切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 160 -165. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2020.03.006

所属专题: 青少年近视防控

论著

复方托吡卡胺和阿托品在儿童验光检查中的应用研究
赵世强1, 王兴存2, 王小兵1, 汪东生1, 李蕾1, 马茜1, 接英1,()   
  1. 1. 100730 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科研究所 北京市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室
    2. 037047 大同,中国人民解放军中部战区空军医院眼科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-22 出版日期:2020-06-28
  • 通信作者: 接英
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(11232013)

The application of compound topicamide and atropine in the cycloplegic refraction for children

Shiqiang Zhao1, Xingcun Wang2, Xiaobing Wang1, Dongsheng Wang1, lei Li1, Qian Ma1, Ying Jie1,()   

  1. 1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
    2. Central Theater Air Force Hospital Eye, People′s Liberation Army of China, Datong 037047, China
  • Received:2020-04-22 Published:2020-06-28
  • Corresponding author: Ying Jie
引用本文:

赵世强, 王兴存, 王小兵, 汪东生, 李蕾, 马茜, 接英. 复方托吡卡胺和阿托品在儿童验光检查中的应用研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(03): 160-165.

Shiqiang Zhao, Xingcun Wang, Xiaobing Wang, Dongsheng Wang, lei Li, Qian Ma, Ying Jie. The application of compound topicamide and atropine in the cycloplegic refraction for children[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(03): 160-165.

目的

探讨复方托吡卡胺滴眼液和阿托品眼用凝胶在儿童验光检查中的应用效果及其相关性。

方法

收集2016年1月至2019年3月于首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院眼科中心就诊儿童151例(302只眼)的资料。其中,男性68例(136只眼),女性83例(166只眼);年龄3~10岁,平均年龄(6.0±1.5)岁。根据屈光状态将患儿分为远视眼组、混合散光组及近视眼组。各组患儿均先后进行复方托吡卡胺和阿托品散瞳,而后检查并记录患儿的球镜值、柱镜值、轴向值及最佳矫正视力。所有指标经Kolmogorov-Smirnov正态性检验,不符合正态分布时,以中位数和四分位数描述。组内比较采用配对样本秩和检验。不同年龄患儿两种药物散瞳验光结果中球镜差值的比较,采用独立样本秩和检验。患儿两种药物散瞳验光结果中球镜值间的关系,采用一元线性回归进行分析。

结果

远视眼组、混合散光组及近视眼组患儿分别有63例(126只眼)、41例(82只眼)和47例(94只眼)。三组患儿性别间的比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.171,P>0.05);三组患儿年龄间的比较,差异无统计学意义(F=1.399,P>0.05)。远视眼组患儿复方托吡卡胺散瞳验光结果中的球镜值、柱镜值、轴向值及最佳矫正视力分别为2.50(1.00,5.31)D、1.00(0.50,1.75)D、90(85,100)°及0.10(0.00,0.20);阿托品散瞳验光结果中的球镜值、柱镜值、轴向值及矫正视力分别为3.50(2.00,6.31)D、1.00(0.50,1.75)D、90(85,95)°及0.10(0.00,0.20)。经配对样本秩和检验,各组患儿球镜值、柱镜值及最佳矫正视力的比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=9.692,-2.726,-2.483;P<0.05);但轴向值的比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.173,P>0.05)。混合散光组患儿复方托吡卡胺散瞳验光结果中的球镜值、柱镜值、轴向值及最佳矫正视力分别为-1.00(-2.00,-0.75)D、3.00(2.00,4.00)D、90(85,95)°及0.10(0.00,0.20);阿托品散瞳验光结果中的球镜值、柱镜值、轴向值及最佳矫正视力分别为-0.50(-1.25,0.00)D、3.00(2.00,4.00)D、90(85,95)°及0.10(0.00,0.20)。经配对样本秩和检验,各组患儿球镜值和最佳矫正视力的比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=7.778,-2.826;P<0.05);但柱镜值和轴向值的比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.098 ,-0.653;P>0.05)。近视眼组患儿复方托吡卡胺散瞳验光结果中的球镜值、柱镜值、轴向值及最佳矫正视力分别为-3.50(-6.00,-1.25)D、-1.38(-2.50,-0.50)D、90(85,95)°及0.00(0.00,0.20);阿托品散瞳验光结果中的球镜值、柱镜值、轴向值及最佳矫正视力分别为-3.13(-5.25,-1.00)D、-1.50(-2.50,-0.50)D、90(85,95)°及0.10(0.00,0.20)。经配对样本秩和检验,各组患儿球镜值和最佳矫正视力的比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=8.388,-2.744;P<0.05);但柱镜值和轴向值的比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=0.511,-1.735;P>0.05)。远视眼组、混合散光组及近视眼组患儿两种药物散瞳验光结果中的球镜值函数关系分别为y阿托品=1.068+0.976x复方托吡卡胺y阿托品=0.775+0.999x复方托吡卡胺y阿托品=0.248+0.949x复方托吡卡胺。远视眼组、混合散光组及近视眼组<6岁患儿的球镜差值分别为1.00(0.75,1.44)D、1.00(0.50,1.25)D及0.50(0.25,0.75)D;≥6岁患儿的球镜差值分别为0.75(0.50,1.00)D、0.50(0.25,0.75)D及0.25(0.00,0.50)D;经独立样本秩和检验,组内两者的比较差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.261,-4.160,-2.360;P<0.05)。

结论

各组两种药物散瞳后,年龄越小者验光结果差异越大。远视眼和混合散光患儿应采用阿托品散瞳验光,在特殊情况下对混合散光和年龄≤6岁的近视眼患儿可在复方托吡卡胺散瞳验光结果的基础上,再根据两者的函数关系修正为阿托品的验光结果,6岁以上近视眼患儿建议采用复方托品卡胺散瞳验光。

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore the application and the correlation of atropine eye gel and compound topicamide eye drops in cycloplegic refraction for children.

Methods

151 cases (302 eyes) who were admitted to Eye Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University from January 2016 to March 2019 were collected. They were aged 3 to 10 years-old with an average age of (6.0±1.5) years-old, including 68 males (136 eyes) and 83 females (166 eyes). Patients were divided into hyperopia group, myopia group and mixed astigmatism group according to their refractive status. All patients underwent cycloplegic refraction using compound topicamide and atropine, resepctviely. The cycloplegic refraction results of two drugs for children in each group, including diopter of spherical power (DS), diopter of cylindrical power (DC), axial length (AL) and corrected visual acuity (CVA) were analyzed. All indices were not in accordance with the normal distribution by Kolmogorov-Smirnov normal test, which was described by median and quartile. And the rank sum test within group paired samples was performed.

Results

There were 63 cases (126 eyes), 41 cases (82 eyes), 47 cases (94 eyes) in patients of hyperopia, mixed astigmatism group and myopia group, respectively. There was no statistical difference among three groups in gender (χ2=0.171, P>0.05), and age (F=1.399, P>0.05). In hyperopia group, DS, DC, AL and CVA of compound topicamide after cycloplegic refraction were 2.50 (1.00, 5.31) D, 1.00 (0.50, 1.75) D, 90 (85, 100) and 0.10 (0.00, 0.20); the results of atropine′s were 3.50 (2.00, 6.31) D, 1.00 (0.50, 1.75) D, 90 (85, 95), 0.10 (0.00, 0.20), respectively. According to the rank sum test of paired samples, there were statistically significant differences in DS, DC and CVA (Z=9.692, -2.726, -2.483; P<0.05); but non-significant differences in AL (Z=-0.173, P>0.05). In mixed astigmatism group, the results of compound topicamide after cycloplegic refraction were -1.00 (-2.00, -0.75) D, 3.00 (2.00, 4.00) D, 90 (85, 95), 0.10 (0.00, 0.20); the results of atropine′s were -0.50 (-1.25, 0.00) D, 3.00 (2.00, 4.00) D, 90 (85, 95), 0.10 (0.00, 0.20), respectively. According to the rank sum test of paired samples, there were statistically significant differences in DS and CVA (Z=7.778, -2.826; P<0.05); but non-significant differences in DC, AL (Z=-1.098, -0.653; P>0.05). In myopia group, the results of compound topicamide after cycloplegic refraction were -3.05 (0-6.00, -1.25) D, -1.38 (-2.50, -0.50) D, 90 (85, 95), 0.00 (0.00, 0.20); the results of atropine′s were -3.13 (-5.25, -1.00), -1.50 (-2.50, -0.50), 90.00 (85.00, 95.00), 0.10 (0.00, 0.20), respectively. According to the rank sum test of paired samples, there were statistically significant differences in DS and CVA (Z=8.388, -2.744; P<0.05); but non-significant differences in DC and AL (Z=0.511, -1.735; P>0.05). The corresponding functional relationship of 3 groups were yatropine=1.068+ 0.976xtopicamide, yatropine=0.775+ 0.999xtopicamide, yatropine=0.248+ 0.949xtopicamide, respectively. In three groups, the D value of DS for patients younger than 6 years-old and aged 6 years-old or older was 1.00 (0.75, 1.44) D, 0.75 (0.50, 1.00) D, 1.00 (0.50, 1.25) D, 0.50(0.25, 0.75) D, 0.50(0.25, 0.75) D, 0.25 (0.00, 0.50) D, respectively. After the rank sum test of independent samples, there were significant difference within groups (Z=-2.261, -4.160, -2.360; P<0.05).

Conclusions

After using two drugs in each refractive state group, there were greater difference in cycloplegic refraction for younger patients. Atropine was suggested to use for children with hyperopia and mixed astigmatism to perform the cycloplegic refraction. In special cases, mixed astigmatism and myopia children aged 6 years or younger could be modified to the topicamide mydriatic′s result by using the correlation function relationship as atropine′s. For children with myopia over 6 years-old, the compound tropine was suggested to use.

表1 远视眼组患儿两种药物散瞳验光结果的比较
表2 混合散光组患儿两种药物散瞳验光结果的比较
表3 两个年龄段患儿两种药物散瞳验光结果中球镜值的比较
[1]
赵世强,王冰,齐林嵩,等. 重视屈光不正的矫正规律及操作实践[J/CD]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版)20199(3):129-133.
[2]
Leo SW. Current approaches to myopia control[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2017, 28(3): 267-275.
[3]
Xie PX, Guo X. Chinese experiences on orthokeratology[J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2016, 42(1): 43-47.
[4]
Wu PC, Huang HM, Yu HG, et al. Epidemiology of myopia[J]. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol, 2016, 5(6): 386-392.
[5]
董彦会. 2000—2050年全球近视和高度近视的患病率及趋势研究[J]. 中华预防医学杂志201751(4):294.
[6]
董彦会,刘慧彬,王政和,等. 中国2005—2014年7~18岁汉族儿童青少年近视现状和增长速度趋势分析[J]. 中华流行病学杂志201738(5):583-558.
[7]
褚仁远,瞿小妹. 医学验光的含义和实施[J]. 眼视光学杂志20024(2):116-117.
[8]
褚仁远,瞿小妹.应大力加强对"医学验光"的研究与实施[J]. 眼视光学杂志2008.10(6):401-402.
[9]
白大勇. 屈光不正检测方法及验光策略规范化的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版)20144(4):229-231.
[10]
杨琳娟,张小玲,郝扬,等. 阿托品凝胶、盐酸环喷托酯和复方托吡卡胺睫状肌麻痹效果比较[J]. 国际眼科杂志201818(9):1665-1668.
[11]
蓝方方,刘洪婷,刘伟民. 复方托吡卡胺滴眼液在青少年近视患者散瞳验光中的临床客观评价[J]. 国际眼科杂志20099(9):1795-1796.
[12]
褚仁远,赵家良.儿童青少年屈光不正诊治应以睫状肌麻痹下验光结果为基准[J].中华眼科杂志201955(2):86-88.
[13]
王兴存,贺树清,常颖,等.硫酸阿托品眼用凝胶诱发儿童频发性房室早搏一例[J].中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志201820(4):250-252.
[14]
American Academy of Ophthalmology. Basic and clinical science course 6 (2016—2017): pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus[M]. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2017: 27-34.
[15]
Nelson LB, Olitsky SE. Harley′s pediatric ophthalmology[M]. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
[16]
Applebaum M, Jaanus SD. Use of diagnostic pharmaceutical agents and incidence of adverse effects[J]. Am J Optom Physiol Opt, 1983, 60(5): 384-388.
[17]
Ka AM, De Medeiros ME, Sow AS, et al. Objective refraction in black children: cycloprntolate and tropicamide combination, a reliable alternative to atropine [J]. J Fr Dophtalmol, 2014, 37(9): 689-694.
[18]
Egashira SM, Kish LL, Twelker JD, et al. Comparison of cyclopentolate versus tropicamide cycloplegia in children[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 1993, 70(12): 1019-1026.
[19]
刘念,陈少芳,李赛群,等. 国产盐酸环喷托酯滴眼液和托吡卡胺对眼睫状肌麻痹效果的比较研究[J]. 国际眼科杂志20077(6):1595-1597.
[20]
刘旭,保金华,吕帆. 利用残余调节客观测量方法研究美多丽对近视儿童睫状肌麻痹的效果[J]. 眼科研究201028(10):974-978.
[21]
董凌燕,亢晓丽,王亚夫. 盐酸环喷托酯、复方托吡卡胺与阿托品睫状肌麻痹作用的比较[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版)201131(10):1432-1435.
[22]
刘新婷,张芳,吕帆. 环戊通与阿托品睫状肌麻痹效果的差异性评价[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志201230(4):353-357.
[23]
吕元. 儿童心理性格特点对牙病诊疗的影响及处理[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志199414(3):142.
[24]
陈炜. 美多丽-P与阿托品滴眼液在屈光不正儿童散瞳验光中的作用比较[J]. 眼科新进展200525(6):562-563.
[25]
余惠玲. 托吡卡胺和阿托品对儿童散瞳验光应用价值的对比研究[J]. 眼视光学杂志200911(5):393-397.
[26]
汪东生. 复方托品酰胺与阿托品对儿童散瞳验光比较[J]. 中国中医眼科杂志19977(4):42-43.
[27]
梁军容,李高兰. 美多丽与阿托品对青少年远视散瞳验光结果的影响[J]. 国际眼科杂志20089(3):631-632.
[28]
滕峰,田祥,罗鑫. 1%阿托品和复方托品酰胺在远视儿童检影比较[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志201028(9):989-991.
[29]
廖斌,卢炜. 两种散瞳剂在弱视儿童验光中的应用探讨[J]. 国际眼科杂志20078(3):868-869.
[30]
惠延年. 眼科学(第6版)(供基础临床预防口腔医学类专业用)(附光盘)[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:192-201.
[31]
张宁,陶晗,张春丽,等. 近视性学龄前儿童复方托吡卡胺与阿托品散瞳后检影验光的比较性研究[J]. 中国妇幼保201126(2):222-223.
[32]
Yasuda A, Yamaguchi T. Steepening of corneal curvature with contraction of the ciliary muscle[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005, 31(6): 1177-1181.
[33]
Saitoh K, Yoshida K, Hamatsu Y. Changes in the shape of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces caused by mydriasis and miosis Detailed analysis[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(5): 1024-1030.
[34]
Baikoff G, Lutun E, Ferraz C,et al. Static and dynamic analysis of the anterior segment with optical coherence tomography[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(9): 1843-1850.
[35]
Yasuda A, Yamaguchi T, Ohkoshi K. Changes in corneal curvature in accommodation [J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, 29(7): 1297-1301.
[36]
Pierscionek BK, Popiotek-Masajada A, Kasprzak H. Corneal shape change during accommodation[J]. Eye, 2001, 15(6): 766-769.
[37]
王利华,徐文文,马鲁新,等. 儿童远视和近视眼睫状肌麻痹前后各屈光成分的变化[J]. 眼视光学杂志200810(5): 365-367.
[38]
施明光. 散光[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2004:2438.
[39]
中华医学会眼科学分会斜视与小儿眼科学组. 弱视诊断专家共识(2011年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志201147(8):768.
[40]
Lin Z, Vasudevan B, Ciuffreda KJ, et al. The difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2017, 37(4): 489-497.
[41]
Adler D, Millodot M. The possible effect of undercorrection on myopic progression in children[J]. Clin Exp Optom, 2006, 89(5): 315-321.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会小儿烧伤学组. 儿童烧伤早期休克液体复苏专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 371-376.
[8] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[9] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[10] 闵筱兰, 周洁超, 陈振添. 健康管理联合心理干预用于腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术患儿术后效果观察[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 657-661.
[11] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[12] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[13] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 余林阳, 王美英, 李建斌, 楼骁斌, 谢思远, 马志忠, 齐海英, 李稼. 高原地区肺炎合并右心功能衰竭体征患儿的肺动脉压力和心脏形态与功能的特征[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 535-544.
阅读次数
全文


摘要