切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 134 -139. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2026.03.002

论著

角膜地形图引导准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜上皮重塑的临床研究
付彩云, 郑燕, 管鑫龙, 张丽, 董依然, 马冬玥, 孙云晓, 翟长斌()   
  1. 100730 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 眼科学与视觉科学北京市重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-18 出版日期:2026-06-28
  • 通信作者: 翟长斌
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC2404505)

The research of epithelial remodeling after topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis

Caiyun Fu, Yan Zheng, Xinlong Guan, Li Zhang, Yiran Dong, Dongyue Ma, Yunxiao Sun, Changbin Zhai()   

  1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2026-05-18 Published:2026-06-28
  • Corresponding author: Changbin Zhai
引用本文:

付彩云, 郑燕, 管鑫龙, 张丽, 董依然, 马冬玥, 孙云晓, 翟长斌. 角膜地形图引导准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜上皮重塑的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 134-139.

Caiyun Fu, Yan Zheng, Xinlong Guan, Li Zhang, Yiran Dong, Dongyue Ma, Yunxiao Sun, Changbin Zhai. The research of epithelial remodeling after topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(03): 134-139.

目的

探究角膜地形图引导(TOPO-G)准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)术后角膜上皮重塑规律及影响因素。

方法

纳入2021年5月至2024年7月于首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院行TOPO-G LASIK的近视眼患者119例(237只眼)。其中,男性28例(56只眼),女性91例(181只眼);年龄18~40岁,平均年龄(27.9±4.7)岁。根据术前主觉验光等效球镜屈光度(MRSE)将患者分为高度近视眼组和中低度近视眼组,前者MRSE≤-6.00 D,后者MRSE>-6.00 D。分别于术前及术后1个月、术后3个月、术后6个月及术后12个月时测量两组患者角膜6 mm范围内0~2 mm中央区、2~5 mm内环区及5~6 mm外环区17个区域的上皮厚度(ET)。患者的年龄、视力、屈光度、角膜厚度及ET均符合正态分布,以±s形式描述,各组术前术后的比较采用配对t检验,两组患者间各时间点比较采用独立样本t检验,采用混合效应模型分析角膜ET变化的影响因素。

结果

术前高度近视眼组患者MRSE、裸眼远视力、最佳矫正远视力及中央角膜厚度分别为(-7.66±1.29)D、(1.35±0.28)最小分辨视角的对数(logMAR)、(-0.04±0.05)logMAR及(535.12±22.98)μm;中低度近视眼组患者分别为(-4.27±1.26)D、(1.08±0.39)logMAR、(-0.05±0.04)logMAR及(529.63±29.76)μm。裸眼远视力中低度近视眼组优于高度近视眼组,差异有统计学意义(t=0.79,P<0.05);两组患者最佳矫正远视力和中央角膜厚度的比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.21,0.21;P>0.05)。高度近视眼组和中低度近视眼组患者术后1个月、术后3个月、术后6个月及术后12个月中央区2 mm平均ET分别为(55.17±4.19)μm、(57.73±4.41)μm、(57.94±3.99)μm、(58.35±3.70)μm、(53.99±4.45)μm、(54.74±3.24)μm、(55.36±3.36)μm及(56.66±4.34)μm,两组患者较术前均增加且高度近视眼组较中低度近视眼组增加明显,差异有统计学意义(t=0.20,0.38,0.38,0.27;P<0.05)。两组患者术后各时间点内环区2~5 mm平均ET分别为(58.79±3.90)μm、(61.08±3.89)μm、(61.11±3.48)μm、(61.78±3.27)μm、(56.23±4.43)μm、(56.93±2.84)μm、(57.52±3.31)μm及(58.56±4.29)μm,两组患者较术前均增加且高度近视眼组较中低度近视眼组增加明显,差异有统计学意义(t=0.43,0.62,0.55,0.53;P<0.05)。两组患者术后各时间点外环区5~6 mm平均ET分别为(56.84±3.57)μm、(58.94±3.12)μm、(58.55±3.18)μm、(59.32±2.87)μm、(55.68±4.19)μm、(56.29±2.73)μm、(56.76±2.92)μm及(57.19±3.98)μm,两组患者较术前均增加,高度近视眼组较中低度近视眼组增加明显,差异有统计学意义(t=0.27,0.52,0.58,0.41;P<0.05)。2~5 mm和5~6 mm区内颞上、颞侧、颞下及下方各区ET变化量随时间逐渐增加,但与中低度近视眼组患者相比,各时间点高度近视眼组患者以上各区角膜ET增加量明显更高。经混合效应模型分析,患者切削深度、MRSE与2 mm ET变化量呈负相关且有统计学意义(β=-1.27,-1.87;P<0.05),术后3个月后的随访时间则与2 mm上皮变化呈正相关且有统计学意义(β=1.72,1.92,2.70;P<0.05)。切削深度与随访时间的交互效应分析可见与术后1个月相比,术后3个月和术后6个月时2 mm ET变化呈正相关且有统计学意义(β=0.60,0.73;P<0.05)。

结论

TOPO-G LASIK术后角膜上皮重塑主要集中于颞下方、下方及颞侧的内外环区,术后各时间点高度近视组患者ET增加均高于中低度近视组,但两组患者术后1年内上皮均持续增殖且未达稳定状态。术前MRSE是术后上皮重塑的主要决定因素;切削深度则通过时间依赖的交互效应影响中央区上皮重塑且中远期影响更明显,临床需加强中长期随访。

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate the patterns of corneal epithelial remodeling and related influencing factors after topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (TOPO-G LASIK).

Methods

A total of 119 patients (237 eyes) based on TOPO-G LASIK from May 2021 to July 2024 were retrospectively included in Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University. There were 28 males (56 eyes) and 91 females (181 eyes) with an average age of 27.9±4.7 years (ranging from 18 to 40 years old). Patients were divided into the high myopia group (≤-6.00 D) and the moderate-to-low myopia group (>-6.00 D) based on the manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE). The epithelial thickness (ET) of 17 regions in total within the 6 mm corneal range, which included 1 central zone (0 to 2 mm), as well as the inner ring zone (2 to 5 mm) and the outer ring zone (5 to 6 mm), was measured by the anterior segment optical coherence tomography preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively. The age, visual acuity, MRSE, corneal thickness and epithelial thickness were all normally distributed and described as ±s. Paired t-tests were used in both groups before and after surgery, and independent sample t-tests were used between the two groups at different time points. And a mixed-effects model was applied to further explore the specific factors affecting postoperative ET changes.

Results

The MRSE, uncorrected distance visual acuity, best corrected distance visual acuity, and central corneal thickness were (-7.66±1.29) D, (1.35±0.28) logarithm of the minium angle of resolution (logMAR), (-0.04±0.05) logMAR, and (535.12±22.98) μm in the high myopic group and (-4.27±1.26) D, (1.08±0.39) logMAR, (-0.05±0.04) logMAR, and (529.63±29.76)μm in the moderate-to-low myopic group. The uncorrected distant visual acuity of the moderate-to-low myopia group was better than that of the high myopia group (t=0.79, P<0.05), while no statistical differences were in the best corrected distance visual acuity and central corneal thickness (t=0.21, 0.21; P>0.05) between the two groups. The central 2 mm average ET of the two groups at 1, 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively was (55.17±4.19)μm, (57.73±4.41)μm, (57.94±3.99)μm, (58.35±3.70)μm, (53.99±4.45)μm, (54.74±3.24)μm, (55.36±3.36)μm, (56.66±4.34)μm, respectively; and the inner 2 to 5 mm ring average ET was (58.79±3.90)μm, (61.08±3.89)μm, (61.11±3.48)μm, (61.78±3.27)μm, (56.23±4.43)μm, (56.93±2.84)μm, (57.52±3.31)μm, (58.56±4.29)μm, respectively; and the outer 5 to 6 mm ring average ET was (56.84±3.57)μm, (58.94±3.12)μm, (58.55±3.18)μm, (59.32±2.87)μm, and (55.68±4.19)μm, (56.29±2.73)μm, (56.76±2.92)μm, (57.19±3.98)μm, respectively. Both groups increased compared with those preoperatively, and the high myopic group showed significant increases in the average corneal ET in the central 2 mm (t=0.20, 0.38, 0.38, 0.27; P<0.05), the inner ring 2 to 5 mm zone (t=0.43, 0.62, 0.55, 0.53; P<0.05), and the outer ring 5 to 6 mm zone (t=0.27, 0.52, 0.58, 0.41; P<0.05) at 1, 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively compared with the moderate-to-low myopic group. The superotemporal, temporal, inferotemporal, and inferior ET of the 2 to 5 mm and 5 to 6 mm zones gradually increased over time, and the increase in the high myopic group was higher than that in the moderate-to-low myopic group. The results of the mixed-effects model analysis showed that the ablation depth and MRSE were negatively correlated with Δ2 mm ET (β=-1.27, -1.87; P<0.05); the follow-up time at 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively was positively correlated with Δ2 mm epithelium (β=1.72, 1.92, 2.70; P<0.05). The interaction effect of cutting depth and follow-up time was positively correlated with Δ2 mm ET. There was statistical significance at 3 months and 6 m (β=0.60, 0.73; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Corneal epithelial remodeling after TOPO-G LASIK was mainly concentrated in the inferotemporal, inferior, and temporal regions of the inner and outer ring zones. The ET increase in the high myopia group was higher than that in the moderate-to-low group at all postoperative times. However, epithelial remodeling continued in both groups within 1 year after surgery and had not reached a stable state. Preoperative MRSE was the main determinant of postoperative epithelial remodeling. Ablation depth could not function independently of time, which influenced central epithelial remodeling through a time-dependent interaction effect with a more significant impact in the mid-to-long term. Therefore, enhanced mid-to-long-term follow-up is required.

图1 高度近视眼组和中低度近视眼组患者术后不同时间角膜上皮厚度变化的热力图 图1A~1D分别示高度近视眼组患者与术前相比术后1个月、术后3个月、术后6个月及术后12个月时角膜上皮厚度变化量的热力分布图;图1E~1H分别示中低度近视眼组患者与术前相比术后1个月、术后3个月、术后6个月及术后12个月时角膜上皮厚度变化量的热力分布图  图2 术后角膜上皮厚度变化影响因素的混合效应模型分析 图2A和图2B分别示与术后1个月相比,中央2 mm区和6 mm区上皮厚度变化量的影响因素混合效应模型
[1]
Sukhee N, Namba H, Ikeda M, et al. Corneal epithelium is altered in keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1): 22203.
[2]
Li J, Huang Y, Song Y, et al. Epithelial remodeling associated with corneal power and corneal higher-order aberrations after ray-tracing guided FS-LASIK for myopia[J]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2025, 56: 105230.
[3]
Chen P, Hou X, Yu N, et al. Corneal epithelial remodeling following cylinder correction with SMILE or FS-LASIK: a contralateral comparative study[J]. J Refract Surg, 2024, 40(10): e728-e741.
[4]
Dutta D, Rao HL, Addepalli UK, et al. Corneal thickness in keratoconus: comparing optical, ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography pachymetry[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013, 120(3): 457-463.
[5]
Abtahi MA, Beheshtnejad AH, Latifi G, et al. Corneal Epithelial Thickness Mapping: A Major Review[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2024, PMID: 6674747.
[6]
Morgado CR, Santhiago MR. Normative distribution of corneal epithelial thickness on 9-mm OCT maps[J]. Front Med, 2025, 12: 1572326.
[7]
Wojtkowski M. Spatio-temporal optical coherence imaging and tomography for in vivo applications[J]. J Biomed Opt, 2026, 31(11): 113504.
[8]
Hoshing AA, Bhosale S, Samant MP, et al. A cross-sectional study to determine the normal corneal epithelial thickness in indian population using 9-mm wide optical coherence tomography scans[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2021, 69(9): 2425-2429.
[9]
赵雪琪. 近视与远视患者FS-LASIK术后角膜上皮重塑及其对视力的影响[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志(中英文)202426(12):888-896.
[10]
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Rate of change of curvature of the corneal stromal surface drives epithelial compensatory changes and remodeling[J]. J Refract Surg, 2014, 30(12): 799-802.
[11]
Yang F, Yang Z, Zhao S, et al. To investigate the changes in corneal curvature and its correlation with corneal epithelial remodeling after trans-PRK and FS-LASIK[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2024, 49(10): 1061-1067.
[12]
Vinciguerra P, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra R. Corneal curvature gradient determines corneal healing process and epithelial behavior[J]. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(4): 281-282.
[13]
Amatu JB, Baudouin C, Trinh L, et al. Corneal epithelial biomechanics: resistance to stress and role in healing and remodeling[J]. J Fr Ophtalmol, 2023, 46(3): 287-299.
[14]
Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. In vivo 3-dimensional corneal epithelial thickness mapping as an indicator of dry eye[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014, 157(1): 63-68.
[15]
Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Longitudinal postoperative lasik epithelial thickness profile changes in correlation with degree of myopia correction[J]. J Refract Surg, 2014, 30(3): 166-171.
[16]
张杨婧,马立威,张帆,等. SMILE与FS-LASIK术后角膜上皮重塑的临床研究[J]. 国际眼科杂志202525(1):37-41.
[17]
Zhu M, Xin Y, Vinciguerra R, et al. Corneal epithelial remodeling in a 6-month follow-up period in myopic corneal refractive surgeries[J]. J Refract Surg, 2023, 39(3): 187-196.
[18]
Fu C, Sun M, Zhang F, et al. Visual quality evaluation of topography-guided FS-LASIK based on phorcides for myopia and astigmatism[J]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2026, 58: 105385.
[19]
Ipek ᶊC, Utine CA. Topography-guided excimer laser ablation in refractive surgery[J]. Front Ophthalmol, 2024, 4: 1367258.
[20]
Holland S, Lin DTC, Tan JCH. Topography-guided laser refractive surgery[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2013, 24(4): 302-309.
[21]
Fan L, Xiong L, Zhang B, et al. Longitudinal and regional non-uniform remodeling of corneal epithelium after topography-guided FS-LASIK[J]. J Refract Surg, 2019, 35(2): 88-95.
[22]
Wang Y, Zhang XF, Qian YF, et al. Comparison of corneal epithelial remodeling after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK[J]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi Chin J Ophthalmol, 2020, 56(2): 93-102.
[23]
张秋露,宋彦铮,付彩云,等. 中高度近视眼SMILE术后早期角膜上皮重塑特点分析[J]. 眼科202130(4):271-274.
[24]
Luo L, Fan Y, Wang X, et al. Corneal epithelial remodeling following myopic ray-tracing-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis[J]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2025, 56: 105257.
[25]
Saleh S, Epp LJ, Manche EE. Effect of corneal epithelial remodeling on visual outcomes of topography-guided femtosecond LASIK[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2022, 48(10): 1155-1161.
[26]
Ma Y, Li Q, Guo Q, et al. The impact of corneal epithelial remodeling on visual quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2025, 25(1): 336.
[27]
Doane MG. Interactions of eyelids and tears in corneal wetting and the dynamics of the normal human eyeblink[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1980, 89(4): 507-516.
[28]
Cruz AAV, Garcia DM, Pinto CT, et al. Spontaneous eyeblink activity[J]. Ocul Surf, 2011, 9(1): 29-41.
[29]
Li J, Qin J, Lv X, et al. Study of corneal and retinal thicknesses at five years after FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopia[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2024, 24(1): 396.
[30]
许杨,牛晓光,刘莉,等. FS-LASIK术后早期角膜上皮厚度变化特点及其相关影响因素分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志202323(9):1551-1554.
[31]
Xu Y, Liu J, Song W, et al. Biomimetic convex implant for corneal regeneration through 3D printing[J]. Adv Sci, 2023, 10(11): e2205878.
[1] 张华, 赵欣, 米金园, 刘啸昔, 张学斌, 闫诗语, 孙朝晖. 角膜断层地形图引导与像差优化准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视眼散光术后1年高阶像差及客观视觉质量的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 282-287.
[2] 郑燕, 翟长斌, 付彩云, 张丽, 王玥, 胡雅斌, 柳静. 准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术联合快速角膜交联术后角膜光密度变化的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 327-334.
[3] 赵欣, 赵晴, 张华. 角膜地形图引导个性化切削屈光术矫正近视眼和散光的早期临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 210-214.
[4] 赵鹏飞, 柳静, 徐雯, 胡雅斌, 翟长斌, 魏文斌. 术前应用人工泪液对FS-LASIK治疗高度近视眼术后干眼自觉症状和泪膜稳定性影响的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(06): 326-332.
[5] 宋耀文, 贺瑞, 马秋霞. 高度近视眼行准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后长期稳定性的研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(01): 15-22.
[6] 周迎霞, 王芳芳. 飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗超高度近视眼的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 07(03): 121-127.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?