切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06) : 339 -344. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2020.06.004

论著

曲安奈德联合吲哚菁绿复合染色技术在黄斑前膜手术中应用的临床研究
张永鹏1, 孙艺梦2, 贾力蕴1, 周海英1, 马凯1,()   
  1. 1. 100730 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室
    2. 510060 广州,中山大学中山眼科中心 国家眼科学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-17 出版日期:2020-12-28
  • 通信作者: 马凯
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81670738)

The application of double vital staining technique in macular epiretinal membrane surgery

Yongpeng Zhang1, Yimeng Sun2, Liyun Jia1, Haiying Zhou1, Kai Ma1,()   

  1. 1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Beijing 100730, China
    2. Zhongshan Eye Center, Sun Yatsen University, National Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Received:2020-09-17 Published:2020-12-28
  • Corresponding author: Kai Ma
引用本文:

张永鹏, 孙艺梦, 贾力蕴, 周海英, 马凯. 曲安奈德联合吲哚菁绿复合染色技术在黄斑前膜手术中应用的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(06): 339-344.

Yongpeng Zhang, Yimeng Sun, Liyun Jia, Haiying Zhou, Kai Ma. The application of double vital staining technique in macular epiretinal membrane surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(06): 339-344.

目的

探讨在黄斑前膜(ERM)手术过程中,同步行曲安奈德(TA)联合吲哚菁绿(ICG)后极部黄斑区复合染色的应用价值。

方法

回顾性病例分析。收集2015年12月至2018年12月于首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院眼科中心采用复合染色技术行ERM术21例(21只眼)患者的病例资料。其中,男性5例(5只眼),女性16例(16只眼);年龄53~79岁,平均年龄(66.0±13.9)岁。观察并记录所有患者手术前后最佳矫正视力、光学相干断层扫描检查结果及并发症的情况。

结果

21例患者均行23G玻璃体视网膜手术。其中,术中联合超声乳化白内障吸除及人工晶状体(IOL)植入者8例(8只眼),占38.09%(8/21);术前为IOL眼者3例(3只眼),占14.29%(3/21);术后二期行白内障手术者3例(3只眼),占14.29%(3/21);未行白内障手术者7例(7只眼),占33.33%(7/21)。术后随访13~36个月,平均随访时间18.52个月。术后最佳矫正视力提高者13例(13只眼),占61.90%(13/21);最佳矫正视力不变者6例(6只眼),占28.57%(6/21);最佳矫正视力降低者2例,占9.52%(2/21)。术后光学相干断层扫描检查结果显示ERM均已去除,随访期内无复发,术中术后无并发症发生。

结论

TA联合ICG复合染色技术在ERM手术中应用安全有效,具有临床应用价值。

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the application value of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) combined with indocyanine green (ICG) for posterior pole macular double vital staining during macular epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery.

Methods

Retrospective cases series. From December 2015 to December 2018, 21 cases of ERM surgery were collected in Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University. Among of them, there were 5 males (5 eyes) and 16 females (16 eyes) with an average age of (66.0±13.9) years-old whose age range of was 53 to 79 years-old. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and complications were evaluated.

Results

All patients underwent 23G vitrectomy, in which 8 cases (8 eyes) accounting for 38.09% (8/21) underwent intraoperative phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation, 3 cases (3 eyes) accounting for 14.29% (3/21) with intraocular lens (IOL) before operation, 3 cases (3 eyes) accounting for 14.29% (3/21) with postoperative cataract surgery, and 7 cases accounting for 33.33% (7/21) with non-cataract surgery. The follow-up time after surgery was 13 to 36 months with average time of 18.52 months. There were 13 cases (13 eyes) whose BCVA was increased accounting for 69.10% (13/21), 6 cases (6 eyes) remained unchanged accounting for 28.57% (6/21), 2 cases (2 eyes) decreased accounting for 9.52% (2/21). OCT showed that the ERM had been removed completely. It was not found that recurrence during the follow-up period and complications occurred during and after the operation.

Conclusions

Double vital staining technique was a safe and effective method in ERM surgery, which has clinical application value.

图2 患者手术前后光学相干断层扫描检查图 图2A示有黄斑前膜;图2B为术后3个月检查示黄斑前膜已去除
表1 21例患者一般资料及手术前后检查的结果
[1]
Xiao W, Chen X, Yan W, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of epiretinal membranes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(9): e014644.
[2]
You Q, Xu L, Jonas JB. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes in adult Chinese: the Beijing eye study[J]. Eye, 2007, 22(7):874-879.
[3]
William S, Claudia PP, Daniel A, et al. Epiretinal membrane: optical coherence tomography-based diagnosis and classification[J]. Clinical Ophthalmology, 2016, 10: 527-534.
[4]
Steel DHW, Lotery AJ. Idiopathic vitreomacular traction and macular hole: a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment[J]. Eye, 2013, 27: S1-S21.
[5]
García-Layana A, García-Arumí J, Ruiz-Moreno JM, et al. A review of current management of vitreomacular traction and macular hole[J]. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015: 809640.
[6]
Ota A, Tanaka Y, Toyoda F, et al. Relationship between variations in posterior vitreous detachment and visual prognosis in idiopathic epiretinal membranes[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2015, 10: 7-11.
[7]
Vogt D, Vielmuth F, Wertheimer C, et al. Premacular membranes in tissue culture[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2018, 256(9): 1589-1597.
[8]
Sebag J. Anatomy and pathology of the vitreo-retinal interface[J]. Eye (Lond), 1992, 6 (Pt6): 541-552.
[9]
Chawla R, Tripathy K, Temkar S, et al. Internal limiting membrane: The innermost retinal barrier[J]. Med Hypotheses, 2017, 98: 60-62.
[10]
Chang WC, Chin L, Cho-Hao L, et al. Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: A meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(6): e0179105.
[11]
Malagola R, Iozzo N, Grenga P. Volumetric assessment of the space between the posterior hyaloid and internal limiting membrane using SD-OCT[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2014, 98(1): 16-18.
[12]
Goldberg RA, Waheed NK, Duker JS. Optical coherence tomography in the preoperative and postoperative management of macular hole and epiretinal membrane[J]. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2014, 98(S2): 20-23.
[13]
Francesco S, Francesco M, Sarah D, et al. Current trends about inner limiting membrane peeling in surgery for epiretinal membranes[J]. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015: 671905.
[14]
Irini C, Panagiotis T, Luke N, et al. Advances in vitreoretinal interface disorders[J]. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2017: 7612712.
[15]
Schechet SA, Devience E, Thompson JT. The effect of internal limiting membrane peeling on idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery, with a review of the literature[J]. Retina, 2017, 37(5): 870-880.
[16]
Azuma K, Ueta T, Eguchi S, et al. Effects of internal limiting membrane peeling combined with removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis[J]. Retina, 2017, 37(10): 1813-1819.
[17]
Abdelkader E, Lois N. Internal limiting membrane peeling in vitreo-retinal surgery[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2008, 53(4):368-396.
[18]
Koestinger A, Bovey EH. Visual acuity after vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane peeling with or without premacular indocyanine green injection[J]. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 2005, 15(6): 795.
[19]
Rodrigues EB, Meyer CH, Mennel S, et al. Mechanisms of intravitreal toxicity of indocyanine green dye: implications for chromovitrectomy[J]. Retina, 2007, 27(7): 958-970.
[20]
Stalmans P. Double vital staining using trypan blue and infracyanine green in macular pucker surgery[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2003, 87(6): 713-716.
[21]
Chen F, Zhang Y, Du W, et al. Indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling to induce posterior vitreous detachment in the cases with strong vitreoretinal adhesion[J]. Retina, 2019: 30893274.
[22]
Farah ME, Maia M, Rodrigues EB. Dyes in ocular surgery: principles for use in chromovitrectomy[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2009, 148(3): 332-340.
[23]
Farah ME, Maia M, Furlani B, et al. Current concepts of trypan blue in chromovitrectomy[J]. Dev Ophthalmol, 2008, 42: 91-100.
[24]
Enaida H, Ishibashi T. Brilliant blue in vitreoretinal surgery[J]. Dev Ophthalmol, 2008, 42: 115-125.
[25]
Gelman R, Stevenson W, Prospero PC, et al. Retinal damage induced by internal limiting membrane removal[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2015: 939748.
[26]
Hernández F, Alpizar-Alvarez N, Wu L. Chromovitrectomy: an update[J]. J Ophthalmic Vis Res, 2014, 9(2):251-259.
[27]
Rosenberg KI, Tewari A. Visualizing the internal limiting membrane: what is effective and what is safe? [J]. Int Ophthalmol Clin, 2014, 54(2): 39-49.
[28]
Chatziralli IP, Theodossiadis PG, Steel DHW. Internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery; why, when, and how? [J]. Retina, 2018, 38(5): 870-882.
[29]
Al-Halafi AM. Chromovitrectomy: update[J]. Saudi J Ophthalmol, 2013, 27(4): 271-276.
[30]
Musat O, Stefan C, Boariu AM, et al. Chromovitrectomy[J]. Rom J Ophthalmol, 2016, 60(2): 59-62.
[1] 姚成才, 刘长春, 黄文剑, 陈明. 单孔非溶脂荧光腔镜技术在早期乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结活组织检查中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 266-271.
[2] 张钊, 骆成玉, 何平, 张树琦. 吲哚菁绿乳管造影在乳头溢液手术中对溢液乳管定位和病变腺体标记的可行性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 323-327.
[3] 刘克文, 庞志东. 吲哚菁绿荧光显影在复杂困难肝段肝细胞癌肝切除术的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 319-322.
[4] 刘颂, 胡琼源, 陆晓峰, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿用于外科术中神经显影的现状与展望[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 226-229.
[5] 闫娟, 石昊, 张雨, 张杰, 拓明祥, 田青, 许志平, 肖吓鹏. 复发性甲状腺癌二次手术术中不同甲状旁腺鉴定方案效果对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 180-183.
[6] 齐普良, 田青山, 马丽娜, 李彩霞, 阿吉德. ICG示踪联合三维可视化技术指导下改良右半肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的回顾性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 162-166.
[7] 张中华, 刘扬, 毛伟明, 陈峰, 杜恒. ICG显影技术辅助吻合口血运判断在保留左结肠动脉的腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 688-691.
[8] 沈新, 陈新莉, 刘海旺, 杨洁, 马佳佳, 任敬, 彭年才. 吲哚菁绿荧光融合影像技术在腹腔镜全胃切除+Roux-en-Y吻合中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 651-654.
[9] 刘颂, 宋鹏, 艾世超, 杨志, 王萌, 陆晓峰, 管文贤. 双示踪导航腹腔镜胃癌根治术的单臂开放前瞻性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 647-650.
[10] 李爱华, 龚云翔, 闫元, 刘灿. 不同淋巴结示踪方案在腹腔镜保留脾脏的近端胃癌脾门淋巴结清扫中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 537-540.
[11] 刘宗毅, 邵志强, 刘子丰, 许宗昱, 郭丰富. 腹腔镜保留肾单位手术治疗中央型肾癌的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 468-471.
[12] 李佳颐, 杨森, 王智弘, 林伯铮, 韩显林, 廖泉, 花苏榕. 吲哚菁绿辅助下的荧光腔镜手术在普通外科中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 124-128.
[13] 李博, 胡刚, 邱文龙, 汤坚强, 王锡山. 多功能吲哚菁绿近红外荧光血管成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES Ⅳ式)中的应用(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 524-528.
[14] 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会, 中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会, 北京整合医学学会结直肠肿瘤分会. 吲哚菁绿近红外荧光血管成像技术应用于腹腔镜结直肠手术中吻合口血供判断中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 441-447.
[15] 邱文龙, 刘军广, 胡刚, 李博, 李月刚, 梅世文, 权继传, 庄孟, 迟崇巍, 王锡山, 汤坚强. 基于肠脂垂的近红外荧光血管造影技术在预防腹腔镜超低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术后吻合口漏中的应用价值[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 288-295.
阅读次数
全文


摘要