切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (06) : 249 -255. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2018.06.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

超声乳化白内障吸除联合两种不同非球面人工晶状体植入术后人工晶状体偏心和倾斜的临床研究
王鑫峥1,(), 张健2   
  1. 1. 100036 北京水利医院眼科
    2. 100053 首都医科大学附属宣武医院眼科
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-08 出版日期:2018-12-28
  • 通信作者: 王鑫峥
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学基础与临床科研合作基金重点课题(12JL04)

Study on the Stability of Two Kinds of Aspheric Intraocular Lens After Cataract Surgery

XinZheng Wang1,(), Jian Zhang2   

  1. 1. Department of ophthalmology, Beijingshuili hospital, Beijing 100036, China
    2. Department of opthalmolgy, Graduate school of Capital Medical University of XUANWU Hospital, Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2018-11-08 Published:2018-12-28
  • Corresponding author: XinZheng Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang XinZheng, Email:
引用本文:

王鑫峥, 张健. 超声乳化白内障吸除联合两种不同非球面人工晶状体植入术后人工晶状体偏心和倾斜的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(06): 249-255.

XinZheng Wang, Jian Zhang. Study on the Stability of Two Kinds of Aspheric Intraocular Lens After Cataract Surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2018, 08(06): 249-255.

目的

比较超声乳化白内障吸除联合两种不同非球面人工晶状体植入术后人工晶状体偏心和倾斜程度的异同。

方法

收集2016年9月至2017年10月就诊于首都医科大学宣武医院眼科和北京水利医院眼科,诊断为老年性白内障并行白内障超声乳化吸除联合人工晶状体植入术的患者25例(32只眼)的病例资料进行临床研究。就诊于首都医科大学宣武医院眼科的患者,术中囊袋内植入美国麦德MATRIX Acrylic 404型人工晶状体的患者14例(15只眼)。其中,男性5例(5只眼),女性9例(10只眼),单眼病例14例,双眼病例1例,年龄48~78岁,平均年龄在(69.20±8.35)岁,该组作为第1组;同期收集的就诊于北京水利医院眼科的患者,术中囊袋内植入德国蔡司CT ASPHINA 603P型人工晶状体的患者11例(18只眼)。其中,男性7例(13只眼),女性4例(5只眼),单眼病例4例,双眼病例7例,年龄56~79岁,平均年龄在(70.60±8.28)岁,该组作为第2组。术后3个月对两组患者行跟踪随访,使用德国Oculas公司生产的三维眼前节分析仪Pentacam采集90°和180°两个位置角度上眼前节图像,用AutoCad图像分析软件,测量人工晶状体的倾斜角度和偏心距离,对所得数据采用独立样本t检验进行组间比较。

结果

全部患者手术顺利,均未出现前囊放射状撕裂及后囊膜破裂等并发症,且人工晶状体均植入囊袋内。第1组和第2组患者术后不同类型人工晶状体水平方向的偏心距离,分别为(0.22±0.15)mm和(0.18±0.09)mm。经过独立样本t检验,其差异无统计学意义(t=1.13,P>0.05);第1组和第2组患者术后不同类型人工晶状体垂直方向的偏心距离,分别为(0.14±0.09)mm和(0.16±0.10)mm。经过独立样本t检验,差异无统计学意义(t=0.38,P>0.05)。第1组和第2组患者术后不同类型人工晶状体水平方向的倾斜角度,分别为(2.57±1.25)°和(2.77±1.48)°。经过独立样本t检验,差异无统计学意义(t=0.50,P>0.05);第1组和第2组患者术后不同类型人工晶状体垂直方向的倾斜角度,分别为(1.85±0.87)°和(1.88±1.16)°。经过独立样本t检验,差异无统计学意义(t=0.07,P>0.05)。

结论

两襻的疏水性丙烯酸酯人工晶状体与三襻式的亲水性丙烯酸酯人工晶状体在囊袋内植入后均体现了良好的稳定性,人工晶状体的偏心量及倾斜角度无统计学差异。

Objective

To compare the eccentricity and tilt of intraocular lens after phacoemulsification combined with two different aspheric intraocular lens implantation.

Methods

From September 2016 to October 2017, 25 cases (32 eyes) of senile cataract with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation were studied in the Department of ophthalmology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, and the Department of ophthalmology, Beijing Water Conservancy Hospital. Fourteen patients (15 eyes) received intraoperative implantation of Matrix Acrylic 404 intraocular lens (IOL) in the capsule bag of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University. Among them, there were 5 males (5 eyes), 9 females (10 eyes), 14 monocular cases and 1 binocular case, aged 48-78 years, with an average age of (69.20±8.35) years. This group was the first group. Eleven patients (18 eyes) who were admitted to ophthalmology department of Beijing Water Conservancy Hospital during the same period were implanted with French Zeiss CT ASPHINA 603P intraocular lens. Among them, there were 7 males (13 eyes), 4 females (5 eyes), 4 monocular cases and 7 binocular cases, ranging in age from 56 to 79 years, with an average age of (70.60±8.28) years. This group was the second group. Three months after operation, the two groups were followed up. Pentacam, a three-dimensional anterior segment analyzer manufactured by Oculas, Germany, was used to collect images of the anterior segment at 90 degrees and 180 degrees. The tilt angle and eccentricity distance of intraocular lens were measured by AutoCad image analysis software. The data were compared by independent sample t test.

Results

All the patients were operated smoothly without any complications such as radial tear of anterior capsule and rupture of posterior capsule, and intraocular lenses were implanted into the capsule. The horizontal eccentric distances of different types of intraocular lenses in group 1 and group 2 were (0.22±0.15) mm and (0.18±0.09) mm, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (t=1.13, P>0.05). The vertical eccentric distances of different types of intraocular lenses in group 1 and group 2 were (0.14±0.09) mm and (0.16±0.10) mm, respectively. After independent sample t test, there was no significant difference (t=0.38, P>0.05). The horizontal tilt angles of different types of intraocular lenses in group 1 and group 2 were (2.57±1.25)degree and (2.77±1.48)degree, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.50, P>0.05). The tilt angles of different types of intraocular lenses in the first group and the second group were (1.85±0.87)degree and (1.88±1.16)degree, respectively. After independent sample t test, there was no significant difference (t= 0.07, P>0.05).

Conclusion

These results indicated these two different types of IOL were both showed perfect stability by implanted in the capsular bag in the cataract surgery, there was no significant difference between these two types of IOL on decentration and tilt.

图1 两种人工晶状体的外观彩色图像 A图显示美国Matrix Acrylic 404型人工晶状体;B图显示德国蔡司CT ASPHINA 603P型人工晶状体
图2 采用Pentacam仪器测量获得的术眼散瞳后清晰的Scheimpflug图像 图示植入Matrix Acrylic 404型人工晶状体后,采用Pentacam仪器测量获得的术眼散瞳后清晰的Scheimpflug图像
图3 采用Pentacam仪器测量获得的术眼散瞳后清晰的Scheimpflug图像 图示植入CT ASPHINA 603P型人工晶状体后,采用Pentacam仪器所得到的散瞳后清晰的Scheimpflug图像
图4 采用Autocad软件测绘患者术眼的人工晶状体图像 图示采用Autocad软件描绘的患者术眼人工晶状体前后表面曲线及倾斜度
[1]
Belin MW, Litoff D, Strods SJ, et al. The PAR Technology Corneal Topography System[J]. Refract Corneal Surg, 1992, 8(1): 88-96.
[2]
Konstantopoulos A, Hossain P, Anderson DF. Recent advances in ophthalmic anterior segment imaging: a new era for ophthalmic diagnosis?[J]. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2007, 1(4): 551-555.
[3]
陈星,于建春,周丹英,等. 角膜地形图引导的个性化切口对白内障超声乳化手术的疗效分析[J]. 临床眼科杂志,2013,21(6):503-505.
[4]
Li L, Wang K, Yan Y, et al. Research on Calculation of the IOL Tilt and Decentration Based on Surface Fitting[J]. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2013, 14(1): 1-7.
[5]
Maedel S, Hirnschall N, Bayer N , et al. Comparison of intraocular lens decentration and tilt measurements using 2?Purkinje meter systems[J]. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2017, 43(5): 648-655.
[6]
周琳,张健. Pentacam在白内障手术中的应用[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2015,15(8):1358-1362.
[7]
Wartz T, Marten L, Wang M. Measuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topography[J]. CurrOpinOphthalmol, 2007, 18 (4): 325-33.
[8]
Oliveira CM, Ribeiro C, Franco S. Corneal imaging with slit-scanning and Scheimpflug imaging techniques[J]. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 2011, 94 (1): 33-42.
[9]
Schaellef F. Binocular lens tilt and decentmtionmeaurements in healtlIy subjects with phakic eyes[J]. Invest 0phthalmol Vis Sci, 2008, 49(5): 2216-2222.
[10]
付敏,喻谦. 囊袋内植入人工晶体后偏心与倾斜的原因分析[J]. 医学综述,2016,22(22):4433-4437.
[11]
Thomas UM, Hakan K. Decentration and tilt of a single piece aspheric intraocular lens compared with the lens position in young phakic eyes[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009, 35(8): 485-490.
[12]
Banmeistor M, Bahren J, Kohnen T. Tilt and decentration of spherical and aspheric intraocular lens: effect on higher-order aberrations[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009, 35(15): 1006-1012.
[13]
王莹,马忠旭,刘汝瑜,等. 不同人工晶状体植入术后倾斜和偏心及视觉质量的临床研究[J]. 天津医科大学学报,2011,17(04):521-524.
[14]
Hansen SO, Tetz MR, Solomon KD, et al. Decentration of flexible loop posterior chamber intraocular lenes in a series of 222 postmottern eyes[J]. Ophthalmology, 1988, 95(3): 344-349.
[15]
邢晓杰,汤欣,宋慧,等. 四种非球面人工晶状体植入术后倾斜和偏心的比较[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2010,46(4):332-336.
[16]
英杰,梁先军,何锦贤,等.眼前段照相联合Pentacam眼前节全景分析仪评价AcrysofToric人工晶状体在眼内的稳定性[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2013,31(4):408-411.
[17]
田甜,刘伟,季建,等. 囊袋皱缩综合征的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2013,49(1):79-83.
[18]
王红.人工晶体的设计新进展(综述)[J]. 中国城乡企业卫生,2008,23(4):41-42.
[19]
杨文艳,袁援生. 非球面人工晶体的理论及临床应用研究进展[J]. 医学综述,2009,15(24):3761-3764.
[20]
宋旭东,郭佳. 如何理解和选择非球面人工晶状体[J]. 眼科,2007,16(2):82-84.
[21]
Wang L, Koch DD. Effect of decentration of wavefront corrected intraocular lenses on the higher order aberrations of the eye[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2005, 123(9): 1226-1230.
[22]
薛利利,王晓莉. 非球面人工晶状体临床研究新进展[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2012,18(29):47-48.
[23]
霍婕. 微切口超声乳化加非球面人工晶体植入治疗白内障的疗效观察[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2018,3(3):99-100.
[24]
Werner W, Roth E. Image properties of spherical as asphericintra ocular lens[J]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd, 1999, 214 (4): 246-250.
[25]
Holladay J, Piers P, Koranyi G. A new intraocular lens designed to reduce aberration ofpseudophakic eyes[J].J Refract Surg, 2002, 18(6): 683-691.
[26]
Mester U, Dillinger P, Anterist N. Impact of a modified optic design on visual function: clinical comparative study[J]. J Cataract RefractSurg, 2003, 29(4): 652-660.
[27]
杨琉舒. 两种非球面人工晶体有效晶体位置变化的临床观察研究[D]. 昆明医科大学,2017:65.
[28]
Ze QuanXu, Xu HuaSong, Wen ZheLi, et al. Clinical study inpatient-reported outcomes after binocular implantation of aspheric intraocular lens of different negative spherical aberrations[J]. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 2017, 10(7): 771-774.
[29]
Kretz FTA, Tandogan T, Khoramnia R, et al. High order aberration and straylight evaluation after cataract surgery with implantation of an aspheric, aberration correcting monofocal intraocular lens[J]. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015, 8(4): 736-741.
[30]
张仲臣. 预装式非球面人工晶状体的临床观察[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2008,8(11):2237-2238.
[31]
Nanavaty MA, Spalton DJ, Gala KB, et al. Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification between 2 aspheric microincision intraocular lenses[J]. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2013, 39(5): 705-711.
[32]
Schuster AK, Tesarz J, Vossmerbaeumer U. The Impact on Vision of Aspheric to Spherical Monofocal Intraocular Lenses in?Cataract Surgery[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013, 120(11): 2166-2175.
[33]
Eom Y, Yoo E, Kang SY. Change in efficiency of aspheric intraocular lenses based on pupil diameter[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2013, 155(3): 492-498.
[34]
刘昳,袁进. 个性化植入非球面人工晶状体术后视觉质量的临床观察[J]. 眼科新进展,2016,36(1):35-37.
[35]
Schuster AK, Tesarz J, Vossmerbaeumer U.The impact on vision of pheric to spherical monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: astematic review with meta-analysis[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013, 120(11): 2166-2175.
[36]
Thiagarajan M, McClenaghan R, Anderson DF.Comparison of visual rformance with an aspheric intraocular lens and a spherical intraocular lens[J]. J Cataraet Refract Surg, 2011, 37(11): 1993-2000.
[37]
曾国燕,张远平,李静华,等. 不同球差非球面人工晶状体个体化选择的研究进展[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2017,17(1):62-65.
[1] 陈川, 罗红. 胎儿先天性白内障的超声影像学特征及预后分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 548-552.
[2] 孙秀丽, 刘振宇, 唐婷婷, 张景尚, 李猛, 毛迎燕, 万修华. 关注后发性白内障的发病机制及防控措施[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 193-198.
[3] 陈灏楠, 肖伟. 透明角膜切口对白内障术后角膜散光的影响及其精准测量的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 172-176.
[4] 方蕊, 宋旭东. 非编码核糖核酸与白内障相关的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 94-98.
[5] 郝壮, 马济远, 何梦梅, 李兴育, 陆新婷, 武静, 周健. 迟发性囊袋阻滞综合征临床特征、治疗方法及其疗效的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 70-75.
[6] 刘兆川, 宋旭东. 重视虹膜松弛综合征围手术期的防治[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 1-5.
[7] 万修华. 角膜移植术后白内障吸除联合张力环及后房型人工晶状体植入术[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 0-.
[8] 王震宇, 张维嘉, 胡曼, 高传文, 石砚, 王怀洲. 微导管辅助360°小梁切开术治疗先天性白内障术后继发青光眼的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 275-280.
[9] 万修华. 白内障标准化手术系列视频(5级全白核)[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 0-.
[10] 王晓宇, 李亚新, 刘一昀, 耿嘉懿, 秦锐, 李炎城, 敖明昕, 刘德海, 齐虹. 不同设计多焦点人工晶状体植入后视觉质量差异的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 210-215.
[11] 蒋晨, 万新娟, 谢小东, 丁琳. 糖化血红蛋白、硫氧还蛋白、硫氧还蛋白互作蛋白与皮质性白内障的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(09): 914-918.
[12] 肖士鹏, 徐帅, 李士春, 云才. T1倾斜角-颈椎前凸角(T1S-CL)在三节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中的意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 558-565.
[13] 付鹏, 沈念, 黄艳玲, 杨水平, 万小波. 外伤性晶状体脱位合并周边隐匿性视网膜病变的临床特征及预后分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 536-540.
[14] 彭丽, 于娜, 吴雪莲. 老年白内障患者超声乳化术后眼部疼痛原因分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 49-51.
[15] 刘天龙. 改良型超声乳化手术治疗高度近视合并白内障疗效观察[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 30-33.
阅读次数
全文


摘要