切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 206 -211. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2019.04.003

论著

远程眼科会诊对青光眼检出效果影响的研究
张莉1,(), 徐捷1, 曹凯1, 刘含若1, 孙云晓1, 李建军1, 王宁利1   
  1. 1. 100005 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科研究所 眼科学与视觉科学北京市重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-20 出版日期:2019-08-28
  • 通信作者: 张莉
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71432004); 北京市医院管理局"青苗"计划专项经费资助项目(QML20170206)

The role of teleophthalmology consulting in improving glaucoma diagnosis in population

Li Zhang1,(), Jie Xu1, Kai Cao1, Hanruo Liu1, Yunxiao Sun1, Jianjun Li1, Ningli Wang1   

  1. 1. Beijing Key Lab. of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology; Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100005, China
  • Received:2019-06-20 Published:2019-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Li Zhang
引用本文:

张莉, 徐捷, 曹凯, 刘含若, 孙云晓, 李建军, 王宁利. 远程眼科会诊对青光眼检出效果影响的研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(04): 206-211.

Li Zhang, Jie Xu, Kai Cao, Hanruo Liu, Yunxiao Sun, Jianjun Li, Ningli Wang. The role of teleophthalmology consulting in improving glaucoma diagnosis in population[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2019, 09(04): 206-211.

目的

探讨远程眼科会诊平台对青光眼患者检出率的作用。

方法

回顾性病例系列研究。首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院眼科研究所建立远程眼科会诊中心,收集远程会诊中心患者和基础眼病筛查者。采用Pearson χ2检验,比较同期在北京进行的基础眼病筛查中青光眼的检出率,评价眼科会诊平台对青光眼检出效果的作用,并分析"青光眼"诊断的患者中早期青光眼所占的比例。

结果

远程会诊平台共收集493 221例患者。其中,检索"青光眼"诊断患者11 538例,占2.34%;可疑青光眼者2174例,占0.44%;青光眼及可疑青光眼诊断的检出率为2.78%。其中,早期青光眼诊断在所有"青光眼"诊断中的构成比为12.50%。同一时期在北京某机关进行眼病筛查者20 861例,青光眼诊断检出417例,占1.79%;可疑青光眼诊断检出33例,占0.16%;青光眼及可疑青光眼诊断检出率为1.95%。其中,早期青光眼诊断在青光眼诊断中的构成比为33.60%。两种方式青光眼检出率比较,经Pearson χ2检验结果显示两者差异无统计学意义( χ2=2.0,P>0.05)。

结论

应用互联网技术及眼科影像诊断标准,通过远程眼科会诊平台,可实现与基础眼病筛查对青光眼检出等同的效果,且可以实现以信息技术流动代替患者或医师的流动。

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore the role of teleophthalmology consulting in improving glaucoma diagnosis.

Methods

This study was retrospective case series. Participants were included patients from the Center of Teleophthalmology Consultation and subjects from population-based eye screening. The Center of Teleophthalmology Consultation was established in Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology. Patients were collected from the remote consultation platform and analyzed with the diagnosis of glaucoma patients. The detection rate of glaucoma in population-based ophthalmological screening undertaken in Beijing during the same period, was compared to the detection rate of glaucoma from the remote consultation platform. The role of ophthalmological consultation platform for glaucoma detection was analyzed. Glaucoma detection rates in patients from the Center of teleophthalmology consultation and population-based eye screeners were compared. The constituent ratio of mild glaucoma was calculated.

Results

A total of 493 221 subjects were collected from the Center of teleophthalmology consultation platform. Among them, 11 538 (2.34%) were diagnosed as glaucoma, 2174 (0.44%) were diagnosed as suspicious glaucoma, and the detection rate of glaucoma and suspicious glaucoma was 2.78%. During the same period, 20 861 subjects from the population-basedeye diseases screening in Beijing was enrolled in this study, 417 patients (1.79%) were diagnosed as glaucoma, 33 cases (0.16%) were diagnosed as suspicious glaucoma, and 1.95% were diagnosed as glaucoma and suspicious glaucoma. Pearson chi-square test showed no statistically significant difference in the detection rate of glaucoma between two groups of subjects ( χ2=2.0, P>0.05). The constituent ratio of mild glaucoma from the teleophthalmology consultation glaucoma patients was 12.5%, this constituent ratio was 33.6%in population-based screening glaucoma patients.

Conclusions

Using internet technology and ophthalmic image diagnostic criteria, the effect of glaucoma detection from the teleophthalmology consultation is equal to that of eye diseases screening in population. Therefore, the moving of patients or doctors can be replaced by the flow of information technology.

图1 青光眼视神经损害的分级与分期眼底图像 图A显示青光眼视神经损害1级(早期);图B显示青光眼视神经损害2级(早期);图C显示青光眼视神经损害3级(中期);图D显示青光眼视神经损害3级(中期);图E显示青光眼视神经损害4级(右眼晚期);图F显示青光眼视神经损害5级(左眼晚期)
表1 远程会诊平台对青光眼检出效果的分析
表2 远程会诊平台对青光眼检出成本的分析(人民币:元)
[1]
徐亮,张莉,夏翠然,等. 北京农村及城市特定人群原发性闭角型青光眼的患病率及其影响因素[J]. 中华眼科杂志2005, 41(1): 8-14.
[2]
徐亮,陈建华,李建军,等. 北京农村及城市特定人群原发性开角型青光眼的患病率调查及其筛查方法评价[J]. 中华眼科杂志2004, 40(11): 726-732.
[3]
Liang YB, Friedman DS, Zhou Q, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of primary angle closure diseases in a rural adult Chinese population: The Handan Eye Study[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011, 52(12): 8672-8679.
[4]
Liang YB, Friedman DS, Zhou Q, et al. Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in a rural adult Chinese population: The Handan Eye Study[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011, 52(11): 8250-8257.
[5]
李建军,徐亮,刘丽娟,等. 远程眼科的现状和挑战[J]. 眼科201726(4): 217-219.
[6]
李建军,张莉,彭晓燕. 远程眼科眼底像阅片诊断应注意的问题[J]. 眼科2014, 23(4): 217-220.
[7]
李建军,徐亮,彭晓燕,等. 远程眼科单张眼底像质量标准(征求意见稿)[J]. 眼科2015, 24(1): 11-12.
[8]
李建军,徐亮,彭晓燕,等. 远程眼科眼底照相机外眼及眼前节像质量标准(征求意见稿)[J]. 眼科2015, 24(2): 136-137.
[9]
张琪,李建军,苏炳男,等. 远程眼科阅片筛查疾病谱初步分析[J]. 眼科2015, 24 (4): 220-225.
[10]
Jonas JB, Budde WM. Diagnosis and pathogenesis of glaucomatous optic neuropathy: morphological aspects[J]. Prog Retin Eye Res, 200019(1): 1-40.
[11]
Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, et al. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2002, 86(3): 238-242.
[12]
Cho HK, Kee C. Population-based glaucoma prevalence studies in Asians[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2014, 59(3): 434-447.
[13]
Sharafeldin N, Kawaguchi A, Sundaram A, et al. Review of economic evaluations of teleophthalmology as a screening strategy for chronic eye disease in adults[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2018, 102 (11): 1485-1491.
[14]
Bartnik SE, Copeland SP, Aicken AJ, et al. Optometry-facilitated teleophthalmology: an audit of the first year in Western Australia[J]. Clin Exp Optom, 2018101(5): 700-703.
[15]
Maa AY, Patel S, Chasan JE, et al. Retrospective Evaluation of a Teleretinal Screening Program in Detecting Multiple Nondiabetic Eye Diseases[J]. Telemed J E Health, 2017, 23 (1): 41-48.
[16]
Mohammadpour M, Heidari Z, Mirghorbani M, et al. Smartphones, teleophthalmology, and VISION 2020[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 201710 (12): 1909-1918.
[17]
Ayatollahi H, Nourani A, Khodaveisi T, et al. Teleophthalmology in practice: Lessons learned from a pilot project[J]. Open Med Inform, 2017, 11(1): 20-28.
[18]
Matimba A, Woodward R, Tambo E, et al. Tele ophthalmology: Opportunities for improving diabetes eye care in resource- and specialist limited Sub Saharan African countries[J]. J Telemed Telecare, 2016, 22(5): 311-316.
[19]
Johnson KA, Meyer J, Yazar S, et al. Real time teleophthalmology in rural Western Australia[J]. Aust J Rural Health, 2015, 23 (3): 142-149.
[20]
Tan IJ, Dobson LP, Bartnik S, et al. Real time teleophthalmology versus face to face consultation: A systematic review[J]. J Telemed Telecare, 2017, 23 (7): 629-638.
[21]
Sreelatha OK, Ramesh SV. Teleophthalmology: improving patient outcomes?[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 201610(4): 285-295.
[22]
Chin EK, Ventura BV, See KY, et al. Nonmydriatic fundus photography for teleophthalmology diabetic retinopathy screening in rural and urban clinics[J]. Telemed J E Health, 2014, 20 (2): 102-108.
[23]
Chin EK, Ventura BV, See KY, et al. Nonmydriatic fundus photography for teleophthalmology diabetic retinopathy screening in rural and urban clinics[J]. Telemed J E Health, 2014, 20 (2): 102-108.
[24]
Surendran TS, Raman R. Teleophthalmology in Diabetic Retinopathy[J]. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2014, 8 (2): 262-266.
[25]
Ng M, Nathoo N, Rudnisky CJ, et al. Improving Access to Eye Care: Teleophthalmology in Alberta, Canada[J]. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2009, 3(2): 289-296.
[26]
Kanagasingam Y, Bhuiyan A, Abràmoff MD, et al. Progress on retinal image analysis for age related macular degeneration[J]. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2014, 38(1) 20-42.
[27]
Vaziri K, Moshfeghi DM, Moshfeghi AA. Feasibility of telemedicine in detecting diabetic retinopathy and age related macular degeneration[J]. Semin Ophthalmol, 2015, 30 (2): 81-95.
[28]
Thomas SM, Jeyaraman MM, Hodge WG, et al. The effectiveness of teleglaucoma versus in patient examination for glaucoma screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(12): e113779.
[29]
Verma S, Arora S, Kassam F, et al. Northern Alberta remote teleglaucoma program: clinical outcomes and patient disposition[J]. Can J Ophthalmol, 2014, 49(2): 135-140.
[30]
Arora S, Rudnisky CJ, Damji KF. Improved access and cycle time with an " in house" patient centered teleglaucoma program versus traditional in person assessment[J]. Telemed J E Health, 2014, 20 (5): 439-445.
[31]
Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Haddad NM, et al. Comparison of Nondiabetic Retinal Findings Identified With Nonmydriatic Fundus Photography vs Ultrawide Field Imaging in an Ocular Telehealth Program[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2016, 134 (3): 330-334.
[32]
Thomas S, Hodge W, Malvankar-Mehta M. The cost effectiveness analysis of teleglaucoma screening device[J]. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(9): e0137913.
[33]
Lee JY, Lee SWH. Telemedicine Cost Effectiveness for Diabetes Management: A Systematic Review[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2018, 20 (7): 492-500.
[34]
Pathak S, Kumar B. Wireless Teleophthalmology: A novel, low cost, flexible network Architecture and Its Performance Evaluation for Remote Eye Care Solutions[J]. Telemed J E Health, 2017, 23 (9): 753-762.
[35]
de la Torre-Díez I, López-Coronado M, Vaca C, et al. Cost utility and cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review[J]. Telemed J E Health, 2015, 21 (2): 81-85.
[36]
Gomez-Ulla F, Fernandez M I, Gonzalez F, et al. Digital Retinal Images and Teleophthalmology for Detecting and Grading Diabetic Retinopathy[J]. Diabetes Care, 2002, 25(8): 1384-1389.
[37]
Strouthidis NG, Chandrasekharan G, Diamond JP, et al. Teleglauoma: ready to go?[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2014, 98(10): 1605-1611.
[38]
Sandhu S, Rudnisky C, Arora S, et al. Compressed 3D and 2D digital images versus standard 3D slide film for the evaluation of glaucomatous optic nerve features[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2018, 102 (3): 364-368.
[39]
Kozak I, Payne JF, Schatz P, et al. Teleophthalmology image-based navigated retinal laser therapy for diabetic macular edema: a concept of retinal telephotocoagulation[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2017, 255 (8): 1509-1513.
[40]
Kapoor R, Walters SP, Al-Aswad LA. The current state of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2019, 64(2): 233-240.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 蒋佳纯, 王晓冰, 陈培荣, 许世豪. 血清学指标联合常规超声及超声造影评分诊断原发性干燥综合征的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 622-630.
[3] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[4] 杨小菁, 姜瑞瑞, 石玉香, 王静静, 李长天. 乳腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 375-377.
[5] 冯雪园, 韩萌萌, 马宁. 乳腺原发上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 378-380.
[6] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[7] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[8] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[9] 杨雪, 张伟, 尚培中, 宋创业, 尚丹丹, 张蔚. 胆囊十二指肠瘘结石经瘘口排出后自愈一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 707-708.
[10] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[11] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[12] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[13] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[14] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[15] 周婷, 孙培培, 张二明, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 790-797.
阅读次数
全文


摘要