切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 76 -81. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2023.02.003

论著

改良Ahmed青光眼引流阀植入术治疗闭角期新生血管性青光眼疗效的临床研究
崔宏宇, 杨一佺, 郭黎霞, 吕爱国, 张志宏, 张新, 杨艳萍, 申然, 连丽英, 曹志刚, 王立芳, 胡建华, 范肃洁()   
  1. 056001 邯郸市眼科医院(邯郸市第三医院)青光眼科
    100730 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科研究所 北京市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室
    100029 北京中医药大学第三附属医院眼科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-06 出版日期:2023-04-28
  • 通信作者: 范肃洁
  • 基金资助:
    河北省卫生健康委员会医学适用技术跟踪项目(GZ2021081)

The effect of modified Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation on neovascular glaucoma at the angle-closure stage

Hongyu Cui, Yiquan Yang, Lixia Guo, Aiguo Lyn, Zhihong Zhang, Xin Zhang, Yanping Yang, Ran Shen, Liying Lian, Zhigang Cao, Lifang Wang, Jianhua Hu, Sujie Fan()   

  1. Glaucoma Department, Handan City Eye Hospital (The Third Hospital of Handan), Handan 056001, China
    Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
    Department of Ophthalmology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2023-02-06 Published:2023-04-28
  • Corresponding author: Sujie Fan
引用本文:

崔宏宇, 杨一佺, 郭黎霞, 吕爱国, 张志宏, 张新, 杨艳萍, 申然, 连丽英, 曹志刚, 王立芳, 胡建华, 范肃洁. 改良Ahmed青光眼引流阀植入术治疗闭角期新生血管性青光眼疗效的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 76-81.

Hongyu Cui, Yiquan Yang, Lixia Guo, Aiguo Lyn, Zhihong Zhang, Xin Zhang, Yanping Yang, Ran Shen, Liying Lian, Zhigang Cao, Lifang Wang, Jianhua Hu, Sujie Fan. The effect of modified Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation on neovascular glaucoma at the angle-closure stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(02): 76-81.

目的

观察改良Ahmed青光眼引流阀植入术对闭角期新生血管性青光眼的疗效。

方法

选择2017年10月至2021年1月就诊于邯郸市眼科医院眼科的闭角期新生血管性青光眼患者45例(45只眼)。其中,男性30例(30只眼),女性15例(15只眼);年龄35~82岁,平均年龄(59.4±13.5)岁。所有患者予玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗0.05 mg,3~7 d后行改良Ahmed青光眼引流阀植入术,术后2周分期行全视网膜光凝,术后1 d、3 d、7 d、1个月、3个月及6个月随访,观察患者视力、眼压、虹膜新生血管及眼部并发症的情况。年龄、最小分辨角对数(logMAR)视力及眼压符合正态分布以±s表示。全视网膜光凝治疗的初步有效率和性别以例数和百分比表示。患者不同时间点眼压的比较采用单因素重复测量方差分析,当差异有统计学意义时,进一步两两比较。

结果

45例(45只眼)闭角期新生血管性青光眼患者术前logMAR视力为1.28±0.45,终末logMAR视力1.07±0.48。与术前相比,术后6个月视力较治疗前提高者30例(30只眼),占66.7%;无明显变化者15例(15只眼),占33.3%。玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗3~7 d后,45例(45只眼)虹膜新生血管均明显消退。改良Ahmed青光眼引流阀植入术前、术后1 d、3 d、7 d、1个月、3个月及6个月患者的眼压分别为(42.64±7.96)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)、(19.11±10.15)mmHg、(12.98±2.80)mmHg、(15.04±4.38)mmHg、(15.47±2.46)mmHg、(15.69±1.98)mmHg及(15.25±1.63)mmHg。所有患者不同时间点眼压比较的差异有统计学意义(F=162.012,P<0.05)。术后任意时间点与术前眼压比较的差异均有统计学意义(t=12.81,25.51,20.39,23.87,22.73,21.85;P<0.05)。患者术后7 d、术后1个月、术后3个月及术后6个月时眼压比较的差异无统计学意义(F=1.130,P>0.05)。眼压控制稳定。术后6个月后,眼压≤21 mmHg者38例(38只眼),占84.44%;使用1~2种抗青光眼药物治疗后≤21 mmHg者7例(7只眼),占15.56%。术中前房出血者7例(7只眼),占15.56%;结膜对合不良者1例(1只眼),占2.22%。术后短暂性前房出血、短暂性脉络膜脱离、管周虹膜粘连及滤过泡包裹者分别为3例(3只眼)、1例(1只眼)、1例(1只眼)及3例(3只眼),分别占6.67%、2.22%、2.22%及6.67%。

结论

抗血管内皮生长因子、改良Ahmed青光眼引流阀植入及全视网膜光凝术序贯治疗闭角期新生血管性青光眼,可有效地降低患者眼压,提高患者残余视功能。

Objective

The aim of this study is to observe the efficacy of modified Ahmed glaucoma drainage valve implantation in the treatment of angle-closure neovascular glaucoma.

Methods

A total of 45 cases (45 eyes) of neovascular glaucoma with closed angle were collected from October 2017 to January 2021 at Department of Ophthalmology in Handan Eye Hospital. Among them, there were 30 males (30 eyes) and 15 females (15 eyes) with the average age of (59.4±13.5) years, ranged from 35 to 82 years. All patients were injected with 0.05 mg of Lucentis into the vitreous cavity, and were implanted with the modified Ahmed glaucoma drainage valve 3 to 7 d later. Panretinal photocoagulation was performed at 2 weeks after surgery, and the visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), iris neovascularization and complications were observed after surgery for 1 d, 3 d, 7 d, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. Age, logarithmic minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity and IOP conformed to normal distribution and expressed as ±s. The initial response rate of laser therapy and gender are expressed as number of cases and percentage. The IOP of patients at different time points was compared by ANOVA, and further pairwise comparison was performed when the difference was statistically significant.

Results

The logMAR visual acuity before surgery and at the end of surgery was 1.28±0.45, 1.07±0.48 in 45 eyes with angle-closure neovascular glaucoma, respectively. Compared with the preoperative results, 30 cases (30 eyes) had higher visual acuity after operation for 6 months, accounting for 66.7%. There were 15 cases (15 eyes) with no obvious change, accounting for 33.3%. After intravitreal injection of Lucentis for 3 to 7 d, iris neovascularization subsided significantly in all eyes. The IOP of patients was (42.64±7.96) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), (19.11±10.15) mmHg, (12.98±2.80) mmHg, (15.04±4.38) mmHg, (15.47±2.46) mmHg, (15.69±1.98) mmHg and (15.25±1.63) mmHg at 1 day, 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months before and after implantation of the modified Ahmed glaucoma drainage valve. After surgery for 6 months, there were 38 cases (38 eyes) with IOP≤21 mmHg, accounting for 84.44%. There were 7 cases (7 eyes) with IOP ≤21 mmHg, accounting for 15.56% after using 1 to 2 antiglaucoma drugs. The difference of IOP at different time points was statistically significant (F=162.012, P<0.05). There was a significant difference in the IOP of patients between before and after surger at any time point (t=12.81, 25.51, 20.39, 23.87, 22.73, 21.85; P<0.05). There was not a significant difference in the IOP of patients between after surgery for 7 days, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months (F=1.130, P>0.05), which indicating that the IOP of patients tended to be stable. There were 7 patients (7 eyes) with intraoperative anterior chamber hemorrhage, accounting for 15.56%. There was 1 case (1 eye) with conjunctival malocclusion, accounting for 2.22%. Transient anterior chamber bleeding, transient choroidal detachment, periductal iris adhesion and filtration bubble wrapping occurred in 3 cases (3 eyes), 1 case (1 eye), 1 case (1 eye) and 3 cases (3 eyes), respectively, accounting for 6.67%, 2.22%, 2.22% and 6.67%.

Conclusions

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, modified Ahmed glaucoma drainage valve implantation and panretinal photo-coagulation in sequential treatment of angle-closure neovascular glaucoma could effectively reduce the IOP and improve the residual visual function of patients.

图1 改良Ahmed青光眼引流阀植入术式的彩色照相 图A示将6根6-0可吸收缝线与引流管平行放置,短端置于结膜瓣下,长端置于结膜囊内;图B示以6-0可吸收缝线将引流管连同6根6-0可吸收缝线一并结扎固定至巩膜上;图C示缝合结膜瓣后,6根6-0可吸收缝线长端暴露游离于结膜囊内
表1 闭角期新生血管性青光眼患者序贯治疗前后眼压的比较
[1]
葛坚. 临床青光眼[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2016:291-297.
[2]
Weiss DI, Shaffer RN, Nehrenberg TR. Neovascular glaucoma complicating carotid cavernous fistula[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1963, 69(3): 304-307.
[3]
中华医学会眼科学分会青光眼学组. 中国新生血管性青光眼诊疗专家共识(2019年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志201955(11):814-817.
[4]
Eadie BD, Etminan M, Carleton BC, et al. Association of repeated intravitreous bevacizumab injections with risk for glaucoma surgery[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2017, 135(4): 363-368.
[5]
谢瞻,刘庆淮,杨勤. 改良的Ahmed青光眼引流阀植入术治疗难治性青光眼的疗效[J]. 国际眼科杂志201919(9):1590-1593.
[6]
刘晓瑞. 抗VEGF药物联合青光眼引流阀植入治疗新生血管性青光眼的效果[J]. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志202042(8): 611-616.
[7]
Yang H, Yu X, Sun X. Neovascular glaucoma: Handling in the future[J]. Taiwan J Ophthalmol, 2018, 8(2): 60-66.
[8]
王涛. 重视新生血管性青光眼治疗方法的新转变[J/CD]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版)20166(6):241-247.
[9]
海鸥,刘芳,高丹宇. 玻璃体腔注射康柏西普联合Ahmed青光眼引流阀植入和视网膜光凝治疗新生血管性青光眼[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志201921(11):838-841.
[10]
Takihara Y, Inatani M, Fukushima M, et al. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C for neovascular glaucoma: prognostic factors for surgical failure[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2009, 147(5): 911-918.
[11]
Katz GJ, Higginbotham EJ, Lichter PR, et al. Mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil in high-risk glaucoma filtering surgery. Extended follow-up[J]. Ophthalmology, 1995, 102(9): 1263-1269.
[12]
Tsai JC, Feuer WJ, Parrish RK, et al. 5-Fluorouracil filtering surgery and neovascular glaucoma. Long-term follow-up of the original pilot study[J]. Ophthalmology, 1995, 102(6) : 887-892.
[13]
Kawabata K, Shobayashi K, Iwao K, et al. Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2019, 19(1): 75.
[14]
何媛,权卓娅,何蓓蕾,等. 新生血管性青光眼的治疗[J]. 国际眼科纵览202145(3):188-193.
[15]
Kaya M, Ozbek Z, Yaman A, et al. Long-term success of ahmed glaucoma valve in refractory glaucoma[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2012, 5(1): 108-112.
[16]
张秀兰. 新生血管性青光眼是否难治[J]. 中华眼科杂志201248(6):488-491.
[17]
Riva I, Roberti G, Katsanos A, et al. A review of the ahmed glaucoma valve implant and comparison with other surgical operations[J]. Adv Ther, 2017, 34(4): 834-847.
[18]
Yadav KS, Sharma S. Implantable drainage devices in glaucoma: Quo vadis? [J]. Eur J Pharm Sci, 2019, 133: 1-7.
[19]
Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR, et al. Initial clinical experience with the ahmed glaucoma valve implant[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1995, 120(1): 23-31.
[20]
Molteno AC, Bevin TH, Herbison P, et al. Long-term results of primary trabeculectomies and Molteno implants for primary open-angle glaucoma[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2011, 129: e144450.
[21]
Gedde SJ, Singh K, Schiffman JC, et al. The tube versus trabeculectomy study: interpretation of results and application to clinical practice[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2012, 23: e11826.
[22]
魏雁涛,卓业鸿,王梅,等. Ahmed青光眼引流阀植入术治疗难治性青光眼手术疗效[J]. 中华显微外科杂志200932(16):78-80.
[23]
中华医学会眼科学分会青光眼学组 .中国青光眼引流阀植入手术操作专家共识(2019年2版)[J]. 中华眼科杂志201955(2):93-97.
[24]
白玉婧,王梅,李轶擎,等. FP-7Ahmed青光眼引流阀治疗新生血管性青光眼的临床效果[J]. 中华眼科杂志201147(10):893-897.
[25]
Assaad MH, Baerveldt G, Rockwood EJ. Glaucoma drainage devices: pros and cons[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 1999, 10(2): 147-153.
[26]
Prum BE, Rosenberg LF, Gedde SJ, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma preferred practice pattern guidelines[J]. Ophthalmol-ogy, 2016, 123(1): P41-P111.
[27]
Budenz DL, Barton K, Feuer WJ, et al. Treatment outcomes in the Ahmed baerveldt comparison study after 1 year of follow-up[J]. Ophthalmology, 2011, 118(3): 443-452.
[28]
夏晓波,黄佩刚,蒋幼芹,等. Ahmed阀门植入术治疗新生血管性青光眼的临床疗效[J]. 眼科学报199814(2):87-89,93.
[29]
葛坚,石砚,范志刚. Ahmed青光眼引流阀植入术的应用及进展[J]. 中华眼科杂志202258(1):69-76.
[30]
Jones E, Alaghband P, Cheng J, et al. Preimplantation flow testing of ahmed glaucoma valve and the early postoperative clinical outcome[J]. J Curr Glaucoma Pract, 2013, 7(1): 1-5.
[31]
中华医学会眼科学分会青光眼学组. 我国青光眼引流阀植入手术操作规范专家共识(2016年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志201652(6):407-409.
[32]
周民稳,王伟,黄文彬,等. 葡萄膜炎继发性青光眼与其他难治性青光眼Ahmed青光眼引流阀植入后前房反应的非随机对照研究[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志201533(3):241-245.
[33]
兰贤海,张俊莹,马玉胜. 引流阀植入及雷珠单抗治疗新生血管性青光眼[J]. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志201941(6):419-423.
[34]
曾凤,卢亚梅,周元清,等. 两种型号青光眼阀植入难治性青光眼的疗效对比[J]. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志201941(7):518-523.
[35]
Netland PA, Ishida K, Boyle JW. The Ahmed Glaucoma Valve in patients with and without neovascular glaucoma[J]. J Glaucoma, 2010, 19(9): 581-586.
[1] 张小艳, 郝晓凤, 谢立科. 眼缺血综合征的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 183-187.
[2] 刘国立, 王宁利. 新生血管性青光眼患者房水中血小板反应蛋白-1的表达及其与血管内皮生长因子相关关系的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(04): 163-169.
[3] 周林, 李芳芳. 联合治疗新生血管性青光眼的临床观察[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(19): 2293-2297.
阅读次数
全文


摘要