切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 351 -356. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2025.06.006

论著

轴率比预测儿童近视前期准确性的流行病学研究
吕太亮1, 孙伟1, 殷宏坡2, 吴建峰2, 胡媛媛1, 丁美华1, 王艺蓉1, 毕宏生2,()   
  1. 1250002 济南,山东中医药大学附属眼科医院视光科
    2250002 济南,山东中医药大学附属眼科医院 山东省眼病防治研究院 山东中医药大学眼科与视光医学院
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-20 出版日期:2025-12-28
  • 通信作者: 毕宏生
  • 基金资助:
    山东省中医药科技项目-重点项目(Z20242006); 山东省医务职工科技创新计划项目(SDYWZGKCJH2024012)

Epidemiological research on the accuracy of axial length/corneal radius ratio in predicting pre-myopia in children

Tailiang Lyn1, Wei Sun1, Hongpo Yin2, Jianfeng Wu2, yuanyuan Hu1, Meihua Ding1, Yirong Wang1, Hongsheng Bi2,()   

  1. 1Department of Optometry, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250002, China
    2Affiliated Eye Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong Academy of Eye Disease Prevention and Therapy, Ophthalmology & Optometry Medical School, Ophthalmology & Optometry Medical School, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2025-10-20 Published:2025-12-28
  • Corresponding author: Hongsheng Bi
引用本文:

吕太亮, 孙伟, 殷宏坡, 吴建峰, 胡媛媛, 丁美华, 王艺蓉, 毕宏生. 轴率比预测儿童近视前期准确性的流行病学研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 351-356.

Tailiang Lyn, Wei Sun, Hongpo Yin, Jianfeng Wu, yuanyuan Hu, Meihua Ding, Yirong Wang, Hongsheng Bi. Epidemiological research on the accuracy of axial length/corneal radius ratio in predicting pre-myopia in children[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2025, 15(06): 351-356.

目的

探讨轴率比(AL/CR)和屈光度之间的相关性并评估轴率比在儿童近视前期预测中的准确性。

方法

选取"山东儿童眼病研究"项目数据中2012年9~12月山东省威海市和聊城市冠县幼儿园及小学的4~12岁儿童有完整屈光和眼球生物学参数数据4544例(9088只眼)的调查资料为研究对象。其中,男性2451例(4902只眼),女性2093例(4186只眼);年龄4~12岁,平均年龄(8.5±2.2)岁。所有受检者在非睫状肌麻痹下检查屈光度、眼轴长度(AL)及角膜曲率半径(CR)并在睫状肌麻痹下进行电脑验光检查屈光度。等效球镜(SE)屈光度、眼轴长度、角膜曲率半径及AL/CR比值检测或计算的数据经正态性检验符合正态分布,以±s表示。各年龄组间屈光度、AL及CR的比较采用单因素方差分析。SE屈光度与AL/CR比值、AL及CR的相关性采用Spearman相关性分析。绘制受试者工作特征曲线,计算最佳临界值、敏感度、特异度、约登指数及曲线下面积(AUC)。以睫状肌麻痹验光-0.50 D<SE≤+0.75 D为近视前期的诊断标准、AL/CR比值作为诊断近视前期的指标绘制的工作特征曲线分析结果用以评估其诊断效能。

结果

所有受检者4544例右眼(4544只眼)中诊断为近视前期者有1481例(1481只眼),占32.6%;全部受检者的近视前期患病率在4~12岁年龄区间内,随着年龄的增长呈现上升的趋势。其中,各年龄受检者例数和近视前期例数(百分比)分别为4岁112例中有21例,占18.8%;5岁354例中有69例,占19.5%;6岁435例中有96例,占22.1%;7岁639例中有195例,占30.5%;8岁739例中有267例,占36.1%;9岁541例中有201例,占37.2%;10岁702例中有269例,占38.3%;11岁560例中有200例,占35.7%;12岁462例中有163例,占35.3%。4岁儿童SE为(1.33±1.18)D,向近视化方向发展到12岁的(-0.94±1.89)D;4岁儿童AL为(22.13±0.72)mm,逐渐增长到12岁的(23.93±1.09)mm;4岁儿童AL/CR比值为(2.83±0.09),逐渐增加到12岁的(3.03±0.11)。随着年龄的增长,受检者的SE、AL及AL/CR比值均呈现增长为向近视化方向改变,其差异均有统计学意义(F=145.66,197.75,257.97;P<0.05);而CR却未发生明显变化,其差异无统计学意义(F=0.977,P>0.05)。全部4544例4~12岁学龄前和小学儿童的SE屈光度与AL及AL/CR比值呈负相关,其相关性均具有统计学意义(r=-0.736,0.851;P<0.05);而SE与CR的相关性无统计学意义(r=-0.028,P>0.05)。各年龄段受检儿童的最佳临界值、敏感度、特异度、约登指数及AUC(95%CI),4岁分别为2.86、0.77、0.76、0.53及[0.815(0.716,0.913),P<0.05];5岁分别为2.85、0.80、0.64、0.45及[0.799(0.746,0.852),P<0.05];6岁分别为2.88、0.82、0.72、0.55及[0.823(0.777,0.869),P<0.05];7岁分别为2.93、0.66、0.84、0.50及[0.805(0.769,0.841),P<0.05];8岁分别为2.92、0.85、0.66、0.51及[0.840(0.812,0.867),P<0.05];9岁分别为2.98、0.70、0.90、0.60及[0.858(0.827,0.889),P<0.05];10岁分别为2.96、0.78、0.84、0.62及[0.878(0.853,0.903),P<0.05];11岁分别为3.00、0.73、0.88、0.61及[0.874(0.842,0.905),P<0.05];12岁分别为3.00、0.75、0.93、0.68及[0.892(0.861,0.923),P<0.05]。随着年龄的增长,近视前期的诊断最佳临界值呈现逐渐增高趋势。

结论

AL/CR与屈光度呈高度相关性,且在非睫状肌麻痹下近视前期预测中具有较高的准确性,本研究中不同年龄儿童的AL/CR预测最佳临界值,可为近视发生高危儿童的早期筛查提供简便且可靠的评估方法,将有助于近视预防的早期干预。

Objective

Explore the correlation between axial length/corneal radius ratio (AL/CR) and refractive error, and evaluate the accuracy of AL/CR in predicting pre-myopia in children.

Methods

The study selected 4544 cases (9088 eyes) of children aged 4 to 12 years old from kindergartens and primary schools in Weihai City and Guan County, Liaocheng City, Shandong Province, who had complete refractive and ocular biological parameter data from the " Shandong Children's Eye Disease Research" project in September to December 2012 as the research subjects. Among them, there were 2451 males (4902 eyes) and 2093 females (4186 eyes); The age range is 4 to 12 years old, with an average age of (8.5 ± 2.2) years. All subjects were examined for refraction, axial length (AL), and corneal curvature radius (CR) before cycloplegia, and auto-refraction was performed after cycloplegia. The data obtained from the detection or calculation of equivalent spherical refraction, axial length, corneal curvature radius, and AL/CR ratio conforms to a normal distribution after normality testing, represented by ±s. The comparison of refractive error, AL, and CR among different age groups was conducted using one-way analysis of variance. The correlation between equivalent spherical (SE) refraction and AL/CR ratio, as well as AL and CR, was analyzed using Spearman correlation analysis. Draw receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculate the optimal cut off value, sensitivity, specificity, youden index, and area under the curve (AUC). The ROC curve analysis results were drawn using cycloplegic refraction with -0.50 D<SE ≤+ 0.75 D as the diagnostic criteria for pre-myopia and AL/CR ratio as the indicator for diagnosing pre-myopia to evaluate its diagnostic efficacy.

Results

Among all 4544 right eyes (4544 eyes) examined, 1481 cases (1481 eyes) were diagnosed with pre-myopia, accounting for 32.6%; the prevalence of pre myopia in all subjects is within the age range of 4 to 12 years old, and shows an increasing trend with age. Among them, the number of cases and pre-myopia cases (percentage) among 112 cases aged 4 were 21 out of 112, accounting for 18.8%; out of 354 cases aged 569 cases accounted for 19.5%; out of 435 cases aged 696 cases accounted for 22.1%; out of 639 cases aged 7195 cases accounted for 30.5%; out of 739 cases aged 8267 cases accounted for 36.1%; out of 541 cases aged 9, 201 cases accounted for 37.2%; out of 702 cases aged 10, 269 cases accounted for 38.3%; out of 560 cases aged 11, there were cases, accounting for 35.7%; among 462 cases aged 12, there were 163 cases, accounting for 35.3%.The SE of 4-year-old children was (1.33±1.18) D, which develops towards myopia at the age of 12 (-0.94±1.89) D. The AL of 4-year-old children was (22.13±0.72) mm, gradually increasing to (23.93±1.09) mm at the age of 12. The AL/CR ratio of 4-year-old children is (2.83±0.09), gradually increasing to (3.03±0.11) at the age of 12. As age increases, the SE, AL, and AL/CR ratios of the subjects all shew an increase towards myopia, and the differences are statistically significant (F=145.66, 197.75, 257.97; P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in CR, and the difference was not statistically significant (F=0.977, P>0.05). The SE refraction of all 4544 preschool and primary school children aged 4 to 12 years old was negatively correlated with AL and AL/CR ratio, and the correlation was statistically significant (r=-0.736, 0.851; P<0.05). The correlation between SE and CR was not statistically significant (r=-0.028, P>0.05). The optimal cut-off values, sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, and AUC (95%CI) for children of different age groups were 2.86, 0.77, 0.76, 0.53, and [0.815 (0.716, 0.913), P<0.05] at the age of 4; At the age of 5, the values were 2.85, 0.80, 0.64, 0.45, and [0.799 (0.746, 0.852), P<0.05]. At the age of 6, the values were 2.88, 0.82, 0.72, 0.55, and [0.823 (0.777, 0.869), P<0.05]. At the age of 7, the values were 2.93, 0.66, 0.84, 0.50, and [0.805 (0.769, 0.841), P<0.05]. At the age of 8, the values were 2.92, 0.85, 0.66, 0.51, and [0.840 (0.812, 0.867), P<0.05]. At the age of 9, the values were 2.98, 0.70, 0.90, 0.60, and [0.858 (0.827, 0.889), P<0.05]. At the age of 10, the values were 2.96, 0.78, 0.84, 0.62, and [0.878 (0.853, 0.903), P<0.05]. At the age of 11, the values were 3.00, 0.73, 0.88, 0.61, and [0.874 (0.842, 0.905), P<0.05]. At the age of 12, the values were 3.00, 0.75, 0.93, 0.68, and [0.892 (0.861, 0.923), P<0.05]. As age increases, the optimal cut-off values for diagnosing premyopia gradually increases.

Conclusions

AL/CR is highly correlated with refractive error and has high accuracy in predicting premyopia before cycloplegia. In this study, the optimal cut off values for AL/CR prediction in children of different ages can provide a simple and reliable evaluation method for early screening of high-risk children for myopia, which will help with early intervention for myopia prevention.

表1 不同年龄受检者等效球镜屈光度、眼轴长度、角膜曲率半径及AL/CR比值的比较(±s)
图3 轴率比和非睫状肌麻痹下等效球镜屈光度联合指标和轴率比在近视前期预测中的受试者工作特征曲线图 注:AUC,曲线下面积
表2 AL/CR比值诊断近视前期准确性的评估(±s)
[1]
Flitcroft DI, He M, Jonas JB, et al. IMI - Defining and Classifying Myopia: A Proposed Set of Standards for Clinical and Epidemiologic Studies[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2019, 60(3):M20-M30.
[2]
Zadnik K, Sinnott LT, Cotter SA, et al. Prediction of Juvenile-Onset Myopia[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2015, 133(6):683-689.
[3]
Wu JF, Bi HS, Wang SM, et al. Refractive error, visual acuity and causes of vision loss in children in Shandong, China. The Shandong Children Eye Study[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12):e82763.
[4]
Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9827):1739-1748.
[5]
Pan CW, Ramamurthy D, Saw SM. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2012, 32(1):3-16.
[6]
Liu HH, Xu L, Wang YX, et al. Prevalence and progression of myopic retinopathy in Chinese adults: the Beijing Eye Study[J]. Ophthalmology, 2010, 117(9):1763-1768.
[7]
Saw SM, Gazzard G, Shih-Yen EC, et al. Myopia and associated pathological complications[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2005, 25(5):381-391.
[8]
Wang CY, Hsu NW, Yang YC, et al. Premyopia at Preschool Age: Population-based Evidence of Prevalence and Risk Factors from a Serial Survey in Taiwan[J]. Ophthalmology, 2022, 129(8):880-889.
[9]
Yin Y, Li L, Wang T, et al. Establishment of noncycloplegic methods for screening myopia and pre-myopia in preschool children[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2023, 10:1291387.
[10]
Morgan IG, Rose KA, Ellwein LB, et al. Is emmetropia the natural endpoint for human refractive development? An analysis of population-based data from the refractive error study in children (RESC)[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2010, 88(8):877-884.
[11]
Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, et al. Axial growth and changes in lenticular and corneal power during emmetropization in infants[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005, 46(9):3074-3080.
[12]
Lu TL, Wu JF, Ye X, et al. Axial Length and Associated Factors in Children: The Shandong Children Eye Study[J]. Ophthalmologica, 2016, 235(2):78-86.
[13]
Goss DA, Jackson TW. Clinical findings before the onset of myopia in youth: 3. Heterophoria[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 1996, 73(4):269-278.
[14]
He X, Zou H, Lu L, et al. Axial length/corneal radius ratio: association with refractive state and role on myopia detection combined with visual acuity in Chinese schoolchildren[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(2):e0111766.
[15]
Liu S, Chen J, Wang J, et al. Cutoff values of axial length/corneal radius ratio for determining myopia vary with age among 3-18 years old children and adolescents[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2024, 262(2):651-661.
[16]
Tang T, Zhao H, Liu D, et al. Axial length to corneal radius of curvature ratio and refractive error in Chinese preschoolers aged 4-6 years: a retrospective cross-sectional study[J]. BMJ Open, 2023, 13(12):e075115.
[17]
Iribarren R, Morgan IG, Chan YH, et al. Changes in lens power in Singapore Chinese children during refractive development[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012, 53(9):5124-5130.
[18]
Rozema J, Dankert S, Iribarren R, et al. Axial Growth and Lens Power Loss at Myopia Onset in Singaporean Children[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2019, 60(8):3091-3099.
[19]
Lu T, Song J, Wu Q, et al. Refractive lens power and lens thickness in children (6-16 years old)[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):19284
[20]
Ghorbani-Mojarrad N, Han X, Dbayat N, et al. What do we know about premyopia and should we be giving it greater consideration?[J]. BMJ Open Ophthalmol, 2025, 10(1):e002059.
[1] 吴群, 李培, 马宁, 王芳韵, 郑淋, 卫海燕, 张鑫. 儿童先天性冠状动脉瘘合并巨大冠状动脉瘤的超声心动图诊断[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(11): 1080-1085.
[2] 刘晴晴, 俞劲, 徐玮泽, 张志伟, 潘晓华, 舒强, 叶菁菁. OBICnet图像分类模型在小儿先天性心脏病超声筛查中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(08): 754-760.
[3] 罗旭芳, 王艳子, 滕红娜, 赵德莉, 袁丽, 靳思雨, 官浩. 基于时机理论对重度烧伤患儿照护者照护体验的质性研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(01): 40-46.
[4] 叶子悟, 周燕, 祖木来提·艾尔肯, 刘娜, 廖贵清, 邱小玲, 周震, 努尔比亚·阿不都西库. 新疆喀什市3 ~ 5岁儿童乳牙龋纵向变化分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 393-399.
[5] 陈赛文, 吴青杰, 林昱东, 张思成. 超声引导下闭合复位克氏针固定与切开复位克氏针固定治疗儿童肱骨内上髁骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 38-44.
[6] 王辉, 孙咏琪. 儿童遗传性肾脏病再认识[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 8-14.
[7] 赵俊红, 吉文玉, 图柯拜, 刘冬, 汪永新. 新疆地区儿童创伤性颅脑损伤的临床特点及预后相关因素分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(06): 346-351.
[8] 达娜·乌木尔扎克, 汪永新. 去骨瓣减压术治疗儿童重型颅脑损伤的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(06): 376-379.
[9] 杜琳, 贾飞勇. 儿童青少年抑郁障碍的多因素病因研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(11): 854-859.
[10] 孙太鹏, 袁勇贵. 儿童青少年精神卫生服务的现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(11): 805-808.
[11] 洪素, 况利. ICD-11 CDDR框架下的实践参考:儿童青少年心境障碍[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(11): 814-817.
[12] 陈妍, 陈珏. ICD-11 CDDR框架下的实践参考:儿童青少年心身疾病[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(11): 818-822.
[13] 高鉴兴, 马晶晶, 夏洁, 柯晓燕, 方慧. 儿童青少年首次抑郁发作的临床特征及非自杀性自伤的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(09): 633-641.
[14] 冉影, 刘瑞云, 王欣宇, 顾家琪, 韩宗泽, 李纪文, 杨辉, 王翛然, 王邦茂, 周璐. 瞬时弹性成像对自身免疫性肝炎肝纤维化的诊断效能及其影响因素[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(09): 651-658.
[15] 姜彤彤, 戎萍, 马融, 付乾芳, 张亚同, 赵书艺, 刘晖, 马榕, 李悦, 李瑞本. 抽动障碍儿童呼吸道感染后的临床特征及抽动症状加重的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 426-432.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?