切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 135 -140. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2025.03.002

论著

VSL型巩膜镜治疗不规则散光有效性与安全性的临床研究
唐果菓1, 彭荣梅2, 肖格格2, 洪晶2,()   
  1. 1100191 北京大学第三医院2025级博士研究生
    2100191 北京大学第三医院眼科
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-22 出版日期:2025-06-28
  • 通信作者: 洪晶
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(82371027)

The effectiveness and safety of VSL scleral lens in patients with irregular astigmatism

Guoguo Tang1, Rongmei Peng2, Gege Xiao2, Jing Hong2,()   

  1. 1Doctor′s Degree 2025, Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    2Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2025-04-22 Published:2025-06-28
  • Corresponding author: Jing Hong
引用本文:

唐果菓, 彭荣梅, 肖格格, 洪晶. VSL型巩膜镜治疗不规则散光有效性与安全性的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 135-140.

Guoguo Tang, Rongmei Peng, Gege Xiao, Jing Hong. The effectiveness and safety of VSL scleral lens in patients with irregular astigmatism[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2025, 15(03): 135-140.

目的

探讨VSL型巩膜镜治疗角膜不规则散光的有效性和安全性。

方法

选取2024年1月至2024年12月在北京大学第三医院眼科行VSL型巩膜镜验配的角膜不规则散光患者10例(11只眼)作为研究对象。其中,男性5例(5只眼),女性5例(6只眼);年龄6~44岁,平均(22.4±13.9)岁。根据患者眼部情况进行巩膜镜个性化装配,根据其角膜地形图、前节光学相干断层扫描及裂隙灯显微镜检查来确定VSL型巩膜镜参数以及拟合情况。患者试戴2 h后确认有效且无不适后记录为基线。在戴镜后第1周、第1个月及此后每3个月进行随访,使用标准对数视力表检查患者的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)并测定眼压,行眼前节照相、前节光学相干断层扫描及角膜地形图检查,询问患者戴镜舒适度、眼部症状改善效果及每天人工泪液的使用量。收集患者的病例资料,记录患者性别、年龄、眼别、病史、配镜参数等;检测并记录治疗前后患眼的裸眼视力、BCVA、眼压、屈光度及并发症。以上临床观察指标全部采用频数和百分比进行描述。

结果

所有患者10例(11只眼)随访3~10个月,平均随访(7.0±2.8)个月。所有患者均有不规则散光疾病病史,角膜移植术后者4例(4只眼),圆锥角膜者8例(9只眼),分别占36%和82%。在圆锥角膜患者中,K1值范围为39.7~57.8 D,平均值为(45.5±4.8)D;K2值范围为46.1~67.5 D,平均值为(50.6±5.9)D;最薄角膜厚度301~584 μm,平均最薄角膜厚度为(488.3±72.6)μm。患者每日配戴时长范围为6~14 h,平均每日配戴(10.2±2.5)h。在随访过程中巩膜镜矫正后的BCVA为0~0.3最小分辨角的对数(logMAR),平均值为(0.06±0.11)logMAR,平均增益为(0.52±0.39)logMAR。配戴巩膜镜后自觉视力明显好转者8例(9只眼),配镜后人工泪液使用量减少者3例(3只眼),分别占81.8%和27.3%。3例(3只眼)弱视患儿配戴巩膜镜弱视训练后视力提升效果较好。所有患者配戴巩膜镜的舒适度评分平均值为(8.7±1.49)分。其中,评分10分者5例(5只眼),占45.5%,未见并发症发生。

结论

VSL型巩膜镜能够显著提高角膜不规则散光患者的BCVA,改善患眼不适,具有良好的配戴舒适度和较高的安全性。配戴VSL型巩膜镜对弱视患儿童进行弱视训练可能有助于改善视觉恢复效果。

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VSL scleral lenses in the treatment of irregular astigmatism.

Methods

A total of 10 patients (11 eyes) with corneal irregular astigmatism who underwent VSL scleral lens fitting at Peking University Third Hospital from January to December 2024 were included. There were 5 males (5 eyes) and 5 females (6 eyes) with an mean age (22.4±13.9) years (ranging from 6 to 44 years). The VSL scleral lenses were customized by optometrists based on patients′ ocular conditions, with parameters determined by corneal topography, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and slit-lamp examination to ensure lens fitting properly. Baseline measurements were recorded after a 2-hour trial period confirmed efficacy and absence of discomfort. Follow-up visits were conducted at 1 week, 1 month, and every 3 months thereafter. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using a standard logarithmic acuity chart, intraocular pressure measurements, anterior segment photography, AS-OCT, corneal topography, patient-reported comfort, ocular symptoms, and daily artificial tear usage were evaluated. The gender, age, ocular history, lens parameters, objective metrics, and subjective feedback were collected. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, refractive error, BCVA, and complications were analyzed using frequency and percentage distributions.

Results

The mean follow-up duration of all patients (11 eyes) was (7±2.8) months. The indications for scleral lens fitting included irregular astigmatism after corneal transplantation (4 patients, 4 eyes) and keratoconus (8 patients, 9 eyes), accounting for 36% and 82%, respectively. In keratoconus patients, the mean of K1 values was (45.5±4.8)D (ranging from 39.7 to 57.8 D); the mean of K2 was (50.6±5.9)D (ranging from 46.1 to 67.5 D; and the mean of thinnest corneal thickness was (488.3±72.6)μm (ranging from 301 to 584 μm). The mean of daily wear duration was (10.2±2.5)hours (ranging from 6 to14 hours). During follow-up, the best BCVA achieved with scleral lenses ranged from 0 to 0.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a mean value of (0.06±0.11) logMAR and a mean improvement of (0.52±0.39) logMAR. After scleral lens fitting, 8 patients (9 eyes) reported significant subjective visual improvement, and 3 patients (3 eyes) showed reduced artificial tear usage, accounting for 81.8% and 27.3%, respectively. Three pediatric patients (3 eyes) exhibited enhanced visual acuity and comfort during amblyopia training with scleral lenses. The mean comfort score was (8.7±1.49) scores, with 5 patients (5 eyes) rating maximum comfort, accouting for 45.5%. No adverse events were observed.

Conclusions

The VSL scleral lenses significantly improved BCVA, alleviated ocular discomfort, and demonstrated favorable wearing comfort and high safety in patients with corneal irregular astigmatism. The VSL scleral lenses may enhance amblyopia training efficacy in children with corneal irregularities.

图1 不规则散光患者行巩膜镜验配及随访的流程图
表1 不规则散光患者的基本临床特征
[1]
Negishi K, Kumanomido T, Utsumi Y, et al. Effect of higher-order aberrations on visual function in keratoconic eyes with a rigid gas permeable contact lens [J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2007, 144(6): 924-929.
[2]
Lim N, Vogt U. Characteristics and functional outcomes of 130 patients with keratoconus attending a specialist contact lens clinic [J]. Eye (Lond), 2002, 16(1): 54-59.
[3]
Kastl PR. Correction of astigmatism with rigid gas permeable lenses [J]. Ophthalmol Clin North Am, 2003, 16(3): 359-363.
[4]
Michaud L, Lipson M, Kramer E, et al. The official guide to scleral lens terminology [J]. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2020, 43(6): 529-534.
[5]
Lee KE, Moon SY, Nam S, et al. Scleral lens applications focused on korean patients with various corneal disorders [J]. Korean J Ophthalmol, 2023, 37(2): 157-165.
[6]
范棋,杨凯丽,任胜卫. 中重度圆锥角膜患者巩膜镜试戴效果评估 [J]. 中华实验眼科杂志2023, 41(12): 1179-1186.
[7]
Korb DR, Finnemore VM, Herman JP. Apical changes and scarring in keratoconus as related to contact lens fitting techniques [J]. J Am Optom Assoc, 1982, 53(3): 199-205.
[8]
Zadnik K, Barr JT, Steger-May K, et al. Comparison of flat and steep rigid contact lens fitting methods in keratoconus [J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2005, 82(12): 1014-1021.
[9]
Carracedo G, Martin-Gil A, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, et al. Symptoms and signs in rigid gas permeable lens wearers during adaptation period [J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2016, 42(2): 108-114.
[10]
Lyons CJ, Buckley RJ, Pullum K, et al. Development of the gas-permeable impression-moulded scleral contact lens: A preliminary report [J]. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl, 1989, 192: 162-164.
[11]
Ezekie D. Gas permeable haptic lenses [J]. J Br Contact Lens Assoc, 1983, 6: 158-161.
[12]
Visser ES, Visser R, van-Lier HJ, et al. Modern scleral lenses part I [J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2007, 33(1): 13-20.
[13]
Schornack MM, Patel SV. Scleral lenses in the management of keratoconus [J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2010, 36(1): 39-44.
[14]
Bergmanson JP, Walker MK, Johnson LA. Assessing scleral contact lens satisfaction in a keratoconus population [J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2016, 93(8): 855-860.
[15]
DeLoss KS, Fatteh NH, Hood CT. Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem (PROSE) scleral device compared to keratoplasty for the treatment of corneal ectasia [J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014, 158(5): 974-982.
[16]
Koppen C, Kreps EO, Anthonissen L, et al. Scleral lenses reduce the need for corneal transplants in severe keratoconus [J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2018, 185: 43-47.
[17]
Kumar M, Shetty R, Lalgudi VG, et al. The effect of scleral lenses on vision, refraction and aberrations in post-LASIK ectasia, keratoconus and pellucid marginal degeneration [J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2021, 41(4): 664-672.
[18]
Fuller DG, Wang Y. Safety and efficacy of scleral lenses for keratoconus [J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2020, 97(9): 741-748.
[19]
Romero-Rangel T, Stavrou P, Cotter J, et al. Gas-permeable scleral contact lens therapy in ocular surface disease [J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2000, 130(1): 25-32.
[20]
Kok JH, Visser R. Treatment of ocular surface disorders and dry eyes with high gas-permeable scleral lenses [J]. Cornea, 1992, 11(6): 518-522.
[21]
Barnett M, Lien V, Li JY, et al. Use of scleral lenses and miniscleral lenses after penetrating keratoplasty [J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2016, 42(3): 185-189.
[22]
Schornack M, Nau C, Nau A, et al. Visual and physiological outcomes of scleral lens wear [J]. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2019, 42(1): 3-8.
[23]
Pecego M, Barnett M, Mannis MJ, et al. Jupiter scleral lenses: the UC Davis Eye Center experience [J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2012, 38(3): 179-182.
[24]
Kreps EO, Pesudovs K, Claerhout I, et al. Mini-scleral lenses improve vision-related quality of life in keratoconus [J]. Cornea, 2021, 40(7): 859-864.
[25]
Stason WB, Razavi M, Jacobs DS, et al. Clinical benefits of the Boston Ocular Surface Prosthesis [J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2010, 149(1): 54-61.
[26]
Rosenthal P, Croteau A. Fluid-ventilated, gas-permeable scleral contact lens is an effective option for managing severe ocular surface disease and many corneal disorders that would otherwise require penetrating keratoplasty [J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2005, 31(3): 130-134.
[27]
Heur M, Bach D, Theophanous C, et al. Prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem scleral lens therapy for patients with ocular symptoms of chronic Stevens-Johnson syndrome [J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014, 158(1): 49-54.
[28]
Visser ES, Van-der-Linden BJ, Otten HM, et al. Medical applications and outcomes of bitangential scleral lenses [J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2013, 90(10): 1078-1085.
[29]
Alipour F, Jamshidi-Gohari S, Azad N, et al. Miniscleral Contact Lens in Pediatric Age Group: indications, safety, and efficacy [J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2021, 47(7): 408-412.
[30]
Attebo K, Mitchell P, Cumming R, et al. Prevalence and causes of amblyopia in an adult population [J]. Ophthalmology, 1998, 105(1): 154-159.
[31]
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens [J]. J Physiol, 1970, 206(2): 419-436.
[32]
von-Noorden GK, Crawford ML. The sensitive period [J]. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K, 1979, 99(3): 442-446.
[33]
Gungor I, Schor K, Rosenthal P, et al. The Boston Scleral Lens in the treatment of pediatric patients [J]. J AAPOS, 2008, 12(3): 263-267.
[34]
Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D, Collins MJ, et al. Hypoxic corneal changes following eight hours of scleral contact lens wear [J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2016, 93(3): 293-299.
[35]
Fogt JS, Karres M, Barr JT. Changes in symptoms of midday fogging with a novel scleral contact lens filling solution [J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2020, 97(9): 690-696.
[36]
Rathi VM, Dumpati S, Mandathara PS, et al. Scleral contact lenses in the management of pellucid marginal degeneration [J]. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2016, 39(3): 217-220.
[37]
Rathi VM, Murthy SI, Bagga B, et al. Keratoglobus: An experience at a tertiary eye care center in India [J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2015, 63(3): 233-238.
[38]
Kawulok ER, Nau CB, Schornack MM. Microbial keratitis associated with penetrating keratoplasty and scleral lens wear: a case series [J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2022, 48(5): 217-221.
[1] 窦恩, 郑磊, 徐通海, 邓先锐. 局部神经阻滞麻醉在成人腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 442-445.
[2] 夏雪霞, 张黎雯, 任明星. 疏清颗粒联合阿奇霉素治疗小儿肺炎支原体感染的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 548-550.
[3] 吴玥琳, 石巍, 李飞燕, 靳冬冬, 薛阳, 贾梦玲, 阴倩阁, 杨立. 经脐单孔与传统腹腔镜治疗输卵管妊娠的疗效及生育结局对比研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 55-61.
[4] 刘晶, 张照程, 叶芙蓉, 接英, 田磊. 巩膜镜在干眼中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 45-49.
[5] 闫刚, 刘梓轩, 曲利军. 了解圆锥角膜分期、分级及分类的历史沿革和应用前景[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 1-5.
[6] 马萍, 鲁静, 兰长骏. 跨上皮和去上皮快速角膜交联术治疗进展期圆锥角膜的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 206-211.
[7] 徐静, 申笛, 孙西宇, 周堃, 王亚妮, 韦伟. 去上皮与跨上皮快速角膜胶原交联术治疗圆锥角膜长期疗效的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 332-337.
[8] 江卓婷, 高妍, 李春晖. 相干光断层扫描在角膜屈光手术术前筛查中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 247-251.
[9] 陈乐然, 袁翌斐, 陈跃国. 儿童圆锥角膜发病机制与角膜胶原交联术适应证及治疗研究的新进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 50-54.
[10] 刘佳, 贺瑞, 李晓娜. 断层扫描生物力学指数应用于屈光手术术前早期圆锥角膜筛查的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 341-346.
[11] 张艺凡, 戴锦晖, 叶琳. 促渗剂在去上皮角膜胶原交联术和跨上皮角膜胶原交联术中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 188-192.
[12] 王见科, 李铭孝, 刘江. 神经内镜在显微血管减压术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 96-99.
[13] 高尔涵, 张硕, 齐岩松, 王一帆. 3D打印个别托盘在全口义齿修复中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 255-259.
[14] 陈慧娟, 陈然, 金平, 吴章松, 刘勇, 徐菲, 赵启媛. 口服阿司匹林联合替罗非班对老年进展性缺血性脑卒中患者功能转归的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(12): 922-927.
[15] 扈姝琴, 许红燕, 曹丹, 丁亚艳. 云平台视频管理在患儿重症哮喘中的应用及对应对方式的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 218-223.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?