切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (03) : 121 -127. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2017.03.005

所属专题: 青少年近视防控 总编推荐 文献

论著

飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗超高度近视眼的疗效观察
周迎霞1,(), 王芳芳2   
  1. 1. 030002 太原,山西省眼科医院综合检查科
    2. 030002 太原,山西省眼科医院医务科
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-21 出版日期:2017-06-28
  • 通信作者: 周迎霞
  • 基金资助:
    山西省卫生攻关项目(201601090)

Observation on effects of femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for ultra-high myopia

Yingxia Zhou1,(), Fangfang Wang2   

  1. 1. Comprehensive inspection department, Shanxi Eye Hospital, Taiyuan 030002, China
    2. medical department, Shanxi Eye Hospital, Taiyuan 030002, China
  • Received:2017-06-21 Published:2017-06-28
  • Corresponding author: Yingxia Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhou Yingxia, Email:
引用本文:

周迎霞, 王芳芳. 飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗超高度近视眼的疗效观察[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 07(03): 121-127.

Yingxia Zhou, Fangfang Wang. Observation on effects of femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for ultra-high myopia[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2017, 07(03): 121-127.

目的

观察飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)矫正超高度近视眼的疗效,以及术后不同时间段的有效性和安全性。

方法

纳入2013年1月~2016年1月在山西省眼科医院行FS-LASIK且术后连续随访1年以上的超高度近视眼患者106例(211只眼)的临床资料。其中,男性50例(100只眼),女性56例(111只眼)。年龄17~43岁,平均(24.09±5.32)岁。患者术前与术后1个月、3个月、6个月及1年均进行常规眼部检查。术前行常规视力检查,包括裸眼视力(UCVA)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。视力记录均以log MAR计数法表示。检查屈光度,包括球镜、柱镜及等效球镜度。采用裂隙灯显微镜检查眼前节、采用非接触式眼压计测量眼压、散瞳后采用双目间接检眼镜行眼底检查、采用综合验光仪验光、采用角膜地形图检查角膜形态及采用AB型超声扫描和生物测量仪测量角膜厚度和眼轴长度。采用飞秒激光系统及准分子激光机对角膜进行切削。分别于术后不同时间段进行UCVA、BCVA、安全性指数、有效性指数及屈光度等项目的检查。有效性指数=术后UCVA/术前BCVA;安全性指数=术后BCVA/术前BCVA。患者手术前后的视力、安全性指数、有效性指数及屈光度采用均数±标准差(±s)表示。手术前后不同时间点各指标的总体差异比较采用单因素重复测量方差分析,组内多重比较采用LSD-t检验。术后不同时间点屈光回退率的比较采用卡方检验。

结果

将患者术前与术后不同时间点的UCVA进行比较,差异均有统计学意义(F时间=2767.01,P<0.05)。术后各时间点的UCVA均高于术前的BCVA,术后3个月患者的视力趋于稳定。将患者术后不同时间点的安全性指数进行比较,差异均有统计学意义(F时间=7.63,P<0.05)。术后各时间点的安全性指数均>1,术后3个月时最佳,至6个月左右略有下降,之后回升。将患者术后不同时间点的有效性指数进行比较,差异均有统计学意义(F时间=5.25,P<0.05)。术后各时间点的有效性指数均>1,术后3个月时最佳,之后趋于稳定。术后不同时间点等效球镜度的差异均无统计学意义(F时间=1.34,P>0.05)。术后各时间点屈光回退率的差异有统计学意义(χ2=13.69,P<0.05)。

结论

FS-LASIK对超高度近视眼的治疗有效。术后1年内各时间点的UCVA好于术前BCVA。随着时间的推移,屈光回退率增加,术后1年时达到7.58%。

Objective

To evaluate the effect and safety of femtosecond laser assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK) in the treatment of ultra-high myopia , and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different times after the operation.

Methods

The clinical data of 106 patients (211 eyes) with ultra-high myopia who were followed up for more than 1 year, was conducted between January 2013 and January 2016 in Hospital of Shanxi Province. Among them, there were 50 males (100 eyes) and 56 females (111 eyes). Age from17 to 43, average (24.09±5.32) years old. Routine ophthalmologic examinations were performed before and after surgery at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. Routine visual acuity was performed before surgery, including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The visual acuity records were indicated by the logMAR. The range of refraction, including balloon, column, and equivalent spherical lenses were examined. Exclusion of anterior segment disease, using non-contact tonometer, using binocular indirect ophthalmoscope after mydriasis fundus examination, using phoropter, using corneal topography exam and corneal shape by AB ultrasound scanning and biological measurement of corneal thickness and axial length by slit lamp microscope examination. The cornea was cut by femtosecond laser system and excimer laser. UCVA, BCVA, safety index, effective index and diopter were examined at different time after operation. Validity index=postoperative UCVA/preoperative BCVA, safety index=postoperative BCVA/preoperative BCVA. The visual acuity, safety index, effective index and diopter before and after the operation were indicated by mean ± standard deviation(±s). The overall difference between the indexes at different time points before and after the operation was compared by single factor repeated measures analysis of variance, and the multiple comparisons in the group were checked by LSD-t test. The comparison of refraction regression at different time points after operation was performed by chi square test.

Results

There were significant differences in UCVA at different time points before and after operation (Ftime=2767.01, P<0.05). The UCVA at each time point after operation were higher than that of preoperative BCVA, and the visual acuity was stable at 3 months after operation. The safety index of patients at different time points after operation was compared, the difference was statistically significant(Ftime=7.63, P<0.05). The safety index at each time point after operation was greater than 1, the optimum time was 3 months after operation, and decreased slightly after 6 months, then recovered. The validity index of patients at different time points after operation was compared, the differences were statistically significant(Fgroup=7.52, P<0.05). The validity index at each time point after operation was greater than 1, which was the best at 3 months after operation, and then stabilized. There were no significant differences in equivalent spherical lenses at different time points after surgery(Ftime=1.34, P>0.05). There were significant differences in refractive regression at different time points (χ2=13.69, P<0.05).

Conclusions

FS-LASIK are effective in the treatment of ultra-high myopia. UCVA at each time point after 1 year was better than preoperative BCVA. With the increase of time, refractive regurgitation rate increased, after 1 year to reach 7.58%.

图1 患者术前与术后不同时间点视力情况的比较
图2 患者术后不同时间点安全性指数的描述
图3 患者术后不同时间点有效性指数的描述
表4 患者术后各时间点的屈光回退数量及所占百分比
图4 患者术后不同时间点等效球镜度在各区间所占百分比示意图
[1]
Mello GR, Rocha KM, Santhiago MR, et al. Applications of wavefront technology[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2012, 38(9):1671-1683.
[2]
姚进. 眼视光应用光学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2015:127.
[3]
Van IJ, Gjertsen J, Kruijt B, et al. Straylight measurements as an indication for cataract surgery[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2012, 38(5):840-848.
[4]
Piñero DP, Ortiz D, Alio JL. Ocular scattering[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2010, 87(9):682-696.
[5]
Kaya V, Oncel B, Sivrikaya H, et a1. Prospective paired comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia less than-6.00 diopters[J]. RefracSurg, 2004, 20(3):223-228.
[6]
Foster PJ, Broadway DC, Hayat S, et al. Refractive error, axial length and anterior chamber depth of the eye in British adults: the EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study[J]. Bri J Ophthalmol, 2010, 94(7):827-830.
[7]
He M, Huang W, Zheng Y, et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in school children in rural southern China[J]. Ophthalmology, 2007, 114(2):374-382.
[8]
Pan CW, Klein BEK, Cotch MF, et al. Racial Variations in the Prevalence of Refractive Errors in the United States: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2013, 155(6):1129-1138.
[9]
Saw SM, Chan YH, Wong WL, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in the Singapore Malay Eye Survey[J]. Ophthalmology, 2008, 115(10):1713-1719.
[10]
Sawada A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, et al. Refractive errors in an elderly Japanese population: the Tajimi study[J]. Ophthalmology, 2008, 115(2):363-370.
[11]
Curtin BJ. The myopias: basic sciencean clinical management[M]. Philadelphia: Harper & Row, 1985: 12.
[12]
Lindbohm N, Tuisku IS, Tervo TM. LASIK for myopia of -9.00 to -17.00 D with the VISX STAR S2: 2- to 5-year follow-up[J]. J Refract Surg, 2009, 25(2):195-200.
[13]
Vaddavalli PK, Yoo SH. Femtosecond laser in-situ keratomileusis flap configurations[J]. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2011, 22(4):245-250.
[14]
Pajic B, Vastardis I, Pajic-Eggspuehler B, et al. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted flap creation for LASIK: a prospective, randomized, paired-eye study[J]. Clinical Ophthalmology, 2014, 2014(default):1883-1889.
[15]
Zarei-Ghanavati S, Ramirez-Miranda A, Yu F, et al. Corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in keratoconic versus post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2012, 38(4):607-614.
[16]
Yip YW, Yu MC, Jhanji V. Randomized, contralateral eye study to evaluate the effect of standard and inverted side-cut angle on corneal biomechanical properties during femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis[J]. Acta Ophthalmologica, 2014, 92(6):437-442.
[17]
Knorz MC, Vossmerbaeumer U. Comparison of flap adhesion strength using the Amadeus microkeratome and the IntraLase iFS femtosecond laser in rabbits[J]. J Refract Surg, 2008, 24(9):875-878.
[18]
Montés-Micó R, Rodríguez-Galietero A, Alió JL. Femtosecond Laser versus Mechanical Keratome LASIK for Myopia[J]. Ophthalmology, 2007, 114(1):62-68.
[19]
Chan A, Ou JE. Comparison of the Femtosecond Laser and Mechanical Keratome for Laser In Situ Keratomileusis[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2008, 126(11):1484-1490.
[20]
Vastardis I, Pajic B, Greiner RH, et al. Prospective study of exclusive strontium-/yttrium-90 beta-irradiation of primary and recurrent pterygia with no prior surgical excision. Clinical outcome of long-term follow-up[J]. Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie, 2009, 185(12):808-814.
[21]
董子献,周行涛,许烨,等. Visumax飞秒激光兔角膜内扫描微囊及基质桥观察[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2011,29(9):818-819.
[22]
Zhao LQ, Zhu H, Li LM. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis in myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Isrn Ophthalmology, 2014, 12(6):1-8.
[23]
刘洋辰,王雁. 人眼散射光研究进展[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2016,52(1):73-76.
[24]
Tobaigy FM, Ghanem RC, Sayegh RR, et al. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2006, 142(6):901-908.
[25]
Kirwan C, O′Keefe M. Comparative Study of Higher-Order Aberrations After Conventional Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Laser Epithelial Keratomileusis for Myopia Using the Technolas 217z Laser Platform[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2009, 147(1):77-83.
[26]
Kim JY, Kim MJ, Kim TI, et al. A femtosecond laser creates a stronger flap than a mechanical microkeratome[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006, 47(2):599-604.
[27]
Calvo R, Mclaren JW, Hodge DO, et al. Corneal aberrations and visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2010, 149(5):785-793.
[28]
Lim T, Yang S, Kim M, et al. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2006, 141(5):833-839.
[29]
周继红,刘龙,高妍,等. 三种角膜屈光手术矫正低中度近视效果的比较[J]. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2016,38(3):170-174.
[30]
O′Doherty M, O′Keeffe M, Kelleher C. Five year follow up of laser in situ keratomileusis for all levels of myopia[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2006, 90(1):20-23.
[31]
Alió J L, Muftuoglu O, Ortiz D, et al. Ten-Year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of up to -10 diopters[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2008, 145(1):46-54.
[32]
Mcdonald MB, Kaufman HE, Frantz JM, et al. Excimer laser ablation in a human eye. Case report[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1989, 107(5):641-642.
[33]
Lipshitz I, Loewenstein A, Varssano D, et al. Late onset corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy for moderate and high myopia[J]. Ophthalmology, 1997, 104(3):369-374.
[34]
Binder PS. One thousand consecutive IntraLase laser in situ keratomileusis flaps[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006, 32(6):962-969.
[35]
蔡劲锋,邱靖森. Intralase飞秒激光和AmadeusⅡ角膜刀制角膜瓣行LASIK术后的观察[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2014,14(1):181-183.
[36]
Hsu SY, Chen HY, Chung CP. Analysis of actual corneal flap thickness and confounding factors between first and second operated eyes[J]. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imag, 2009, 40(5):448-452.
[37]
Maier PC, Birnbaum F, Reinhard T. Therapeutic applications of the femtosecond laser in corneal surgery[J]. Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde, 2010, 227(6):453-459.
[38]
Salomão MQ, Wilson SE. Femtosecond laser in laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36(6):1024-1032.
[39]
Tham VM, Maloney RK. Microkeratome complications of laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Ophthalmology, 2000, 107(5):920-924.
[40]
Sugar A. Ultrafast (femtosecond) laser refractive surgery[J]. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2002, 13(4):246-249.
[41]
Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(4):804-811.
[42]
Ratkaytraub I, Juhasz T, Horvath C, et al. Ultra-short pulse (femtosecond) laser surgery: initial use in LASIK flap creation[J]. Ophthalmol Clin North Am, 2001, 14(2):347-355.
[43]
Binder PS. Flap dimensions created with the IntraLase FS laser[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(1):26-32.
[44]
Chaurasia SS, Luengo GF, Tan K, et al. In vivo real-time intraocular pressure variations during LASIK flap creation[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010, 51(9):4641-4645.
[45]
Tan CS, Au Eong KG, Lee HM. Visual experiences during different stages of LASIK: Zyoptix XP microkeratome vs Intralase femtosecond laser[J]. Ame J Ophthalmol, 2007, 143(1):90-96.
[46]
Kim JR, Kim BK, Mun SJ, et al. One-year outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): mild to moderate myopia vs. high myopia[J]. BMC Ophthalmology, 2015, 15(1):59-60.
[47]
Xu Y, Yang Y. Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia: Results of a 12-Month Prospective Study[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2015, 92(1):123-131.
[48]
Ang M, Mehta JS, Chan C, et al. Refractive lenticule extraction: transition and comparison of 3 surgical techniques.[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2014, 40(9):1415-1424.
[49]
Miao H, Tian M, Xu Y, et al. Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality After Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: An 18-Month Prospective Study[J]. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(11):726-731.
[50]
Kazutaka K, Kimiya S, Akihito I, et al. Visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: 1-year follow-up[J]. BMJ Open, 2015, 5(11):e008268.
[51]
Ganesh S, Gupta R. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser-assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism[J]. J Refract Surg, 2014, 30(9):590-596.
[52]
Touboul D, Salin F, Mortemousque B, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of the femtosecond laser microkeratome[J]. Journal Franais Dophtalmologie, 2005, 28(5):535-546.
[53]
Biser SA, Bloom AH, Donnenfeld ED, et al. Flap folds after femtosecond LASIK[J]. Eye & Contact Lens, 2003, 29(4):252-254.
[54]
Garner LF, Stewart AW, Owens H, et al. The Nepal Longitudinal Study: biometric characteristics of developing eyes[J]. Optome Vis Sci, 2006, 83(5):274-280.
[55]
林会儒,于凤华,高富军. 206例胎儿眼外形及眼球的测量[J]. 眼科新进展,1992,12(1):5-7.
[56]
王雁,鲍锡柳,汤欣,等. 飞秒激光角膜微小切口基质透镜取出术矫正近视及近视散光的早期临床研究[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2013,49(4):292-298.
[57]
王雁,赵堪兴. 飞秒激光屈光手术学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:220-240.
[58]
马代金,蔡望,朱睿玲,等. 应用FemtoLDV飞秒激光制瓣的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术[J]. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2012,34(12):909-912.
[59]
赵金荣,赵少贞. 超高度近视准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术术后视力及屈光状态的改变[J].国际眼科杂志,2008,8(8):1626-1628.
[60]
王泽欧,刘华,尚志宏,等.超高度近视LASIK后视力分析[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志,2000,18(3):180-181.
[61]
Applegate RA, Howland HC. Magnification and visual acuity in refractive surgery[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1993, 111(10):1335-1342.
[62]
Gatinel D, Chaabouni S, Adam PA, et al. Corneal hysteresis, resistance factor, topography, and pachymetry after corneal lamellar flap[J]. J Refract Surg, 2007, 23(1):76-84.
[63]
Guirao A. Theoretical elastic response of the cornea to refractive surgery: risk factors for keratectasia[J]. J Refract Surg, 2005, 21(2):176-185.
[64]
Seiler T, Koufala K, Richter G. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. J Refract Surg, 1998, 27(27):312-317.
[65]
Mccarty CA, Aldred GF, Taylor HR, et al. Comparison of results of excimer laser correction of all degrees of myopia at 12 months postoperatively. The Melbourne Excimer Laser Group[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1996, 121(4):372-383.
[66]
Durrie DS, Kezirian GM. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective contralateral eye study[J]. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2005, 31(1):120-126.
[67]
Stahl JE, Durrie DS, Schwendeman FJ, et al. Anterior segment OCT analysis of thin IntraLase femtosecond flaps[J]. J Refract Surg, 2007, 23(6):555-558.
[68]
Sakimoto T, Rosenblatt MI, Azar DT. Laser eye surgery for refractive errors[J]. Lancet, 2006, 367(9520):1432-1447.
[69]
刘兆强. mAChR、VIP在豚鼠FDM模型中表达的实验研究及PRK、LASIK远期效果的临床研究[D]. 济南:山东大学,2007.
[70]
Dirani M, Couper T, Yau J, et al. Long-term refractive outcomes and stability after excimer laser surgery for myopia[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36(10):1709-1717.
[71]
Liu Z, Li Y, Cheng Z, et al. Seven-year follow-up of LASIK for moderate to severe myopia[J]. J Refract Surg, 2008, 24(9):935-940.
[72]
黄婉蓉,孙慧敏,赵少贞. LASIK术后角膜的创伤愈合反应[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2005,5(5):1024-1027.
[73]
孙慧敏,乔丽萍,赵少贞,等. LASIK术后早期角膜上皮改变的共焦显微镜观察[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志,2004,22(6):417-421.
[1] 赵欣, 赵晴, 张华. 角膜地形图引导个性化切削屈光术矫正近视眼和散光的早期临床疗效[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 210-214.
[2] 曹晓光, 何燕玲, 鲍永珍, 王凯, 赵明威. 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术矫正散光的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 57-62.
[3] 尹奕秀, 刘新泉. 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术适应证、禁忌证及术式优劣势的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 247-251.
[4] 王曙亮, 张晓宇, 艾明. 应用纤维蛋白胶粘合多层角膜基质透镜治疗真菌性角膜溃疡并发穿孔的实验研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 82-87.
[5] 姜雅琴, 张敏, 马健利, 黄旭东, 宋丽平. 飞秒激光辅助超声乳化术后不同人工晶状体有效位置和轴向位移量变化的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 76-81.
[6] 何海龙, 刘振宇, 周春媛, 张立平, 王进达, 万修华. 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜切除术与有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术矫正高度近视眼疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 22-28.
[7] 赵鹏飞, 柳静, 徐雯, 胡雅斌, 翟长斌, 魏文斌. 术前应用人工泪液对FS-LASIK治疗高度近视眼术后干眼自觉症状和泪膜稳定性影响的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(06): 326-332.
[8] 莒瑞红, 武哲明, 陈韵, 林振德, 杨威. 飞秒激光辅助超声乳化白内障吸除联合张力环及人工晶状体植入术治疗晶状体不全脱位的临床观察[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(03): 134-139.
[9] 曾丽娟, 韦琦, 左慧懿, 谭少健. 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术矫正中高度近视眼术后早期角膜后表面高度变化及影响因素的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(02): 105-110.
[10] 李梦媛, 汤云霞, 张静琳, 侯金佟, 陈倩茵, 马红婕, 吴德正. 成年超高度近视眼患者黄斑区巩膜厚度及其相关影响因素[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(02): 77-82.
[11] 陈茂盛, 曹丹敏, 王勇, 鲍先议, 雷荣, 许丽, 黎晗, 蒋丽娟, 谭倩. 飞秒激光辅助晶状体前囊膜切开与手动撕囊的微观形态结构对比分析[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(02): 56-63.
[12] 宋耀文, 贺瑞, 马秋霞. 高度近视眼行准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后长期稳定性的研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(01): 15-22.
[13] 秦艳, 谭吉林, 周晓虹, 朱思泉, 陈茂盛, 王世明. 飞秒激光辅助白内障手术联合Restor+2.5 D和Restor+3.0 D多焦点人工晶状体双眼植入术后视觉质量的评价[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 07(05): 203-210.
[14] 姚克, 鱼音慧. 重视飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的新认识[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 07(03): 97-102.
[15] 周迎霞, 贺瑞, 王芳芳. 两种角膜屈光手术方式治疗高度近视眼的疗效观察[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 07(02): 66-71.
阅读次数
全文


摘要