 70-75.
[7] 李茹月, 庞睿奇, 王宁利. 血脂异常与原发性开角型青光眼发病相关性的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 35-39.
[8] 刘兆川, 宋旭东. 重视虹膜松弛综合征围手术期的防治[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 1-5.
[9] 金杉杉, 熊琨, 王璐, 梁远波. 中国青光眼流行趋势及特征的Meta分析[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 332-340.
[10] 王柠, 王佳伟, 刘旭阳. 重视眼颅压力差在多学科领域的应用[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 321-325.
[11] 万修华. 角膜移植术后白内障吸除联合张力环及后房型人工晶状体植入术[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 0-.
[12] 蒋晨, 万新娟, 谢小东, 丁琳. 糖化血红蛋白、硫氧还蛋白、硫氧还蛋白互作蛋白与皮质性白内障的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(09): 914-918.
[13] 付鹏, 沈念, 黄艳玲, 杨水平, 万小波. 外伤性晶状体脱位合并周边隐匿性视网膜病变的临床特征及预后分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 536-540.
[14] 彭丽, 于娜, 吴雪莲. 老年白内障患者超声乳化术后眼部疼痛原因分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 49-51.
[15] 刘天龙. 改良型超声乳化手术治疗高度近视合并白内障疗效观察[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 30-33.
阅读次数
全文


摘要