Short-term objective visual quality comparison between after implantation of segmental refractive multifocal intraocular lens and aspheric-surface monofocal intraocular lens

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2018.03.002

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the short-term postoperative quality of vision of segmental refractive multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) SBL-3 and aspheric-surface monofocal intraocular lens Akreos Adapt AO.

Methods

26 cases of age-related cataract (35 eyes) after phacoemulsification cataract extraction combined with IOL implantation were collected from June of 2017 to January of 2018 in the Peking University First Hospital. There were 15 eyes in SBL-3 group, and 20 eyes in AO group according to the different types of IOL implanted. At 1 month after operation the following parameters of the two groups were assessed: uncorrected distant visual acuity(UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity(UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity(UNVA), corrected distant visual acuity(CDVA), corrected near visual acuity (CNVA), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity(DCIVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity(DCNVA). And analyze total higher order aberrations (ocular, corneal, internal), spherical aberration, point spread function for 4mm and 6mm optical zone. Defocusing curve of SBL-3 group was also drawn at 1 month postoperatively. The two groups of patients, UDVA, CDVA, CNVA, UIVA, UNVA, DCIVA, DCNVA and visual quality were expressed as mean standard deviation (±s), and were compared with non parametric Mann-Whimey U test.

Results

At 1 month after operation, the UIVA, UNVA, DCIVA and DCNVA in SBL-3 group [(0.32±0.08), (0.44±0.18), (0.30±0.10), (0.33±0.11)] were all better than that of the eyes in AO group [(0.25±0.10), (0.27±0.09), (0.20±0.07), (0.21±0.10)] (Z=-2.26, -3.13, -1.84, -2.17; P>0.05). But there were no statistical differences between two groups in UDVA, CDVA and CNVA(Z=-0.99, 0, -1.84; P>0.05). The visual quality assessment showed that the difference of eyeball difference between the two groups with the pupil diameter of 4 mm was not statistically significant (Z=-1.50, -1.04, -0.82; P>0.05), and the difference of eyeball difference between the two groups with 6 mm pupil diameter was not statistically significant (Z=-0.12, -1.93, -1.16; P>0.05). The total higher order aberrations of ocular for 4mm and 6mm optical zone in SBL-3 group [(0.45±0.12), (1.41±0.21)] were better than that in AO group [(0.26±0.12), (0.82±0.13)] (Z=-3.45, -3.24; P<0.05). But there were no statistical differences between two groups in spherical aberration. The point spread function in SBL-3 group (0.05±0.02) was lower than that in AO group (0.11±0.07) (Z=-2.60, P<0.05). There is a peak appeared at 0 D and the defocusing curve was smooth within -1.0 D and -3.0 D but was steep within -3.0 D and -5.0 D.

Conclusions

The objective visual quality of Adapt AO is better than that of SBL-3 lens, but the application of SBL-3 lens in medium and near vision is better than that of Adapt AO lens. The peak of the defocus curve of SBL-3 lens appeared at 0 D, and the curve in -1.0 D to -3.0 D was stable, and the decrease was not obvious. This study also needs to expand the sample size and observe its efficacy and safety in the long term.

Key words: Segmental refractive, Multifocal, Intraocular lens, Quality of vision, Defocusing curve

Wei Cui, Songlin Yang, Xiaoming Yan. Short-term objective visual quality comparison between after implantation of segmental refractive multifocal intraocular lens and aspheric-surface monofocal intraocular lens[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2018, 08(03): 103-109.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhykyxzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2018.03.002

https://zhykyxzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2018/V08/I03/103

Figures/Tables 4

References 55

[1]	Maxwell A, Holland E, Cibik L, et al. Clinical and patient－reported outcomes of bilateral implantation of a ＋2.5 diopter multifocal intraocular lens[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2017, 43(1): 29-41.
[2]	王蒙蒙，张凤妍，崔琨明，等. 衍射型非球面多焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量评价[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志，2013，31(5):561-564.
[3]	Mojzis P, Piñero DP, Ctvrteckova V, et al. Analysis of internal astigmatism and higher order aberrations in eyes implanted with a new diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2013, 251(1): 341-348.
[4]	Yoshino M, Minami K, Hirasawa M, et al. Clinical Results of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis[J]. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi, 2015, 119(9): 613-618.
[5]	De Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, et al. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction[J]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016, 12: CD003169.
[6]	Chen T, Fang Y, Lin H, et al. Objective and subjective visual quality after implantation of all optic zone diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses: a prospective, case－control observational study[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2016, 100(11): 1530-1535.
[7]	Ramón ML, Piñero DP, Pérez－Cambrodí RJ. Correlation of visual performance with quality of life and intraocular aberrometric profile in patients implanted with rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOLs[J]. J Refract Surg, 2012, 28(2): 93-99.
[8]	Cillino S, Casuccio A, Di PF, et al. One－year outcomes with new－generation multifocal intraocular lenses[J]. Ophthalmology, 2008, 115(9): 1508-1516.
[9]	Javitt JC, Steinert RF. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: A multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality－of－life outcomes[J]. Ophthalmology, 2000, 107(11): 2040-2048.
[10]	刘芳，王方，苏彦，等. AcrySof Restor多焦点人工晶状体SN6AD1和SN6AD3型植入术后患者视功能及生存质量研究[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志，2013，31(7):837-840.
[11]	Vries NED, Webers CAB, Touwslager WRH, et al. Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(5): 859-865.
[12]	Woodward MA, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009, 35(6): 992-997.
[13]	Lafuma A, Khoshnood B, Berdeaux G. Comparison of outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses: a meta－analysis[J]. Clinical Ophthalmology, 2011, 5(default): 45-56.
[14]	De Vries NE, Nuijts RM. Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2013, 39(2): 268-278.
[15]	Velika V, Hejsek L, Raiskup F. Clinical Results of the Implantation of Two Types of Multifocal Rotational Asymmetric Intraocular Lenses[J]. Cesk Slov Oftalmol, 2017, 73(1): 3-12.
[16]	Shah S, Perismartinez C, Reinhard T, et al. Visual Outcomes After Cataract Surgery: Multifocal Versus Monofocal Intraocular Lenses[J]. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(10): 658-666.
[17]	Zelichowska B, Rekas M, Stankiewicz A, et al. Apodized diffractive versus refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: optical and visual evaluation[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2008, 34(12): 2036-2042.
[18]	Venter JA, Barclay D, Pelouskova M, et al. Initial experience with a new refractive rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens[J]. J Refract Surg, 2014, 30(11): 770-776.
[19]	Schmidt JC, Nietgen GW, Freisberg L, et al. Modified transscleral suture for sulcus fixation of posterior chamber lenses[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002, 28(1): 15-17.
[20]	Walkow L, Klemen UM. Patient satisfaction after implantation of diffractive designed multifocal intraocular lenses in dependence on objective parameters[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2001, 239(9): 683-687.
[21]	Hayashi K, Manabe SM, Hayashi H. Effect of astigmatism on visual acuity in eyes with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36(8): 1323-1329.
[22]	Monaco G, Scialdone A. Long－term outcomes of limbal relaxing incisions during cataract surgery: aberrometric analysis[J]. Clinical Ophthalmology, 2015, 9(default): 1581-1587.
[23]	Toto L, Vecchiarino L, D'Ugo E, et al. Astigmatism correction with toric IOL: analysis of visual performance, position, and wavefront error[J]. J Refract Surg, 2013, 29(7): 476-483.
[24]	Venter JA, Pelouskova M, Collins BM, et al. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction in 9366 eyes using a refractive segmented multifocal intraocular lens[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2013, 39(10): 1477-1484.
[25]	Behndig A, Montan P, Stenevi U, et al. Aiming for emmetropia after cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2012, 38(7): 1181-1186.
[26]	Pierro L, Modorati G, Brancato R. Clinical variability in keratometry, ultrasound biometry measurements, and emmetropic intraocular lens power calculation[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1991, 17(1): 91-94.
[27]	Raman S, Redmond R. Reasons for secondary surgical intervention after phacoemulsification with posterior chamber lens implantation[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, 29(3): 513-517.
[28]	Snead MP, Rubinstein MP, Lea SH, et al. Calculated versus A－scan result for axial length using different types of ultrasound probe tip[J]. Eye, 1990, 4(5): 718-722.
[29]	Alio J, Plazapuche AB, Férnandezbuenaga R, et al. Multifocal Intraocular Lenses: An Overview[J]. Survey of Ophthalmology, 2017, 62(5): 611-634.
[30]	Pedrotti E, Carones F, Aiello F, et al. Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 4 intraocular lenses: Monofocal, multifocal, and extended range of vision[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2018, 44(2): 156-167.
[31]	Liao X, Lin J, Tian J, et al. Evaluation of Optical Quality: Ocular Scattering and Aberrations in Eyes Implanted with Diffractive Multifocal or Monofocal Intraocular Lenses[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2018, 43(6): 696-701.
[32]	Alió JL, Piñero DP, Plaza－Puche AB, et al. Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new－generation multifocal intraocular lens[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(2): 241-250.
[33]	Akondi V, Dorronsoro C, Gambra E, et al. Temporal multiplexing to simulate multifocal intraocular lenses: theoretical considerations[J]. Biomedical Optics Express, 2017, 8(7): 3410-3425.
[34]	De Vries NE, Laurendeau C, Lafuma A, et al. Lifetime costs and effectiveness of ReSTOR compared with a monofocal IOL and Array－SA40 in the Netherlands[J]. Eye, 2010, 24(4): 663-772.
[35]	Maxwell WA, Waycaster CR, D′Souza AO, et al. A United States cost－benefit comparison of an apodized, diffractive, presbyopia－correcting, multifocal intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal lens[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2008, 34(11): 1855-1861.
[36]	Akaishi L, Vaz R. Visual Performance of Tecnis ZM900 Diffractive Multifocal IOL after 2500 Implants: A 3－Year Followup[J]. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2010, 2010(2090-004X): 717591.
[37]	Chen W, Meng Q, Ye H, et al. Reading ability and stereoacuity with combined implantation of refractive and diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses[J]. Acta Ophthalmologica, 2011, 89(4): 376-381.
[38]	Ji J, Huang X, Fan X, et al. Visual performance of Acrysof ReSTOR compared with a monofocal intraocular lens following implantation in cataract surgery[J]. Experimental & Therapeutic Medicine, 2013, 5(1): 277-281.
[39]	Alfonso JF, Puchades C, Fernández－Vega L, et al. Contrast sensitivity comparison between AcrySof ReSTOR and Acri.LISA aspheric intraocular lenses[J]. J Refract Surg, 2010, 26(7): 471-477.
[40]	Ravalico G, Parentin F, Sirotti P, et al. Analysis of light energy distribution by multifocal intraocular lenses through an experimental optical model[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1998, 24(5): 647-652.
[41]	Martínez PA, Gómez FP, España AA, et al. Visual function with bilateral implantation of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial[J]. J Refract Surg, 2008, 24(3): 257-264.
[42]	Aslam TM, Gupta M, Gilmour D, et al. Long－term Prevalence of Pseudophakic Photic Phenomena[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2007, 143(3): 522-524.
[43]	Hofmann T, Zuberbuhler BA. Retinal straylight and complaint scores 18 months after implantation of the AcrySof monofocal and ReSTOR diffractive intraocular lenses[J]. J Refract Surg, 2009, 25(6): 485-492.
[44]	Donnenfeld ED, Solomon R, Roberts CW, et al. Cyclosporine 0.05% to improve visual outcomes after multifocal intraocular lens implantation[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36(7): 1095-1100.
[45]	Cillino S, Casuccio A, Di PF, et al. One－year outcomes with new－generation multifocal intraocular lenses[J]. Ophthalmology, 2008, 115(9): 1508-1516.
[46]	Holladay JT, Dijk HV, Lang A, et al. Optical performance of multifocal intraocular lenses[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1990, 16(4): 413-422.
[47]	Shoji N, Shimizu K. Clinical evaluation of a 5.5 mm three－zone refractive multifocal intraocular lens[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1996, 22(8): 1097-1101.
[48]	MontãS－Micã R, Espaã AE, Bueno I, et al. Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses: mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions[J]. Ophthalmology, 2004, 111(1): 85-96.
[49]	Rosen E, Alió JL, Dick HB, et al. Efficacy and safety of multifocal intraocular lenses following cataract and refractive lens exchange: Metaanalysis of peer－reviewed publications[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2016, 42(2): 310-328.
[50]	Plaza－Puche AB, Alio JL, Sala E, et al. Impact of low mesopic contrast sensitivity outcomes in different types of modern multifocal intraocular lenses[J]. Euro J Ophthalmol, 2016, 26(6): 612-617.
[51]	Greenstein S. The Quest for Spectacle Independence: A Comparison of Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implants and Pseudophakic Monovision for Patients with Presbyopia[J]. Seminars in Ophthalmology, 2017, 32(1): 111-115.
[52]	Attia MS, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU, et al. Near and intermediate visual and reading performance of patients with a multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens using an electronic reading desk[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2016, 42(4): 582-590.
[53]	魏超，张晗. 多焦点人工晶状体的临床应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报，2017，31(4):29-35.
[54]	Akondi V, Pérezmerino P, Martinezenriquez E, et al. Evaluation of the True Wavefront Aberrations in Eyes Implanted With a Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lens[J]. J Refract Surg, 2017, 33(4): 257-265.
[55]	Mckee HD, Jhanji V. Theoretical Effect of Lens Position and Corneal Curvature on the Near Focal Point of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses[J]. J Refract Surg, 2016, 32(1): 64-66.

组别	眼数	点扩散函数	瞳孔直径4 mm
			总高阶相差			球差
			全眼	角膜	眼内	全眼	角膜	眼内
SBL－3组	15	0.05±0.02	0.45±0.12	0.23±0.09	0.43±0.06	0.06±0.04	0.06±0.05	0.02±0.03
AO组	20	0.11±0.07	0.26±0.12	0.24±0.10	0.12±0.03	0.08±0.05	0.03±0.03	0.03±0.02
Z值	?	－2.60	－3.45	－0.65	－3.97	－1.50	－1.04	－0.82
P值	?	<0.05	<0.05	>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

组别	眼数	点扩散函数	瞳孔直径4 mm
			总高阶相差			球差
			全眼	角膜	眼内	全眼	角膜	眼内
SBL－3组	15	0.05±0.02	0.45±0.12	0.23±0.09	0.43±0.06	0.06±0.04	0.06±0.05	0.02±0.03
AO组	20	0.11±0.07	0.26±0.12	0.24±0.10	0.12±0.03	0.08±0.05	0.03±0.03	0.03±0.02
Z值	?	－2.60	－3.45	－0.65	－3.97	－1.50	－1.04	－0.82
P值	?	<0.05	<0.05	>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

组别	眼数	点扩散函数	瞳孔直径6 mm
			总高阶相差			球差
			全眼	角膜	眼内	全眼	角膜	眼内
SBL－3组	15	0.05±0.02	1.41±0.21	0.58±0.15	1.32±0.02	0.43±0.32	0.29±0.06	0.42±0.06
AO组	20	0.11±0.07	0.82±0.13	0.57±0.17	0.63±0.30	0.52±0.12	0.21±0.06	0.25±0.16
Z值	?	－2.60	－3.24	－0.14	－1.85	－0.12	－1.93	－1.16
P值	?	<0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

组别	眼数	点扩散函数	瞳孔直径6 mm
			总高阶相差			球差
			全眼	角膜	眼内	全眼	角膜	眼内
SBL－3组	15	0.05±0.02	1.41±0.21	0.58±0.15	1.32±0.02	0.43±0.32	0.29±0.06	0.42±0.06
AO组	20	0.11±0.07	0.82±0.13	0.57±0.17	0.63±0.30	0.52±0.12	0.21±0.06	0.25±0.16
Z值	?	－2.60	－3.24	－0.14	－1.85	－0.12	－1.93	－1.16
P值	?	<0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export