切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (03) : 116 -121. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2018.03.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

手术显微镜直视下巩膜外加压治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的临床观察
杨来庆1, 张沧霞1, 谢立科2,(), 郝晓凤2, 明静2, 孙会兰2, 李晓宇2   
  1. 1. 061000 河北省沧州中西医结合医院眼科
    2. 100041 北京,中国中医科学院眼科医院玻璃体视网膜病科
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-01 出版日期:2018-06-28
  • 通信作者: 谢立科
  • 基金资助:
    北京市石景山区科技计划项目(201704)

Clinical observation of scleral buckling in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment under surgical microscope

Laiqing Yang1, Cangxia Zhang1, Like Xie2,(), Xiaofeng Hao2, jing Ming2, Huilan Sun2, Xiaoyu Li2   

  1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Hebei Cangzhou integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Cangzhou 061000, China
    2. Department of Vitreoretinopathy, Ophthalmology hospital of Chinese Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100000, China
  • Received:2018-06-01 Published:2018-06-28
  • Corresponding author: Like Xie
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xie Like, Email:
引用本文:

杨来庆, 张沧霞, 谢立科, 郝晓凤, 明静, 孙会兰, 李晓宇. 手术显微镜直视下巩膜外加压治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的临床观察[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(03): 116-121.

Laiqing Yang, Cangxia Zhang, Like Xie, Xiaofeng Hao, jing Ming, Huilan Sun, Xiaoyu Li. Clinical observation of scleral buckling in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment under surgical microscope[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2018, 08(03): 116-121.

目的

观察显微镜直视下巩膜外加压治疗孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)的临床疗效。

方法

纳入2016年9月至2017年9月于中国中医科学院眼科医院玻璃体视网膜病科诊断为RRD,并首次接受巩膜外加压术的患者18例(20只眼)的临床资料,在显微镜下进行巩膜外加压手术,所有患者随访1~12个月,平均(6.1±1.2)个月,观察视力、视网膜复位率及并发症等。术前与术后患者的视力按照<0.05,0.05~0.30和>0.30分为三类,采用眼数和百分比进行描述,比较采用Kruskal-Wallis H秩和检验。

结果

在本研究所观察的病例中,视网膜全部复位,无重大并发症发生。其中,有6例(6只眼)患者需联合玻璃体腔注气术治疗,术后1~2周完全吸收。所有病例均予以巩膜穿刺放液,残余视网膜下液多在术后2周左右完全消退,但有2例(2只眼)患者在术后半年才完全吸收。此外,有4例(4只眼)患者术后补充视网膜裂孔周围激光光凝。随访过程中观察到病例中原病变区视网膜裂孔全部闭合,视网膜复位率100%。12例(13只眼)术后视力得以提高,6例(7只眼)术后视力无变化。因巩膜外加压导致眼球形态由原来的近似正球形发生改变。部分病例屈光度发生改变,视网膜脱离累及黄斑区者在视网膜下液吸收、黄斑复位后,视力有部分提高,经Kruskal-Wallis H秩和检验,差异有统计学意义(Hc=8.62,P<0.05)。有4例(4只眼)出现术后轻度双眼复视,5~7 d后症状消失,眼球运动无受限;13例(13只眼)术后因结膜缝线刺激主诉异物感,拆除缝线后无不适;1例(1只眼)术后结膜切口延期愈合。

结论

显微镜下外路视网膜脱离复位手术可以提高视网膜裂孔的封闭率,提高手术成功率,避免一部分手术并发症。

Objective

To observe the clinical efficiency of scleral bucking surgery under the microscope for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment(RRD).

Methods

The clinical data of 18 patients (20 eyes), diagnosed as RRD in the vitreoretinopathy Department of the ophthalmological Hospital of Chinese Academy of traditional Chinese medicine, from September 2016 to September 2017, were treated with scleral pressure surgery under microscope. All patients were followed up for 1~12 months, with an average of (6.1±1.2) months, observation and observation. Force, retinal reposition rate and complications. The visual acuity of the patients before and after operation was divided into three categories according to <0.05, 0.05~0.30 and >0.30. The number and percentage of eyes were described with Kruskal-Wallis H rank sum test.

Results

In the cases observed in this study, the retina of the patient was completely restored without significant complications. 6 patients(6 eyes) were treated with vitreous cavity gas injection, and vitreous cavity gas was absorbed completely after 1~2 weeks. All cases were given scleral puncture drainage, and residual subretinal fluid completely subsided around 2 weeks after operation. However, 2 patients(2 eyes) were completely absorbed after six months. In addition, 4 patients(4 eyes) received laser photocoagulation around the retinal hole after operation. During the follow-up, all the retinal holes in the central lesion area were closed and the retinal reattachment rate was 100%.Visual acuity was improved in 12 patients(13 eyes) and no change in visual acuity was found in 6 patients(7 eyes). Due to scleral buckling, the shape of the eyeball changes from the original approximately spherical shape. In some cases, the diopter was changed. The visual acuity was partly improved after retinal detachment and macular reduction. The difference was statistically significant (Hc=8.62, P<0.05) after Kruskal-Wallis H. There were 4 cases(4 eyes) of postoperative mild binocular diplopia, 5~7 days after the symptoms disappeared, the eyeball movement was not limited; 13 cases(13 eyes) of conjunctival suture stimulation after the main complaint of foreign body sensation, after the dismantling suture is not unsuitable, 1 case(1 eye) of conjunctival incisional nonunion.

Conclusion

It′s practicable to replace traditional external surgery by external retinal detachment surgery under the microscope. With the advantages of high magnification microscope, retinal hiatus closure rate and surgical success rate can be improved, and avoiding some surgical complications.

图1 显微镜下顶压巩膜图像 图示显微镜下顶压后可见视网膜圆形裂孔及周边视网膜变性
图2 显微镜下视网膜裂孔和变性区的眼球外观图像 图示视网膜裂孔标记位置
图3 显微镜下视网膜冷凝图像 图示显微镜直视下裂孔周围视网膜冷冻至视网膜略发白
图4 显微镜下巩膜外加压缝线操作的眼球外观图像 图示结扎外加压预置缝线固定硅海绵
表1 视网膜脱离患者裂孔数量、视网膜脱离范围及PVR分级的情况
表2 RRD患者手术前后视力的比较
[1]
Wilkinson CP, Rice TA. Michels Retinal Detachment[M]. 2nd edition, Saint Louis: Mosby, 1997: 595-638.
[2]
Haimann MH, Burton TC, Brown CK. Epidemiology of Retinal Detachment[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1982, 100(2): 289-292.
[3]
Wilkes SR, Beard CM, Kurland LT, et al. The incidence of retinal detachment in Rochester, Minnesota, 1970-1978[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1982, 94(5): 670-673.
[4]
Törnquist R, Stenkula S, Törnquist P. Retinal detachment. A study of a population-based patient material in Sweden 1971-1981. I. Epidemiology[J]. Acta Ophthalmologica, 1987, 66(6): 213-222.
[5]
Yoshida A, Ogasawara H, Jalkh AE, et al. Retinal Detachment after Cataract Surgery : Predisposing Factors[J]. Ophthalmology, 1992, 99(3): 453-459.
[6]
李凤鸣. 中华眼科学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:2182-2183.
[7]
Aras C, Ucar D, Koytak A, et al. Scleral buckling with a non-contact wide-angle viewing system[J]. Ophthalmologica, 2012, 227(2): 107-110.
[8]
赵东生.赵东生视网膜脱离手术学[M]. 上海:上海科技教育出版社,1999:171-172.
[9]
孙俏,孙涛,徐艺,等.手术治疗孔源性视网膜剥离的Meta分析[J]. 华西医学,2011,26(6):912-918.
[10]
Harris MJ, Blumenkranz MS, Wittpenn J, et al. Geometric alterations produced by encircling scleral buckles. Biometric and clinical considera-tions[J]. Retina, 1987, 7(1): 14-19.
[11]
Wu TJ, Rosenbaum AL, Demer JL. Severe strabismus after scleral buck-ling: multiple mechanisms revealed by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Ophthalmology, 2005, 112(2): 327-336.
[12]
Kawana K, OkamotoF, Hiraoka T, et al. Ciliary body edema after scleral buckling surgery in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Ophthalmology, 2006, 113(1): 36-41.
[13]
Regillo CD, Sergott RC, Brown GC. Successful scleral buckling proce-dures decrease central retinal artery blood flow velocity[J]. Ophthalmology, 1993, 100(7): 1044-1049.
[14]
Lincoff H, Stopa M, Kreissig I, et al. Cutting the encircling band[J]. Retina, 2006, 26(6): 650-654.
[15]
Choi MY, Yu YS. Effects of scleral buckling of refraction and oculargrowth in young rabbits[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2000, 238(9): 774-778.
[16]
Moshfeghi AA, Pendergast SD, HartzerMK, et al. The effects of scleralbuckling on young rabbit eyes[J]. Arch Ophthalmol 2004, 122(4): 473-476.
[17]
克雷西格. 视网膜脱离最小量手术治疗实用指南[M]. 惠延年,译. 北京:北京科学技术出版社,2004:119-265.
[18]
闵寒毅,毛进,高斐,等. 无放液最小量巩膜外加压术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离[J]. 协和医学杂志,2011,2(4):357-361.
[19]
黄欣,赵培泉,王文吉. 裂孔源性视网膜脱离的最小量巩膜外加压手术[J]. 眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2006,28(12):918-920.
[20]
Rezaei KA, Abrams GW. The history of retinal detachment surgery[M]. Kreissig I, Primary retinal detachment (option for repair). New York: Springer, 2005: 1-24.
[21]
张皙. 加压不放液手术治疗视网膜脱离(附150例报告)[J].中华眼科杂志,1982,18(6):336-340.
[22]
王启常,刘汉生. 不放液巩膜外加压术治疗陈旧性视网膜脱离[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2011,11(6):1049-1050.
[23]
向艳,杨红,李涛,等. 最小量巩膜外垫压术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离[J]. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2015,37(8):575-579.
[24]
谢洪涛,刘钊臣. 最小剂量手术方法治疗裂孔源性视网膜脱离的疗效[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2016,16(12):2326-2328.
[25]
宋琛. 眼科手术学[M]. 北京:人民军医出版社,2008:524-525.
[26]
傅宁静. 视网膜脱离诊断学[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1999:147-152.
[27]
田超伟,朱琦,王雨生,等. 巩膜外加压术治疗陈旧性视网膜脱离[J]. 中华眼底病杂志,2006,22(1):35-38.
[28]
刘文,李春芳,黄素英,等. 视网膜脱离外路显微手术的临床观察[J]. 中华眼底病杂志,2004,20(6):369-373.
[29]
杨薇,许惠卓,熊思齐,等. 视网膜脱离显微外路手术与传统外路手术的临床比较[J]. 临床眼科杂志,2014,22(3):234-236.
[30]
Eriksson A, Koranyi G, Seregard S, et al. Risk of acute suprachoroidal hemorrhage with phacoemulsification[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1998, 24(6): 793-800.
[31]
WirostkoWJ, Han DP, Mieler WF, et al. Suprachoroidal hemorrhage: outcome of surgical management according to hemorrhage severity[J]. Ophthalmology, 1998, 105(12): 2271-2275.
[32]
郝燕生,赵琳,刘卫华. 白内障术中暴发性脉络膜出血12例[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志,2004,22(5):398-398.
[33]
Veckeneer M, Overdam KV, Bouwens D, et al. Randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy versus laser photocoagulation for retinopexy in conventional retinal detachment surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2001, 132(3): 343-347.
[34]
黎晓新,王景昭. 玻璃体视网膜手术学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2000:152-154,171-180.
[35]
Bonnet M. Microsurgery of retinal detachment (vitreous surgery excluded) advantages, disadvantages, limitations, results[J]. Lanneé Thérapeutique Et Clinique En Ophtalmologie, 2015, 29(11): 93.
[36]
Bonnet M, Nagao M. Microsurgery of aphakic retinal detachment[J]. Ophthalmologica, 1983, 186(4): 177-182.
[37]
Conart JB, Hubert I, Casillas M, et al. Results of scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in phakic eyes[J]. Journal Français Dophtalmologie, 2013, 36(3): 255-260.
[38]
Zhao Y, Yuan HP. The observation of the eyeball structure and intraocular pressure changes after two types of external-route microsurgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Ophthalmology in China, 2017, 26(1): 30-34.
[39]
Garg SJ, Theventhiran AB. Retained subretinal perfluorocarbon liquid in microincision 23-gauge versus traditional 20-gauge vitrectomy for retinal detachment repair[J]. Retina, 2012, 32(10): 2127-2132.
[40]
Chen XZ, Huang WJ, Miao XQ. Comparison of efficacy of scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment under microscope and under indirect ophthalmoscope[J]. International Eye Science, 2015, 15(2): 292-294.
[1] 姜红艳, 周玉竹, 孙钡. 现代显微根尖手术的器械配置及口腔护理配合[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(02): 148-153.
[2] 曾百卉, 王倩, 韩宁, 隋桂琴. 下方孔源性视网膜脱离手术治疗的进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 60-64.
[3] 贾力蕴, 张永鹏, 佘海澄, 周海英, 高丽琴, 马凯, 魏文斌. 儿童孔源性视网膜脱离发病特点、病因及手术方式的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 35-40.
[4] 李玲, 侯军军, 张红. 玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术对孔源性视网膜脱离疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 14-21.
阅读次数
全文


摘要