[1] |
Piňero DP, Alcón N. Corneal biomechanics: a review[J]. Clin Exp Optom, 2015, 98(2): 107-116.
|
[2] |
Ambrósio R , Correia FF, Lopes B, et al. Corneal biomechanics in ectatic diseases: refractive surgery implications[J]. Open Ophthalmol J, 2017, 11: 176-193.
|
[3] |
Chen KJ, Joda A, Vinciguerra R, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2018, 44(5): 581-588.
|
[4] |
SalomãoMQ, Hoffling-Lima A, Lopes BT, et al. Recent developments in keratoconus diagnosis[J]. 2018, 13(6): 329-341.
|
[5] |
Vellara HR, Patel DV. Biomechanical properties of the keratoconic cornea: a review[J]. Clin Exp Optom, 2015, 98(1): 31-38.
|
[6] |
Zhang M, Zhang F, Li Y, et al. Early diagnosis of keratoconus in Chinese myopic eyes by combining Corvis ST with pentacam[J]. Current Eye Res, 2020, 45(2): 118-123.
|
[7] |
Ortiz D, Piňero D, Shabayek MH, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2007, 33(8): 1371-1375.
|
[8] |
Ramirez-Garcia MA, Sloan SR, Nidenberg B, et al. Depth-dependent out-of-plane young's modulus of the human cornea[J]. Curr eye research, 2018, 43(5): 595-604.
|
[9] |
De-Stefano VS, Dupps WJ. Biomechanical diagnostics of the cornea[J]. Int Ophthalmol Clin, 2017, 57(3): 75-86.
|
[10] |
Eliasy A, Chen KJ, Vinciguerra R, et al. Determination of corneal biomechanical behavior in-vivo for healthy eyes using CorVis ST tonometry: Stress-Strain Index[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2019, 7: 105.
|
[11] |
Kaushik S, Pandav SS. Ocular response analyzer[J]. J Curr Glaucoma Pract, 2012, 6(1): 17-19.
|
[12] |
Sedaghat MR, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Heravian J, et al. Detection ability of corneal biomechanical parameters for early diagnosis of ectasia[J]. Eye (London, England), 2023, 37(8): 1665-1672.
|
[13] |
Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Invest Ophth Vis Sci, 2003, 44(9): 3790-3794.
|
[14] |
Qian CX, Duperré J, Hassanaly S, et al. Pre versus post-dilation changes in intraocular pressure: their clinical significance[J]. Can J Ophthalmol, 2012, 47(5): 448-452.
|
[15] |
Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, et al. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry[J]. Am J Ophthal-mol, 2007, 143(1): 39-47.
|
[16] |
Tsai AS, Loon SC. Intraocular pressure assessment after laser in situ keratomileusis: a review[J]. Clin Exp Optom, 2012, 40(3): 295-304.
|
[17] |
Eliasy A, Chen KJ, Vinciguerra R, et al. Ex-vivo experimental validation of biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure measurements on human eyes using the CorVis ST[J]. Exp Eye Res, 2018, 175: 98-102.
|
[18] |
Elsheikh A, Geraghty B, Alhasso D, et al. Regional variation in the biomechanical properties of the human sclera[J]. Exp Eye Res, 2010, 90(5): 624-633.
|
[19] |
Joda AA, Shervin MM, Kook D, et al. Development and validation of a correction equation for Corvis tonometry[J]. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 2016, 19(9): 943-953.
|
[20] |
Fernández J, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Martínez J, et al. New parameters for evaluating corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after small-incision lenticule extraction by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2017, 43(6): 803-811.
|
[21] |
Liu G, Rong H, Pei R, et al. Age distribution and associated factors of cornea biomechanical parameter stress-strain index in Chinese healthy population[J]. BMC Ophthalmol 2020, 20(1): 436.
|
[22] |
Vinciguerra R, Ambrósio R, Roberts CJ, et al. Biomechanical characterization of subclinical keratoconus without topographic or tomographic abnormalities[J]. J Refract Surg, 2017, 33(6): 399-407.
|
[23] |
Vinciguerra R, Ambrósio R, Elsheikh A, et al. Detection of keratoconus with a new biomechanical index[J]. J Refract Surg, 2016, 32(12): 803-810.
|
[24] |
Wang YM, Chan TCY, Yu M, et al. Comparison of corneal dynamic and tomographic analysis in normal, forme fruste keratoconic, and keratoconic eyes[J]. J Refract Surg, 2017, 33(9): 632-638.
|
[25] |
Chan TC, Wang YM, Yu M, et al. Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2018, 102(1): 42-47.
|
[26] |
Steinberg J, Amirabadi NE, Frings A, et al. Keratoconus screening with dynamic biomechanical in vivo scheimpflug analyses: a proof-of-concept study[J]. J Refract Surg, 2017, 33(11): 773-778.
|
[27] |
Augustin VA, Son HS, Baur I, et al. Detecting subclinical keratoconus by biomechanical analysis in tomographically regular keratoconus fellow eyes[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2021, PMID: 34841930.
|
[28] |
Ambrósio R, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, et al. Integration of scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing Ectasia detection[J]. J Refract Surg, 2017, 33(7): 434-443.
|
[29] |
Ferreira-Mendes J, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, et al. Enhanced Ectasia detection using corneal tomography and biomechanics[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2019, 197: 7-16.
|
[30] |
Fernández J, Rodríguez-Vallejo M. Tomographic and biomechanical index (TBI) for screening in laser refractive surgery[J]. J Refract Surg, 2019, 35(6): 398.
|
[31] |
Kataria P, Padmanabhan P, Gopalakrishnan A, et al. Accuracy of Scheimpflug-derived corneal biomechanical and tomographic indices for detecting subclinical and mild keratectasia in a South Asian population[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2019, 45(3): 328-336.
|
[32] |
Steinberg J, Siebert M, Katz T, et al. Tomographic and biomechanical scheimpflug imaging for keratoconus characteri-zation: a validation of current indices[J]. J Refract Surg, 2018, 34(12): 840-847.
|
[33] |
Xu H, Zong Y, Zhai R, et al. Intereye and intraeye asymmetry analysis of retinal microvascular and neural structure parameters for diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma[J]. Eye (London, England), 2019, 33(10): 1596-1605.
|
[34] |
Elsheikh A, Geraghty B, Rama P, et al. Characterization of age-related variation in corneal biomechanical properties[J]. J R Soc Interface, 2010, 7(51): 1475-1485.
|
[35] |
Clayson K, Pan X, Pavlatos E, et al. Corneoscleral stiffening increases IOP spike magnitudes during rapid microvolumetric change in the eye[J]. Exp Eye Res, 2017, 165: 29-34.
|
[36] |
Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005, 31(1): 146-155.
|
[37] |
Ye Y, Li Y, Zhu Z, et al. Effect of mydriasis-caused intraocular pressure changes on corneal biomechanical metrics[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2021, 9: 751628.
|
[38] |
Maklad O, Eliasy A, Chen KJ, et al. Fluid-structure interaction based algorithms for iop and corneal material behavior[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020, 8: 970.
|
[39] |
Han F, Li M, Wei P, et al. Effect of biomechanical properties on myopia: a study of new corneal biomechanical parameters[J]. BMC Ophthalmol 2020, 20(1): 459.
|
[40] |
Zhang H, Eliasy A, Lopes B, et al. Stress-strain index map: a new way to represent corneal material stiffness[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2021, 9: 640434.
|
[41] |
Liu Y, Zhang Y, Chen Y. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients[J]. BMC Ophthalmol 2021, 21(1): 339.
|
[42] |
Daxer A, Misof K, Grabner B, et al. Collagen fibrils in the human corneal stroma: structure and aging[J]. Invest Ophth Vis Sci, 1998, 39(3): 644-648.
|
[43] |
Blackburn BJ, Jenkins MW, Rollins AM, et al. A review of structural and biomechanical changes in the cornea in aging, disease, and photochemical crosslinking[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2019, 7: 66.
|
[44] |
He M, Ding H, He H, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in healthy children measured by corneal visualization scheimpflug technology[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2017, 17(1): 70.
|
[45] |
Tubtimthong A, Chansangpetch S, Ratprasatporn N, et al. Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties among axial myopic, nonaxial myopic, and nonmyopic eyes[J]. BioMed Res Int, 2020, PMID: 8618615.
|
[46] |
Jonas JB, Xu L. Histological changes of high axial myopia[J]. Eye (London, England), 2014, 28(2): 113-117.
|
[47] |
Harper AR, Summers JA. The dynamic sclera: extracellular matrix remodeling in normal ocular growth and myopia development[J]. Exp Eye Res, 2015, 133: 100-111.
|
[48] |
Morgan SR, Dooley EP, Hocking PM, et al. An X-ray scattering study into the structural basis of corneal refractive function in an avian model[J]. Biophys J, 2013, 104(12): 2586-2594.
|
[49] |
Chang SW, Tsai IL, Hu FR, et al. The cornea in young myopic adults[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2001, 85(8): 916-920.
|
[50] |
Ohno-Matsui K, Akiba M, Ishibashi T, et al. Observations of vascular structures within and posterior to sclera in eyes with pathologic myopia by swept-source optical coherence tomography[J]. Invest Ophth Vis Sci, 2012, 53(11): 7290-7298.
|
[51] |
Chua J, Nongpiur ME, Zhao W, et al. Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties between Indian and Chinese adults[J]. Ophthalmology, 2017, 124(9): 1271-1279.
|
[52] |
Vinciguerra R, Herber R, Wang Y, et al. Corneal biomechanics differences between Chinese and Caucasian healthy subjects[J]. Front Med, 2022, 9: 834663.
|