切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 13 -19. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2020.01.003

论著

两种不同诱因所致巨细胞病毒视网膜炎预后的临床观察
孔文君1, 陶勇2,(), 陈超1, 谢连永1, 杜葵芳1   
  1. 1. 100069 首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院眼科 北京市感染性眼病诊疗中心
    2. 100020 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院眼科 北京市感染性眼病诊疗中心
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-11 出版日期:2020-02-28
  • 通信作者: 陶勇
  • 基金资助:
    北京市教育委员会科研计划项目(KM202010025020); 北京朝阳医院"1351人才培养计划"项目(CYXX-2017-21); 国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2015AA020949); 中国初级卫生保健基金会佑安肝病艾滋病基金项目(YNKT20160038); 首都医科大学北京市重点实验室开放性课题(2016YKSJ04)

Comparison of prognosis of cytomegalovirus retinitis induced by AIDS and HSCT postoperation

Wenjun Kong1, Yong Tao2,(), Chao Chen1, Lianyong Xie1, Kuifang Du1   

  1. 1. Department of Opthalmology, Beijing You′an Hosptial, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
    2. Department of Opthalmology, Beijing Chaoyang Hosptial, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
  • Received:2019-12-11 Published:2020-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Yong Tao
引用本文:

孔文君, 陶勇, 陈超, 谢连永, 杜葵芳. 两种不同诱因所致巨细胞病毒视网膜炎预后的临床观察[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(01): 13-19.

Wenjun Kong, Yong Tao, Chao Chen, Lianyong Xie, Kuifang Du. Comparison of prognosis of cytomegalovirus retinitis induced by AIDS and HSCT postoperation[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(01): 13-19.

目的

探讨两种不同病因诱发的巨细胞病毒视网膜炎(CMVR)的预后情况。

方法

观察2015年5月至2019年10月首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院眼科和北京朝阳医院眼科确诊为CMVR患者32例(52只眼)。其中,男性27例(44只眼),女性5例(8只眼),平均年龄(25.4±7.8)岁。根据常见病因,分为获得性免疫缺陷综合征(AIDS)组和造血干细胞移植(HSCT)术后组两组。全部患者均行更昔洛韦和(或)膦甲酸钠玻璃体腔注药联合全身治疗,随访6个月。检查并记录治疗前和治疗6个月后患者的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、眼压、眼底彩色照相、房水中巨细胞病毒脱氧核糖核酸(CMV-DNA)含量及外周血CD4+T淋巴细胞计数等指标。眼压以均数±标准差描述,以t检验进行比较。BCVA、外周血CD4+T淋巴细胞计数、房水CMV-DNA含量以中位数(最小值,最大值)描述,以Wilcoxon秩和检验进行比较。注药次数用频数或率(%)表示,组间比较采用卡方检验。

结果

治疗前AIDS组患者和HSCT术后组患者BCVA分别为0.36(0.02,1.00)和0.21(0.01,0.60);治疗后AIDS组和HSCT术后组患者BCVA分别为0.53(0.05,1.00)和0.36(0.02,0.80)。经秩和检验,治疗前两组患者BCVA比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.23,P>0.05);治疗后AIDS组患者BCVA高于HSCT术后组,差异具有统计学意义(Z=-2.05,P<0.05)。治疗前AIDS组和HSCT术后组患者眼压分别为(11.9±2.8)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)和(12.8±2.2)mmHg;治疗后AIDS组和HSCT术后组患者眼压分别为(13.4±2.7)mmHg和(13.9±3.5)mmHg。经t检验,治疗前和治疗后两组患者眼压比较,差异无统计学意义(t=-0.94,-0.54;P>0.05)。治疗前AIDS组和HSCT术后组患者外周血CD4+T淋巴细胞计数分别为54(0,213)个/μl和47(2,87)个/μl;治疗后AIDS组和HSCT术后组患者外周血CD4+T淋巴细胞计数分别为139(32,371)个/μl和76(21,212)个/μl。经秩和检验,治疗前两组患者外周血CD4+T淋巴细胞计数比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.65,P>0.05)。治疗后AIDS组患者外周血CD4+T淋巴细胞计数高于HSCT术后组,差异具有统计学意义(Z=-2.45,P<0.05)。治疗前AIDS组和HSCT术后组患者房水中CMV-DNA含量分别为2.74×104(1.59×103,5.14×105)拷贝/ml和7.18×103(3.17×103,5.89×105)拷贝/ml;治疗后AIDS组和HSCT术后组患者房水中CMV-DNA含量分别为1.24×10(0,2.23×102)拷贝/ml和2.01×10(0,3.45×102)拷贝/ml。经秩和检验,治疗前和治疗后两组患者房水中CMV-DNA含量比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.68,-0.27;P>0.05)。HSCT术后组患者在抗病毒治疗6个月内有3只眼出现CMVR复发,AIDS组患者在抗病毒治疗6个月内有1只眼出现CMVR复发。HSCT术后组患者玻璃体腔注药次数≥4次者占55%(11只眼/20只眼),AIDS组患者玻璃体腔注药次数≥4次者占18.8%(6只眼/32只眼)。经卡方检验,HSCT术后组和AIDS组患者玻璃体腔注药次数≥4次者的比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.231,P<0.05)。

结论

较之于AIDS诱发的CMVR,HSCT术后诱发的CMVR局部联合全身抗病毒治疗后免疫功能恢复慢,视功能较差,可能需要更长时间的眼内抗病毒治疗。

Objective

To explore the prognosis of cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) induced by two different etiologies.

Methods

From May 2015 to October 2019, 32 CMVR patients (52 eyes) diagnosed in the department of Ophthalmology of Beijing You′an Hospital and Beijing Chaoyang Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University. There were 27 males and 5 females, with an average age of (25.4±7.8) years. According to common causes, patients were divided into two groups; one group was acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and the other group with the postoperative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) . 32 patients were treated with ganciclovir and (or) sodium phosphonate intravitreal injection combined with systemic therapy and followed up for 6 months. Analysis of the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, fundus and cytomegalovirus virus (CMV)-DNA in anterior chamber, CD4+ T cells in blood was made before and after the treatment. Intraocular pressure was represented as expressed in mean ± SD and compared with t test. BCVA, the number of CD4+ T cells in blood and the content of CMV-DNA in aqueous humor were expressed in median (minimum, maximum) and compared with Wilcoxon rank sum test. Counting data was expressed by frequency or rate (%) and compared with Chi-square test.

Results

Before treatment, the BCVA of patients in the AIDS group and the HSCT postoperative group were 0.36 (0.02, 1.00) and 0.21 (0.01, 0.60). After treatment, the BCVA of patients in the AIDS group and the HSCT postoperative group were 0.53 (0.05, 1.00) and 0.36 (0.02, 0.80). With Wilcoxon rank sum test, there was no significant difference in BCVA between two groups of patients before treatment (Z=-0.23, P>0.05). The BCVA in the AIDS group was higher than that in the HSCT postoperative group after treatment (Z=-2.05, P<0.05). Before treatment, the intraocular pressure of patients in the AIDS group and in the HSCT postoperative group were (11.9±2.8)mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) and (12.8±2.2)mmHg. After treatment, the intraocular pressure of patients in the AIDS group and HSCT postoperative group were (13.4±2.7) and (13.9±3.5)mmHg. With t test, there was no significant difference in intraocular pressure between two groups of patients before and after treatment (t=-0.94, -0.54; P>0.05). Before treatment, the peripheral blood CD4+ T cell counts of patients in the AIDS group and HSCT postoperative group were 54 (0, 213) cells/μl and 47 (2, 87) cells/μl. After treatment, the peripheral blood CD4+ T cell counts of patients in the AIDS group and HSCT postoperative group were 139 (32, 371) cells/μl and 76 (21, 212) cells /μl. With Wilcoxon rank sum test, there was no significant difference in the peripheral blood CD4+ T cell counts between two groups of patients before treatment (Z=-0.65, P>0.05). The peripheral blood CD4+ T cell counts in the AIDS group were higher than that in the HSCT postoperative group after treatment (Z=-2.45, P<0.05). Before treatment, the CMV-DNA in the aqueous humor of the AIDS group and the HSCT postoperative group were 2.74×104 (1.59×103, 5.14×105) copies/ml and 7.18×103 (3.17×103, 5.89×105) copies/ml. After treatment, the CMV-DNA in the aqueous humor of the AIDS group and the HSCT postoperative group was 1.24×10 (0, 2.23×102) copies/ml and 2.01×10 (0, 3.45×102) copies/ml. With Wilcoxon rank sum test, there was no significant difference in CMV-DNA in aqueous humor between two groups of patients before and after treatment (Z=-0.68, -0.27; P>0.05). Recurrence of CMVR occurred in 3 eyes within 6 months of antiviral treatment in the HSCT postoperative group, and recurrence of CMVR occurred in 1 eye within six months of antiviral treatment in the AIDS group. Additionally, 55% patients in the HSCT group and only 18.8% patients in the AIDS group underwent intravitreal injections for 4 times and more than 4 times. The analysis of Chi-square test showed that there was a significant difference in the number of intravitreal injections 4 times or more between HSCT and AIDS patients (χ2=6.23, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with AIDS-induced CMVR, CMVR induced by HSCT has more severe visual impairment, slower recovery of immune function during treatment, which requires longer-term intraocular antiviral treatment.

图1 巨细胞病毒视网膜炎治疗前后眼底彩色照像 图A示获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并巨细胞病毒视网膜炎患者治疗前眼底周边型巨细胞病毒视网膜炎,左眼视网膜鼻侧和下方可见黄白色渗出及沿血管周围出血,病灶未累及黄斑区。图B示获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并巨细胞病毒视网膜炎患者治疗6个月后左眼视网膜鼻侧原有病灶处出血渗出吸收,形成机化膜,下方原有病灶陈旧瘢痕化。图C示造血干细胞移植术后合并巨细胞病毒视网膜炎患者治疗前右眼中央型巨细胞病毒视网膜炎,视网膜广泛渗出和出血位于视盘和黄斑区,并向下方延伸。图D示造血干细胞移植术后合并巨细胞病毒视网膜炎患者治疗6个月后右眼视网膜病灶吸收,视网膜血管白线并残存黄白色颗粒样结晶
表1 治疗前和治疗6个月后两组患者BCVA、外周血CD4+T淋巴细胞计数及房水CMV-DNA值的比较
表2 治疗前及治疗6个月后两组患者患眼眼压的比较[±s ,mmHg]
表3 治疗期间两组患者玻璃体腔内注药次数的比较[%(注药眼数/组内总眼数)]
[1]
Roubalová K, Zufanová S, Vftek A, et al. Prevalence of glycoproteinB genotypes in the patients with high risk of symptomatic cytomegalovirus infection[J]. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol, 2009, 58(9): 148.
[2]
苗恒,侯婧. 异基因造血干细胞移植术后巨细胞病毒视网膜炎治疗过程的影响因素分析[J]. 中华眼科杂志201753(10):740-745.
[3]
Yeh S, Forooghtan F, Faia U, et al. Fondus autofluorescenee changes in cytomegalovirus retinitis[J].Retina, 2010, 30(1): 42-50.
[4]
Okinami S, Nakamatsu T, Saito I, et al. Four cases of frosted retinal angiitis [J].Nihon Ganka Kiyo, 1994, 45(4): 314-318.
[5]
Boeckh M, Geballe AP. Cytomegalovirus: pathogen, paradigm, andpuzzle[J]. JCl in Invest, 2011, 121 (5) : 167.
[6]
Jabs DA, Holbrook JT, Van Natta ML, et al.Risk factors for mortality in patients with AIDS in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy[J].Ophthalmology, 2005, 112(5): 771-779.
[7]
Port AD, Orlin A, Kiss S, et al. Cytomegalovirus Retinitis: A Review[J]. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 2017, 33(4): 224-234.
[8]
中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病学组. 艾滋病诊疗指南(第3版)[J]. 中华传染病杂志201533 (10):577-593.
[9]
Sobrin L, Foster CS. Cytomegalovinls retinitis after one decade of HAART[J]. Int Ophthalnlol clin, 2007, 47(2): 155-164.
[10]
Qian Z, Chen X, Tao Y, et al. Prognostic Factors of Cytomegalo-virus Infection Associated Retinitis in HIV-Negative Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study[J]. Ocul Immunol Inflamm, 2019, 10(3): 1-6.
[11]
赖曼,张玉林,田亚坤,等.2016版美国成人和青少年艾滋病感染者机会性感染防治指南中巨细胞病毒病的解读[J]. 中国医药导报201714(2):37-40.
[12]
Ausayakhun S, Yuvaves P, Ngamtiphakom S, et al. Treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in AIDS patients with intravitreal ganciclovir[J].J Med Assoc Thai, 2005, 88(9): 15-20.
[13]
Arevalo JF, Garcia RA, Mendoza AJ. High-dose (5000-microg) intravitreal ganciclovir combined with highly active antiretroviral therapy for cytomegalovirus retinitis in HIV-infected patients in Venezuela[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2005, 15: 610-618.
[14]
Yutthitham K, Ruamviboonsuk P. The high-dose alternate-week intravitreal ganciclovir injections for cytomegalovirus retinitis in acquired immune defificiency syndrome patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy[J]. Med Assoc Thai, 2005, 88 (9): S63-S68.
[15]
Morlet N, Young S, Naidoo D, et al. High dose intravitreal ganciclovir injection provides a prolonged therapeutic intraocular concentration[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 1996 , 80(4): 214-216.
[16]
Chan ST. Logan AC. The clinical impact of cytomegalovirus infection following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: why the quest for meaningful prophylaxis still matters[J]. Blood Rev, 2017, 31(3): 173-183.
[17]
Xie LY, Chen C, Kong WJ, et al. Effect of individualized therapy for AIDS patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis in intravitreal ganciclovir injections[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2019, 12(8): 1351-1355.
[18]
耿爽,叶俊杰,刘丽秋,等. 人类免疫缺陷病毒感染及获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者眼部病变的诊断与治疗[J].中华眼科杂志2009, 45(12):1093-1098.
[19]
Munro M, Yadavalli T, Fonteh C, et al. Cytomegalovirus Retinitis in HIV and Non-HIV Individuals[J]. Microorganisms, 2019, 8(1): e55.
[20]
Port AD, Alabi RO, Koenig L, et al. Cytomegalovirus retinitis in the post-cART era[J]. Curr Ophthalmol Rep, 2018, 6(2): 133-144.
[21]
Miao H, Tao Y, Jiang YR, et al.Multiple intravitreal injections of ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus retinitis after stem-cell transplantation[J].Graefes Arch cljn Elp Ophthalmol, 2013, 251(7): 1829-1833.
[22]
Fu L. Santhanakrishnan K, Al-Aloul M, et al. Management of Ganciclovir Resistant Cytomegalovirus Retinitis in a Solid Organ Transplant Recipient: A Review of Current Evidence and Treatment Approaches[J].Ocul Immunol Inflamm, 2019, 10(17): 1-7.
[23]
Hunt PW. HIV and innammation: mechanisms and consequences[J]. Curr HIV/AlDS Rep, 2012, 9(2): 139-147.
[24]
Dammermann W, Bochmann D, Bentzien F, et al. CMV specmc cytokine release assay in whole blood is optimized by conlbining synthetic CMV peptides and toll like receptor agonists[J].J Immunol Methods, 2014, 414: 82-90.
[25]
Di Y, Zhao XY, Ye JJ, et al. Fundus manifestations and HIV viral loads of AIDS patients before and after HAART[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2019, 12(9): 1438-1443.
[26]
Suzuki N, Kudoh T, Mizue N, et al. CMV retinitis after cessation of ganciclovir therapy for CMV antigenemia in an unrelated BMT recipient[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 1998, 22(9): 931-932.
[27]
朱雪菲,陆云峰,陆培荣,等. 白血病患者巨细胞病毒性视网膜炎的临床特点和疗效观察[J].中华眼底病杂志201834(1):43-46.
[28]
Banker AS. Posterior segment manifestations of human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2008, 56(5): 377-383.
[29]
Ando T, Suzuki T, Ishiyama Y, et al. Impact of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation and Natural Killer Reconstitution on Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Analysis[J]. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2020, 26(1): 171-177.
[30]
Pearce WA, Yeh S, Fine HF. Management of eytomegalovirus retinitis in HIV and Non-HIV patients[J]. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina, 2016, 47(2): 103-107.
[31]
Iu LP, Fan MC, Lau JK, et al. Long-term follow up of cytomegalovirus retinitis in Non-HIV immunocompromised patients: clinical features and visual prognosis[J].Am J Ophthalmol, 2016, 165: 145-153.
[32]
Hiwarkar P, Gajdosova E, Qasim W, et al.Frequent occurrence of cytomegalovirus retinitis during immune reconstitution warrants regular ophthalmic screening in high-risk pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients[J].Clin Infect Dis, 2014, 58(12): 1700-1706.
[33]
Kim T, Lee YM, Lee SO, et al.Difierences of cytomegalovirus diseases between kidney and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients during preemptive therapy[J]. Korean J Intern Med, 2016, 31(5): 961-970.
[34]
Kedhar SR, Jabs DA. Cytomegalovirus retinitis in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy[J]. Herpes, 2007, 14(3): 66-71.
[35]
Teoh SC, Ou X, Lim TH. Intravitreal ganeiclovir maintenance injection for cytomegalovirus retinitis: efficacy of a low-volume, intermediate-dose regimen[J]. Ophthalmology, 2012, 119(3): 588-595.
[36]
Pearce WA, Yeh S, Fine HF. Management of Cytomegalovirus Retinitis in HIV and Non-HIV Patients[J]. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina, 2016, 47(2): 103-107.
[37]
Maffini E, Giaccone L, Festuccia M. Treatment of CMV infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J]. Expert Rev Hematol, 2016, 9(6): 585-96.
[38]
Gwee A, Curtis N, Connell TG, et al.Ganciclovir for the treatment of congenital cytomegalovirus: what are the side effects[J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2014, 33(1): 115.
[39]
Poole CL, James SH. Antiviral Therapies for Herpesviruses: Current Agents and New Directions[J]. Clin Ther, 2018, 40(8): 1282-1298.
[40]
Pitipol C, Kamolporn V, Duanphen K, et al. Treatment outcomes of reduced-dose intravitreal ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus retinitis[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2016, 16(4): 164.
[41]
Friiideberg DN. Treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis with intraocular sustained-release ganciclovir implant [J] . Arch Ophthalmol, 1995, 113(11): 1354-1355.
[1] 李春静, 张明帅, 彭卫, 付晓莹, 刘雪珍, 曹春燕, 任雅坤, 李洪娟, 赖丽思, 郑维. 巨大乳腺癌伴人免疫缺陷病毒感染一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 319-321.
[2] 吴令杰, 陈瑞烈, 陈桂佳, 肖湘明, 林钟滨. 两例获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并新型冠状病毒感染者抗病毒治疗并文献复习[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 282-286.
[3] 李玉静, 陈七一, 谢汝明, 陈步东. 获得性免疫缺陷综合征相关原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的预后研究[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 200-208.
[4] 袁瑞, 胡文佳, 桂希恩, 严亚军, 冯玲, 柯亨宁, 熊勇, 杨蓉蓉. 淋巴细胞精细分型检测在人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者/获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者中的应用[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 84-91.
[5] 王彤彤, 朱春雨, 刘颖楚, 郜桂菊. 复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并肺孢子菌肺炎现状及其肝功能损伤机制[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 79-83.
[6] 朱晓红, 周诗梦, 朱晓霞, 邹美银. 壳聚糖修饰的聚乳酸-羟基乙酸共聚物纳米颗粒在控制释放抗人类免疫缺陷病毒药物传递中的应用[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 125-132.
[7] 王延雪, 胡虹英, 李新刚, 鹿星梦. 获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者免疫重建炎症综合征相关Graves’病5例并文献复习[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 65-70.
[8] 李倩, 邓莉平, 陈果, 张忠威, 莫平征, 胡文佳, 陈良君, 张捷, 张永喜, 杨蓉蓉, 熊勇. 宏基因组二代测序在获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并中枢神经系统感染中的临床应用[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 24-31.
[9] 董愉, 柳月红, 许雪静, 刘彬彬. 免散瞳超广角激光扫描检眼镜在获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者眼底病筛查中的优势[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 344-347.
[10] 魏春波, 万钢, 许东梅, 赵兴云, 袁柳凤, 吴焱, 伦文辉. 60例人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者/获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并神经梅毒患者临床和实验室特征[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 254-260.
[11] 田飞, 高颂, 李铮, 王颖慧, 王媛媛. 1989至2020年北京市东城区1 076例人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者/获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者生存时间及影响因素[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 100-107.
[12] 周莹莹, 邓莉平, 鲁植艳, 苏志颖, 熊勇. 获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并神经梅毒及巨细胞病毒脑炎一例并相关文献分析[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 350-355.
[13] 覃亚勤, 秦英梅. 8 369例人类免疫缺陷病毒感染/获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者合并乙型肝炎病毒和(或)丙型肝炎病毒感染临床分析[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 295-302.
[14] 李玉娟, 潘蕾, 鱼高乐, 代川川, 南岩东, 金发光. 获得性免疫缺陷综合征并发卡氏肺孢子菌肺炎一例报告[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 600-602.
[15] 万秋, 唐莉歆. 获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病的研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(01): 129-131.
阅读次数
全文


摘要