切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 212 -219. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2025.04.004

论著

基于增殖型糖尿病视网膜病变玻璃体切割术后短期预后影响因素Lasso-Logistic回归预测模型的临床研究
关倩(), 潘晓霞, 王东   
  1. 041000 山西省临汾市人民医院眼科
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-16 出版日期:2025-08-28
  • 通信作者: 关倩
  • 基金资助:
    山西省卫健委2022年度卫生健康科研课题(2022152)

The effect factor in short-term prognosis of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy after pars plana vitrectomy based on Lasso-Logistic regression analysis

Qian Guan(), Xiaoxia Pan, Dong Wang   

  1. Ophthalmology Department, Linfen People′s Hospital, Linfen 041000, China
  • Received:2025-06-16 Published:2025-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Qian Guan
引用本文:

关倩, 潘晓霞, 王东. 基于增殖型糖尿病视网膜病变玻璃体切割术后短期预后影响因素Lasso-Logistic回归预测模型的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 212-219.

Qian Guan, Xiaoxia Pan, Dong Wang. The effect factor in short-term prognosis of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy after pars plana vitrectomy based on Lasso-Logistic regression analysis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2025, 15(04): 212-219.

目的

应用Lasso-Logistic回归分析玻璃体切割术(PPV)后增殖型糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)患者短期预后的影响因素并构建预测模型。

方法

选取2021年1月至2024年2月在临汾市人民医院眼科PPV术后的PDR患者179例(179只眼)作为研究对象。其中,男性96例(96只眼),女性83例(83只眼);年龄29~81岁,平均年龄(64.3±8.3)岁。按照术后6个月视力较术前减少程度分为预后不良组和预后良好组。收集PDR患者的病史、血压、血脂、血糖、肝肾功能生化检测结果及术后并发症的信息。年龄、糖尿病病程、术前最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、视网膜激光数量、术前眼内压、血压、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、血脂四项、血常规及肝肾功能生化检测结果进行正态性检验,当符合正态分布用±s表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验,糖尿病病程和尿白蛋白偏态计量资料采用M(P25, P75)表示,组间比较采用秩和检验;性别、眼别、病史、PDR分期、糖尿病治疗类型、黄斑脱离、虹膜红变、玻璃体积血、视网膜前积血、抗血管内皮生长因子治疗、联合白内障手术、玻璃体腔填充物及术后并发症以例数(眼数)和百分比表示,采用皮尔逊或连续性修正卡方检验;采用单因素分析和Lasso筛选影响PDR患者PPV术后短期预后不良的因素;使用多因素Logistic回归分析独立影响因素,并基于影响因素构建列线图预测模型;拟合度采用霍斯默-莱梅肖检验,C指数分析采用区分能力,准确性采用校准曲线分析,临床效益采用决策曲线分析,预测效能采用受试者工作特征曲线分析。

结果

预后不良组患者33例(33只眼)平均糖尿病病程和尿白蛋白中位和四分位数分别为11.00(9.00,13.50)年和42.37(36.41,48.46)mg/L;高脂血症者13例(13只眼),冠心病者14例(14只眼),高血压者6例(6只眼),分别占39.39%、42.42%及18.18%;PDR Ⅳ期者6例(6只眼),Ⅴ期者15例(15只眼),Ⅵ期者12例(12只眼),分别占18.18%、45.45%及36.36%;口服药物治疗糖尿病者6例(6只眼),注射胰岛素者17例(17只眼),胰岛素联合口服药物者10例(10只眼);黄斑脱离者14例(14只眼),虹膜红变者4例(4只眼),玻璃体积血者31例(31只眼),视网膜前积血者13例(13只眼),分别占42.42%、12.12%、93.94%及39.39%;未使用抗血管内皮生长因子治疗者11例(11只眼),术前使用者18例(18只眼),术中使用者4例(4只眼),分别占33.33%、54.55%及12.12%;联合白内障手术者17例(17只眼),占51.52%;玻璃体腔填充六氟乙烷者2例(2只眼),硅油填充者27例(27只眼),平衡液填充者4例(4只眼),分别占6.06%、81.82%及12.12%;术后并发症者18例(18只眼),占54.55%。预后良好组患者146例(146只眼)糖尿病病程和尿白蛋白中位和四分位数分别为9.00(7.00,11.00)年和41.76(37.10,46.09)mg/L;高脂血症者37例(37只眼),冠心病者42例(42只眼),高血压者27例(27只眼),分别占25.34%、28.77%及18.49%;PDR Ⅳ期者44例(44只眼),Ⅴ期者85例(85只眼),Ⅵ期者17例(17只眼),分别占30.14%、58.22%及11.64%;口服药物治疗糖尿病者37例(37只眼),注射胰岛素者70例(70只眼),胰岛素联合口服药物者39例(39只眼),分别占25.34%、47.95%及26.71%;黄斑脱离者16例(16只眼),虹膜红变者3例(3只眼),玻璃体积血者127例(127只眼),视网膜前积血者52例(52只眼),分别占10.96%、2.05%、86.99%及35.62%;未使用抗血管内皮生长因子治疗者35例(35只眼),术前使用者94例(94只眼),术中使用者17例(17只眼),分别占23.97%、64.38%及11.65%;联合白内障手术者58例(58只眼),占39.73%;玻璃体腔填充六氟乙烷者38例(38只眼),硅油填充者90例(90只眼),平衡液填充者18例(18只眼),分别占26.03%、61.64%及12.33%;术后并发症者32例(32只眼),占21.92%。预后不良组患者术眼术前BCVA、视网膜激光光斑数量、术前眼内压、收缩压、舒张压、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、总胆固醇、甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、中性粒细胞计数、淋巴细胞计数、血小板计数、白细胞计数、丙氨酸转氨酶、天冬氨酸转氨酶、谷氨酰转肽酶及血肌酐分别为(1.97±0.60)最小分辨角对数(logMAR)、(652.06±381.20)个、(19.12±4.30)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)、(153.97±20.86)mmHg、(93.85±10.03)mmHg、(10.22±1.41)mmol/L、(7.71±1.72)%、(5.33±0.33)mmol/L、(1.84±0.39)mmol/L、(1.05±0.07)mmol/L、(3.20±0.54)mmol/L、(3.90±1.14)×109/L、(1.60±0.45)×109/L、(254.93±54.14)×109/L、(8.47±2.62)×109/L、(26.92±8.18)U/L、(24.34±8.70)U/L、(36.60±11.12)U/L及(123.39±16.96)μmol/L;预后良好组患者分别为(1.62±0.47)logMAR、(1055.26±433.68)个、(17.40±5.08)mmHg、(149.12±20.14)mmHg、(89.84±11.11)mmHg、(9.71±1.35)mmol/L、(6.99±1.40)%、(5.20±0.51)mmol/L、(1.78±0.34)mmol/L、(1.06±0.13)mmol/L、(3.00±0.55)mmol/L、平均(3.72±1.26)×109/L、(1.76±0.59)×109/L、(254.40±69.00)×109/L、(8.33±2.49)×109/L、(24.80±8.82)U/L、(22.52±7.54)U/L、(33.36±10.23)U/L及(119.65±18.23)μmol/L。两组患者糖尿病病程比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.316,P<0.05);黄斑脱离、虹膜红变、玻璃体腔填充物及术后并发症组间比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=19.102,4.827,6.479,14.234;P<0.05);术前BCVA、视网膜激光数量及糖化血红蛋白组间比较,差异有统计学意义(t=3.667,4.926,2.573;P<0.05)。Lasso回归筛选出PDR分期、术前BCVA、黄斑脱离、视网膜激光数量及术后并发症5个具有非零特征的变量。经多因素Logistic回归分析,PDR分期Ⅴ期、Ⅵ期、黄斑脱离及术后并发症是PDR患者PPV术后短期预后不良的独立危险因素(OR=3.630,10.296,3.082,3.806,2.920;95%CI:1.088~12.110,2.630~40.303,1.074~8.845,1.260~11.499,1.075~7.930;P<0.05),视网膜激光数量是其独立保护因素(OR=0.784,95%CI:0.685~0.897;P<0.05)。基于PDR患者PPV术后短期预后不良的独立影响因素构建列线图预测模型Logit(P)=-3.233+1.289×PDR分期Ⅴ期+2.332×PDR分期Ⅵ期+1.125×术前BCVA+1.337×黄斑脱离-0.002×视网膜激光数量+1.071×术后并发症。预测模型拟合较好,C指数为0.885(95%CI:0.876~0.895,P>0.05)。经校准曲线和决策曲线分析,列线图预测模型预测概率接近理想曲线,净收益范围较大。经受试者工作特征曲线分析,列线图预测模型预测PDR患者PPV术后短期预后不良的曲线下面积0.885(95%CI:0.828~0.927),敏感度84.85%,特异度78.77%,约登指数0.6362。

结论

PDR分期、术前BCVA、黄斑脱离、视网膜激光数量及术后并发症是PPV术后PDR患者短期预后不良的独立影响因素,视网膜激光数量是其独立保护因素,基于上述影响因素构建的列线图预测模型对PDR患者PPV术后短期预后不良具有较高的预测能效。

Objective

The aim of this study is to identify factors influencing the short-term prognosis of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using Lasso-Logistic regression analysis and construct a predictive model.

Methods

A total of 179 PDR patients (179 eyes) who underwent PPV in the Ophthalmology Department of Linfen People′s Hospital from January 2021 to February 2024 were selected as the study subjects. There were 83 female (83 eyes) and 96 male (96 eyes) with a mean age of (64.3±8.3) years (ranging from 29 to 81 years). Based on the degree of visual acuity after surgery 6 months decline compared to preoperative levels, patients were divided into the poor prognosis group with 33 cases (33 eyes) and the favorable prognosis group with 146 cases (146 eyes). Data collected included gender, age, eye involved, diabetes duration, medical history, PDR stage, diabetes treatment type, preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), disease severity, treatment modality, intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure, blood glucose, blood lipids, blood cells, liver and kidney biochemistry, and postoperative complications. The age, diabetes duration, preoperative BCVA, number of retinal laser photocoagulations, preoperative IOP, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), four lipid items, complete blood count, liver and kidney function indices. Data conforming to a normal distribution were expressed as ±s and compared between groups using independent samples t-test. Skewed measurement data including the diabetes duration and urinary albumin were expressed as M(P25, P75) and compared between groups using the rank-sum test. The gender, eye involved, medical history, PDR stage, diabetes treatment type, macular detachment, iris neovascularization/rubeosis, vitreous hemorrhage, preretinal hemorrhage, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment, combined cataract surgery, vitreous cavity tamponade, postoperative complications were expressed as number and percentage, and compared between groups using Pearson′s or continuity-adjusted chi-square test. Univariate analysis and Lasso regression were used to screen factors affecting short-term poor prognosis after PPV in PDR patients. Independent influencing factors were identified using multivariate Logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram prediction model was constructed based on these factors. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used for goodness-of-fit; the C-index was used to analyze discriminative ability; the accuracy was analyzed using calibration curves; the clinical utility was analyzed using decision curve analysis, and predictive efficacy was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

In the poor prognosis group with 33 cases (33 eyes), the diabetes duration median and urinary albumin were 11.00 (9.00, 13.50) years and 42.37 (36.41, 48.46) mg/L, respectively; there were 13 with hyperlipidemia, 14 with coronary heart disease, 6 with hypertension, accounting for 39.39%, 42.42% and 18.18%, respectively; 6 cases (6 eyes) with PDR stage Ⅳ, 15 cases (15 eyes) with stage Ⅴ, 12 cases (12 eyes) with stage Ⅵ, accounting for 18.18%, 45.45% and 36.36%, respectively; 6 with oral medications of diabetes treatment type, 17 with insulin injections, 10 with insulin combined with oral medications, accounting for 18.18%, 51.52% and 30.30%, respectively; 14 with macular detachment, 4 with iris rubeosis, 31 with vitreous hemorrhage, 13 with preretinal hemorrhage, accounting for 42.42%, 12.12%, 93.94% and 39.39% respectively; 11 not used anti-VEGF treatment, 18 used preoperativly, 4 used intraoperativly, accounting for 33.33%, 54.55% and 12.12% respectively; 17 combined with cataract surgery, accounting for 51.52%; 2 with C3F8 for vitreous cavity tamponade, 27 with silicone oil, 4 with balanced saline solution, accounting for 6.06%, 81.82% and 12.12% respectively; 18 with postoperative complications accounting for 54.55%. In the good prognosis groups with 146 cases (146 eyes), the diabetes duration median were 9.00 (7.00, 11.00) years; urinary albumin 41.76 (37.10, 46.09) mg/L; 37 with hyperlipidemia, 42 with coronary heart disease, 27 with hypertension, accounting for 25.34%, 28.77% and 18.49% respectively; PDR stage: 44 cases (44 eyes) with Ⅳ stage, 85 cases (85 eyes) with Ⅴ stage, 17 cases (17 eyes) with Ⅵ stage, accounting for 30.14%, 58.22% and 11.64% respectively; diabetes treatment type: 37 used by oral medications, 70 used by insulin injections, 39 used by insulin combined with oral medications, accounting for 25.34%, 47.95% and 26.71% respectively; 16 with macular detachment, 3 with iris rubeosis, 127 with vitreous hemorrhage, 52 with preretinal hemorrhage, accounting for 10.96%, 2.05%, 86.99% and 35.62% respectively; 35 not used anti-VEGF treatment, 94 preoperative, 17 intraoperative, accounting for 23.97%, 64.38% and 11.65% respectively; 58 with combined cataract surgery, accounting for 39.73%; 38 with C3F8 after vitreous cavity tamponade, 90 with silicone oil, 18 with balanced saline solution, accounting for 90.41%, 61.64% and 12.33% respectively; 32 with postoperative complications, accounting for 21.92%. The mean preoperative BCVA, number of retinal laser spots, preoperative IOP, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, platelet count, white blood cell count, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate transaminase, glutamyl transpeptidase, serum creatinine were (1.97±0.60) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), (652.06±381.20)spots, (19.12±4.30)mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), (153.97±20.86)mmHg, (93.85±10.03)mmHg, (10.22±1.41)mmol/L, (7.71±1.72)%, (5.33±0.33)mmol/L, (1.84±0.39)mmol/L, (1.05±0.07)mmol/L, (3.20±0.54)mmol/L, (3.90±1.14) ×109/L, (1.60±0.45) ×109/L, (254.93±54.14) ×109/L, (8.47±2.62) ×109/L, (26.92±8.18)U/L, (24.34±8.70)U/L, (36.60±11.12)U/L, (123.39±16.96)μmol/L, respectively; while those of good prognosis group were (1.62±0.47) logMAR, (1055.26±433.68) spots, (17.40±5.08) mmHg, (149.12±20.14) mmHg, (89.84±11.11) mmHg, (9.71±1.35) mmol/L, (6.99±1.40)%, (5.20±0.51) mmol/L, (1.78±0.34) mmol/L, (1.06±0.13) mmol/L, (3.00±0.55) mmol/L, (3.72±1.26) ×109/L, (1.76±0.59) ×109/L, (254.40±69.00) ×109/L, (8.33±2.49) ×109/L, (24.80±8.82) U/L, (22.52±7.54) U/L, (33.36±10.23) U/L, (119.65±18.23) μmol/L, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in diabetes duration(Z=-3.316, P<0.05); macular detachment, iris rubeosis, vitreous cavity tamponade, and postoperative complications (χ2=19.102, 4.827, 6.479, 14.234; P<0.05); preoperative BCVA, number of retinal laser spots, and HbA1c (t=3.667, 4.926, 2.573; P<0.05). Lasso regression identified five variables with non-zero features: PDR stage, preoperative BCVA, macular detachment, number of retinal lasers, and postoperative complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PDR Ⅴ, Ⅵ stages, preoperative BCVA, macular detachment, and postoperative complications were independent risk factors for short-term poor prognosis in PDR patients after PPV (OR=3.630, 10.296, 3.082, 3.806, 2.920; 95%CI: 1.088 to 12.110, 2.630 to 40.303, 1.074 to 8.845, 1.260 to 11.499, 1.075 to 7.930; P<0.05), while the number of retinal lasers was an independent protective factor (OR=0.784, 95%CI: 0.685~0.897; P<0.05). A column chart prediction model was constructed based on independent influencing factors of short-term poor prognosis in PDR patients undergoing PPV Logit (P)=-3.233+ 1.289×PDR stage Ⅴ+ 2.332×PDR stage Ⅵ+ 1.125×preoperative BCVA+ 1.337×macular detachment -0.002×number of retinal lasers+ 1.071×postoperative complications. The prediction model was well, and C index of 0.885 (95%CI: 0.876 to 0.895, P>0.05). The predicted probability of the column chart prediction model after the calibration curve and decision curve was close to the ideal curve, and the net profit range was relatively large. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of the line chart prediction model for predicting short-term poor prognosis in PDR patients after PPV was 0.885 (95%CI: 0.828 to 0.927), with a sensitivity of 84.85%, specificity of 78.77%, and a Youden index of 0.6362.

Conclusions

PDR staging, preoperative BCVA, macular detachment, number of retinal lasers, and postoperative complications are independent factors affecting the short-term poor prognosis of PDR patients after PPV. The column chart prediction model constructed based on these factors has high predictive efficiency for the short-term poor prognosis of PDR patients after PPV.

表1 增殖型糖尿病视网膜病变患者行玻璃体切割术后短期预后不良的多因素Logistic回归分析
图1 预测模型预测增殖型糖尿病视网膜病变患者行玻璃体切割术短期预后不良的列线图 图A~C分别示校准曲线分析图、决策曲线分析图及受试者工作特征曲线分析图
[1]
胡如英,何青芳,周晓燕. 2型糖尿病患者肥胖状态与全因死亡风险的关联研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志202445(4):542-547.
[2]
中华医学会眼科学分会眼底病学组,中国医师协会眼科医师分会眼底病学组. 我国糖尿病视网膜病变临床诊疗指南(2022年)--基于循证医学修订[J]. 中华眼底病杂志202339(2):99-124.
[3]
中华医学会眼科学分会眼底病学组,中国医师协会眼科医师分会眼底病专委会,《玻璃体切割手术治疗2型糖尿病视网膜病变专家共识》专家组. 玻璃体切割手术治疗2型糖尿病视网膜病变专家共识[J]. 中华眼底病杂志202440(9):663-686.
[4]
王爽,李晓鹏. 房水中内皮素-1、超氧化物歧化酶与糖尿病视网膜病变患者术后视力残疾的关系[J]. 眼科新进展202343(3):203-207.
[5]
张立琳,章金鹏,金律,等. 基于序贯器官功能衰竭评分的LASSO-Logistic诊断模型在脓毒症中的效能分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版)202445(10):1207-1212.
[6]
吴红,蔡伟茶,金琪琪,等. 髋部骨折老年患者术后1年死亡的危险因素及其预测模型的准确性:基于LASSO-Logistic回归[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志202444(1):15-19.
[7]
中华医学会眼科学会眼底病学组. 我国糖尿病视网膜病变临床诊疗指南(2014年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志201450(11):851-865.
[8]
中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2020年版)[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志202137(4):311-398.
[9]
中华医学会糖尿病学分会视网膜病变学组. 糖尿病相关眼病防治多学科中国专家共识(2021年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志202113(11):1026-1042.
[10]
代莉,李娟,邹明菊. 增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变微创玻璃体切割术预后影响因素[J]. 安徽医药202226(7):1433-1436.
[11]
中国研究型医院学会糖尿病学专业委员会. 社区医疗机构糖尿病视网膜病变筛查工作流程与管理规范的专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志202416(1):20-27.
[12]
Lin TZ, Kong Y, Shi C, et al. Prognosis value of Chinese ocular fundus diseases society classification for proliferative diabetic retinopathy on postoperative visual acuity after pars plana vitrectomy in type 2 diabetes[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2022, 15(10): 1627-1633.
[13]
单田慧,俞嘉宣,刘春莉,等. 玻璃体腔注射康柏西普联合全视网膜激光光凝治疗不同分期增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变[J]. 国际眼科杂志202323(8):1242-1249.
[14]
周天球,朱曦,施祥. 增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变患者玻璃体切除术后玻璃体再积血的影响因素及预后分析[J]. 中国现代医学杂志202333(24):55-59.
[15]
国家重点研发计划2020YFC2008200项目组,中华医学会眼科学分会眼视光学组,中国医师协会眼科医师分会眼视光专业委员会. 中国低视力康复临床指南(2021)[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志202123(3):161-170.
[16]
杨英,向彦锋. 糖尿病视网膜病变患者血糖指标与视力严重程度的相关性[J]. 血栓与止血学202228(3):553-554,557.
[17]
祖雪,代光政,林铁柱. 增生性糖尿病视网膜病变行玻璃体切割术后发生新生血管性青光眼的风险因素[J].国际眼科杂志202323(5):808-812.
[18]
Perais J, Agarwal R, Evans JR, et al. Prognostic factors for the development and progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy in people with diabetic retinopathy[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2023, 2(2): CD013775.
[19]
Cyrino FVR, de-Lucena MM, de-Oliveira-Audi L, et al. Historical and practical aspects of macular buckle surgery in the treatment of myopic tractional maculopathy: case series and literature review[J]. Int J Retina Vitreous, 2024, 10(1): 60.
[20]
Ecsedy M, Szabo D, Szilagyi Z, et al. Personalized management of patients with proliferative diabetic vitreoretinopathy[J]. Life (Basel), 2024, 14(8): 993.
[21]
李昕,吴苗琴,郦晓霞,等. 不同类型视网膜激光光凝治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变的研究进展[J]. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志202345(3):229-235.
[22]
范小娥,柯屹峰,任新军,等. 增生性糖尿病视网膜病变玻璃体切割术后玻璃体再出血危险因素分析[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志202139(9):803-810.
[23]
Wang XF, Zhang XW, Liu YJ, et al. The causal effect of hypertension, intraocular pressure, and diabetic retinopathy: a mendelian randomization study[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2024, 2(15): 1304512.
[24]
曾春梅,邓斌,白莹,等. 房水Sema3A、Klotho、SDF-1与增生型糖尿病视网膜病变患者术后新生血管性青光眼的关系研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展202424(12):2356-2360.
[25]
Guo H, Li W, Wang K, et al. Analysis of risk factors for revitrectomy in eyes with diabetic vitreous hemorrhage[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 2023, 10(16): 3161-3162.
[26]
李蕴智,安洋,成艾璇,等. 玻璃体切割术后糖尿病黄斑水肿治疗新进展[J]. 眼科新进展202343(3):249-252.
[27]
Nisic F, Gadzo AP, Fajkic A, et al. Predictors of visual outcome after pars plana vitrectomy secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy[J]. Rom J Ophthalmol, 2023, 67(3): 283-288.
[1] 钱何布, 朱林, 姚月平, 姚峰, 李玉卓, 马家驹, 晏倩, 倪晓艳. 应用机器学习建立脓毒性休克患者住院28天死亡预测模型及验证[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 288-297.
[2] 徐世伟, 廖杜荣, 张镐, 叶辉, 陈志平, 雒洪志. 基于一种新炎症-营养指标构建结直肠癌术前淋巴结转移预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 383-389.
[3] 孙圣梅, 习一清, 安宁. 人表皮生长因子受体2阳性型乳腺癌新辅助治疗响应的基因预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 332-339.
[4] 罗仲燃, 曾智豪, 黄梦娟, 何晓艺. 乳腺癌术后腋窝淋巴结负荷的多因素分析及预测模型的建立及验证[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 46-50.
[5] 谷瑞辰, 林福杨, 刘永达. 术前尿培养阴性患者PCNL术后尿路感染的预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 772-777.
[6] 黄少坚, 梁汉标, 李清平, 唐善华, 李青妍, 李芷西, 黄灿, 王小振, 陈灿辉, 王恺, 李川江. 基于影像组学和临床特征构建肝癌新辅助/转化治疗后病理学完全缓解预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 860-867.
[7] 林水荣, 宋子敏, 于玺, 李绍强, 华赟鹏, 沈顺利. 术前抗病毒治疗对HBV相关肝癌肝切除术后肝衰竭影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 700-706.
[8] 赵俊宇, 林航宇, 李会灵, 王显飞, 游川. 肝癌肝切除术后大量腹水预测模型的建立与验证[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 740-747.
[9] 刘燕, 马亦旻. 消化道早癌患者内镜黏膜下剥离术后局部复发预测模型构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 576-582.
[10] 李曰平, 鞠倩, 张汝梦, 韩博. 基于CT影像组学预测胃癌根治术复发风险的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 460-466.
[11] 李姁, 冯中秋. HBV相关原发性肝癌患者经导管动脉化疗栓塞术后严重腹痛预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 480-485.
[12] 王超, 张晓会, 李晓帆, 赵海丹. 维持性血液透析患者感染与心脑血管死亡风险的比较及联合预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(09): 675-681.
[13] 郭岩, 赵灵芝, 石光英. 代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者发生冠心病的风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(09): 682-688.
[14] 高兴梅, 周洁容, 杨溢, 张孟祥, 张仲谋, 李斌. 重症肺炎患者血磷水平轨迹与短期预后之间的关系[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(07): 479-485.
[15] 皇立媛, 浦洁, 王苏贵, 陈婷婷, 朱德慧, 胡雪. 中青年脑卒中患者应激障碍风险预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(07): 504-512.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?