切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 9 -15. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2026.01.002

论著

浙江省金华市儿童5年眼生物学参数随访近视眼风险评估的流行病学研究
吴尧1, 赵英涵1, 潘哲2, 张纯2, 李学民1, 邱伟强1,()   
  1. 1100096 北京大学第三医院眼科中心
    2102218 北京,清华大学附属长庚医院眼科
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-01 出版日期:2026-02-28
  • 通信作者: 邱伟强
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(82501341)

Epidemiological studies on risk assessment of ocular biological parameters for myopia progression in children after a 5-year follow-up in Jinhua City of Zhejiang Province

Yao Wu1, Yinghan Zhao1, Zhe Pan2, Chun Zhang2, Xuemin Li1, Weiqiang Qiu1,()   

  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100096, China
    2Department of Ophthalmology, Tsinghua University Changgeng Hospital, Beijing 102218, China
  • Received:2026-02-01 Published:2026-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Weiqiang Qiu
引用本文:

吴尧, 赵英涵, 潘哲, 张纯, 李学民, 邱伟强. 浙江省金华市儿童5年眼生物学参数随访近视眼风险评估的流行病学研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 9-15.

Yao Wu, Yinghan Zhao, Zhe Pan, Chun Zhang, Xuemin Li, Weiqiang Qiu. Epidemiological studies on risk assessment of ocular biological parameters for myopia progression in children after a 5-year follow-up in Jinhua City of Zhejiang Province[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(01): 9-15.

目的

分析浙江省金华市儿童眼生物学参数与近视眼进展风险的关联,探讨多参数联合评估在近视眼进展风险预测中的应用价值。

方法

收集2014年1月至2023年12月于浙江省金华地区进行近视眼防控筛查的6~12岁儿童9567人(9567只眼)的临床资料。其中,男性4872人(4872只眼),女性4695人(4695只眼);年龄6~12岁,平均年龄(8.0±2.0)岁。随访5年,收集研究对象一般人口学信息、检测眼球生物学参数并进行非睫状肌麻痹验光。根据5年近视眼等效球镜屈光度(SE)进展情况,分为无进展组、缓慢进展组及快速进展组。年龄、身体质量指数(BMI)及SE呈偏态分布,采用中位数(四分位间距)表示,组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验;眼轴长度(AL)、角膜曲率半径(CR)、AL/CR及眼压(IOP)分布近似正态,采用±s表示,组间比较采用单因素方差分析。性别以例数和百分比表示,组间比较采用Pearson χ2检验。近视眼进展具有有序等级特征,进行Jonckheere-Terpstra趋势检验,作为补充趋势分析。对总体差异有统计学意义的变量进一步进行两两比较,并采用Bonferroni法校正。以近视眼进展等级为因变量,分别进行单因素和多因素有序Logistic回归分析,计算β系数、Z值、Waldχ2值、OR值、95%置信区间及P值。将基线年龄、BMI、基线SE、基线AL/CR及基线IOP纳入多因素Logistic回归分析。采用方差膨胀因子评估自变量间多重共线性,方差膨胀因子<5认为不存在明显多重共线性。

结果

经相关性检验,所有受试者左右眼SE呈高度正相关,有统计学意义(r=0.89,P<0.05),故本研究以右眼数据作为主要分析对象。本研究儿童年龄中位数为8.0(7.0,9.0)岁,身高中位数为130.0(124.0,140.0)cm,体质量中位数为26.5(23.0,32.0)kg,BMI中位数为15.63(14.42,17.36)kg/m2。所有受试者平均AL、CR、AL/CR及IOP分别为(23.30±1.07)mm、(7.81±0.25)mm、(2.99±0.13)及(15.23±2.83)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),SE中位数0.00(-1.00,0.38)D。正视、低度近视眼及远视者分别为5458只眼、2250只眼及1160只眼,分别占57.0%、24.0%及12.0%。本研究无进展组767人(767只眼)、缓慢进展组3359人(3359只眼)、快速进展组5441人(5441只眼)。Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验显示,三组基线年龄、BMI及SE的总体差异均有统计学意义(H=245.07,20.30,622.58;P<0.05)。单因素方差分析显示,三组基线AL、CR、AL/CR及IOP的总体差异均有统计学意义(F=277.14,10.28,392.62,9.70;P<0.05)。Jonckheere-Terpstra趋势检验显示,随着近视眼进展等级升高,年龄、BMI、AL、AL/CR及IOP呈递增趋势,而CR和SE呈递减趋势(Z=15.09,2.73,24.11,-4.01,31.34,3.92,-20.99;P<0.05)。经Bonferroni法校正,两两比较结果显示,年龄、BMI、AL、AL/CR及SE在无进展组、缓慢进展组与快速进展组之间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。性别分布在三组间总体差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.190,P>0.05)。屈光状态分布在三组间总体差异有统计学意义(χ2=811.670,P<0.05),且无进展组与缓慢进展组、无进展组与快速进展组、缓慢进展组与快速进展组之间的两两比较差异均有统计学意义(χ2=91.05,312.08,571.32;P<0.05)。多因素有序Logistic回归分析显示,年龄和BMI为基线学龄期人群近视眼进展的独立保护因素(OR=0.947,0.983;95%CI:0.919~0.976,0.967~0.999;P<0.05),SE、AL/CR及IOP为近视眼进展至更高等级的独立危险因素(OR=1.177,712.007,1.019;95%CI:1.124~1.232,399.544~1275.193,1.004~1.033;P<0.05)。其中,AL/CR的关联强度最大,其每升高0.1,儿童进展至更高近视眼等级的风险约增加93%。共线性诊断显示,所有自变量的方差膨胀因子均<5,无明显多重共线性。

结论

多项眼生物学参数与儿童近视眼进展密切相关。其中,AL/CR是预测近视眼进展的核心指标,IOP可作为附加参考指标。以AL/CR为核心的多指标联合评估策略,有助于近视眼快速进展的高危个体早期识别,为儿童近视眼的早期筛查、分层管理及公共卫生防控策略制定提供循证依据。

Objective

The aim of this study is to analyze the association between ocular biological parameters and the risk of myopia progression in children in Jinhua City of Zhejiang Province, and to explore the application value of combined multi-parameter assessment in predicting the risk of myopia progression.

Methods

Clinical data of 9567 children aged 6 to 12 years at baseline who underwent myopia screening and prevention programs in the Jinhua area of Zhejiang Province from January 2014 to December 2023 were collected. Among them, 4872 were boys and 4695 were girls, with a mean age of (8.0±2.0) years (ranging from 6 to 12 years). All participants were followed up for 5 years. Demographic information, ocular biometric parameters, and non-cycloplegic refractive data were obtained. According to the 5-year progression of spherical equivalent (SE), participants were classified into the non-progression group, slow progression group, and rapid progression group. Continuous variables were first tested for normality and further evaluated using histograms and Q-Q plots. Skewed distributions were described as median (interquartile range) and were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test between-group comparisons. Normal distributions were described as ±s and were performed using one-way analysis of variance between-group comparisons. Categorical variables were expressed as number and percentage and compared using the Pearson chi-square test. Myopia progression was performed by Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test, and pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction. Univariate and multivariable ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed with myopia progression grade as the dependent variable, and β coefficients, Z values, Wald χ2 values, odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and P values were calculated. The multivariable model included baseline age, BMI, baseline SE, baseline AL/CR, and baseline IOP. Variance inflation factor (VIF) was used to assess multicollinearity among independent variables.

Results

After correlation analysis, a strong positive correlation was observed between the SE of the left and right eyes in all subjects, with statistical significance (r=0.89, P<0.05). Therefore, the right eye data were used as the primary analysis object in this study. Among of them, the median age was 8.0 (7.0, 9.0) years, the median height was 130.0 (124.0, 140.0) cm, the median body mass was 26.5 (23.0, 32.0) kg, and the median BMI was 15.63 (14.42, 17.36) kg/m2. The mean AL, CR, AL/CR, and IOP of all subjects were (23.30±1.07) mm, (7.81±0.25) mm, (2.99±0.13), and (15.23±2.83) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), respectively. The median SE was 0.00 (-1.00, 0.38) D. There were 5458 eyes with emmetropia, 2250 eyes with low myopia, and 1160 eyes with hyperopia, accounting for 57.0%, 24.0%, and 12.0%, respectively. Among of the 9567 participants, there were 767 cases (767 eyes) in the non-progression group, 3359 cases (3359 eyes) in the slow progression group, and 5441 cases (5441 eyes) in the rapid progression group. Kruskal-Wallis tests showed significant overall differences in baseline age, BMI, and SE among the three groups (H=245.07, 20.30, 622.58; P<0.05). One-way analysis of variance showed significant overall differences in baseline AL, CR, AL/CR, and IOP (F=277.14, 10.28, 392.62, 9.70; P<0.05). Jonckheere-Terpstra trend analysis showed that with increasing myopia progression grade, age, BMI, AL, AL/CR, and IOP showed increasing trends, whereas CR and SE showed decreasing trends (Z=15.09, 2.73, 24.11, -4.01, 31.34, 3.92, -20.99; P<0.05). After correction using the Bonferroni method, pairwise comparisons showed that there were statistically significant differences in age, BMI, AL, AL/CR, and SE among the non-progression group, the slow progression group, and the rapid progression group(P<0.05). There was no significant overall difference in sex distribution among the three groups (χ2=2.190, P>0.05). In contrast, refractive status distribution differed significantly overall (χ2=811.670, P<0.05), and all three pairwise comparisons were also significant (χ2=91.05, 312.08, 571.32; P<0.05). Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis showed that age and BMI were independent protective factors for myopia progression in the baseline school-age population (OR=0.947, 0.983; 95%CI: 0.919 to 0.976, 0.967 to 0.999; P<0.05), whereas SE, AL/CR, and IOP were independent risk factors for progression to a higher myopia grade (OR=1.177, 712.007, 1.019; 95%CI: 1.124 to 1.232, 399.544 to 1275.193, 1.004 to 1.033; P<0.05). Among them, AL/CR showed the strongest association, and each 0.1 increase in AL/CR was associated with an approximately 93% increase in the risk of progression to a higher myopia grade. Collinearity diagnostics showed that all VIF were <5, indicating no evident multicollinearity.

Conclusions

Multiple ocular biological parameters were closely associated with myopia progression in children and adolescents. Among them, AL/CR was the core indicator for predicting myopia progression, while IOP may serve as an additional reference indicator. A multi-parameter assessment strategy centered on AL/CR may facilitate early identification of individuals at high risk of rapid myopia progression and provide an evidence-based basis for early screening, stratified management, and public health prevention and control of myopia in children and adolescents.

表1 不同近视眼进展组基线特征的比较
表2 近视眼进展等级的单因素有序Logistic回归分析
表3 近视眼进展等级的多因素有序Logistic回归分析
[1]
Tahhan N, Bullimore MA, He X, et al. IMI-2025 digest[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2025, 66(12): 27.
[2]
Li SM, Wei S, Atchison DA, et al. Annual incidences and progressions of myopia and high myopia in Chinese schoolchildren based on a 5-Year Cohort Study[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2022, 63(1): 8.
[3]
Liang J, Pu Y, Chen J, et al. Global prevalence, trend and projection of myopia in children from 1990 to 2050: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2025, 109(3): 362-371.
[4]
Wang J, Ying GS, Fu X, et al. Prevalence of myopia and vision impairment in school students in Eastern China[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2020, 20(1): 2.
[5]
Chen X, Xie Y, Zhu L. Trends and predictions of myopia among Chinese children aged 7-12 years from 1985 to 2019[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1): 40250.
[6]
Liu Q, Liu C, Shi Y, et al. Prevalence and influencing factors of myopia among primary and secondary school students——Zhejiang Province, China, 2023[J]. China CDC Wkly, 2026, 8(6): 154-160.
[7]
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine. Myopia: causes, prevention, and treatment of an increasingly common disease [M]. Washington: National Academies Press, 2024: 45-52.
[8]
Flitcroft DI, He M, Jonas JB, et al. IMI-defining and classifying myopia: a proposed set of standards for clinical and epidemiologic studies[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2019, 60(3): M20-M30.
[9]
Chen S, Guo Y, Han X, et al. Axial growth driven by physical development and myopia among children: a two year cohort study[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(13): 3867-3879.
[10]
Zhang XJ, Zhang Y, Kam KW, et al. Prevalence of myopia in children before, during, and after COVID-19 restrictions in Hong Kong[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2023, 6(3): e234080.
[11]
Hu Y, Ding X, Guo X, et al. Association of age at myopia onset with risk of high myopia in adulthood in a 12-year follow-up of a Chinese cohort[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2020, 138(11): 1129-1134.
[12]
Lee S, Lee HJ, Lee KG, et al. Obesity and high myopia in children and adolescents: Korea national health and nutrition examination survey[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(3): e0265317.
[13]
Zheng T, Fu W, Jiang S, et al. Inverse L-shaped association between body mass index and myopia in Chinese schoolchildren: a pilot study[J]. J Multidiscip Healthc, 2024, 17: 1839-1846.
[14]
Yin C, Gan Q, Xu P, et al. Weight status and myopia in children and adolescents: a nationwide cross-sectional study of China[J]. Nutrients, 2025, 17(2): 260.
[15]
Biswas S, El-Kareh A, Qureshi M, et al. The influence of the environment and lifestyle on myopia[J]. J Physiol Anthropol, 2024, 43(1): 7.
[16]
Ding H, Jiang L, Lin X, et al. Association of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, sleep and myopia in children and adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis[J]. BMC Public Health, 2025, 25(1): 1231.
[17]
Sijtsma A, Koller M, Sauer PJ, et al. Television, sleep, outdoor play and BMI in young children: the GECKO Drenthe cohort[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2015, 174(5): 631-639.
[18]
Ha A, Lee YJ, Lee M, et al. Digital screen time and myopia: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2025, 8(2): e2460026.
[19]
Mu J, Zhong H, Zhu H, et al. Interaction effect of age and axial length-to-corneal radius ratio on myopia in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study in China[J]. J Transl Med, 2025, 23(1): 1180.
[20]
Liu S, Chen J, Wang J, et al. Cutoff values of axial length/corneal radius ratio for determining myopia vary with age among 3-18 years old children and adolescents[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2024, 262(2): 651-661.
[21]
Mu J, Zeng D, Fan J, et al. The accuracy of the axial length and axial length/corneal radius ratio for myopia assessment among Chinese children[J]. Front Pediatr, 2022, 10: 859944.
[22]
Tang T, Zhao H, Liu D, et al. Axial length to corneal radius of curvature ratio and refractive error in Chinese preschoolers aged 4-6 years: a retrospective cross-sectional study[J]. BMJ Open, 2023, 13(12): e075115.
[23]
He X, Sankaridurg P, Naduvilath T, et al. Normative data and percentile curves for axial length and axial length/corneal curvature in Chinese children and adolescents aged 4-18 years[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2023, 107(2): 167-175.
[24]
Wang P, Kong K, Jiang J, et al. Intraocular pressure is a promising target for myopia control[J]. J Transl Med, 2025, 23(1): 556.
[25]
Zhang D, Wang L, Jin L, et al. A review of intraocular pressure (IOP) and axial myopia[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2022, PMID: 5626479.
[1] 李隆松, 易阳, 沈凯悦, 江凯华, 葛亚文, 张优仪, 宋健, 彭然, 王秋伟, 赵根明, 张涛. 2020年至2024年常州市儿童重症肺炎的流行特征及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 33-41.
[2] 张猛, 李军, 李娜, 孙豪, 韩军涛. 小儿烧伤后手指掌侧瘢痕的临床分型与治疗方式探讨[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(03): 177-182.
[3] 罗旭芳, 王艳子, 滕红娜, 赵德莉, 袁丽, 靳思雨, 官浩. 基于时机理论对重度烧伤患儿照护者照护体验的质性研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(01): 40-46.
[4] 周珣, 陈红兵. 2024年南京及周边地区呼吸道感染患儿病原体分布特点[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 39-45.
[5] 王妮, 赵哲, 王敏, 缪怡. 瑞马唑仑联合右美托咪定滴鼻在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 190-194.
[6] 汤亚南, 刘晓亮, 马秀英, 赵璐珊, 王丽颖, 周鹏翔, 盖晓燕, 邢燕. 577例儿童社区获得性肺炎临床特征及诊疗现状回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 303-308.
[7] 麦吾兰江·麦麦提, 阿力娅·图拉丁, 吐尔洪江·吐逊. ABO血型不相容肝移植免疫抑制策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 152-159.
[8] 陈赛文, 吴青杰, 林昱东, 张思成. 超声引导下闭合复位克氏针固定与切开复位克氏针固定治疗儿童肱骨内上髁骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 38-44.
[9] 许萍萍, 宋丹阳, 李笑, 李辉, 王霞. 降钙素原与氨基末端B型利钠肽原联合评分对甲泼尼龙联合集成化血液净化治疗儿童严重脓毒症效果的分层价值[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 93-99.
[10] 赵文龙, 刘冬, 达娜, 古力米热, 张经, 木拉地力, 吉文玉. 多模态技术在儿童脑功能区肿瘤切除术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 45-51.
[11] 汪嘉曦, 叶曾盼盼, 冉茂兵, 刘文科. 儿童颅内巨大脑膜瘤一例报道[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 57-59.
[12] 何淑敏, 盛倩倩, 丁桂霞. 儿童狼疮性肾炎合并高尿酸血症的特征分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 90-96.
[13] 宋学栋, 夏杰军, 庞宁东, 刘国珩, 韦树长. 经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压患儿一例[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(02): 216-218.
[14] 柯嘉慧, 刘新献. 双侧岩下窦静脉采血精准诊断儿童疑难库欣病1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 114-117.
[15] 杜泽宇, 郭恒, 张向辉, 何佳, 木拉提别克·克尔曼, 马儒林, 郭淑霞. 新疆兵团农村居民血脂指标与心血管疾病发病关联的队列研究[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 28-35.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?