切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (03) : 109 -113. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2017.03.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

泪道探通术在小儿先天性泪道阻塞治疗中的临床价值研究
丁慧芬1, 焦彩云1, 张丽萍2,()   
  1. 1. 014040 内蒙古自治区包头市中心医院眼科
    2. 014040 内蒙古自治区包头市中心医院新生儿科
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-16 出版日期:2017-06-28
  • 通信作者: 张丽萍
  • 基金资助:
    吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金项目(320.6750.11088)

Clinical value of probing of lacrimal passage in the treatment of congenital obstruction of lacrimal duct in children

Huifen Ding1, Caiyun Jiao1, Liping Zhang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Baotou Central Hospital of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Baotou 014040, China
    2. Department of Neonatology, Baotou Central Hospital of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Baotou 014040, China
  • Received:2017-05-16 Published:2017-06-28
  • Corresponding author: Liping Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Liping, Email:
引用本文:

丁慧芬, 焦彩云, 张丽萍. 泪道探通术在小儿先天性泪道阻塞治疗中的临床价值研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 07(03): 109-113.

Huifen Ding, Caiyun Jiao, Liping Zhang. Clinical value of probing of lacrimal passage in the treatment of congenital obstruction of lacrimal duct in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2017, 07(03): 109-113.

目的

观察泪道探通术治疗先天性泪道阻塞的临床效果。

方法

本研究纳入2014年1月至2017年1月在内蒙古自治区包头市中心医院眼科就诊的先天性泪道阻塞的患者76例(140只眼)的临床资料。采用数字表法将全部患者随机分为两组,其中,观察组为38例,对照组为38例。对照组患者实施常规药物治疗,观察组患者均行泪道探通术。针对两种治疗方案的近期疗效和远期效果进行比较。评价近期疗效的指标主要包括治疗的有效程度和泪道功能恢复正常的时间;评价远期效果的指标主要包括患者术后并发症的发生情况和疾病复发的情况。治疗疗效按照显效、有效及无效分为三级。观察组与对照组的疗效、并发症总发生率及总复发率的描述采用例数和百分比,两组的有效率比较采用χ2检验。泪道恢复时间的描述采用(±s)表示,两组泪道恢复时间的比较采用t检验。

结果

观察组患者显效17例、有效19例及无效2例,治疗有效率为94.74%;对照组患者显效14例、有效17例及无效7例,治疗有效率为81.09%。将两组的有效程度进行比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.41,P<0.05)。对照组患者泪道恢复正常的平均时间为(5.65±1.25)d,观察组患者泪道恢复正常的平均时间为(2.64±0.97)d。将两组患者的恢复时间进行比较,差异有统计学意义(t=-12.51,P<0.05)。将发生假道形成、皮下水肿及感染撕裂等并发症的患者数据进行统计,对照组的并发症总发生率与疾病复发率均高于观察组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.26,7.24;P<0.05)。

结论

泪道探通术效果显著,能够降低泪道阻塞性疾病术后并发症的发生率及疾病复发的几率,有益于患者病情的恢复及疾病的预后改善。可作为治疗先天性泪道阻塞性疾病的有效手段。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect and influence of probing of lacrimal passage in congenital obstruction of lacrimal duct.

Methods

The clinical data of 76 patients (140 eyes) with congenital obstruction of lacrimal duct from January 2014 to January 2017 in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Baotou Central Hospital were included in this study. According to the order of admission, all the patients were randomly divided into two groups, of which 38 cases were in the observation group and 38 cases in the control group. The control group received routine medication, and the observation group received lacrimal probing. The short-term and long-term effects of the two treatment regimens were compared. The short-term efficacy mainly includes the effective degree of treatment and the time of lacrimal passage function returning to normal. The long term effect mainly deals with the occurrence of postoperative complications and the recurrence of the disease. The curative effect is divided into three grades according to obvious effect, effectiveness and ineffectiveness, the observation group and the control group′s curative effect, the complication total occurrence rate and the total recurrence rate description, uses the case number and the percentage, the two groups′ efficiency comparison uses the χ2 test. The time of lacrimal passage recovery was described by (±s) and the two groups were compared with the recovery time of lacrimal passage by t-test.

Results

Patients in the observation group were markedly effective in 17 cases, effective in 19 cases and ineffective in 2 cases, the effective rate was 94.74%; the control group patients markedly effective in 14 cases, effective in 17 cases and ineffective in 7 cases, the effective rate was 81.09%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2=4.41, P<0.05). In the control group, the average time of lacrimal passage was (5.65 ±1.25) days, and the average time of lacrimal passage in the observation group was (2.64±0.97) days. The recovery time of the two groups was compared, the difference was statistically significant (t=-12.51, P<0.05). The patient data form, via subcutaneous edema and infection complications such as tear statistics, the total occurrence of complications of the control group the recurrence rate and disease rate were higher than the observation group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=7.26, 7.24; P<0.05).

Conclusion

The effect of lacrimal passage exploration is significant, which can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and the probability of disease recurrence. It is beneficial to the recovery of the patient′s condition and the improvement of the prognosis of the disease. It can be used as an effective treatment for congenital obstruction of lacrimal duct.

表1 两组患者并发症发生率及疾病复发情况的比较
[1]
赵伟,陈丽丽,项道满,等. 儿童先天性泪道阻塞临床分型对泪道探通疗效的影响[J]. 中华医学杂志,2012,92(35):2477-2480.
[2]
丁训佑. 泪道探通术治疗小儿先天性泪道阻塞临床疗效观察[J]. 中国伤残医学,2012,20(7):80-81.
[3]
吴艳丽. 小儿先天性泪道阻塞采用泪道探通术治疗的临床价值分析[J].中国医药指南,2015,14(4):161-162.
[4]
陈婷,张浩,杨素红,等. 2769例先天性泪道阻塞的临床分析[J]. 中国斜视与小儿眼科杂志,2012,20(4):157-160.
[5]
罗中伶,张立新,朱国平,等. 两种泪道探通冲洗术治疗先天性鼻泪管阻塞的疗效比较[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2013,13(4):814-816.
[6]
江茂松,陈国智. 泪道探通术治疗小儿先天性泪道阻塞的临床观察[J]. 医学理论与实践,2016,29(17):3088-3089.
[7]
Lee H, Ahn J, Shin HH, et al. Effectiveness of primary monocanalicularnasal intubation with Monoka tubes and nasal endoscopic findings for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with enlarged lacrimal sac and chronic dacryocystitis[J]. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2012, 23(6):1638-1641.
[8]
林峰.小儿先天性泪道阻塞采用泪道探通术治疗的临床效果观察[J].饮食保健,2015,2(16):32-33.
[9]
汪芬,董武剑. 婴幼儿先天性泪道阻塞的治疗体会[J]. 医学理论与实践,2012,25(2):187-188.
[10]
王洪涛,崔哲. 新生儿泪囊炎的综合治疗时机[J]. 临床医学,2011,31(8):37-38.
[11]
韦超兵,蔡瑞玲. 泪道探通术治疗新生儿泪囊炎40例疗效分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2011,11(6):1080-1081.
[12]
Rumelt S. Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction[J]. J AAPOS, 2009, 13(4):426-427.
[13]
Moscato EE, Kelly JP, Weiss A. Developmental Anatomy of the Nasolacrimal Duct: Implications for Congenital Obstruction[J]. Ophthalmology, 2010, 117(12):2430-2434.
[14]
Dantas RRA. Lacrimal Drainage System Obstruction[J]. Seminars in Ophthalmology, 2010, 25(3):98-103.
[15]
向勤,陈新科. 幼儿年龄对泪道探通术治疗婴幼儿先天性泪道阻塞患儿的疗效[J]. 医疗装备,2016,29(9):142.
[16]
程海霞,陈志钧,周青,等. 基础麻醉下泪道探通治疗先天性泪道阻塞[J]. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2014,36(7):526-528.
[17]
丁娟,潘叶. 阻塞性泪道疾病的临床治疗进展[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2014,16(2):125-128.
[18]
杨晨皓,陈超,高路,等. 先天性鼻泪管阻塞的临床治疗[J]. 眼科新进展,2008(12):943-945.
[19]
谢秀缎,林玲,林暖春. 探针式泪道冲洗针治疗婴幼儿先天性鼻泪管阻塞[J]. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2010,32(7):553-554.
[20]
濮清岚,王虹,王鸿静. 早期泪道探通术治疗先天性鼻泪管阻塞的疗效观察[J]. 中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志,2010,10(6):365-367.
[21]
张翠艳,王旭东,王力文,等. 新生儿泪囊炎行泪道探通术的手术时机及其安全性的探讨[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2011,11(11):2039-2040.
[22]
Yuksel D, Ozer PA. Long-term results of probing guided with soft cannula in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction[J]. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 2014, 58(1):94-99.
[23]
袁媛. 365例婴幼儿先天性泪道阻塞的治疗体会[J]. 医学信息,2013,21(28):660.
[24]
张燕,张侠,苏晓明,等. Nd:YAG激光泪道探通治疗泪道阻塞28例[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2012,32(17):3769-3770.
[25]
王达. 泪道探通术治疗先天性泪道阻塞的疗效及影响因素分析[D]. 大连:大连医科大学,2016.
[26]
宋振凤. 156例先天性鼻泪管阻塞临床分析[J]. 医药前沿,2014,14(34):206-207.
[27]
关彩霞,梁伟亮,余剑佩,等. 改良泪道按摩干预对婴幼儿泪道探通远期效果的影响[J].护理实践与研究,2016,13(10):47-48.
[28]
曾朝霞,梁艳丽,陈荟郦,等. 婴幼儿先天性泪道阻塞320例临床分析[J]. 现代医院,2015,15(11):57-58.
[29]
路振莉,袁晔,于立波,等. 泪道探通术联合妥布霉素地塞米松眼膏治疗儿童泪道阻塞[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2016,16(9):1615-1618.
[30]
李世莲,刘淑芳,唐小娣,等. 泪道探通术治疗儿童先天性泪囊炎[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志,2012,30(10):1238-1240.
[31]
黄小琴. 治疗先天性鼻泪管阻塞168例的疗效观察[J]. 贵阳中医学院学报,2013,34(1):79-80.
[32]
Takahashi Y, Matsuda H, Nakamura Y, et al. Dacryoendoscopic Findings of Lacrimal Passage with Congenital Punctal Atresia[J]. Orbit, 2013, 32(5):338-340.
[33]
曹文红. 球囊管扩张术治疗儿童先天性泪道阻塞效果初探[C]. 首届中华医学会眼科学分会眼整形眼眶病学术会议论文集,2012:45-46.
[34]
李瑞宏,王瑞雪,姜志馨,等. 先天性泪道阻塞的临床治疗及手术时机[J]. 中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2013,16(3):358-359.
[35]
韩立坡,王凤仙,陈会宁,等. 泪道扩张联合泪道插管治疗儿童难治性泪道阻塞疗效分析[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志,2015,33(9):1021-1024.
[36]
常敏,武镪,冯雪亮,等. 泪道探通术治疗婴幼儿泪道阻塞临床分析[J]. 山西医药杂志,2015,12(23):2818-2819.
[37]
韩立坡,张瑜,王凤仙,等. 改良式泪道插管系统治疗儿童难治性泪道阻塞临床分析[J].河北医科大学学报,2016,37(2):171-174.
[38]
Lee H, Ahn J, Lee JM, et al. Clinical effectiveness of monocanalicular and bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction[J]. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2012, 23(4):1010-1014.
[39]
郑建华,赖世佳. 综合治疗先天性泪道阻塞133例临床分析[J]. 空军医学杂志,2016,32(6):384-385.
[40]
吴倩,于刚,全晓杰,等. Ritleng泪道插管术治疗泪道探通失败的先天性泪道阻塞[J]. 眼科,2012,21(5):331-335.
[41]
Hung CH, Chen YC, Lin SL, et al. Nasolacrimal Duct Probing under Topical Anesthesia for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Taiwan[J]. Pediatrics & Neonatology, 2015, 56(6):402-407.
[42]
Basar E, Oguz H, Ozdemir H, et al. Outcome of office probing and irrigation under topical anesthesia for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction[J]. Annals of Ophthalmology, 2005, 37(2):95-98.
[43]
Shrestha JB, Bajimaya S, Hennig A. Outcome of probing under topical anesthesia in children below 18 months of age with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction[J]. Nepal Medical College Journal Nmcj, 2009, 11(1):46.
[44]
Lim SW, Park JS, Lew H. Clinical Outcomes of Probing in Children with Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction[J]. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc, 2016, 57(7):1031.
[45]
李瑞宏,戴秀华. 地塞米松眼膏辅助鼻内镜造袋术治疗先天性泪道阻塞的临床效果[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(13):130-131.
[46]
徐鑫,向敏,丁琼弟,等. 先天性泪道阻塞探通治疗的临床体会[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2012,12(6):1176-1178.
[47]
谈晖珍. 80例小儿先天性泪道阻塞临床治疗观察[J]. 现代预防医学,2012,39(19):4980-4981.
[48]
徐鑫,向敏. 婴幼儿泪囊炎探通治疗的临床体会[J]. 中外医学研究,2012,10(16):25-26.
[49]
张玮玮. 儿童Crawford泪道置管术治疗先天性泪道阻塞的效果观察[J]. 中国实用医药,2016,11(15):129-130.
[50]
张莉,方旺,王莉,等. 新型泪道探通针治疗先天性泪道阻塞临床分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2012,12(1):14-16.
[51]
张敏,朱健华,冯浩,等. KPT-Nd-YAG激光联合药物灌注治疗先天性泪道阻塞临床观察[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2016,1(17):48-50.
[52]
邓宏伟,张敬先,赖小兰,等. 先天性泪囊膨出诊断和治疗及病因探讨[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2012,12(11):2222-2224.
[53]
于刚,张诚玥,崔燕辉,等. CT泪囊造影在儿童泪道疾病中的应用价值[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2013,49(8):706-710.
[54]
Serin D, Alagöz G, Karsloĝlu S, et al. External dacryocystorhinostomy: Double-flap anastomosis or excision of the posterior flaps?[J]. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 2007, 23(1):28.
[55]
Liu HF, Zheng AZ. Observation on curative effect of doubleflap or single-flap anastomosis in two different external dacryocystorhinostomy methods[J]. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2010, 10(5):1007-1008.
[56]
李福生,于刚. 先天性鼻泪管阻塞的治疗进展[J]. 国际眼科纵览,2008,32(2):285-289.
[57]
Haefliger IO, Tschopp M, Pimentel AR. Mucosal excision instead of fashioning nasolacrimal mucosae flaps during external dacryocystorhinostomy: a pilot study[J]. Klinische Monatsblätter Für Augenheilkunde, 2012, 229(4):387-390.
[58]
Alagoz G, Serin DS, Kukner S, et al. Treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with high-pressure irrigation under topical anesthesia[J]. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 2005, 21(6):423-426.
[59]
孙以杨. 综合治疗婴幼儿泪囊炎的临床观察[J]. 中国保健营养,2013,23(10):5777.
[1] 李博, 孔德璇, 彭芳华, 吴文瑛. 超声在胎儿肺静脉异位引流诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(04): 437-441.
[2] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 杨星海, 潘圣宝, 杨帆, 赵胜. 腹膜后内寄生胎产前和新生儿期的临床与超声影像学特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1349-1354.
[3] 李文琳, 羊玲, 邢凯慧, 陈彩华, 钟丽花, 张娅琴, 张薇. 脐动脉血血气分析联合振幅整合脑电图对新生儿窒息脑损伤的早期诊断价值分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 550-558.
[4] 魏徐, 张鸽, 伍金林. 新生儿脓毒症相关性凝血病的监测和治疗[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 379-386.
[5] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[6] 李聪, 徐艳, 吴铭, 丁瑞东, 王军. 极低出生体重儿出生时血清25-羟维生素D水平与其生后早期喂养不耐受关系的临床分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 309-314.
[7] 张霭润, 招嘉樑, 李管明, 李嘉鸿, 陈静蓉, 王兰, 庄思齐, 房晓祎. 早产儿RhE合并Rhc溶血病1例并文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 93-99.
[8] 李东明, 何升. 先天性巨细胞病毒感染早期筛查研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 627-633.
[9] 郝萧, 刘兴莉, 夏小叶, 刁雪芹, 姚美雪. 母亲免疫球蛋白G不规则抗体效价及其效价积分对母婴Rh血型不合新生儿溶血病患儿换血治疗的预测分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 677-684.
[10] 鲍引娣, 范翠芳, 张珺, 孙艳梅, 杨菁. 妊娠合并严重精神障碍精神疾病孕妇妊娠结局的临床分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 739-744.
[11] 张海金, 王增国, 蔡慧君, 赵炳彤. 2020至2022年西安市儿童医院新生儿细菌感染分布及耐药监测分析[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 222-229.
[12] 蔡金娥, 吴勇, 孙迎春. 经鼻无创DouPAP和nCPAP辅助PS在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 829-831.
[13] 冀京雷, 李秀丽, 贾亚男, 冯会敏, 刘丽艳. 改良aEEG评分评估高危足月低体质量新生儿脑损伤的效果分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 165-169.
[14] 梁玉兰, 陈亮, 曾令梅. NLR、RDW水平联合振幅整合脑电图在缺氧缺血性脑病患儿的预后研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 84-89.
[15] 李变, 王莉娜, 桑田, 李珊, 杜雪燕, 李春华, 张兴云, 管巧, 王颖, 冯琪, 蒙景雯. 亚低温技术治疗缺氧缺血性脑病新生儿的临床分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
阅读次数
全文


摘要