切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 116 -122. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2020.02.009

论著

头盔式眼球运动训练系统在眼眶骨折术后患者康复训练中的应用
周丽娟1, 付晶1,(), 周军1, 赵博文1, 李蕾1, 褚航2   
  1. 1. 100730 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 眼科学与视觉科学北京市重点实验室
    2. 510500 广州,国家医疗保健器具工程技术研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-01 出版日期:2020-04-28
  • 通信作者: 付晶
  • 基金资助:
    北京市卫生系统高层次卫生技术人才学科骨干基金项目(2015-3-023); 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院护理研究专项基金资助项目(TRYY-KYJJ-2017-021)

Application of helmet eye movement training system in rehabilitation training of postoperative patients with orbital fracture

Lijuan Zhou1, Jing Fu1,(), Jun Zhou1, Bowen Zhao1, Lei Li1, Hang Chu2   

  1. 1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab., Beijing 100730, China
    2. National Engineering Research Center for Healthcare Devices, Guangzhou 510500, China
  • Received:2020-03-01 Published:2020-04-28
  • Corresponding author: Jing Fu
引用本文:

周丽娟, 付晶, 周军, 赵博文, 李蕾, 褚航. 头盔式眼球运动训练系统在眼眶骨折术后患者康复训练中的应用[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(02): 116-122.

Lijuan Zhou, Jing Fu, Jun Zhou, Bowen Zhao, Lei Li, Hang Chu. Application of helmet eye movement training system in rehabilitation training of postoperative patients with orbital fracture[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(02): 116-122.

目的

探讨头盔式眼球运动训练系统在眼眶骨折术后患者康复训练中的应用效果。

方法

收集2018年4月至2018年12月在首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院眼科中心行眼眶骨折修复术的患者40例(40只眼)。其中,男性25例(25只眼),女性15例(15只眼),年龄7~55岁,平均(26.4±12.8)岁。术后采用头盔式眼球运动训练系统进行康复训练。检查并记录患者术后1周、术后1个月及术后3个月的眼位、斜视度、静态立体视觉及动态立体视觉。以例数(眼数)和百分比进行描述。采用混合效应模型比较不同时间点的斜视度;采用广义线性混合效应模型比较不同时间点的眼位偏斜率、静态立体视觉及动态立体视觉。

结果

本研究40例(40只眼)患者中眶下壁骨折者12例(12只眼),眶内壁骨折者6例(6只眼),眶内下壁骨折者19例(19只眼),眶外下壁骨折者1例(1只眼),多发性骨折者2例(2只眼)。术后1周,眼位偏斜者有22例(22只眼),占57.89%;术后1个月,眼位偏斜者有12例(12只眼),占35.29%;术后3个月,眼位偏斜者有3例(3只眼),占9.68%。术后各时间点患者眼位的偏斜率经广义线性混合效应模型比较,水平偏斜率、垂直偏斜率以及水平合并垂直偏斜率随时间变化均逐渐降低,其差异均有统计学意义(χ2=6.20,6.21,3.24;P<0.05)。水平偏斜组内进一步两两比较,术后1周与术后3个月比较,术后1个月与术后3个月比较,其差异均有统计学意义(χ2=3.52,2.06;P<0.05)。垂直偏斜组内进一步两两比较,术后1周与术后1个月及术后3个月比较,其差异均有统计学意义(χ2=2.32,3.42;P<0.05)。水平合并垂直偏斜组内进一步两两比较,术后1周与术后3个月比较,其差异有统计学意义(χ2=2.49,P<0.05)。水平斜视度在术后1周、术后1个月及术后3个月分别为(1.92±2.73)△、(1.29±2.24)△及(0.23±0.72)△。垂直斜视度在术后1周、术后1个月及术后3个月分别为(2.61±4.22)△、(0.74±1.76)△及(0.10±0.40)△。经混合效应模型比较,水平与垂直斜视度均随时间变化逐渐下降,其差异均有统计学意义(F=5.41,7.83;P<0.05)。水平斜视度与垂直斜视度术后1周与1个月和3个月比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-3.28,2.01,2.86,3.74;P<0.05)。术后1周,具备静态立体视觉功能的患者22例(22只眼),占56.41%;术后1个月,具备静态立体视觉功能的患者30例(30只眼),占81.08%;术后3个月,具备静态立体视觉功能的患者有34例(34只眼),占91.89%。经广义线性混合效应模型比较,具备静态立体视觉功能的患者均随时间变化逐渐增加,其差异有统计学意义(F=7.71,P<0.05)。术后1周与术后1个月及术后3个月比较,其差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.66,3.82;P<0.05)。术后1周,具备动态立体视觉功能的患者有29例(29只眼),占74.36%;术后1个月,具备动态立体视觉功能的患者有34例(34只眼),占91.89%;术后3个月,具备动态立体视觉功能的患者有36例(36只眼),占97.30%。经广义线性混合效应模型比较,具备动态立体视觉功能的患者均随时间变化逐渐增加,其差异有统计学意义(F=5.42,P<0.05)。术后1周与1个月及3个月比较,其差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.40,-3.14;P<0.05)。

结论

眼眶骨折术后患者应用头盔式眼球运动训练系统进行康复训练,可以减少患者眼位偏斜度,助其恢复立体视觉,提高双眼视觉质量。

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore the effect of helmet eye movement training system in eye position and stereo vision rehabilitation of postoperative patients with orbital fracture.

Methods

A total of 40 patients (40 eyes) who underwent orbital fracture repair surgery in the Beijing Tongren Eye Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University from April to December 2018 were collected. There were 25 males (25 eyes) and 15 females (15 eyes). The age ranged from 7 to 55 years-old, with an average of (26.4±2.8) years-old. After operation, the helmet display equipment combined with the relevant visual perception biological model was used for eye movement, binocular integration and fixation stability rehabilitation training. The eye position, strabismus and static/dynamic stereoscopic vision were recorded after operation for 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. The mixed effect model was used to compare the changes of strabismus degree at different time points, and the generalized linear mixed effect model was used to compare the eye position deviation slope and static/dynamic stereo vision changes at different time points.

Results

Among of 40 cases (40 eyes), there were 12 cases (12 eyes) of inferior orbital wall fracture, 6 cases (6 eyes) of medial orbital wall fracture, 19 cases (19 eyes) of medial inferior orbital wall fracture, 1 case (1 eye) of external inferior orbital wall fracture and 2 cases (2 eyes) of multiple fracture. One week after operation, there were 22 patients (22 eyes) with ocular deviation, accounting for 57.89%. One month after operation, there were 12 cases (12 eyes) with ocular deviation, accounting for 35.29%. Three months after operation, there were 3 cases (3 eyes) of eye position deviation, accounting for 9.68%. Compared with the generalized linear mixed effect model at each time point after operation, the horizontal deviation, vertical deviation and horizontal combined vertical deviation decreased gradually with time with the statistically significant difference between them (χ2=6.20, 6.21, 3.24; P<0.05). Further pairwise comparison of horizontal deviation group showed that there was significant difference between 1 week and 3 months after operation, 1 month and 3 months after operation (χ2=3.52, 2.06; P<0.05). Further pairwise comparison of vertical deviation group showed that there were significant differences between 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after operation (χ2=2.32, 3.42; P<0.05) . Further pairwise comparison of horizontal with vertical deviation group showed that there was significant difference between 1 week and 3 months after operation (χ2=2.49, P<0.05) . The degree of horizontal strabismus after operation for 1 week, 1 month and 3 months was (1.92±2.73)△, (1.29±2.24)△, (0.23±0.72)△, respectively. The degree of vertical strabismus after operation for 1 week, 1 month and 3 months was (2.61±4.22)△ , (0.74±1.76)△, (0.10±0.40)△, respectively. Compared with the mixed effect model, the degree of horizontal/vertical strabismus decreased gradually with time with the statistically significant difference between them (F=5.41, 7.83; P<0.05). There were significant differences in the degree of horizontal/vertical strabismus among 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after operation (t=-3, 28, 2.01, 2.86, 3.74; P<0.05). One week after operation, there were 22 patients (22 eyes) with positive static stereoscopic vision, accounting for 56.41%. One month after operation, there were 30 patients (30 eyes) with positive static stereoscopic vision, accounting for 81.08%. Three months after operation, there were 34 patients (34 eyes) with positive static stereoscopic vision, accounting for 91.89%.Compared with the generalized linear mixed effect model, the positive rate of static stereo vision gradually increased with time, and the difference was statistically significant (F=7.71, P<0.05). There were significant differences between 1 week and 1 month and 3 months after operation (t=-2.66, 3.82; P<0.05). One week after operation, dynamic stereoscopic vision passed through 29 patients (29 eyes), accounting for 74.36%. One month after operation, dynamic stereoscopic vision passed through 34 patients (34 eyes), accounting for 91.89%. Three months after operation, dynamic stereoscopic vision passed through 36 patients (36 eyes), accounting for 97.30%. Compared with the generalized linear mixed effect model, the passing rate of dynamic stereo vision gradually increased with time with the statistically significant difference between them (F=5.42, P<0.05). There were significant differences among 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after operation (t=-2.40, -3.14; P<0.05).

Conclusions

The application of helmet eye movement training system for rehabilitation training in postoperative patients with orbital fracture can reduce the degree of eye position deviation, help to restore stereoscopic vision and improve the quality of binocular vision.

图1 头盔式眼球运动训练系统 图A和图B示在大范围360度粗糙立体视双眼整合锁定生物模型基础上,根据临床检查得出患者眼球运动受限范围进行量化的眼球运动训练;图C和图D示在大范围360度粗糙立体视双眼整合锁定生物模型基础上,通过眼球运动控制目标进行阈值范围摆动,配合眼球注视扫视追随运动,形成前庭反射和视觉处理闭环;图E和图F示在双眼整合环境下,患者用眼球运动控制中心凹十字视标并维持眼球注视目标,进行注视稳定性视觉交互训练
表1 眼眶骨折术后训练各时间点患者术眼眼位偏斜情况的比较[例数(%)]
表2 眼眶骨折术后训练各时间点患者术眼斜视度的比较(△)
表3 眼眶骨折术后训练各时间点患者静态立体视觉功能的比较[例数(%)]
表4 眼眶骨折术后训练各时间点患者动态立体视觉功能的比较[例数(%)]
[1]
万丽萍,李晓玲. 眼眶爆裂性骨折术后复视原因分析与临床处理对策[J]. 医学临床研究201633(11): 2220-2222.
[2]
Lim LH, Lam LK, Moore MH, et al. Associated injuries in facial fractures: Review of 839 patients[J]. Br J Plast Surg, 1993, 46(8): 635-638.
[3]
Ai-Qurainy IA, Stassen LF, Dutton GN, et al. The characteristics of midfacial fractures and the association with ocular injury: A prospective study[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1991, 29(5): 291-301.
[4]
Ioannides C, Treffers W, Rutten M, et al. Ocular injuries associated with fractures involving the orbit[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 1988, 16(4): 157-159.
[5]
Li KK, Teknos TN, Lauretano A, et al. Traumatic optic neuropathy complicating facial fracture repair[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 1997, 8(5): 352-355.
[6]
Park CH, Chung KJ, Kim TG, et al. Big Data Statistical Analysis of Facial Fractures in Korea[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 2020, 35(7): e57.
[7]
肖利华,王毅. 眼眶骨折的诊断与治疗[M]. 北京:人民军医出版社,2014:37-63.
[8]
Kontio R, Suuronen R, Ponkkonen H, et al. Have the causes of maxillofacial fractures changed over the last 16 years in Finland? An epide-miological study of 725 fractures[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2005, 21(1):14-19.
[9]
Tong L, Bauer RJ, Buchman SR. A current 10-year retrospective survey of 199 surgically treated orbital floor fractures in a nonurban tertiary care center[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2001, 108(3): 612-621.
[10]
Chi MJ, Ku M, Shin KH, et al. An analysis of 733 surgically treated blowout fractures[J]. Ophthalmologica, 2010, 224(3): 167-175.
[11]
Read RW, Sires BS. Association between orbital fracture location and ocular injury: a retrospective study[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma, 1998, 4(3): 10-15.
[12]
Chiang E, Saadat LV, Spitz JA ,et al. Etiology of orbital fracture at a level Ⅰtrauma center in a large metropolitan ciyt[J]. Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology, 2016, 6(1): 26-31.
[13]
Avisham R, Gary H. Does Preoperative Diplopia Determine the Incidence of Postoperative Diplopia After Repair of Orbital Floor Fracture?An Institutional Review[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 75(3): 565-575.
[14]
Amrith S, Saw SM, Lim TC, et al. Ophthalmic involvement in cranio-facial trauma[J]. Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2000, 28(3): 140-147.
[15]
Hosal BM, Beatty RL. Diplopia and enophthalmos after surgical repair of blowout fracture[J]. Orbit, 2002, 21(1): 27-33.
[16]
Biesman BS, Hornblass A, Lisman R, et al. Diplopia after surgical repair of orbital floor fractures[J]. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 1996, 12(1): 9-16.
[17]
Greenwald HS, Keeney AH, Shannon GM.A review of 128 patients with orbital fractures[J]. Am J Ophthalmology, 1974, 78(4): 655-664.
[18]
Brucoli M, Arcuri F, Cavenaghi R, et al. Analysis of complications after surgical repair of orbital fractures[J]. Craniofac Surg, 2011, 22(4): 1387-1390.
[19]
Tahiri Y, Lee J, Tahiri M, et al. Preoperative diplopia: The most important prognostic factor for diplopia after surgical repair of pure orbital blowout fracture[J]. Craniofac Surg, 2010, 21(4): 1038-1041.
[20]
Hsu CK, Hsieh MW, Chang HC, et al. Anatomic Factors Predicting Postoperative Strabismus in Orbital Wall Fracture Repair[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9: 14785.
[21]
Boffano P, Roccia F, Gallesio C, et al. Diplopia and orbital wall fractures[J]. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2014, 25(2): 183-185.
[22]
Burnstine MA. Clinical recommendations for repair of isolated orbital floor fractures: an evidence-based analysis[J]. Ophthalmology, 2002, 109(7): 1207-1210.
[23]
Burnstine MA. Clinical recommendations for repair of orbital facial fractures[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2003, 14(5): 236-240.
[24]
Gart MS, Gosain AK. Evidence-based medicine: orbital floor fractures[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2014, 134(6): 1345-1355.
[25]
Hawes MJ, Dortzbach RK. Surgery on orbital floor fractures. Influence of time of repair and fracture size[J]. Ophthalmology, 1983, 90(9): 1066-1070.
[26]
Yano H, Nakano M, Anraku K, et al. A consecutive case review of orbital blowout fractures and recommendations for comprehensive management[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2009, 124(2): 602-611.
[27]
Simon GJ, Syed HM, McCann JD, et al. Early versus late repair of orbital blowout fractures[J]. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging, 2009, 40(2): 141-148.
[28]
Scawn RL, Lim LH, Whipple KM, et al. Outcomes of Orbital Blow-Out Fracture Repair Performed Beyond 6 Weeks after Injury[J]. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016, 32(4): 296-301.
[29]
Lee HB, Nunery WR. Orbital adherence syndrome secondary to titanium implant material[J]. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 2009, 25(1): 33-36.
[30]
周凌云,刘巧英,纪晓杰,等. 眼眶骨折致眼球运动障碍的康复治疗进展[J]. 中国中医眼科杂志201323(6):453-455.
[31]
王峥嵘,肖孜,谌晓兰. 全自动眼球训练仪在眼眶爆裂性骨折术后眼球运动训练中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志201934(9):34-36.
[32]
王毅,肖利华. 与眼眶疾病相关的复视问题及治疗对策[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志201214(5):260-263.
[33]
Joseph JM, Glavas LP.Orbital fracture: a review[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2011, 5: 95-100.
[34]
Adams WE, Hatt SR, Leske DA, et al. Comparison of a Diplopia Questionnaire to the Goldmann Diplopia Fiel[J]. J AAPOS, 2008, 12(3): 247-251.
[35]
Hatt SR, Leske DA, Holmes JM. Comparison methods to quantify diplopia[J]. Ophthalmology, 2007, 114(12): 2316-2322.
[36]
Nagy EV, Toth J, Kaldi I, et al. Graves' ophthalmopathy: eye muscle involvement in patients with diplopia[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2000, 142(6): 591-597.
[1] 孙俊锋, 涂家金, 付丹, 蒋满香, 刘金晶, 崔乃硕. 手部烧伤瘢痕挛缩畸形整形术后综合康复联合点阵二氧化碳激光治疗的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 411-415.
[2] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[3] 李月平, 李科, 乔禹铭, 钟美浓. 前列腺热蒸汽消融术医护康一体化快速康复模式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 464-472.
[4] 曹健, 冯高华, 周卫军, 陈诚, 沈王丰, 吴英姿. 补脾益肺膏联合肺康复训练治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 781-784.
[5] 杨轲, 丁增巴姆, 马静, 李盼盼, 陈婷. 全程无缝隙肺康复训练在单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 801-804.
[6] 任甜甜, 张玉慧, 祁玲霞, 朱梅冬, 胡佳. 多学科疼痛管理对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后胸痛及应激反应的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 630-633.
[7] 郭少琳, 郭建英, 左秀萍, 高苗. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病康复训练依从性影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 652-654.
[8] 冯嘉楠, 蔡磊, 何国林, 付顺军, 张成, 冯周彬, 温耀鸿, 谭洪坤, 潘明新. 腹腔镜胆总管切开探查取石一期缝合的安全性与疗效:附128例分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 543-550.
[9] 丁镇涛, 邢博涵, 曲洋, 王泊江, 张培训. 老年肱骨近端骨折的围手术期治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 292-294.
[10] 王洪, 王骏华, 范建楠. 人工智能技术在肩袖损伤中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 356-361.
[11] 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 曹晓光. 上肢外骨骼机器人在脑卒中康复中的应用与研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 312-317.
[12] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
[13] 贾玲玲, 滕飞, 常键, 黄福, 刘剑萍. 心肺康复在各种疾病中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 859-862.
[14] 刘芳明, 石秀秀, 唐冲, 张克石, 徐影, 王桂杉, 关振鹏, 李晓. 骨科康复患者对数字疗法应用的知晓度和需求度:一项基于928 份问卷调查结果分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 654-661.
[15] 刘晓鹏, 柳聪艳, 杨宁, 蔡琛, 李晓兵, 王红宇, 张思森. 三穴五针联合腹部提压法在机械通气患者肺康复中的疗效[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 193-198.
阅读次数
全文


摘要