切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (05) : 257 -261. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2020.05.001

述评

重视角膜屈光手术后调节功能的变化及其影响
李仕明1, 何曦2, 翟长斌1,()   
  1. 1. 100730 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科研究所 北京市眼视光与视觉科学重点实验室
    2. 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院2016年硕士研究生
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-20 出版日期:2020-10-28
  • 通信作者: 翟长斌
  • 基金资助:
    首都卫生行业发展科研专项(2020-2-1081); 北京市优秀人才培养资助青年拔尖个人项目(2016000021223ZK28); 北京市自然科学基金杰出青年基金项目(JQ20029)

Pay attention to the change of accommodation function after corneal refractive surgery and its influence

Shiming Li1, Xi He2, Changbin Zhai1,()   

  1. 1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing 100730, China
    2. Master′s degree 2016, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2020-09-20 Published:2020-10-28
  • Corresponding author: Changbin Zhai
引用本文:

李仕明, 何曦, 翟长斌. 重视角膜屈光手术后调节功能的变化及其影响[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(05): 257-261.

Shiming Li, Xi He, Changbin Zhai. Pay attention to the change of accommodation function after corneal refractive surgery and its influence[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(05): 257-261.

角膜屈光手术的技术日益成熟,在帮助越来越多的近视眼患者摘掉眼镜的同时,所导致的术后视疲劳也较为普遍,特别是在术后早期的视疲劳症状较重,这与角膜屈光手术前后的调节功能的突然变化有关。眼的调节功能可以提供聚焦于视网膜的清晰图像,用于神经系统对眼球运动的精确控制以及用于对深度的感知。调节相关的参数,包括调节幅度、正负相对调节、调节灵敏度、调节反应及调节性集合与调节的比率等。这些参数在术后短期的突然变化和长期恢复趋势对于评估患者术后近距离工作的疲劳、指导术前的手术方式设计具有重要的指导意义。本文中笔者就目前常见的几种角膜屈光手术如小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(SMILE)、飞秒激光辅助下的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)和准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)对调节功能相关参数的影响进行评述,以促进角膜屈光手术的个性化设计和追求更好的视觉效果。

The technology of corneal refractive surgery is increasingly mature. While corneal refractive surgery was helpful to remove glasses for more and more patients with myopia, the postoperative visual fatigue caused by it is also common, especially in the early postoperative period, It is related to the sudden changes in the accommodation function before and after the corneal refractive surgery. The eye′s accommodation function had the ability to provide a clear image focused on the retina, which was used for precise nervous system control of eye movements and for depth perception. The parameters related to accommodation include amplitude of accommodation, positive and negative relative accommodation, accommodation facility, accommodative response, AC/A ratio, etc. The short-term sudden change and long-term recovery trend of these parameters after corneal refractive surgery were important to evaluate patients′postoperative close work fatigue and guide preoperative design of operation method. In this paper, the effects of several common corneal refractive surgeries, such as small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis(FS-LASIK) and laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK), on the parameters related to accommodation function were reviewed, in order to promote the personalized design of corneal refractive surgery and pursue better visual effects.

[1]
Dishler JG, Slade S, Seifert S, et al. Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for the Correction of Myopia with Astigmatism: Outcomes of the United States Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval Clinical Trial[J]. Ophthalmology, 2020, 127(8): 1020-1034.
[2]
Wang Y, Ma J. Future Developments in SMILE: Higher Degree of Myopia and Hyperopia[J]. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila), 2019, 8(5): 412-416.
[3]
Shah R. History and Results; Indications and Contraindications of SMILE Compared With LASIK[J]. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila), 2019, 8(5): 371-376.
[4]
Xia F, Shen Y, Han T, et al. Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Moderate and High Myopia: Seven-Year Outcomes of Refraction, Corneal Tomography, and Wavefront Aberrations[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2020: 3825864.
[5]
Han T, Xu Y, Han X, et al. Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2019, 103(4): 565-568.
[6]
Shaaban YM, Badran TAF. Comparison Between the Effect of Femtosecond Laser in situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and Femtosecond Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (FS-SMILE) on the Corneal Endothelium[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2020, 14: 2543-2550.
[7]
Cao K, Liu L, Yu T, et al. Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK)[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2020, 35(3): 599-609.
[8]
Moshirfar M, Bennett P, Ronquillo Y. Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)[M]. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls, 2020.
[9]
Li SM, Zhan S, Li SY, et al. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correction of myopia[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016, 2: CD009799.
[10]
陈晓琴,王雁,杨悦. SMILE术后调节功能变化[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志2019, 21(2): 117-121.
[11]
邓国涛,贡雅洁. LASIK术后眼调节状态的改变及其与视疲劳的关系[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志201214(3): 169-172.
[12]
周少博,郭海科,李辉. 近视眼LASIK术后调节幅度变化[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志201129(12):1252-1254.
[13]
Liu L,,Yuan J, Li J, et al. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on accommodation[J]. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 2008, 28(5): 596-598.
[14]
叶璐,刘建国,杨新光. 近视患者LASIK术后早期单眼调节幅度的变化观察[J]. 国际眼科杂志20088(7):1395-1397.
[15]
高娜,武正清,何芳. 不同屈光手术对双眼视功能的影响研究[J]. 临床眼科杂志201725(4):356-358.
[16]
李姝燕,张敏,杜驰. 飞秒激光制瓣LASIK术对近视性屈光参差患者调节功能的影响[J]. 国际眼科杂志201919(2):332-334.
[17]
陈世豪,吕帆,王勤美. LASIK对近视眼调节功能的影响及临床意义[J]. 眼视光学杂志20002(1):26-29.
[18]
杜凯旋,吴小影,文丹. 近视患者SMILE术后双眼视觉功能变化[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志201921(7):521-526.
[19]
Hashemi H, Samet B, Mirzajani A, et al. Near Point of Accommodation and Convergence after Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) for Myopia[J]. Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano, 2013, 28(1): 29-35.
[20]
刘汉强,刘婷婷. 近视眼LASIK术后远期单眼调节幅度变化的研究[J]. 国际眼科杂志20099(12):2344-2346.
[21]
Karimian F, Baradaran-Rafii A, Bagheri A, et al. Accommodative changes after photorefractive keratectomy in myopic eyes[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2010, 87(11): 833-838.
[22]
Wilson SE, Mohan RR, Hong JW, et al. The wound healing response after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy: elusive control of biological variability and effect on custom laser vision correction[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2001, 119(6): 889-896.
[23]
Marcos S, Barbero S, Llorente L, et al. Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2001, 42(13): 3349-3356.
[24]
张莉花,刘克政,刘永琰,等. LASIK术后正负相对调节的变化与近距离工作疲劳症状的研究[J]. 江西医药201752(12):1279-1281.
[25]
廖晓捷,鲍锡柳. FS-LASIK术后早期视觉质量变化与近距离工作疲劳症状的研究[J]. 现代诊断与治疗201526(24):5637-5639.
[26]
许琛琛,王勤美,余野. 老视前期近视患者LASIK术后相对性调节的变化[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志200826(2):157-159.
[27]
庞彦利,吴小影,刘双珍. 近视患者准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术术后正负相对调节的变化[J]. 国际眼科杂志20088(9):1866-1868.
[28]
郭晓枚,李伟力,赵雅丽. 国人和白种人近视患者LASIK手术前后正负相对调节的比较[J]. 国际眼科杂志20099(11):2123-2125.
[29]
莫云飞,谷浩,盛红艳,等. 屈光手术对近视眼双眼视功能影响的研究现状[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘202020(11):85-88.
[30]
蔡洁,李沁,何剑. 高度近视LASIK术后双眼调节聚散及近立体视功能的变化[J]. 眼科新进展201333(8):757-760.
[31]
Airiani S, Braunstein RE. Accommodative spasm after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2006, 141(6): 1163-1164.
[32]
Shetty R, Deshpande K, Kemmanu V, et al. The Role of Aberrometry in Accommodative Spasm After Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy[J]. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(12): 851-853.
[33]
Zheng K, Han T, Zhou X. Accommodative changes after SMILE for moderate to high myopia correction[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2016, 16(1): 173.
[34]
杨智宽. 临床视光学[M]. 2版. 北京:科学出版社,2014:221.
[35]
张晶津,胡建章,韩晓丽. 近视患者LASIK术后AC/A值的变化[J]. 临床眼科杂志201624(4):329-331.
[36]
Prakash G, Choudhary V, Sharma N, et al. Change in the accommodative convergence per unit of accommodation ratio after bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia in orthotropic patients: prospective evaluation[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2007, 33(12): 2054-2056.
[37]
牛晓霞,徐志刚,郝月茗. 准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后AC/A的变化观察及临床意义[J]. 国际眼科杂志20099(8):1543-1545.
[38]
曹国平. LASIK手术后调节及AC/A的改变及临床意义[J]. 国际眼科杂志20088(11):2278-2280.
[39]
Jain S, Ou R, Azar DT. Monovision outcomes in presbyopic individuals after refractive surgery[J]. Ophthalmology, 2001, 108(8): 1430-1433.
[40]
Levinger E, Trivizki O, Pokroy R, et al. Monovision surgery in myopic presbyopes: visual function and satisfaction[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2013, 90(10): 1092-1097.
[41]
Miranda D, Krueger RR. Monovision laser in situ keratomileusis for pre-presbyopic and presbyopic patients[J]. J Refract Surg, 2004, 20(4): 325-328.
[42]
Richdale K, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2006, 83(5): 266-273.
[43]
Mahrous A, Ciralsky JB, Lai EC. Revisiting monovision for presbyopia[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2018, 29(4): 313-317.
[44]
Luger MH, Ewering T, Arba-Mosquera S. One-year experience in presbyopia correction with biaspheric multifocal central presbyopia laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Cornea, 2013, 32(5): 644-652.
[45]
Gualdi L, Gualdi F, Rusciano D, et al. Ciliary Muscle Electrostimulation to Restore Accommodation in Patients With Early Presbyopia: Preliminary Results[J]. J Refract Surg, 2017, 33(9): 578-583.
[46]
Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Presbyopia: Effectiveness of correction strategies[J]. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2019, 68: 124-143.
[47]
Wang K, Pierscionek BK. Biomechanics of the human lens and accommodative system: Functional relevance to physiological states[J]. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2019, 71: 114-131.
[48]
Bassnett S. Zinn's zonule[J]. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2020: 100902.
[49]
Abdelkader A. Improved Presbyopic Vision With Mioticsv[J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2015, 41(5): 323-327.
[50]
Abdelkader A, Kaufman HE. Clinical outcomes of combined versus separate carbachol and brimonidine drops in correcting presbyopia[J]. Eye Vis (Lond), 2016, 3: 31.
[51]
Renna A, Vejarano LF, Dela CE, et al. Pharmacological Treatment of Presbyopia by Novel Binocularly Instilled Eye Drops: A Pilot Study[J]. Ophthalmol Ther, 2016, 5(1): 63-73.
[52]
Benozzi J, Benozzi G, Orman B. Presbyopia: a new potential pharmacological treatment[J]. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol, 2012, 1(1): 3-5.
[53]
Garner WH, Garner MH. Protein Disulfide Levels and Lens Elasticity Modulation: Applications for Presbyopia[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2016, 57(6): 2851-2863.
[54]
Cui T, Wang Y, Ji S, et al. Applying Machine Learning Techniques in Nomogram Prediction and Analysis for SMILE Treatment[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2019, 210: 271-277.
[1] 邓欣怡, 曾振宇, 李晓岚. 细菌群体感应信号对宿主免疫调节机制的研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 140-147.
[2] 陈珊, 胡智强, 张月明, 唐定, 黎蒙, 赵帅. Orai1、Orai3在乳腺癌组织中的表达及与病理学指标的相关性分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 514-517.
[3] 崔键, 戴庆. 基于肝囊型包虫病所致过敏反应模型研究Treg细胞数量比例与过敏反应的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 427-430.
[4] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[5] 罗婷, 张实. 5种生物标志物对ARDS预后的预测分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 471-475.
[6] 刘康凯, 姚光辉. 补肺纳肾汤对COPD稳定期患者肺功能及外周血Treg、Th17细胞比率的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 376-378.
[7] 娜荷雅, 朱丹. 红光疗法在儿童近视眼防控中的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 252-256.
[8] 赵欣, 赵晴, 张华. 角膜地形图引导个性化切削屈光术矫正近视眼和散光的早期临床疗效[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 210-214.
[9] 江卓婷, 高妍, 李春晖. 相干光断层扫描在角膜屈光手术术前筛查中应用的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 247-251.
[10] 任美琪, 李俊红, 冯张青. 间歇性外斜视新型热点问题的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 162-166.
[11] 刘德海, 刘一昀, 蓝倩倩, 孙彤, 边林博, 秦锐, 邱磊, 周一凡, 齐虹. 老视药物疗法的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 177-182.
[12] 赵艳, 朱丹. 低浓度阿托品在儿童近视眼防控中应用的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 124-128.
[13] 陶璐, 初楠, 韩洁, 白春英, 逄雯丽, 余海源. 血清PECAM-1、Sirt1水平与2型糖尿病患者颈动脉粥样硬化的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 291-296.
[14] 李世浩, 李子豪, 董博, 吴春莉, 吴彬, 盛银良, 齐宇. 胞质分裂蛋白调节因子1对肺腺癌细胞迁移、侵袭和增殖的影响[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 164-175.
[15] 金泽平, 董晶, 柳云鹏, 汪阳. 菌群-肠道-脑轴与缺血性卒中危险因素关系的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 510-517.
阅读次数
全文


摘要